No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Care Of Mechanicsville

7600 Autumn Parkway, Mechanicsville, VA 23116 · For profit - Corporation · 169 certified beds · (804) 730-0009 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (804) 730-0009 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
$10,358 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,358 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7489 Right Flank Rd · (804) 559-8055 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7430 Bell Creek Rd · (804) 730-8882 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.6 mi
8319 Bell Creek Rd · (804) 559-5826 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.9%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.5%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.8%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.6%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.7%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.8%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.0%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.631.521.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 604 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 335 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 50.9–58.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 9.2–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.5–8.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
32.1%
Total nursing turnover
39.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 169 beds and averages 164.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-26)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain one of two dumpsters in a sanitary manner. Facility staff failed to close one of two lids on the top of a facility's dumpster. The findings include: On 02/24/2025 at approximately 11:35 a.m., an observation of the facility's two dumpsters located behind the facility was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #4, assistant dietary manager. The observation revealed the left lid of the dumpster on the right side (when facing the dumpsters) was resting on a bag(s) of trash in an open position. Further observations revealed the trach bag(s) were exposed. When asked how often the dumpsters were emptied OSM #4 stated they were emptied six days a week. When asked about the open lid on the dumpster she stated the trash should have been pushed down into the dumpster and the lid should have been closed. OSM #4 further stated the dietary department and the facility's maintenance department shared the responsibility of maintaining the dumpsters by alternating the responsibility monthly. On 02/25/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's highest level of well-being for 1 (one) of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #31 (R31). The findings include: For R31, the facility staff failed to follow the physician's order for daily weights. R31 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to CHF (congestive heart failure) (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/12/2025, R31 scored 0 (zero) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R31 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The physician's order for R31 documented in part, Daily weight for CHF Monitoring. Frequency: Once A Day. Repeat: Every Day. Notify MD/NP if Resident has greater than 2.5 lbs. (pounds) weight gain in 3 (three) days or greater than 5 (five) lbs. in a week. Start Date: 1/29/25. The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R31 dated February 2025 documented the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to monitor a significant weight loss for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #120. The findings include: For Resident #120 (R120), the facility staff failed to obtain physician ordered daily weights after the resident experienced a significant weight loss. A review of R120's clinical record revealed the resident's weight was 159 lbs. (pounds) on 1/2/25 and 142 lbs. on 2/1/25 (a 10.69% weight loss in 30 days). A note signed by the RD (registered dietician) on 1/29/25 documented, Tube Feeding reviewed as weekly follow up. #CBW (Current Body Weight): 137 Lbs. BMI (Body Mass Index): 22.86 WNL (Within Normal Limits) but low for age. -14% loss less than a month, significant and concerning. RD requests reweigh for accuracy. Diet: Reg, Puree. Formula: Isosource 1.5 Cal. RD was notified by nurse on floor resident isn't eating well, formula was increased from twice daily to TID (Three Times Daily) for nutrition. If loss is true, frequency of feed will be increased to 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens and failed to maintain holding temperatures during lunch in one of two dining rooms observed. The findings include: 1. On 02/24/2025 at approximately 11:15 a.m., an observation of the facility's walk-in refrigerator in the facility kitchen was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #4, assistant dietary manager. An observation revealed an open three-pound package of sliced ham with approximate one pound remaining and an open bag of shredded cheddar cheese sitting on the middle shelf in the back of the walk-in refrigerator. Further observations of the packages of ham and cheese failed to evidence an open date. 2. On 02/24/2025 at approximately 11:25 a.m., an observation of the facility's walk-in freezer in the facility kitchen was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #4. An observation revealed two, 2.2 (two point two) pound bags of frozen breaded shrimp laying in an open box on the middle shelf on the left side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident / staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence bed inspections for four of 35 residents in the survey sample, R20, R59, R409 and R31. The findings include: 1.The facility staff failed to perform bed rail inspections for the use of positioning / assist bars for R20. The facility's bed inspections were reviewed since last survey, they were completed 1/2023 and 2/12/2024. R20 was observed in bed on 2/24/25 at 2:30 PM and 2/25/25 at 8:14 AM in bed with 1/2 rails bilaterally. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to CHF (congestive heart failure), prosthetic heart valve, DM (diabetes mellitus) and osteoarthritis. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 115/25, coded the resident as scoring a 05 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide dignity for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #79. The findings include: For Resident #79 (R79), the facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience. A CNA (certified nursing assistant) stood over R79 while feeding the resident. On 2/25/25 at 12:50 p.m. R79 was observed sitting up in bed. CNA #3 was observed standing over R79 while feeding the resident. On 2/25/25 at 3:37 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA #2. CNA #2 stated the, CNAs should sit in a chair when feeding residents CNA #2 stated standing up while feeding residents does not provide a dignified experience because residents are more comfortable when staff sits down. On 2/25/25 at 4:21 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the director of nursing) were made aware of the above concern. The facility document titled, Resident Rights Inservice documented, The Nursing Home Reform Act established the following rights for nursing home residents: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of a room change for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #100. The findings include: For Resident #100 (R100), the facility staff failed to provide written notification to the resident of a room change on 9/5/24 and 1/30/25. On 2/24/25 at 1:52 p.m., R100 was interviewed. She stated she had recently moved to her current room and was still in the process of adjusting to it. She stated she does not like this room as much as she liked her previous room. A review of R100's clinical record revealed she was transferred to different room on 9/5/24 and 1/30/25. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed no evidence that she was provided written notice prior to the room change. On 2/26/25 at 10:56 a.m., OSM (other staff member) #9, the social services assistant, was interviewed. She stated, When a resident is going to change rooms, she is responsible for notifying everyone, including the resident and/or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0560 — isolated
    Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the reason for a room change for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #100. The findings include: For Resident #100 (R100), the facility staff failed to provide the reason for a room change on 1/30/25. On 2/24/25 at 1:52 p.m., R100 was interviewed. She stated she had recently moved to her current room and was still in the process of adjusting to it. She stated she does not like this room as much as she liked her previous room. A review of R100's clinical record revealed she was transferred to different room on 1/30/25. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed no evidence of why the resident was transferred within the facility, or that the resident was made aware of the reason. On 2/26/25 at 10:56 a.m., OSM (other staff member) #9, the social services assistant, was interviewed. She stated, When a resident is going to change rooms, she is responsible for notifying everyone, including the resident and/or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide notification to the physician of a residents refusal of treatment for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #359. The findings include: For Resident #359 (R359), the facility staff failed to evidence notification of the physician of R359's refusal of lab testing on 11/6/24 and 11/7/24. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/29/24, the resident scored three on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. The physician orders for R359 documented in part, - BMP (basic metabolic profile) and CBC (complete blood count); Special Instructions: BMP and CBC Once- One Time 23:00 (11:00 pm)- 07:00 (7:00am). Start Date: 11/06/2024. End Date: 11/06/2024. - BMP and CBC; Special Instructions: BMP and CBC Once- One Time 23:00 - 07:00. Start Date: 11/07/2024. End Date: 11/07/2024. The progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #35. The findings include: For Resident #35 (R35), the facility staff inaccurately coded the resident as having a restraint on the resident's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/16/25. A review of R35's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 1/16/25 revealed section P, Restraints and Alarms that coded the resident as using a chair that prevents rising less than daily. A review of R35's clinical record failed to reveal documentation regarding the use of a restraint/chair that prevents rising. Observations of R35 during the survey failed to reveal the use of a restraint/chair that prevents rising. On 2/25/25 at 9:13 a.m., RN (registered nurse) #3 (the MDS coordinator) was made aware of the above concern. On 2/25/25 at 9:24 a.m., an interview was conducted with RN #3. RN #3 stated,The coding of the use of a restraint on R35's MDS assessment was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for three of 35 residents in the survey sample, Residents #120, #2, and #61. The findings include: 1. For Resident #120 (R120), the facility staff failed to implement the resident's comprehensive care plan for obtaining weights. R120's comprehensive care plan dated 10/22/24 documented, Resident requires Enteral tube feeding and is at risk for dehydration, aspiration .Monitor weight per orders. A physician's order dated 1/29/25 documented, Obtain weight daily. Further review of R120's clinical record failed to reveal the resident's weight was obtained on 2/5/25, 2/14/25, 2/16/25, 2/17/25, 2/18/25, 2/19/25, and 2/22/25. On 2/25/25 at 3:46 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2. RN #2 stated the purpose of the care plan is to follow doctors' orders and nursing staff implement residents' care plans by looking at the care plans. On 2/26/25 at 10:14 a.m., an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 35 residents in the survey sample, Residents #79, and #75. The findings include: 1.a. For Resident #79 (R79), the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan for adaptive eating equipment. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/10/24, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. A review of R79's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/10/24 that documented, Provide 2 handled cup with lid + straw and red foam to knife and fork for all meals as tolerated. R79's comprehensive care plan edited on 2/13/25 failed to revealed documentation regarding a two handled cup with a lid and straw, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to clarify a physician order for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #16. The findings include: For Resident #16 (R16), the facility staff failed to clarify a physician order regarding tracheostomy (1) change every two months. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an annual assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/28/2024, the resident scored a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R16 receiving tracheostomy care at the facility. On 2/24/25 at 2:53 p.m., an observation was made of R16 in their room. At that time an interview was conducted with R16 who stated that they had a tracheostomy. R16 was observed with a bandana around their neck and proceeded to remove it to show a tracheostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide foot care for one of 35 residents in the sample R20. The findings include: The facility failed to evidence provision of foot care for R20. R20 was observed in bed on 2/24/25 at 2:30 PM with thick toenails on both large toes and toenails approximately one-half inch in length. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to CHF (congestive heart failure), prosthetic heart valve, DM (diabetes mellitus) and osteoarthritis. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 115/25, coded the resident as scoring a 05 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent worsening of a contracture of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #75 (R75). The findings include: For Resident #75 (R75), the facility staff failed to provide an orthotic device to the resident's right hand. On the following dates and times, R75 was observed. At each of these observations, the resident had a visible contracture of her right hand: 2/24/25 at 2:20 p.m., 2/25/24 at 9:05 a.m. and 1:18 p.m. At the 2/24/25 observation at 2:20 p.m., the resident was seated in the facility common area. In the resident's room, a carrot orthotic device was visible on the resident's bedside table. On 2/25/25 at 1:18 p.m., R75 stated she had been seen by the occupational therapy staff, and they had given her a carrot to hold to help the contracture. She stated she did not know where the carrot orthotic device was, and that the staff do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 35 residents, Resident #61 and Resident #2. The findings include: 1. For Resident #61 (R61), the facility staff failed to administer oxygen at the prescribed rate. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/22/25, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O documented R61 receiving oxygen at the facility. On 2/25/25 at 8:22 a.m., an observation was made of R61 in their room. R61 was observed in bed wearing an oxygen cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen was observed to be set at a rate of 3.5 l/min (liters per minute). At that time an interview was conducted with R61 who stated that they wore oxygen all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide assistive devices for eating for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #75 (R75). The findings include: For Resident #75 (R75), the facility staff failed to provide built up eating utensils for the resident to use during meals. On the following dates and times, R75 was observed eating a meal. At each of these observations, the resident was attempting to use regular utensils to feed herself. At all observations, she abandoned using the utensils, and used her fingers to feed herself: 2/24/25 at 2:20 p.m., 2/25/24 at 9:05 a.m. and 1:18 p.m. On 2/25/25 at 1:18 p.m., R75 stated she had been seen by the occupational therapy staff, and they had given her eating utensils that were built up on the ends so she could more easily manipulate them. She stated she had lost the utensils, and it was her fault that she didn't have any adaptive utensils to use. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the resident representative and/or the State LTC Ombudsman with written notification of hospital transfers for four of 51 in the survey sample; Residents #68, #147, #61, and #163, The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide the resident representative and the ombudsman with written notice of a hospital transfer when the resident was sent to the hospital on 8/18/22 for Resident #68. On the 10/14/22 quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), Resident #68 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. A review of the clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 8/18/22, that documented, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) .found pt (patient) on floor and called nurse. nurse observe pt laying on left hip on floor next to bed, pt was wearing gripper socks. left hip has protrusion and blanchable redness. pt state [they] was trying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to prepare food in the facility kitchen in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. The findings include: On 11/30/2022 at approximately 9:50 a.m., an observation of the facility's dish room revealed OSM (other staff member) #8, dietary staff member, removing clean, wet cups, bowls and plate covers that had just come out of the automatic dishwasher and drying them with a towel and stacking them on drying racks. On 11/30/2022 at approximately 1:45 p.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #6, dietary manager. When asked about hand drying the plate covers OSM # 6 stated that it was their understanding that it was okay to hand dry the dishes as long as staff were wearing gloves. After reviewing the facility's policy Dish Machine Use Policy OSM # 6 stated that they were not aware that the dishes were not to be dried with a towel and needed to air dry. The facility's policy Dish Machine Use Policy documented in part, 11. Allow the dishes to air dry on the dish racks or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain one of three dumpsters in a sanitary manner. The dumpster used for cardboard, was observed with debris, including several pieces of cardboard, plastic bags, used face masks and trash lying on the ground on the right and back side of the dumpster. The findings include: On 11/29/2022 at approximately 11:40 a.m., an observation of the facility's dumpsters was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #1, director of maintenance and OSM #2, maintenance helper. The observation revealed that the facility had one dumpster specifically for cardboard surrounded by a wooden fence. Observation of the area around the dumpster revealed several pieces of cardboard, plastic bags, used face masks and trash were found lying on the ground on the right and back side of the dumpster. When asked who was responsible for maintaining the immediate area around the dumpsters in a clean and sanitary manner and how often it was checked and cleaned OSM #1 stated that it was the maintenance department that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence notification of facility COVID-19 activity to residents and/or their responsible party (RP) and families for five of five residents reviewed, Residents #24, #68, #85, #132 and #48. The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence notification by 5:00 p.m. the next calendar day following a single confirmed infection of COVID-19 (1) to sampled residents (Residents #24, #68, #85, #132 and #48) and/or their responsible party and families. On 11/29/2022 at 10:40 a.m., during entrance meeting with RN (registered nurse) #3, the infection preventionist and ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, RN #3 stated that residents/RP's and families were notified of new cases of COVID-19 in the facility by staff members after a case was identified and a progress note was entered into each residents medical record regarding the update regarding the facility status. On 11/29/2022 at approximately 1:00 p.m., ASM #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assess one of 51 residents in the survey sample for self-administration of medication, Resident #48. The findings include: For Resident #48 (R48), the facility staff failed to assess for self-administration of medication. A bottle of docusate sodium (1) was observed unsecured at the bedside in R48's room. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a five-day admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/13/2022, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. On 11/29/2022 at 2:46 p.m., an observation of R48's room was conducted with R48 present. A bottle of docusate sodium softgels were observed sitting on top of the nightstand to the left of R48's bed. On 11/30/2022 at 9:36 a.m., an interview was conducted with R48 in their room. The bottle of docusate sodium was on top of the nightstand to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to complete and accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for three of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents #115, #132 and #106. The findings include: 1. For Resident #115 (R115), the facility staff failed to complete Sections B - Hearing, Speech and Vision, Section C - Cognition, and Section D - Mood on the Quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. On the most recent MDS assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/27/2022, the resident was coded in Section B - Hearing, Speech and Vision, as being understood and understanding when spoken to. Sections C and D had dashes in all the boxes indicating it was not completed. On the quarterly MDS assessment, with an ARD of 9/7/2022, the resident was coded in Section B as being understood and understanding when spoken to. Section C had dashes in all the boxes. In Section C0600,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident #113 (R113). The findings include: For (R113), the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the placement of two fall mats next to (R113's) bed. (R113) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to: muscle weakness and a history of falling. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/2022, the (R113) was coded as having both short- and long-term memory difficulties and was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 11/29/22 at approximately 3:13 p.m., (R113) was observed lying in bed with one fall mat on floor next to the left side of (R113's) bed. On 12/01/22 at approximately 7:10 a.m., (R113) was observed lying in bed with one fall mat on floor next to the left side of (R113's) bed. The physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions to reduce the risk of fall related injury, for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 113 (R113). The findings include: For (R113), the facility staff failed to place fall mats on the right and left side of bed while (R113) was lying in bed. (R113) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to: muscle weakness and a history of falling. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/2022, the (R113) was coded as having both short and long term memory difficulties and was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 11/29/22 at approximately 3:13 p.m., an observation of (R113) revealed they were lying in bed and one fall mat on floor next to the bed on (R113's) left side. On 12/01/22 at approximately 7:10 a.m., an observation of (R113) revealed they were lying in bed and one fall mat on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling urinary catheter, for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents #24 (R24). The findings include: For (R24), the facility staff failed to keep the indwelling urinary catheter (1) tubing off the floor. (R24) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: benign prostatic hyperplasia (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/13/2022, (R24) scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating (R24) was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Sect H Bladder and Bowel code (R24) as having an indwelling catheter. On 11/29/22 at approximately 1:26 p.m., an observation of (R24) revealed they were sitting in their wheelchair in their room with the catheter tubing under the wheelchair; a portion of the catheter tubing was resting on the floor. On 11/29/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents #24 (R24). The findings include: For (R24), the facility staff failed to store a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) (1) mask in a sanitary manner. (R24) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (2). On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 06/13/2022, (R24) scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating (R24) was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs coded (R24) for CPAP while a resident. On 11/29/22 at approximately 1:26 p.m., an observation of (R24's) CPAP mask revealed it was placed on top of their bedside table and uncovered. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct performance evaluations for two of five CNA's (certified nursing assistants) reviewed. The findings include: During the Sufficient and Competent Staffing facility task review on 11/30/22 at 2:30 PM there was no evidence of performance evaluations for two of five CNA's (certified nursing assistants) reviewed. On 11/30/22 at approximately 11:00 AM, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, was provided with the list of five CNA's highlighted with request for evidence of performance reviews. At 2:00 PM, ASM #1, the administrator, provided the employee files requested which revealed the following: 1. CNA #2 with a date of hire of 9/25/17, revealed the last performance evaluation dated 10/23/21. There were no performance evaluation within the last 12 months. 2. CNA #3 with a date of hire of 3/1/16, revealed the last performance evaluation dated 8/15/21. There were no performance evaluation within the last 12 months. On 11/30/22 at 3:00 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for four of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #107, #86, #12 and #61. The findings include: 1.a. The facility staff failed to implement Resident #107's comprehensive care plan for pain medication administration. Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107's diagnoses included but were not limited to heart disease, high blood pressure and a history of a hip fracture. Resident #107's significant change in status minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 5/17/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #107's clinical record revealed the following physician's orders: -5/10/21- oxycodone 5 mg (milligrams) - Give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain for 7 days. Give for pain 1-5. -5/10/21- oxycodone 5 mg - Give 1 tablet by mouth every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 52 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #86, #12 and #61). The facility staff failed to administer oxygen at the physician ordered rate to Resident #86 and Resident #12, and failed to maintain Resident #12's oxygen concentrator in a sanitary manner. The Facility staff failed to provide Resident # 61's oxygen continuously according to the physician's orders and keep the nasal cannula off the floor. The findings include: 1. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to neuropathic bladder, diabetes, depression, high blood pressure, and quadriplegia. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/6/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #107. The facility staff failed to administer the correct dosage of prn (as needed) oxycodone (1) per physician's order, based on Resident #107's pain rating on 5/14/21. The findings include: Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107's diagnoses included but were not limited to heart disease, high blood pressure and a history of a hip fracture. Resident #107's significant change in status minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 5/17/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #107's clinical record revealed the following physician's orders: -5/10/21- oxycodone 5 mg (milligrams) - Give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain for 7 days. Give for pain 1-5. -5/10/21- oxycodone 5 mg - Give 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure one of 52 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #107), was free from unnecessary medication. The facility staff failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering prn (as needed) oxycodone to Resident #107 on 5/12/21. The findings include: Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107's diagnoses included but were not limited to heart disease, high blood pressure and a history of a hip fracture. Resident #107's significant change in status minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 5/17/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #107's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 5/10/21 for oxycodone 5 mg (milligrams) - Give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain for 7 days. Give for pain 1-5. Resident #107's comprehensive care plan revised on 5/11/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate medical record for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #479 and Resident #40). The facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate medical record of progress notes for Resident #479's Foley catheter being pulled out, reinserted and scratches on the residents fingers while the resident was admitted to the facility for respite care 2/17/21 through 2/22/21, and staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record documenting activities of daily living tasks completed for Resident #40. The findings include: 1. Resident #479was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #479's diagnoses included but were not limited to: congestive heart failure (abnormal condition characterized by circulatory congestion and retention of salt and water by the kidneys) (1), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHG AUTUMN, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/01/2016
OHL ASSET (VA) MECHANICSVILLE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2019
HOPKINS, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
LEGETTE, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/12/2021
DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020OrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2021
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2025
WALKER & ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
DHARANIKOTA, PADMALATHAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+16.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 17%Other / private 78%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,468per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$371per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495413. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next