Autumn Care Of Suffolk
2580 Pruden Boulevard, Suffolk, VA 23434 · For profit - Individual · 110 certified beds · (757) 934-2363 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2021
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.5% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 38.0% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.1% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.2% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 36.0% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.4% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.4% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.7%CMS range 42.3–65.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.9–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 69.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 75.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.6–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 108.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2021-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff, resident and family interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure two residents were free from abuse; one resident (R#185) who was intentionally restricted from movement by a tucked in top bed sheet on each side with the two top corners tied at the junction of the side rail and bed frame, and the bottom two corners of the top sheet tied to the bedframe; and, a second resident (R#47) to be free of mental and verbal abuse as evidenced by threatening a 30 day notice of discharge. The treatment of Resident #185 constituted harm. The findings included: 1. Resident #185 was admitted to the nursing facility on 7/12/19 for skilled services with a primary diagnosis of stroke with aphasia. She was discharged home on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded the resident as having no problems with short and long term memory and moderately impaired (cues and supervision required) in the skills needed for daily decision making. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to ensure heated beverage was served in a manner to prevent an avoidable accident for 1 of 59 residents in the survey sample (Resident #83), with known behaviors of throwing objects, food and beverages resulting in harm, a second degree burn, to Resident #74. The staff served Resident #83 a cup of hot coffee without a lid. Resident #83 threw the hot coffee onto Resident #74 resulting in a second degree burn to the resident's left upper thigh requiring physician intervention, medication and treatment. A second degree burn involves the first two layers of the skin. These may present as deep reddening of the skin, pain, blisters, glossy appearance from leaking fluid, and possible loss of some skin. Referenced from http://www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/burns.asp The findings include: A Facility Reportable Incident (FRI), incident type Unusual Occurrence, was received at the State Agency on 1/23/19. The FRI evidenced that on 1/22/19, Resident #74…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Facility staff failed to ensure that residents and/or resident representative had the opportunity to develop an Advanced Directive for 19 of 24 residents reviewed. These requirements include provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive. This includes a written description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives. Facility policy does not meet requirement for advance planning, affecting all residents including a number of residents in the survey sample. During record review, surveyors noted difficulty locating documentation concerning advance care planning in resident records. Since the facility had changed clinical record software during calendar year 2024, surveyors asked staff for advance care planning documentation for 24 residents in the survey sample. Surveyors received a policy titled Advance Care Planning Meeting Protocol with revision date 10/1/2023. The policy stated under Purpose: It is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team, and/or failed to involve the resident and/or resident representative in planning care, for 5 of 35 sampled residents. Resident #28, Resident #61, Resident #83, Resident #40, and Resident #206. The findings included: 1. For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to review the plan of care after the resident's comprehensive assessment on 3/21/24 and the facility staff failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative, was provided the opportunity to participate in planning care at the facility. Resident #28's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Emphysema, Hypertension, Glaucoma, Anxiety Disorder, Adult Failure to Thrive, Acute Respiratory Failure, Legal Blindness, Depression, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Insomnia. The most recent minimum data set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of medications for 5 of 35 residents, Resident #33, Resident #207, Resident #100, Resident #357, and Resident #20. The findings included: 1. For Resident #33 the facility staff failed to administer the medication gabapentin per the physician's orders. Resident #33's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to hypertension and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #33's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/02/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 11 out of 15 in section C, cognitive status. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #33's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Pain: Resident has potential for pain r/t (related to) generalized discomfort. Interventions for this care plan include Administer pharmacological interventions as indicated per physician and monitor the effectiveness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure one of 24 residents was clinically appropriate for self-administration of medications, Resident #87. The findings included: For Resident #87 the facility staff failed to complete a self-administration of medications assessment. Resident #87's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to stiff-man syndrome, other pulmonary embolism without cor pulmonale, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #87's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/27/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #87's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, albuterol sulfate HFA aerosol inhaler; 90 mcg/actuation; amt: 2 puffs; inhalation. Special instructions: May keep at bedside. Twice a day 9:00, 21:00. This order listed a start date of 07/30/24. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to screen for a mental disorder and/or intellectual disability prior to admission for 2 of 24 sampled residents. Resident #20 and Resident #61. The findings include: 1. For Resident #20, the facility staff failed to obtain a Level I Screening for Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability (ID), or Related Conditions, to determine if the resident had or may have had a MD (Mental Disorder), ID, or related condition prior to admission. Resident #20's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, Type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus, Muscle weakness (generalized), Hyperlipidemia, Encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective disorder, and Phantom limb syndrome with pain. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/30/24, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 10 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered, comprehensive, activity care plan for 1 of 24 sampled residents, Resident #83. The findings included: For Resident #83 the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's mental and psychosocial needs and include the resident's goals, desired outcomes, and preferences for activities. Resident #83's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Epilepsy, Personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), Unspecified convulsions, and Type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus. Resident #83 is on Hospice Services for end-of-life care. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/18/24 indicated in the review of Section C-Cognitive Patterns, that Resident #83 was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered activity program to support resident choice, interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 24 sampled residents, Resident #83. The findings included: For Resident #83, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered, activity program to support resident choice, interests, and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #83's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Epilepsy, Personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), Unspecified convulsions, and Type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus. Resident #83 is on Hospice Services for end-of-life care. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/18/24 indicated in the review of Section C-Cognitive Patterns, that Resident #83 was severely impaired in cognitive decision-making with short &…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate accounting of narcotics for one of 24 residents, Resident #18. The findings included: For Resident #18 the facility staff failed to report and/or account for missing doses of the medication morphine sulfate. Resident #18's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease and pain. Resident #18's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 06/29/24 coded the resident as having both short- and long-term memory problems. Resident #18's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, morphine concentrate-Schedule II solution; 100 mg/5 ml (20 mg/ml); amt: 0.25 ml; oral. Special Instructions: Take 0.25 ml (5mg) by mouth every hour as needed for mild pain or shortness of breath. This order was discontinued on 04/22/24. Resident #18's electronic medication administration records for the months of July-December 2023 and January-April 2024 were reviewed and contained an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and/or act upon pharmacist recommendations for 3 of 24 residents, Resident #4, #51, #48. The findings included: 1. For resident # 4, the facility staff failed to review and act upon a pharmacy recommendation to complete an AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessment for two months. Resident # 4's diagnoses included but were not limited to major depressive disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and dementia with behavior disturbance. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 8/12/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating they had a moderate cognitive impairment. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for resident # 4 was reviewed. Resident had an order for Quetiapine ( an antipsychotic) 25 mg every 12 hours for bipolar disorder. The clinical record was reviewed. A pharmacy consultation report dated 9/13/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 3 of 35 residents was free of significant medication errors, Resident #33, Resident #87, and Resident #206. The findings included: 1. For Resident #33 the facility staff held the blood pressure medication amlodipine without a hold order. Resident #33's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to hypertension and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #33's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/02/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 11 out of 15 in section C, cognitive status. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #33's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, amlodipine tablet; 2.5 mg; amt: 1 tab; Oral. Special Instructions: Give 2.5 mg by mouth one time a day related to essential hypertension. Resident #33's electronic medication administration record for month of August 2024 was reviewed and contained an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to obtain lab testing as ordered by the medical provider for 2 of 35 sampled residents. (Resident #51 and #357). The findings included: 1. For resident # 51 the facility failed to obtain a hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1c) ordered by the primary care provider. Resident # 51's diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus. During a review of the clinical record on 9/12/24, an order to obtain a HgbA1c on 9/2/24 was noted. This surveyor was not able to locate results in the clinical record. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed. The order was on the MAR and scheduled for 9/2/24, the order had not been signed off as done. On 09/12/24 04:04 PM this surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) # 2. They stated, the lab was not done. The physician has been notified and it is scheduled to be done tomorrow. They stated they did not know how the order was missed, I don't know, it was just missed. HgbA1c is a blood test that measures average blood sugar levels over the past two to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, document review, and clinical record review facility staff failed to notify the medical provider and/or a responsible party for related to residents' medication regime for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #100 & #206). 1. For Resident #100, facility staff failed to notify the physician when an anti-hypotensive medication was held. Resident #100 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus, anemia, septicemia, peripheral vascular disease, deep vein thrombosis, orthostatic hypotension, and malnutrition. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. Clinical record review revealed an order for Midodrine 5 milligrams 3 tabs oral every 6 hours. A nursing medication note dated 9/10/2024 18:00 indicated Not Administered: Other Comment: held due to BP of 140/71. The surveyor was unable to locate hold parameters for the medication in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure communication with hospice staff allowed for the timely implementation of resident orders for one (1) of 35 sampled residents (Resident #206). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure communication with hospice allowed for the prompt implementation of an order to discontinue Resident #206's oral morphine. Resident #206's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/25/23, was signed as completed on 7/27/23. Resident #206 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #206 was assessed as having problems with both short-term memory and long-term memory. Resident #206 was assessed as being dependent on others for transfers, dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. The following VERBAL ORDER was found in Resident #206's clinical record (dated 7/7/23 at 2:14 p.m.): Discontinue: effective 7/7/23 - morphine 20 mg/ml oral concentrate; Administer 0.25 milliliter(s) orally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-21 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide one resident (Resident #85) in the survey sample of 35 residents with a notice of transfer to the office of the state Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The findings included: Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anemia, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipdemia, manic depression, end stage renal disease, and bipolar disorder. The facility staff failed to provide a notice of transfer to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman while being discharged to the hospital. A 3/3/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed this resident in the area of Cognitive Patterns - Brief Interview for Mental Status as a (10). In the area of Daily Living this resident was coded as requiring minimum assist with supervision in the areas of dressing, toileting, and eating. Resident #85 was continent of bowel and bladder. A 3/18/21 Care Plan indicated: Resident #85 receives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-21 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #85 with a bed-hold policy prior to transferring to a hospital. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anemia, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipdemia, manic depression, end stage renal disease, and bipolar disorder. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #85 with a bed-hold policy prior to transferring to a hospital. A 3/3/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed this resident in the area of Cognitive Patterns - Brief Interview for Mental Status as a (10). In the area of Daily Living this resident was coded as requiring minimum assist with supervision in the areas of dressing, toileting, and eating. Resident #85 was continent of bowel and bladder. A 3/18/21 Care Plan indicated: Resident #85 receives dialysis and refuses to go to appointments on multiple occasions. Resident have behaviors of cursing, throwing items in room, also noted to make self vomit when not getting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents (Resident #24) in the survey sample who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) receives the necessary services. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #24 had his hair washed and fingernail care was provided. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #24 included but not limited to contracture to the left and right upper arm. Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) a significant changes with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/06/21 coded Resident #24 total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfer, extensive assistance of one with dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #24's comprehensive care plan with a revision date 01/19/20 documented the resident frequently refuses showers (agrees to bed baths) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-21 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, resident, family and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility's staff failed to ensure a resident's emotional well being was managed to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for a resident with an anxiety disorder and a major depressive disorders for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #80), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #80 was originally admitted to the facility 11/19/20, and had never been discharged from the facility. Resident #80's diagnoses included; coronary artery disease, chronic diarrhea related to a hemicolectomy (surgical removal of part of the colon), a major depressive disorder and an anxiety disorder. The quarterly discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/28/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #80's cognitive abilities for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 35 residents in the survey sample (Resident #67 and #16) received physician ordered medications. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #67 received physician ordered medication (Maalox vixcous Lidocaine, Benadryl 1:1:1: max sign 10 ml) on 06/11, 06/12, 06/13, 06/14, 06/15, and 06/16/21. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx, unspecified, Dysphagia and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/19/2021 was not coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #67 as requiring limited assistance of 1 with dressing and personal hygiene, extensive assistance of 1 with bed mobility and toilet use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff to ensure reasonable accommodation of need for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #24) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #24 was assessed for the correct call light device. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #24 included but not limited to contracture to the left and right upper arm. Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) a significant changes with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/06/21 coded Resident #24's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 10 out of a possible score of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #24 total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfer, extensive assistance of one with dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #24's comprehensive care plan with a revision date 06/16/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to assist one resident (Resident #85) in the survey sample of 35 residents to obtain his Federal Internal Revenue Service Stimulus funds. The findings included: Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anemia, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipdemia, manic depression, end stage renal disease, and bipolar disorder. The facility staff failed to assist Resident #85 in obtaining his Federal Internal Revenue Service Stimulus funds. A 3/3/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed this resident in the area of Cognitive Patterns - Brief Interview for Mental Status as a (10). In the area of Daily Living this resident was coded as requiring minimum assist with supervision in the areas of dressing, toileting, and eating. Resident #85 was continent of bowel and bladder. A 3/18/21 Care Plan indicated: Resident #85 receives dialysis and refuses to go to appointments on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure that 2 of 35 residents in the survey sample were afforded the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive upon admission, Residents' #63 and #84. The findings included: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Pleural Effusion. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an admission 5 day with an Assessment Reference Date(ARD) of 5/5/21. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #63 was coded as a 9 out of a possible 15, which indicates the resident was moderately cognitively impaired but capable of some daily decision making. Resident #63's Physician Orders were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: Order Summary: Full Code Order Date: 5/20/2021 A review of Resident #63's medical record evidenced no Advance Directive documentation. On 6/16/21 at 12:15 P.M. a phone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of new order and a change in condition for one of 35 residents in the survey sample; Resident # 38. The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) post stroke, high blood pressure, chronic pain syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #38's most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/24/21. Resident #38 was coded as being severely impaired in cognitive function on the Staff Assessment for Mental Status. Review of Resident #38's clinical record revealed that she was evaluated by the NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 6/14/21 at 12:35 p.m. The assessment documented the following: Pt (Patient) is a 63 y/o (year old) black female with a past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide reasonable care for the protection of residents' property from loss for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #53) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #53 was originally admitted to the facility 04/28/21 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Aspiration Pneumonia and Lung Abscess. The admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/04/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of 15. This indicated Resident #53 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one person with bathing, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Requiring supervision of one person physical assistance with eating, locomotion on and off the unit. A review of Resident's Care plan reveal the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to report a suspected abuse allegation within the required time frame after the allegation was made for 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #16. The findings included: Resident #16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Palliative Care and Pain Syndrome. The significant change, annual quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/24/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 6 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #16 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility and transfers. Requires extensive assistance of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to send a copy of the Resident's Care Plan for two residents (Resident #76 and Resident #38) after being transferred to the hospital. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to send Resident #76's care plan to include their goals when discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #76 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #76 included but not limited to Dementia. Resident #76's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/19/21 coded Resident #76 with short and long-term memory problems and cognitive skills severely impaired-never/rarely made decisions. The Discharge MDS assessments was dated for 03/13/21 - discharge return anticipated. Resident #76 was re-admitted to the nursing facility on 03/16/21. On 03/13/21, according to the facility's documentation, Resident #76 was observed lying on the floor beside the bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide evidence that one out of 35 sampled residents was invited to attend a care plan meeting on 5/18/21, Resident #54. The findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage 3, adult failure to thrive, and personal history of mental and behavioral disorders. Resident #54's most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/7/21. Resident #54 was coded as being moderately impaired in cognitive function scoring 11 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. On 6/15/21 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #54. Resident #54 had stated that he wasn't sure why he was still in the facility and why (Name of Social Service Agency)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure medication order was correctly transcribed for 1 resident (Resident #67) and the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for Neurontin (Gabapentin) for 1 resident (Resident #16) of 35 residents in the survey sample. Resident #16 should have received Neurontin 100 mg TID (Three Times a Day) but was given Neurontin 300 mg TID. The findings included: 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx, unspecified, Dysphagia and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/19/2021 was not coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #67 as requiring limited assistance of 1 with dressing and personal hygiene, extensive assistance of 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure that a physician order for daily weights was carried out for 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample, Residents' #63. The findings included: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Pleural Effusion. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an admission 5 day with an Assessment Reference Date(ARD) of 5/5/21. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #63 was coded as a 9 out of a possible 15, which indicates the resident was moderately cognitively impaired but capable of some daily decision making. Resident #63's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: Discharge Orders: Diet: Cardiac Diet, daily weight. Resident #63's Physician Orders were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: Order Summary: Weigh Resident Daily every day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents (Resident #24) in the survey sample who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) receives the necessary services to maintain toenail care. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that podiatry services was provided to Resident #24. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #24 included but not limited to Chronic Pain Syndrome. Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) a significant changes with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/06/21 coded Resident #24's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 10 out of a possible score of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #24 total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and transfer, extensive assistance of one with dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility's staff failed to ensure the resident was not left in fecal matter for extended periods of time for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #80) surveys, in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #80 was originally admitted to the facility 11/19/20, and had never been discharged from the facility. Resident #80's diagnoses included; coronary artery disease, chronic diarrhea related to a hemicolectomy (surgical removal of part of the colon), a major depressive disorder and an anxiety disorder. The quarterly discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/28/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #80's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. Section D (Mood) stated the resident wasn't assessed and Section E (Behavior) for coded for no behaviors. Section G was coded for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The findings included: The request for the (RN) weekend coverage for a 60-day lookback was requested on 06/16/21 at 8:32 a.m., 06/17/21 at 8:05 a.m., and again on 06/17/21 at 1:27 p.m. The RN weekend coverage documents for a 60-day lookback was received on 06/21/21 at approximately 6:32 a.m. After reviewing the staffing documentation during a 60-day lookback indicated the following: 1.) On 05/22/21, RN #3 worked a total of 7.25 hours out of a scheduled 8 hour shift. 2.) On 05/23/21, RN #3 worked a total of 4.5 hours out of a scheduled 8 hours shift. A pre-exit conference was conducted with the [NAME] President of Operations and Regional Director of Clinical Services on 06/21/21 at approximately 9:30 a.m. When asked, What is the facility's expectation for RN weekend coverage, the Regional Director stated, To provide 8 hours of RN coverage on the weekends.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure the physician reviewed pharmacy recommendation for 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #18. The findings included: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #18 was discharged to the hospital on 4/22/2021 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Unspecified. Resident #18's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/26/2021 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 05 indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #18 as requiring supervision with setup help only with eating, limited assistance of 1 with walk in room, walk in corridor, extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food at a palatable temperature. The findings included: On 6/15/21 at 11:25 a.m. tray line was observed with OSM #5 , the dietary cook. The main entree was pizza which was temped at 150 degrees Fahrenheit. The alternate entree was a salmon patty. This food item was not temped at tray line. There were no plate warmers observed being used during tray line. On 6/15/21 at 12:16 p.m., at the end of tray line; a test tray was requested. On 6/15/21 at 12:19 p.m., the last cart was brought to the last hallway (100 hall). On 6/15/21 at 12:39 p.m., the test tray was conducted with another surveyor and OSM #5, the dietary cook. The main entree pizza, dropped to a temperature of 92 degrees Fahrenheit. The alternate main entree, salmon patty dropped to a temperature of 86 degrees Fahrenheit. The above food items were not palatable due to temperature. There were no concerns with the additional food items on the test tray. On 6/15/21 at 12:40 p.m., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices during incontinence care observation for one of 35 sampled residents; Resident #37. The findings included: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to stroke, atrial fibrillation, anemia, contracture of the left hip, knee and ankle, and right hip, knee and ankle. Resident #37's most recent MDS (Minimum data Set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/21/21. Resident #37 was coded as being severely impaired in cognitive function scoring 01 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #37 was coded as requiring total dependence from two plus staff with bed mobility and toileting; and total dependence on one staff with transfers. Resident #37 was coded as being frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and a review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to designate at least one qualified Infection Preventionist. The findings included: On 6/15/21 at approximately 4:37 PM an email was sent to ASM #2 requesting proof of IP (Infection Preventionist) training. On 6/15/21 at 5:12 PM ASM #2 responded via email. I will work on this and get it to you soon. According to ASM #2 the DON (Director of Nursing) was also the IP, but left the facility abruptly on 6/17/21. She also stated that the ADON (Acting Director of Nursing) was seeking training in Infection Prevention. On 6/21/21 at approximately 5:31 PM., the above findings were shared with ASM (Administrative Staff Member/Regional Director of Clinical Services) #2 and with ASM #4 concerning the Infection Preventionist (IP) Training Completion Certificate. The ASM #2 stated, The former DON (Director of Nursing) may not give me a copy of her training certificate. She walked out the other night. I have a certificate. I received the training around 2019. I'm at the facility two or three days a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program for the facility kitchen. The findings included: On 6/15/21 at 11:00 a.m., observation of the facility kitchen was conducted. At 11:06 a.m. OSM (Other Staff Member) #8, the dietary aide was observed sweeping a pile of cockroaches; approximately 15 roaches. Some roaches were dead while others were living and on their backs moving their legs. When asked how many roaches were in her pile; OSM #8 stated that it was at least 15 of them. OSM #8 stated that she has always seen roaches in the kichen but never like this. OSM #8 stated that the roaches had been mostly found under the three compartment sink and she finally had the time to sweep them up. OSM #8 stated that they were under the sink since 5:30 a.m. that morning when she first arrived to her shift. On 6/15/21 at 11:09 a.m., OSM #9, the cook stated that maintenance had added two plugs (Pest Repellers) to the outlets on Monday 6/14/21. OSM #9 stated that he believed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that comprehensive care plan goals were sent upon transfer to the hospital for 4 of 59 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #89, #112, #74 and #101. The findings included: 1. Resident #89 was a [AGE] year old who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Failure. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/4/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicates that Resident #89 has short and long term memory recall and is severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The facility Discharge Report dated 1/1/19 through 5/31/19 for Resident #89 was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: Hospital: 1/29/19 Hospital: 2/14/19 Hospital: 2/25/19 Hospital: 3/27/19 Hospital: 4/25/19 Hospital: 5/29/19 On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that the bed hold policy was provided to the resident or resident representative upon transfer to the hospital for 6 of 59 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #89, #112, #74, #1, #101 and #461. The findings included: 1. Resident #89 was a [AGE] year old who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Failure. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/4/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated that Resident #89 has short and long term memory recall and is severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #89 MDS history was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: 1/29/19- Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated, Unplanned. 2/4/19- Re-Entry from Acute Hospital. 2/14/19-Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-07-26 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and documentation review, it was determined that facility staff failed to complete and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for three of 59 residents (Resident #27, #66 and #92) in the survey sample. The findings include: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the nursing facility on 12/15/2018. Diagnoses included but not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease and Muscle Weakness. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly revision MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/07/19 coded the resident with a 14 of a total possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated that Resident #27's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. A Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section A, A1600-Entry Date of 12/15/18. Section A, A1700 Reads: Type of Entry: Admission. A review of the Resident #27's Baseline care plan in the clinical record read the following: Most Recent admission: [DATE]. Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for 4 residents ( Resident #3, Resident #74, #83, #31) of 59 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was on Hospice. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Chronic Pain Syndrome and Osteonecrosis Left Femur. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment protocol) was a significant change in status assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/12/2019. The MDS coded the resident with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #3 as requiring extensive assistance of 1 for eating, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene, extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility and total dependence of 1 for bathing. On 07/25/2019 Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, family member interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide foot nail care and/or podiatry services for four of 59 residents in the survey sample (Resident #27, #66, #43 and #12 ). The findings include: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the nursing facility on 12/15/2018. Diagnoses included but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease and Diabetes Mellitus. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly revision MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/07/19 coded the resident with a 14 of a total possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated Resident #27's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 07/25/19 at approximately 12:44 PM an observation of Resident #27's feet was made with assistance from LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #9. The Resident's toenails on both feet were thick and yellow. Resident and Resident Representative (RP) was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure food was labeled and dated in the kitchen refrigerator. The findings included: During the initial tour of the Kitchen on 07/24/19 at approximately 11:00 a.m. the following were observed in the kitchen refrigerator: 1. One small container of beets- with initials DR (staff member initials). 2. Dietary staff lunch box found in refrigerator. 3. One 15 pound pork not labeled or dated. 4. One container of Moderately Thicken Sweet Tea exp. 1/15/20 was opened with no open date written on container. 5. One container of Mildly Thicken Sweet teas exp. 11/05/19. was opened with no date written on container. On 07/24/19 at 3:50 PM a brief interview was conducted with the Regional Dietitian, (Other Staff #3) and Dietary [NAME] (Other Staff #10) concerning the above findings. They were asked what should have been done. Other Staff #10, stated I should have labeled and put the dates on opened containers. On 07/26/19 at approximately,5:35 PM, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure annual review of the antibiotic stewardship and infection control policies; and failed to ensure staff wear the appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for contact precautions for one of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12. The findings included: 1. On 07/26/2019 at approximately 1:30 p.m., the Surveyor met with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to review the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The Surveyor requested a copy of the Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy. On 07/26/2019 at approximately 5:00 p.m., the ADON provided a copy of the, Infection Control Policy dated with an effective date of May 2015 to the Surveyor. The Surveyor asked the ADON if she could provide a copy of the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program Policy which was provided and dated with an effective date of April 16, 2018. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, documentation review, and complaint investigation, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by insects, including roaches and ants, in the kitchen, resident rooms and hallways. The findings Included: 1. The facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food in an insect free environment. On 07/24/19, at approximately 11:00 AM during the initial inspection of the kitchen, the dietary staff were asked if they had roaches in the kitchen. Dietary Staff #10, stated Yes. No live cock roaches were seen in the kitchen by surveyor. On 07/25/19, day 2 of the kitchen inspection, at approximately 11:00 AM., while inspecting the dry storage area, seven (7) dead cockroaches were seen on the floor located underneath the shelving in the dry storage area. The Regional Dietician (Other Staff #13) was present. She confirmed that they were dead cockroaches. A review of the Sanitation/Inspection and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff to ensure reasonable accommodation of need and preferences for the use of a bariatric shower bed for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #100) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #100 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #100 included but are not limited to *Morbid (severe) obesity. Resident #100's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/11/19 coded the resident with a 13 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #100 total dependent of two with bathing and toileting, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. An interview was conducted with Resident #100 on 7/24/19 at approximately 11:30 a.m. Resident #100 stated, I have not had a shower since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a clean comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12 and #56. The findings include: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to atrial fibrillation, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident #12's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/26/19. Resident #12 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. On 7/24/19 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #12. Resident #12 had stated that she was afraid of the roaches that were in her room. Resident #12 stated that she liked to leave her bathroom light on during the night to prevent the roaches from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to complete each required section of an MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 out of 59 residents (Resident #41) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to complete the required section of Resident #41's quarterly MDS: section C-Brief Interview for Mental Status. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #41 included but are not limited to *Alzheimer's disease. Review of the most recent quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/31/19 revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) was not completed. Under (C0100) Section C, should the Brief Interview for Mental Status be conducted, the MDS was coded as Yes. Further review of section (C0100) showed evidence that Section (C0100) was not completed. Under Section C (C0600) asks if the staff assessment for mental status be conducted, the MDS was coded No. An interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for blood sugar monitoring on 07/05/19 for 1 (Resident #27) of 59 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: Resident #27 was admitted to the nursing facility on 12/15//2018. Diagnosis included but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus and End Stage Renal Disease. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly revision MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/07/19 coded the resident with a 14 of a total possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). This indicated Resident #27's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. Section I, Metabolic,12900 of the MDS indicated that Resident #27 had Diabetes Mellitus. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2019 was conducted. On 07/05/2019 at 1130 physicians order included: Novolin R solution 100 unit/ML (Insulin Regular Human) inject as per sliding scale however, no blood sugar reading was evidenced. An X was placed in the box for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for two of 59 residents in the survey sample (Residents #31 and #89); and failed to administer oxygen per physician's order for Resident #31. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to pneumonia, muscle weakness, and Alzheimer's disease. Resident #31's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with and ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/10/19. Resident #31 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #31's clinical record revealed that he was diagnosed with pneumonia on 7/20/19. The following orders were documented: 1) 02 (oxygen) continuous via NC (nasal cannula) at 2 L (liters)/min (minute) every shift. 2) Levofloxacin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure an ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 of 59 resident in the survey sample, Resident #73. The findings included: Resident #73 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease and Type II Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a Quarterly assessment with a Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #73 was a 10 out of a possible 15 indicating the resident had mild cognitive impairment but was capable of some daily decision making. Under Section O Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs Resident #73 was coded as receiving Dialysis Services. Resident #73's current Physician Orders were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: May attend dialysis on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHG AUTUMN, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/01/2016 |
| OHL ASSET (VA) SUFFOLK LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| JACKSON, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/28/2022 |
| MOTLEY, STERLING | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2023 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2021 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
| SHG MT, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/07/2026 |
| WALKER & ASSOCIATES PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
| HUGHES, CANDICE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.