Good Samaritan Society - Stillwater

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 32.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.32 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.53 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess for and implement appropriate interventions to decrease the risk for falls for 4 of 4 residents (R189, R7, R29, R24) reviewed for falls. This failure led to actual harm for R189 when R189 obtained a right ankle fracture after a fall. Findings include: R189 R189's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], at risk for falls and had a fall with injury prior to admission. Further indicated, diagnosis of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the left femur. R189's cognitive loss/dementia CAA dated 9/2/23, indicated R189 had confusion, disorientation, and forgetfulness and requires frequent reorientation, reassurance, and reminders to help make sense of things. The CAA lacked any interventions. R189's fall CAA dated 9/2/23, indicated R189 was at risk for falls related to being unable to ambulate without staff assistance due to unsteadiness, fall history within the last month prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide appropriate clinical oversight of a urinary collection device used to manage chronic urinary incontinence for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for urinary incontinence.Findings include:R1's face sheet printed 6/3/26, identified diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 3, lymphedema (swelling caused by a buildup of fluid), chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, chronic right-sided heart failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with urinary symptoms, localized edema (swelling), acute cystitis with hematuria (bladder infection with blood in the urine), and muscle weakness.R1's care area assessment (CAA) for urinary incontinence dated 2/5/26, identified urinary incontinence as an actual problem. The CAA identified R1 required assistance with toileting and was occasionally incontinent of urine. Contributing factors identified in the assessment included pain, restricted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess pain, re-evaluate the effectiveness of the pain regimen, ensure accurate and complete documentation, and notify the physician of break through pain for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for pain management. Findings include:R1's face sheet printed 6/3/26, identified diagnoses of pain in left elbow, generalized muscle weakness, cervical spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal in the neck), lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back), low back pain, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder (depression).R1's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 2/5/26, identified pain as an actual problem and triggered due to a pain numeric intensity rating of 7/10. The CAA identified multiple diagnoses and conditions that could contribute to pain, including cardiac disease, pneumonia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), arthritis, and dental problems. The CAA further identified pain could result…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to employ either a full-time registered dietitian (RD) or a qualified dietary manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who resided in the facility.Findings include:Dietary manager qualifications were requested however were not received. The registered dietitian worked part time at facility. When interviewed on 2/11/26 at 2:00 p.m., the administrator stated the facility had a part time dietitian who worked between two facilities. The administrator stated dietary manager did not have required qualifications however was signed up for classes. When interviewed on 2/12/26 at 1:08 p.m. stated DM had accepted the role in November as DM. DM verified she was not currently qualified however had re-enrolled in classes.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments and measurements were completed for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU).Findings include:R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact, required partial to substantial assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs), did not display rejection of care behaviors, and has one stage-four pressure ulcer. R3's diagnoses included fracture of left arm, open wound on left elbow, received intravenous (IV) medications and osteomyelitis (a bone infection). R3's care area assessment (CAA) dated 1/19/26, indicated, Pressure injury to left elbow related to fracture, impaired ROM [range of motion], Osteomyelitis/cellulitis [bone/skin infection] infection puts patient at risk of complications like sepsis, increased care needs, further functional or cognitive decline and disability. R3's care plan (CP) dated 1/13/26, indicated R3 had potential and actual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a root cause analysis was completed and implement new interventions following a fall for 1 of 3 residents (R11).Findings include: R11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of dementia (decline in cognitive ability), abnormalities of gait and mobility, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. It further indicated R11 required partial to moderate assistance with ambulation and had two or more falls since admission, one with injury. R11's progress note dated 10/23/25, indicated R11 was found on the floor in middle of the dining room. Her wheelchair was 10 feet away from the table and the other chairs surrounding her were 5 feet away. R11 was assessed for injuries and lacerations were noted on her head. Neurological checks were initiated with no changes and vital signs were stable. The patient was assisted off the floor by two staff. Patient was able to bend her knees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to identify triggers or attempt to identify triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization and failed to develop a care plan to include individualized trauma-informed approaches for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had a history of trauma.Findings include:R1's admit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors or rejection of care present. R1 was independent for all activities of daily living (ADLs), with occasional incontinence. R1 ambulated around facility with a wheeled walker. R1's diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and bipolar disorder (mood disorder).R1's trauma assessment dated [DATE], indicated the purpose of the assessment was to identify residents who are trauma survivors. R1's trauma assessment indicated R1 did not have past trauma. R1's care plan dated [DATE], indicated R1 had sleep disturbance related to PTSD. Staff directed to monitor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to identify prior appropriate interventions prior to use of grab bars, assess for risk of entrapment, and obtain consent 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for the use of grab bars. Findings include: R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of muscular sclerosis (disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves) and chronic kidney disease (condition in which the kidneys gradually lose their ability to function properly). It further indicated bilateral impairment of the lower extremities ([NAME]) and R12 required substantial assistance with bed mobility.During interview and observation on 2/09/2026 at 3:05 p.m., R12 had bilateral grab bars on her bed. R12 stated she didn't use the bars and was able to reposition herself. She further indicated she thinks the facility uses them to keep us in bed.R12's physical device assessment dated [DATE], lacked indication the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R27) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).Findings include:R3 R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact, required partial to substantial assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs), did not display rejection of care behaviors, and has one stage-four pressure ulcer. R3's diagnoses included fracture of left arm, open wound on left elbow, received intravenous (IV) medications and osteomyelitis (a bone infection). R3's care area assessment (CAA) dated 1/19/26, indicated, Pressure injury to left elbow related to fracture, impaired ROM [range of motion], Osteomyelitis/cellulitis [skin infection] infection puts patient at risk of complications like sepsis, increased care needs, further functional or cognitive decline and disability. R3's care plan dated 1/13/26, indicated R3 required IV…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure liquid morphine (opioid analgesic used to treat severe pain) was administered per physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who was administered ten times the ordered dose.Findings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated diagnosis of anemia, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and seizure disorder. The MDS indicated she was moderate cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living. The MDS indicated R1 received scheduled pain medication and had a condition or chronic disease that may result in life expectancy of less than 6 months and received hospice care.R1's Care Plan dated 10/13/25, indicated R1 had acute and chronic pain/discomfort related to history of cerebral vascular accident and weakness. The care plan indicated nursing to evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions after administration of pain medication, satisfaction with results, impact on functional ability and impact on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was maintained to promote dignity for 1 of 1 resident (R21) observed with bare skin and undergarments visible from the hallway to other residents, visitors, and staff. Findings include: R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had severe cognitive impairment, displayed disorganized thinking, had physical behaviors directed towards others (sexual), that interfered with care, or social interactions, did not reject care, and required maximal assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Further, the MDS identified R21 was incontinent of both bowel and bladder, had diagnoses of dementia, Parkinson's disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), heart failure, and had a history of falls. R21's Care Plan dated 1/28/25, lacked information regarding preserving privacy and dignity. The care plan indicated brief use for incontinence, check upon rising, before and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $848K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN