Currituck Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 210 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with Division of Health Service Regulation (DHSR) Life Safety Surveyor, resident, physician and staff, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision to ensure residents were safe while smoking when Resident #31 was found smoking in the presence of a supplemental oxygen device, to implement their smoking policy and effective interventions to address the resident's repeated non-compliance with safe smoking practices both inside and outside of the facility, and to monitor the resident to prevent further incidents of unsafe smoking. Resident #31 was assessed on admission as a non-smoker at the facility. On 1/31/24 Resident #31 was observed smoking outside in the designated smoking area and he had smoking materials in his possession in violation of the smoking policy. On 6/27/24 Resident #31 was observed smoking outside in a non-designated smoking area with his portable oxygen tank on his wheelchair. On 7/9/24 Resident #31 was observed lying in bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff, physician and laboratory customer service staff, the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #6 experienced a change of condition. Resident #6 received a positive result from a urinalysis (UA) and culture and sensitivity (C&S), which indicated the resident had a urinary tract infection (UTI) with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL, an enzyme produced by some bacteria that makes them resistant to many antibiotics) in her urine and failed to notify the physician of the C&S results after the report was received from the facility. These deficient practices affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for a experiencing a change of condition related to a UTI (Resident #6). Resident #6 was sent to the emergency department on 6/22/24 after being found with seizure-like symptoms, requiring hospital admission for acute metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused by large-scale brain dysfunction from impaired cerebral metabolism) caused by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed protect a resident's right to be free from abuse when a moderately cognitively impaired resident (Resident #29) punched severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #231) in the face. Resident #231 was prescribed and received a blood thinner daily. Resident #231 sustained bruising and swelling to the left side of his face. Resident #231 stated he was scared and did not want to be near Resident #29. Resident #29 and Resident #231 were immediately separated. Resident #29 was moved to another room by himself. Resident #231 requested to be sent to emergency room for evaluation and did not return to the facility. Resident #231 transferred from the hospital to a different facility. Resident #231's family member stated Resident #231 had never emotionally recovered from the incident and still does not want to be in a room with someone else. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: Resident #231 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff and the physician, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received necessary care and services for a urinary tract infection (UTI) when she experienced signs and symptoms of a change in condition. The facility failed to follow up on results of urinalysis, failed to effectively respond to a positive urinalysis (UA) report, failed to follow up on results of urine culture and sensitivity, effectively respond to urine culture and sensitivity results (C&S), and administer an antibiotic that was sensitive to the microorganism listed on the C&S report. These deficient practices affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for UTI (Resident #6). Resident #6 was sent to the emergency department on 6/22/24 due to being found with seizure-like symptoms, requiring hospital admission for acute metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused by large-scale brain dysfunction from impaired cerebral metabolism) due to a UTI with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, Responsible Party (RP) interview, and Physician interview the facility failed to provide supervision of a resident with severe cognitive impairment and known exit seeking behaviors to prevent an unsupervised exit for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #56). On 1/01/23 Resident #56 exited the facility out the dining room exit doors unsupervised and without staff knowledge. An alarm sounded, however the alarm announcement was muffled and had static which made the announcement unclear, so the staff were not aware the announcement was in reference to an elopement. Staff did not respond to the alarm due to the poor quality of sound and did not initiate a search for Resident #56. Resident #56 was found by a visitor outside the facility near the dining room door. This dining room door had a one lane exit road on its left that was bordered by a brush covered area on the opposing side and to the right of the dining room door was an access road for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Responsible Party, Law Enforcement and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property when a staff member (Nurse Aide #1) took checks from Resident #92 without her knowledge, cashed one of the checks for $1000.00, and attempted to cash additional checks. The deficient practice was for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #92). Findings included: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An initial allegation report dated [DATE] completed by the Former Administrator showed that she (the Former Administrator) received an email from the Responsible Party of Resident #92, who also had Power of Attorney, on [DATE]. The Responsible Party of Resident #92 made the Former Administrator aware that someone had forged and cashed multiple checks from Resident #92's bank account. The report stated that the Responsible Party of Resident #92 did not accuse any one person and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) after enrollment in a hospice program for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for death in the facility (Resident #6).Findings included:Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart failure.A Long-Term Care Status Form dated 9/5/25 revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the hospice program at the facility on 9/5/25. His level of hospice care was routine hospice. No SCSA was found in Resident #6's medical record.In an interview on 12/2/25 at 3:51 PM MDS Nurse #1 stated Resident #6 was admitted to hospice services at the facility on 9/5/25. She reported she would have been responsible for completing an MDS SCSA for Resident #6 when he began receiving hospice services. She indicated she had missed this. MDS Nurse #1 stated she could not say why this had been missed.On 12/2/25 at 3:57 PM an interview with the Administrator indicated if Resident #6 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #40) reviewed for PASRR.Findings included:Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.Resident #40's PASRR Level II determination notice dated 