Good Samaritan Society - Inver Grove Heights
1301 50th Street East, Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 · Non profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (651) 451-1853 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.2% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 4.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.6% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.3% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.9% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.9% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.9% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.2% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.3% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.7% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.2% | 14.8% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 46.3–70.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 36.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.28 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.42 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for medication errors did not have properly transcribed orders for an antibiotic for an infected pressure ulcer. This medication error resulted in actual harm to R1 when she developed sepsis and was hospitalized . The facility implemented corrective action prior to the survey, so the deficiency was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: Pressure Ulcer staging per the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP): Stage 2 pressure ulcer: a partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis, the wound bed is viable, pink, and moist. Stage 4 pressure ulcer: a full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, ligament, cartilage or bone. Slough and/or eschar may be visible. Rolled edges or tunneling often occur. R1's 1/8/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified she was cognitively intact, and required extensive assist of one to two staff for all activities of daily living. R1 had one Stage 2 pressure ulcer and one Stage 4 pressure ulcer. R1's care plan dated 4/8/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directives were accurately and consistently documented in the resident's electronic health record (EHR) banner, Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), and physician orders to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed in the event of a cardiac arrest for 3 of 35 residents (R8, R36, R40) reviewed for code status.Findings include:R8R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 had severely impaired cognition and was receiving hospice care. The MDS indicated R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with a stroke, a seizure disorder, and respiratory failure. R8's POLST dated [DATE], indicated attempt resuscitation/full treatment and was signed by family member (FM)-B, prepared on [DATE], and signed by the provider on [DATE]. This POLST was found in the orange Resident Advance Directives binder at the nursing station on [DATE] at 11:14 a.m. along with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN; CMS-10055) to 2 of 3 residents (R14 and R38) reviewed whose Medicare Part A coverage ended and then remained in the facility. The facility further failed to ensure an appropriate 48-hour notice was given for 1 of 3 residents (R51) who discharged from the facility. Findings include:R14R14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R14 was admitted to the care facility on 12/5/25.R14's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC; CMS 10123), signed on 1/26/26, indicated R14's Medicare A coverage ended on 1/29/26 and they would assume cost for their care at the care facility.R14's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence R14 and/or their representative had received a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN; CMS-10055) despite the fact he remained in the facility when his Medicare A coverage ended.R38R38's admission MDS, dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to monitor for resident specific target behaviors related to psychotropic medications use for 1 of 5 residents (R50) and failed to ensure appropriate medication side effect monitoring for potential daytime sleepiness/drowsiness was completed for 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/1/26, identified R18 had moderately impaired cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors or rejections of cares with an admission of 1/26/26. Diagnoses included: anxiety, depression, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint (a break in the thigh bone adjacent to the artificial hip stem), hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes (body can't manage blood sugars properly). R50's Order Summary Report, printed 2/19/26, included the following orders: -bupropion HCL ER (antidepressant medication) 150 milligram (mg) tablet:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning and maintenance of a non-invasive ventilation machine to reduce the risk of complications (i.e., respiratory infection) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) observed for a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine.Findings include:The [NAME] Dream Station 2 User Manual dated 2021, indicated cleaning the CPAP machine daily. The manual indicated to use a lint-free cloth dampened with a liquid soap solution to clean the exterior of the machine, heater plate and the air inlet/outlet seal. The manual indicated daily hand wash of the humidifier water tank with warm water and mild soap. Furthermore, the manual indicated the humidifier water tank should be disinfected once a week with 70% isopropyl alcohol, and the tube should be washed once a week with warm water and mild soap. The filter and tube should be replaced once a month. The American Thoracic Society information series dated 2020 indicated the CPAP mask should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement or maintain an appropriate communication and collaboration system with an outside dialysis clinic to promote continuity of care and reduce the risk of complications (i.e., missed orders, insufficient preparation for treatment) for 1 of 1 residents (R4) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified that R4 had moderate cognitive impairment along with several medical conditions, including anemia, diabetes, and kidney failure. R4's order summary dated 10/31/25, included an order for staff to send a dialysis communication sheet with R4, and it was to be checked upon return for new orders.R4's care plan dated 11/18/25, indicated R4 received hemodialysis (use of a machine that filters wastes, salts, and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do so) on Mondays and Fridays. The care plan included information such as monitoring related to dialysis, contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and recorded prior to the administration of as-needed (PRN) pain medication to help facilitate person-centered care planning and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., constipation, sedation) for 1 of 5 residents (R50) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include:R18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/1/26, identified R18 had moderately impaired cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors or rejections of cares with an admission of 1/26/26. Diagnoses included: periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint (a break in the thigh bone adjacent to the artificial hip stem), hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes (body can't manage blood sugars properly). In addition, the MDS outlined R50 did not receive scheduled pain medication but did receive PRN pain medication during the review along with non-medication interventions for pain. R50 indicated she frequently experienced pain which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 residents (R40) observed whose headboard and footboard of their bed was not maintained in good repair and whose personal fan was not clean.Findings include: R40R40's Significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R40 had impaired cognition, required assistance of two for all personal cares and transfers, was on oxygen and hospice, and had diagnoses of heart failure, kidney disease, hip fracture, respiratory failure, obesity and lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the body's tissues).During observation and interview on 2/17/26 at 8:18 a.m., R40 was lying in bed on her back with cracked, splintered particle board running along top of the footboard and headboard of her bed. The edge banding on top of them was not adhered. In addition, her personal fan with visible matter attached to the front of the fan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R1 R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact, and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Identified R1 had diagnoses that included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and quadriplegia. R1's care plan dated 8/26/24, indicated R1 had a self-care performance deficit related to quadriplegia and further indicated due to paralysis and contractures, R1 needed assistance with personal hygiene. On 4/1/25 at 1:44 p.m., during an interview and observation, R1 stated her nails were trimmed very occasionally and thought it had been weeks since they had been cut. R1 stated she preferred them short. R1's left hand was not covered by the blanket and her fingernails were very long. R1 stated she felt like staff did not want to help her or take care of her. On 4/2/25 at 11:48 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) and bathing/shower assistance was provided for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: R1 R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact, and was dependent upon staff for all ADLs. Identified R1 had diagnoses that included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and quadriplegia. R1's care plan dated 8/26/24, indicated R1 had a self-care performance deficit related to quadriplegia and further indicated due to paralysis and contractures, R1 needs assistance with personal hygiene. On 4/1/25 at 1:44 p.m., during an interview and observation, R1 stated her nails were trimmed very occasionally and thought it had been weeks since they had been cut. R1 stated she preferred them short. R1's left hand was not covered by the blanket and her fingernails were very long. On 4/2/25 at 10:37 a.m., during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a provider order for a TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone - a protein produced in the brain that regulates the thyroid gland's production of thyroid hormones) blood draw was performed as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for services performed as ordered. Findings include: R3's Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 was unable to complete the cognitive assessment, but had a memory problem. Identified a diagnosis that included a thyroid disorder. R3's diagnoses list printed 4/2/25, included hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone). R3's progress notes dated 3/19/25, at 3:28 p.m. indicated the TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone) lab level was not drawn because the order was missing the resident's room number, and the lab would be redrawn 3/21/25. The medical record lacked indication an order was placed to redraw the lab on 3/21/25, nor that it had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed for 1 of 3 residents (R1). Additionally, the facility failed to secure a leg bath for a catheter off the floor for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling catheter, an ostomy (a surgically created opening in the abdomen that allows waste to exit the body), a feeding tube, and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Identified R1 had diagnoses that included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, a neurogenic bladder (loss of bladder function due to a nerve problem), and quadriplegia. R1's care plan dated 8/26/24, indicated R1 had an indwelling foley catheter, a feeding tube, and indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (measures intended to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms) was in place related to wounds and an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure final cooking temperatures were checked or obtained in a manner to reduce the risk of cross-contamination between food items prepared in the main production kitchen. This had potential to affect all 36 residents who were served the meal. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 11:36 a.m., food production in the main kitchen was observed with cook (CK)-A present. CK-A placed a metallic tray filled with breadsticks into the oven and pulled out a pan which had two, foil pans on top with lasagna in them. CK-A used a spike-style thermometer to pierce the seal over the lasagna and obtain a temperature which read, 182 [F]. CK-A then turned and stated aloud to the food and nutrition service manager (FNM) they were looking for a wipe to clean the probe of the thermometer. FNM left the kitchen and returned with a white-colored box labeled, Ecolab Probe Wipes, and placed them on the elevated counter. The counter space contained another box of these wipes hidden amongst some spices and paper, along with several loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide the opportunity for 4 of 4 residents (R22, R31, R1, R15) reviewed to participate in care planning and care conferences. Findings include: R22 R22's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition. R22's medical record was reviewed from 2/10/24 to 12/11/24 and lacked evidence that R22's representative was invited or attended a care conference held during this period. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 2:30 p.m., R22's resident representative (FM)-A stated she was the one who would attend R22's care conferences but she had not been invited to one since 10/23. FM-A stated she would have wanted to participate in a care conference, but none had been offered since last year. R31 R31's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R31 had intact cognition. R31's medical record was reviewed from 6/10/24 to 12/11/24 and lacked evidence that R31 or her representative was invited or attended a care conference held…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of potential staff to resident abuse to the state agency (SA) within two hours, as required for 1 of 3 residents (R29) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 had intact cognition with no delusional behaviors or hallucinations. R29's care plan dated 7/18/24, indicated R29 had a history of paranoia, accusations against staff, only allowing certain staff to work with her, and manipulating situations and staff. The care plan included goals for R29 of not displaying symptoms such as paranoia, yelling and swearing at staff, refusing care, accusing staff, and manipulation. The care plan included interventions such as using approaches with R29 to maximize involvement in daily decision-making and activity, stopping care and returning if R29 becomes agitated, and providing care in pairs for staff and resident safety. The care plan did not indicate what accusations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure voiced complaints of potential abuse were acted upon, and investigated to ensure an adequate protection plan was provided to ensure freedom from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R29) reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 had intact cognition with no delusional behaviors or hallucinations. R29's care plan dated 7/18/24, indicated R29 had a history of paranoia, accusations against staff, only allowing certain staff to work with her, and manipulating situations and staff. The care plan included goals for R29 of not displaying symptoms such as paranoia, yelling and swearing at staff, refusing care, accusing staff, and manipulation. The care plan included interventions such as using approaches with R29 to maximize involvement in daily decision-making and activity, stopping care and returning if R29 becomes agitated, and providing care in pairs for staff and resident safety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for smoking for 1 of 1 residents (R189) reviewed who smoked. Findings include: During an interview on 12/10/24, at 11:57 a.m., R189 indicated he smoked cigarettes and was made aware after admission the facility was a non-smoking facility. R189 stated he has gone outside the building to smoke while being a resident. R189 indicated staff has told him a few different things about smoking which included: must go on the other side of the parking lot to smoke, can't let people see me smoking and just tell people I am going for a walk. R189 stated the staff at the front desk told him, that as long as she couldn't see me, I could go for a long walk [to smoke]. R189 indicated that over the weekend, one of the nurses sat by the front window and watched me smoke outside. R189 further indicated the head of nursing came and told me today that I can't smoke here and indicated no staff have discussed or offered any nicotine replacement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure routine personal care (i.e., bathing, nail care) were provided for 1 of 3 residents (R11) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: R11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/11/24, indicated R11 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions, no behaviors or no rejection of care. MDS assessment indicated R11 required maximal staff assistance for bathing and moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Diagnoses included: diabetes (disease that results in too much sugar in the blood), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that affects memory and other mental functions), and epilepsy (abnormal electrical brain activity that causes seizures). R11's care plan, printed 12/12/24, identified R11 has an ADL [activity of daily living] self-care performance deficit with the following interventions: -BATHING: Resident requires 1 staff for bathing. Prefers two baths/showers per week. -ORAL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure vision needs were met for 1 of 1 residents (R31) reviewed for missing eye glasses. Findings include: R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R31 was diagnosed with dementia and required set-up help with dressing. The MDS indicated R31 had adequate vision and used corrective lenses. R31's admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated R31 had adequate ability to see in adequate light (with glasses or other visual appliances) and utilized corrective lenses. R31's care plan dated 2/22/24, indicated R31 had impaired cognition, impaired decision making, short-term memory loss, and scored an 8/30 on the St. Louis University Status Examination (SLUMS, test to determine neurocognitive disorder/dementia) indicating dementia. R31's care plan indicated she needed the assistance of one person for dressing and grooming and had a history of falls. The care plan did not include R31's need for corrective lenses but did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with repositioning for 1 of 1 residents (R22) with a history of pressure ulcers. Findings include: R22's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R22 had severely impaired cognition and was diagnosed with kidney disease, diabetes, and dementia. The MDS indicated R22 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and was receiving hospice care. The MDS indicated R22 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. R22's provider progress note dated 11/26/24, indicated R22 had a pressure injury on her right shoulder, impaired skin integrity, limited mobility, and muscle weakness. The note indicated R22 was predisposed to pressure injuries due to weakness and inability to reposition herself. The provider encouraged staff to offload and reposition [R22] as much as possible. R22's Order Summary Report dated 12/5/24, indicated nursing staff were to turn and reposition R22 every two to three hours and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide appropriate side effect monitoring of psychotropic medication consumption for 1 of 5 residents (R26) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R26 was cognitively intact, needed setup for oral hygiene and eating, needed moderate assistance with upper body dressing and was dependent with bathing, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. The MDS included diagnoses of fractures and other multiple traumas, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart) , hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency (poor function of the kidneys), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles in the blood), thyroid disorder (thyroid gland dysfunction), arthritis (swelling and tenderness in one or more joints), depression, and glaucoma (a condition that damages the optic nerve that causes vision loss and blindness). R26's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the physician directly and immediately regarding changes in lower extremity movement for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change of condition, additionally nurse practitioner failed to notify the medical doctor regarding change of condition concerns brought to her attention by her nurse. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet identified R1 had diagnoses of spinal stenosis. R1's care plan dated 10/17/23, identified R1 had mobility deficits due to spinal stenosis and required one staff with maximum assistance for toilet use, one staff for bed mobility and dressing. R1 required assist of one staff to stand pivot to the wheelchair. During interview on 10/30/23 at 10:55 a.m.,R1 recalled a situation in therapy on a Friday (10/20/22) when she was being transferred and experienced a sudden onset of intense pain in her back, it felt like electrodes all over the body. R1 indicated she yelled out at the time. R1 did not recall if a nurse evaluated her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 residents (R135) who utilized a urinary catheter. Findings include: R135's medical diagnoses from her electronic medical record (EMR) downloaded 10/3/23, indicated an admission date of 9/26/23. R135's diagnoses include osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (infections of the bones of spine), Stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacral region, Stage 4 pressure ulcer to right buttock, Stage 4 pressure ulcer to left upper back, quadriplegia (paralysis), epilepsy, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder's muscles and nerves are not communicate properly with the brain), neurogenic bowel (loss of normal bowel function), depression, colostomy (opening in the abdomen for stool to exit the body), gastrostomy (feeding tube inserted in the abdomen and used to supply nutrition to the stomach), and anxiety. R135's care plan printed 10/2/23, failed to mention a foley catheter care. R135's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and care plan to ensure competency and safety with self-administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident (R26) observed to be storing and self-administering medication in their room. Findings include: R26's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R26 had intact cognition. On 10/2/23 at 8:16 a.m., R26 was observed laying in his bed. R26 had a bedside table positioned immediately next to his bed and within his reach and, on top of the table, there was a white-colored bottle of nasal spray sitting on the bedside table with a commercial label indicating it was a medicated spray (i.e., Triamcinolone Acetonide). The bottle lacked a pharmacy label. When interviewed at this time, R26 stated he used the nasal spray for a long time when he needed it adding the staff did not assist him with it. In addition, on the bedside shelf there were multiple, opened bottles of Debrox (carbamide peroxide)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident resuscitation wishes were updated in the electronic medical record (EMR) based on a signed Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a medical order indicating treatments a person would like to receive in case of serious illness and/or cardiac arrest) for 1 of 1 residents (R23) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: R23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R23 had moderately impaired cognition with diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- incurable lung disease causing breathlessness, frequent coughing, and chest tightness). R23 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transferring, dressing, and toilet use. R23's order summary on [DATE], included a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order dated [DATE], indicating R23 would not receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac arrest. R23's POLST dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately complete the comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences to determine a resident's functional capacity. In addition, the facility failed to ensure cognitive mood and needs were completed for 1 of 1 residents (R285) reviewed for assessment accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2017, identified the MDS as an assessment tool which facilities are required to use. The manual directed comprehensive assessments, include the completion of both the MDS and the CAA process, as well as care planning. Further, the manual provided instructions to ensure accurate and complete coding for each section of the assessment as follows: Section C: Cognitive Patterns, with a written intent of determining the residents attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) in a complete, accurate manner to ensure cognitive, mood, and bowel and bladder statuses were evaluated for 4 of 4 residents (R8, R10, R27, R30) reviewed for assessment accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2017, identified the MDS as an assessment tool which facilities are required to use. The manual directed comprehensive assessments, include the completion of both the MDS and the CAA process, as well as care planning. Further, the manual provided instructions to ensure accurate and complete coding for each section of the assessment as follows: Section C: Cognitive Patterns, with a written intent of determining the residents attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information. These items were listed as crucial factors in many care planning decisions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an incomplete Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was conducted for 1 of 1 (R2); and failed to ensure a Level II PASARR was conducted, documented, and retained to ensure mental health needs were appropriately addressed or provided for 2 of 2 residents (R4, R11) reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: R2 R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted to facility on 3/6/21. In addition, R2 was unable to complete the cognitive portion of assessment, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. In addition, listed R2 with several diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a chronic degenerative disorder of the central nervous system), depression, and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by continuous or relapsing episodes of psychosis). R2's entire medical record was reviewed and lacked documentation an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timeliness of person-centered care conferences for 1 of 1 resident (R11) to include review and revision of the care plan by an interdisciplinary team and the resident. Findings include: R11's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was cognitively intact, independent with ambulation and required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADLs) to include bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. R11's diagnoses, printed on 10/4/23, indicated R11 had several medical diagnoses including a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (also called COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and other diagnoses of congestive heart failure (also called CHF, a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should with symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide general daily grooming tasks, including shaving, for one of one resident (R4) observed with facial hair. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADLs) and extensive assistance with toileting. R4's Medical Diagnoses list, dated 3/31/23, indicated R4 had several medical diagnoses including a primary diagnosis of epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures) and a secondary diagnosis of schizophrenia (a serious mental condition involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to properly care plan for and monitor a wound VAC (vacuum-assisted closure of a wound is a type of therapy to help wounds heal and is also known as wound VAC) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. In addition, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, and create and implement interventions for a new, non-pressure related skin injury for 1 of 1 residents (R23) reviewed for wounds. In addition, the facility failed to perform neurological evaluations on a resident following a fall with a head strike and subsequent change in mentation for 1 of 1 residents (R26) reviewed. Findings include: Wound VAC R186's entry Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R186 did not have cognitive scoring in her MDS but appeared alert and oriented during interview. R186's entire medical record, including physician orders, care plan, and medication and treatment record lacked orders and direction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with repositioning for 1 of 1 (R135) who was at risk for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R135's medical diagnoses from her electronic medical record (EMR) downloaded 10/3/23, indicated an admission date of 9/26/23. R135's diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (infections of the bones of spine), Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full skin thickness) to sacral (tailbone) region, Stage 4 pressure ulcer to right buttock, Stage 4 pressure ulcer to left upper back, quadriplegia (paralysis), epilepsy, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder's muscles and nerves are not communicate properly with the brain), neurogenic bowel (loss of normal bowel function), depression, colostomy (opening in the abdomen for stool to exit the body), gastrostomy (feeding tube inserted in the abdomen and used to supply nutrition to the stomach), and anxiety. R135's care plan dated 9/27/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen orders were received and tubing was changed and dated timely for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for respiratory care. Furthermore, the facility failed to create a comprehensive plan of care for oxygen therapy for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R11's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact, was independent with ambulation and required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADLs) to include bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS further indicated R11 was not admitted with oxygen but was currently using oxygen. R11's diagnoses, printed on 10/4/23, indicated R11 had several medical diagnoses including a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (also called COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and other diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review the facility failed to assess and monitor for complications per standard of practice before and after dialysis for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 was admitted to facility on 3/23/23 and had intact cognition and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADL's). R29's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anemia, diabetes, and depression. In addition, R29 received dialysis. R29's provider orders downloaded from electronic medical record on 10/2/23, failed to indicate dialysis site care and assessment before and after dialysis sessions. R29's care plan printed 3/30/23 indicated a focus of The resident needs hemodialysis R/T [related to] Renal failure and an intervention initiated on 5/3/23 which indicated, Monitor/document/report to health care provider PRN for s/s of renal insufficiency: changes in level of consciousness, changes in skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and recorded prior to administration of as-needed (PRN) narcotic medication to reduce the risk of potential complications for 1 of 1 residents (R30) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R30 had intact cognition. R8's significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated R30 had diagnoses including hypertension, a hip fracture, and a stroke. The pain assessment indicated R30 frequently had severe activity-limiting pain and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transferring, and dressing. The MDS lacked documentation related to R30's cognition. R30's care plan dated 9/8/23, lacked interventions related to R30's pain. R30's Order Summary Report dated 10/1/23, indicated R30 received: two milligrams (mg) of oral hydromorphone (a narcotic pain medication) every eight hours as needed. The order also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate side effect monitoring was completed, in accordance with the care plan and standard of care, related to antipsychotic medication use despite an increase in abnormal involuntary movement scoring for 1 of 5 residents (R14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A National Library of Medicine (NIH) Management of Commons Adverse Effects of Antipsychotic Medication article, dated 9/2018, identified the elderly were at risk of adverse effects (i.e., falls) of antipsychotic medication. The article outlined, All antipsychotics carry some risk of orthostatic hypotension [which can] lead to dizziness, syncope, falls. It should be evaluated by both historical and routine measurement. R11's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was cognitively intact, independent with ambulation and required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADLs) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Two medication administration errors occurred out of 27 opportunities resulting in a 7.41 % medication error rate for 1 of 5 residents (R8) observed during medication pass. Findings include: Mayo Clinic article dated 2/1/23, Blood Sugar Testing: Why, When and How, indicated blood sugar testing results may be used to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes medications and understand how diet, exercise, and other factors effect blood sugar levels. The article indicated blood sugar testing should be completed before meals and at bedtime if daily insulin injections were used. Novolog Insulin Aspart Prescribing Information dated 2/23, indicated insulin aspart (a fast-acting insulin that begins to work 15 minutes after injection and reaches peak effect after one hour) should be administered five to ten minutes prior to a meal. R8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure standard infection control practices were in place during administration of intramuscular (IM) seasonal flu injection for 1 of 1 (R135) observed for injection practices. In addition, facility failed to ensure contaminated lancets for 1 of 1 (R11) were secured in a sharps container. Findings include: R135's medical diagnoses from the electronic medical record (EMR) downloaded 10/3/23, indicated an admission date of 9/26/23. R135's diagnoses include osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (infections of the bones of spine), Stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacral region, Stage 4 pressure ulcer to right buttock, Stage 4 pressure ulcer to left upper back, quadriplegia (paralysis), epilepsy, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder's muscles and nerves are not communicate properly with the brain), neurogenic bowel (loss of normal bowel function), depression, colostomy (opening in the abdomen for stool to exit the body), gastrostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-05 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were posted in a prominent location and readily accessible to person wishing to review such information. This had potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the nursing home or any visitors who wanted to review this information. Findings include: The CMS CASPER Report 0003D, dated 9/26/23, identified the completed recertification surveys for the previous three years. This identified the most recently completed recertification survey for the nursing home was exited on 1/12/23. On 10/3/23 at 1:00 p.m., an informal resident council meeting was held with R8, R13, and R19 present. The residents were asked, as part of the meeting, if the most recent survey results were readily posted within the facility for them to review at leisure. However, none of the residents voiced they knew the location or these results, nor had the results been discussed with them during the resident council meetings to their recall. Immediately following the council meeting, on 10/3/23 at 1:22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted on the weekend and in a timely manner at the start of the shift. This had potential to affect all 29 residents, staff, and visitors who could wish to review this information. Findings include: During entrance to the nursing home, on 10/2/23 (Monday) at 7:06 a.m., a one-page document in a clear plastic page protector was observed hanging on the bulletin board to the left of the director of nursing office. This contained a document titled, GSS - Inver Grove Heights Daily staffing for Friday September 29, 2023 [two days prior]. The form contained the actual and total hours of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, trained medication aides, and certified nursing assistants which was broken down into each respective shift (i.e., day shift, evening shift, night shift). There was no visible nurse staffing information posted or displayed for 9/30/23, 10/1/23, or 10/2/23. On 10/2/23 at 7:10 a.m., the DON was interviewed and verified the posting currently displayed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANFORD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| BROWN, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| DYKHOUSE, DANA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| ENGBRECHT, WESLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| GASSEN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| GULSVIG, NEIL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| LUNDEEN, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| MCCAUSLAND, MAUREEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MOLBERT, LAURIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| NORTH, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| SCHIEFFER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SHULKIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| TEIKEN, BRENT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| WENZEL, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| FLUIT, JOEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/15/2026 |
| MIDDLETON, AIMEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2022 |
| OLSON, NICHOLAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SCHEMA, NATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| JANUSZ, ANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| MITTAL, VIKAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| MORRISON, TONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SANDGREN, DEEANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2023 |
| DTN STAFFING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/02/2024 |
| FOCUSONE SOLUTIONS | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2024 |
| GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2018 |
| THRIFTY DRUG STORES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $603K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245285. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.