3/12/21 revealed nursing home placement was appropriate. It included the specialized service determination of follow-up psychiatric services by a psychiatrist. This PASRR Level II determination notice had no expiration date.Resident #40's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was not currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition.On 12/2/25 at 12:23 PM an interview with MDS Nurse #2 indicated she coded the PASRR section of Resident #40's MDS assessment dated [DATE]. She stated Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to attempt alternatives prior to the installation and use of bed rails and did not assess for risk of entrapment when completing assessments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for bed rails (Resident #67).Findings included:Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hypertension.Resident #67's current comprehensive care plan revealed a focus area dated as initiated on 3/8/25 and last reviewed on 9/11/25 for bilateral quarter bed rails (bed rails which extend from the head of the bed to a quarter of the way down the bed) to promote bed mobility. The goal was for Resident #67 to not demonstrate a decline in bed mobility through the next review. An intervention was for staff to assist with bed mobility as needed. Resident #67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. He had no behaviors or rejection of care. He was independent with all bed mobility and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and resident, staff, Pharmacy Consultant and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than five percent as evidenced by 4 medication errors out of 33 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.12% for 2 of 4 residents observed during the medication administration observations (Resident #18 and Resident #71). Findings included: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute bronchitis, congestive heart failure and hypertension. Physician orders for Resident #18 included the following medications: - On 3/5/2024, Klor-Con 10 (Potassium Chloride) Extended Release 10 milliequivalent (meq) two tablets once a day. - On 3/7/2024, Fluticasone propionate spray 50 micrograms (mcg) suspension 1 spray alternating nostrils once a day for allergies. - On 7/3/2024, Polyethylene glycol 3350 powder 17 grams per dose mixed in 4-8 ounces of fluid. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a dinner meal tray line observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu for pureed diets for 7 of 7 residents on a pureed diet. The findings included: Review of the facility's menu dated 8/6/24 revealed the meal was a chicken sandwich, potatoes, vegetables, and baked beans. According to the menu residents on a pureed diet should have received one #10 scoop (3/8 cup or 3-4 ounces, an ivory colored handle) of pureed chicken and two #20 scoops (1.5 ounces, a yellow colored handle) of pureed bread. Observation of the dinner meal on 8/6/24 5:25 PM revealed [NAME] #1 used the one blue scoop of pureed chicken. There was no pureed bread on the serving line. In an interview on 8/6/24 at 5:33 PM, [NAME] #1 confirmed he used one blue scoop for the pureed chicken. He said he was not sure what size the blue scoop was and was unable to find the label with the number on the scoop. He said he did not add any bread to the pureed chicken or serve bread with the meal because the chicken patties were already breaded. He did not think there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record by failing to document the assessment and orders related to a resident's change in condition (Resident #6) and failed to maintain an accurate medical record for documentation of the administration of medications (Resident #6, Resident #18, Resident #71) for 3 of 33 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings included: 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including renal (kidney) insufficiency a. Review of Resident #6's nursing Situation, Background, Appearance, and Review (SBAR) Communication Form to the provider dated 6/22/24 completed by Nurse #12 noted Resident #6 was unresponsive after a seizure. There was no assessment information on the SBAR, including no vital signs or interventions used to assist the resident. Review of Resident #6's Transfer and Discharge Information form dated 6/22/24 indicated there was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately document code status in the electronic medical record for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for advance directives. The findings included: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction. A physician order dated 3/19/24 by Physician #1 stated full code status. The electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form dated 03/20/24 signed by Resident #63 and Physician #1. The care plan revised 6/26/24 indicated Resident #63 had chosen DNR status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was severely cognitively impaired. On 08/06/24 at 01:16 PM an interview was conducted with the Admissions Coordinator. She stated she verified advance directives/code status upon admission. If a newly admitted resident had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) (form 10055) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services for 1 of 3 (Resident #30) residents reviewed for beneficiary protection review. The findings included: Resident #30 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to Medicare Part A services. Resident #30's Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 4/24/24 with days remaining and she remained in the facility. Review of Resident #30's medical records revealed a NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) was given by phone to the resident's power of attorney on 4/22/24. Record review revealed no SNF ABN was provided to the resident or the resident's power of attorney. An interview was conducted with the facility Social Worker on 8/05/24 at 4:33 PM who stated she was responsible for issuing the NOMNC with the resident or responsible party. She said she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code smoking, the use of antiplatelets (medications that prevents blood cells from clumping together to form a clot), and the use of opioids (medications used for relieving pain) for 3 of 33 residents whose Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were reviewed (Resident # 3, Resident #54 and Resident #31). Findings included: 1.Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A Smoking Assessment completed by nursing staff dated 1/27/24 indicated Resident #31 was a non-smoker or intended not to smoke. Nursing documentation dated 1/31/24 written by Nurse #2 revealed Resident #31 had gone outside to smoke and had taken his oxygen off before lighting his cigarette. Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had moderate cognitive impairment and was on oxygen therapy. The Current Tobacco use section was marked No. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$120,975 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $120,975 — penalty dated 2024-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $976K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC