Riverside Health & Rehab Center
100 8th Street, McKeesport, PA 15132 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (412) 664-8860 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $35,138 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.6% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 29.4% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.4% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.3%CMS range 39.2–67.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.2–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 80.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 80.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.2–13.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 104.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility review of policy, manufacturer's instructions, clinical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) resulting in immediate jeopardy for 14 of 22 residents (R6, R8, R22, R32, R38, R39, R44, R56, R57, R59, R65, R79, R150, R195). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Diabetic Protocol dated 1/2/24, indicated provider and staff will work together to give appropriate treatment to manage diabetes. The provider will follow up on any acute episodes associated with significant blood glucose level changes and deterioration of previous glucose control and document resident status at subsequent visits until the acute situation is resolved. The staff will identify and report complications such as hypoglycemia. Review of the facility Hypoglycemia Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated nursing personnel are responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and date food, clean and sanitize food service items/dishes, and maintain cleanliness in the Main Kitchen.Findings include:Review of the Dietary Services policy, Sanitation dated 9/12/25, indicated food and nutrition services staff will maintain a clean and sanitary environment in food services areas through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. During an observation of the Main Kitchen on 1/6/26, at 9:05 a.m. revealed the following:-Dishwasher was not reaching temperature to effectively sanitize.-Plate warmer was not operational.-Hole in the ceiling related to a pipe burst. Hole was covered with plastic and pipe was fixed.-Styrofoam was being used to serve the residents. During an interview at this time, Dietary Manager Employee E40 confirmed that they were using Styrofoam to serve the residents due to the dishwasher and plate warmer not being in working order.During a second observation of the Main Kitchen on 1/7/26, at 1:48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide concern forms assessable to resident's and visitor's from a wheelchair on one of six nursing units (700 Hall Memory Unit), failed to have a grievance box and forms accessible for four of four grievance boxes (Front Hall, Activities Room, Nurses Station 1, and Nurses Station 2) and failed to provide residents with the grievance official contact information (name, business address, email address, and business telephone number) for three of four grievance boxes (Nurses Station 1, Nurses Station 2, and 700 Hall Memory Unit).Findings include:A review of facility policy Resident Grievances and Concerns dated 9/12/25, indicated the facility recognizes that residents have the right to voice grievances to the facility, or other agencies or entities that hear grievances, without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The facility will make available to all residents via a posting in a prominent location in the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were accurate and fully completed for seven of thirteen residents (Resident R1, R50, R89, R94, R95, R103, and R114).Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated October 2025, indicated that Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, or it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. Section D: Mood, Question D0100 Should Resident Mood Interview Be Conducted? should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, and or it should be coded 1, and the assessment should be completed if the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain controlled substances were accounted for accurately for seven of thirteen residents (Resident R1, R5, R32, R53, R60, R113, R115).Findings include: Review of the facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 9/12/25, indicated for staff to Document the administration of controlled substances in accordance with applicable law. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/23/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications and medical supplies were properly stored and/or disposed of in two of three medication rooms (700-Hall medication room and [DATE]-Hall medication room).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals dated [DATE], indicated, Facility should ensure medications and biologicals that: (1) have an expired date on the label; (2) have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines; or (3) have been contaminated or deteriorated, are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier.During an observation on [DATE], at 2:18 p.m. of the 700-Hall medication room, the following was noted:(5) Packages of Xeroform with an expiration date of [DATE].(8) Packages of oil emulsion dressings with an expiration date of 05/2023(2) Central Line Dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for two of four quarterly meetings (second and third quarters).Findings Include:Review of Quality assurance and Performance Improvement sign in sheets and attendance records for 2025, failed to reveal a quarterly meeting with at least three other staff, one of whom must be the facility's administrator, owner, board member, or other individual in a leadership role who has knowledge of facility systems and the authority to change those systems.During an interview on 1/8/26, at 12:20 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for two of four quarterly meeting (second and third quarters), as required.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination during medication administration for two of four Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) (Employees E5 and E11).Review of facility General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 9/12/25, indicated, Medications should not come in contact with any surface except for the medication cup and, Facility staff should avoid touching the medication with bare hands when opening a bottle or unit dose package. During an observation on 1/6/26, at approximately 8:30 a.m. LPN Employee E5 was observed opening bottles of over the counter medications, pouring the tablets into the palm of her hand, then placing the tablets in the medication cup. During an observation on 1/8/26, at approximately 9:00 a.m. LPN Employee E1 was observed popping the tablets/capsules from the medication blister packs into the palm of her hand, then placing the tablets in the medication cup. During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on infection control for two of ten staff members Nurse Aide Employee E9 and Dietary Aide Employee E10). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on infection control. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have infection control in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Dietary Employee E10 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have infection control in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on infection control for two of ten staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment and care to promote dignity during medication administration for each resident's quality of life for one of four residents observed (Resident R52).Findings:Review of facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration reviewed 9/12/25, indicated during medication administration, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to the following: 5.6 - Observe each resident's privacy and rights in accordance with applicable law (e.g., knocking before entering the room, pulling privacy curtains, informing resident what is to occur before administration, blocking unnecessary access to the MAR [Medication Administration Record]).Review of facility policy Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities Policy reviewed 9/12/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to comply with all Resident's Rights.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide in a timely manner, notice of Medicare non coverage (payment) for one of three residents (Resident R600).Findings include: The form Notice Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 indicated a Medicare provider/plan must deliver a completed copy of the NOMNC to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing, home health, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, and hospice services. The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end or the second to the last day or services if care is not being provided daily. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R600 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, muscle weakness, and GERD (acid reflux). Resident R600 discharged home with home health services on 12/5/25.During an interview on 1/7/26, at 1:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure equipment was in safe operating condition for one of two crash carts (carts maintained with equipment used in emergencies) (700-Hall crash cart).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Emergency Equipment Check Policy dated 9/12/25, indicated, Emergency equipment/cart[s] will be checked daily and items which are outdated or opened will be replaced. During an observation on 1/6/26, at 2:30 p.m. of the Emergency Cart located in the 700-Hall medication room, the following was noted:(3) Yankauer with an expiration date of 2/28/24.(1) Dressing Change Kits with an expiration date of 3/20/25.(1) Central Line Dressing Change Kit with an expiration date of 1/31/24.(1) IV Start Kit with an expiration date of 6/30/25.(1) Luer Lock Y-Sites with an expiration date of 4/13/22.(1) Bottles of sterile normal saline with an expiration date of 9/1/25.(2) Bottles of sterile normal saline with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, staff education records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of five nurse aides (Nurse Aide Employees E8 and E9).Findings include:Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have 12 hours of in-service education:NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 7/1/23, with 4.10 hours of in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25.NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/1/23, with 0.00 hours of in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25.During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of five nurse aides.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician wrote, signed, and dated progress notes at each visit for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Clostridium difficile (C. diff - highly contagious bacterium that causes diarrhea and colitis), diabetes, and high blood pressure. Resident R1 was on respite (provides short-term relief for primary caregivers, giving them time to rest, travel, or spend time with other family and friends) stay for seven days.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was seen by the wound doctor on 10/13/25, with the following orders:Wound #1 Left, Plantar Foot: Cleanse Wound. Cleanse with 0.125% Dakin's Solution - and pat dry. Pack undermining, areas and wound bed with kling, cutting only once and leaving tail end visible out of wound bed. Cover with ABD and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included dialysis care and interventions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for three of seven residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3).Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included dialysis care and interventions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for three of seven residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: The facility policy Interim/Baseline-Care Plans reviewed 1/13/25, indicated a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed within forty-eight hours of the resident's admission. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe kidney damage requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for three of six residents (Residents R1, R3, and R4).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hemodialysis Care Policy dated 1/13/25, indicates pre -dialysis process includes document assessment in the dialysis communication tool. Post-dialysis process includes receive report from dialysis provider and/or review dialysis communication tool documentation by dialysis provider.Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/8/25, diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe kidney damage requiring dialysis), hypertension, and heart failure. Review of Resident R1's physician orders dated 8/15/25, indicated dialysis: at [Dialysis Center], Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was in proper working order in the Main Kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 7/8/25, of the noon meal, it was noted that all the residents received their meals in Styrofoam containers and cups. During an observation on 7/8/25, of the Main Kitchen it was noted that the drainage sink of the dishwasher had standing water in it. During an interview on 7/8/25, at 1:10 p.m. Dietary Employee E1 confirmed that the dishwasher had been inoperable since Saturday morning (7/5/25), and that on Saturday and Sunday (7/5/25, 7/6/25), dietary employees had been washing dishes by hand. During an interview on 7/8/25, at 1:12 p.m. Dietary Manager confirmed she was not aware that the dishwasher was inoperable until the morning of 7/7/25, and she directed staff to use Styrofoam containers and cups. At this time, Dietary Manager Employee E2 confirmed that the facility administration was aware of the dishwasher was not working. Dietary Manager Employee E2 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate injuries during care for and an injury of unknown origin possible neglect for three of four residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, indicated it is that facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation of residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/10/25, included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and dementia. Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident R1 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG: Functional Abilities indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of observations and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for three of five of residents (R4, R5, and R6). The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. Scores from a BIMS assessment suggests the following distributions: 13 - 15: cognitively intact 8 - 12: moderately impaired 0 - 7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/13/25, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for two of four residents (Resident R1 and R2). Review of the facility policy, Fall Management dated 1/2/24, indicated if risks are identifed, preventative measures will be put in place and care planned. All falls will be reviewed and investigated. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/10/25, included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat) and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident R1 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG: Functional Abilities indicated Resident R1 utilized a walker and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative of changes in condition for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility, Resident Change in Condition Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated The physician/provider and resident/family/responsible party will be notified when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/10/25, included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat) and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident R1 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of an incident report dated 6/14/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician ordered follow-up MRI Scan for one of three residents reviewed with brain cancer (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included a Glioblastoma removal with a craniotomy from a traumatic brain injury. Resident R1 had developed behaviors s/p the craniotomy and required constant monitoring, he was placed on the MIU(Memory care unit) of the facility as the resident also been exit seeking. Review of the clinical record indicated that on 4/30/25, Resident R1 had been sent to the hospital due to increased unsteadiness on his feet and a change in condition. Review of the clinical record indicated that on 5/7/25, Resident R1 returned to the facility with and order for a MRI on May 9, 2025. Resident R1's wife gave the paperwork and information to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for six of 24 residents (Resident R67, R147, R148, R153, R248, and R249). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission. Resident R67 had an admission date of 12/4/24, with an MDS completion date of 1/8/25. Resident R147 had an admission date of 12/2/24, with an MDS completion date of 1/11/25. Resident R148 had an admission date of 12/20/24, with an MDS not completed as of 1/13/25. Resident R153 had an admission date of 11/29/24, with an MDS completion date of 1/5/25. Resident R248 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that that quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic review of resident care needs) assessments were completed within the required time frame for three of eight residents reviewed (Resident R44, R52, and R76). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments, dated October 2023, indicated that quarterly MDS assessments were to be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Resident R44 had an ARD of 12/5/24, with an MDS completion date of 1/7/25. Resident R52 had an ARD of 12/18/24, with the MDS not completed as of 1/13/25. Resident R76 had an ARD of 12/5/24, with an MDS completion date of 1/7/25. During an interview on 1/8/24, at 1:35 p.m. the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) Employee E9 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise/update care plans for two of eight residents to accurately reflect the current status of the resident (Residents R5 and R195). Findings include: Review of facility Comprehensive Care Planning Policy dated 1/13/25, previously reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that in cases of significant changes in the resident's condition, the care plan must be updated within seven days of the new MDS. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/4/24, indicated the diagnoses of Alzheimer ' s disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue), and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function). Review of Resident R5's physician order dated 6/11/24, indicated to that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documentation, cited deficiencies from previous surveys, review of plan of correction documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program failed to correct previously cited deficiencies. This has the potential to affect 26 of 84 residents. Finding include: Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy dated 1/13/2025, indicated objectives of the QAPI program include providing a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators and to establish systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective actions involving all levels of the organization. The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending 1/5/24, revealed the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included diabetes care and interventions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for four of fourteen residents (Resident R22, R32, R44, R150, and R195) . Finding include: The facility policy Baseline-Care Plans reviewed 1/2/24, indicated a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed within forty-eight hours of the resident's admission. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood). Review of Resident R22's baseline care plan completed on 1/11/25, indicated the resident has not been care planned for diabetes. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident R32's baseline care plan completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for five of fourteen residents (R22, R32, R44, R150, R195). Finding include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions or completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions for Section V Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary, Questions V0200: For each triggered Care Area, indicate whether a new care plan, care plan revision, or continuation of current care plan is necessary to address the problem(s) identified in your assessment of the care area. The Care Planning Decision column must be completed within 7 days of completing the RAI (MDS and CAA(s)). Check column B if the triggered care area is addressed in the care plan. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, documentation and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for Legionella (bacteria that causes disease found in contaminated water) control, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive program for water management to monitor the potential development and spread of Legionella and failed to implement control measures for Legionella within the facility for ten of twelve months (April 2024 through January 2025). Finding include: Review of the facility policy Legionella Assessment and Prevention Program dated 1/13/25, previously dated 1/2/24, indicated the facility will utilize water management practices to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems. Core Elements of the Water Management Plan are: 1. Establish Water Management Plan team. 2. Describe Center's water system using text and flow diagram. 3. Risk assessment with control methods and corrective actions. 4. Monitoring control measures. 5. Corrective actions. 6. Verification and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and investigate incidents of possible neglect and abuse for two of three residents (Residents R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse/ Neglect, last reviewed on 1/2/24, with a previous review date of 4/21/23, indicated that it is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, etc. Facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator. The Administrator will immediately begin an investigation and notify the applicable local and state agencies in accordance with the procedures in this policy. Review of the facility Event Summary Report, dated from 1/1/24 through 3/31/24, indicated Resident R1 had a fall while receiving care when Resident R1 rolled out of bed with no injuries identified on 2/21/24. Review of the incident report dated 2/21/24, indicated Resident R1 kept rolling during incontinence care and slid onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain significant medications are administered as ordered by the physician for one of four residents (Resident R3). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Medication Administration last reviewed on 1/2/24, with a previous review date of 4/21/23, indicated to administer medications as prescribed by the provider. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included syncope, muscle weakness and rheumatoid arthritis (the body's immune system attacks its own tissue, mainly in the hands and feet). A review of the MDS(Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/15/2024, indicated the diagnoses remain current. A review of a physician order dated 2/14/2024, indicated to give Hydroxychloroquine (immunosuppressive) oral tablet 200 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth every twelve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documents, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 16 of 25 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, and R16). Findings Include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 1/2/24, indicated the facility will provide necessary person-centered care and services. During an observation on 2/17/24, at 12:13 p.m., Resident R1 had unkempt, greasy appearing hair. Resident R1 was eating lunch, still wearing a gown. During an interview and observation on 2/17/24, at 12:16 p.m., when asked if there were enough nursing staff to care for the residents, Resident R2 stated that she had no concerns. Observation at this time revealed Resident R2 to be still wearing a gown while eating lunch, slumped to her left side, leaning against her enabler bar. Resident R2's meal cover was still on her food,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for eight of eight residents reviewed (Resident R5, R6, R44, R57, R65, R70, R76, R188). Findings include: A review of the facility Advance Directives Protocol reviewed January 2023 and 1/2/24, indicated upon admission advance directives will be discussed with the resident and/or resident representative to determine is any advance directives have been chosen. Advance directives will be reviewed at minimum annually according to MDS (Minimum Data Set - mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) schedule. A review of the medical record indicated Resident R5 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (gradual and progressive brain disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to make certain residents were notified of the procedure for filing a grievance, failed to have grievance boxes and forms labeled for resident use on one of three nursing units (200/300/400 hall), and failed to make certain the current grievance official's name and contact information was posted. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Grievances and Concerns Policy reviewed January 2023 and 1/2/24, indicated the facility recognizes that residents have the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. The facility will make available to all residents via posting in a prominent location in the facility contact information for the grievance official. During a resident group interview conducted on 1/4/24, at 1:00 p.m., seven residents were asked if they knew how to file a grievance or a concern and how they would file anonymously, five of seven residents were unclear on how to file a grievance, and they did not know who the current grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels and failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose), for five of seven Residents (Residents R6, R44, R57, R65, and R236). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) center for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R57, and R239). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hemodialysis Care Policy last reviewed on January 2023 and 1/2/24, indicated communication between the hemodialysis provider and facility staff will occur before and after each hemodialysis treatment and as needed. Post-dialysis information will include: vital signs, post-treatment weight, lab draws and/or results, medications administered during or after treatment, any new orders, and any additional alerts or information. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R57 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage kidney disease (the kidneys…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to respect residents' rights in the handling and protection of their personal property and clothing for one of three residents reviewed. (Residents R188). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities reviewed January 2023 and 1/2/24, indicated it is the facility's policy to comply with all Resident Rights, and to communicate these rights to residents. The Nursing Home Reform Act established the following rights for nursing home residents: -The right to freedom from abuse, mistreatment, and neglect; -The right to freedom from physical restraints; -The right to privacy; -The right to accommodation of medical, physical, psychological, and social needs; -The right to participate in resident and family groups; -The right to be treated with dignity; -The right to exercise self-determination; -The right to communicate freely; -The right to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents reviewed was free from misappropriation (Resident R188) Findings included: Review of the facility policy Pennsylvania Resident Abuse reviewed January 2023 and 1/2/24, indicated the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property by anyone. Misappropriation is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. The facility will contact the police for any allegation of misappropriation of resident property. Review of the facility policy Personal Belongings Policy reviewed January 2023 and 1/2/24, indicated the facility will ensure each resident has the right to retain and to use personal possessions while residing in facility. Staff will inventory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet care needs for two of 24 residents (Residents R10 and R12). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning dated January 2023, indicated an interdisciplinary care plan will be established for every resident and updated in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. Review of facility policy Psychotropic Gradual Dose Reduction dated January 2023, indicated once the inter-disciplinary team has completed the Psychopharmacologic Review Form, a plan of care will be developed to include specific non-pharmacological interventions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set-Resident Assessment and Care Screening) dated 8/3/23, indicated diagnoses of dementia and heart failure. A review of Section O, Special Treatments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that showers were consistently provided for two of six residents (Resident R31, and R65). Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Bath/Showering/Scheduling Policy dated January 2023, indicated each resident will be asked about their bathing preference and will be scheduled to receive bathing a minimum of two times per week unless they prefer less frequent baths. The facility will maintain a bathing/showering schedule for each unit. Review of Resident R31's admission record indicated that Resident R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder (decreased mental function and loss of ability to do daily tasks), diabetes, and obesity. Review of Resident R31's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/22/23, indicated that diagnoses remain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, facility provided documents and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of an elopement to the State Survey Agency within five working days for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Incident/Accident Policy last reviewed on 6/21/22, informed an incident/accident is any occurrence which is not consistent with the routine care of a particular resident. Any required regulatory reporting will be completed. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia (a chronic brain disorder to include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and lack of motivation), diabetes, intellectual disabilities (a problem with mental ability that affects learning, problem solving, judgement, communication, and independent living), and pressure ulcers of the right and left heels. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed develop and implement a base line care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning last reviewed 6/21/22, informed an interim care plan must be developed within 48 hours of admission to ensure that the resident's needs are met appropriately until the comprehensive care plan is completed. A comprehensive care plan must be developed by the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment (Minimum Data Set (MDS) - a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes that helps to identify a resident's functional capabilities and health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided documents, resident clinical record, alarm contractor documentation, staff interviews, and staff witness statements, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision to an elopement risk resident, and to maintain mechanical and electrical equipment in a safe operating condition creating the opportunity for the elopement of a one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Elopement/Unauthorized Absence Policy last reviewed 6/21/22, informed the facility will identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization and/or any necessary supervision to do so. All residents will be assessed for the risk of elopement using the [NAME] Elopement Assesment on admission, quarterly, and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-05 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and document a physician's discharge order for four of five residents discharged (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4). Finding include: Review of the facility Discharge/Transfer Documentation Check List Guide for Nursing and Social Services policy dated 7/1/23, indicated transfers to the ER/ED (emergency room/emergency department) must include an order to transfer, and for routine discharges to home, another facility or assisted living, a discharge order is obtained from the physician. Discharges must be documented in the progress notes. Review of Resident R1's face sheet indicated an admission date of 6/23/23, with diagnoses that included dementia and heart disease. Review of Resident R1's Discharge Summary indicated the resident was discharged to another facility on 7/19/23. Review of Resident R1's clinical record did not include a physician order, or a progress note to discharge from the facility on 7/19/23. Review of Resident R2's face sheet indicated an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-08 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for two of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents R1 and R102). Findings Include: Review of federal regulation S483.15(d) Notice of Bed-Hold Policy, indicated, facilities must provide written information about these policies to residents prior to and upon transfer for such absences. This information must be provided to all facility residents, regardless of their payment source. These provisions require facilities to issue two notices related to bed-hold policies. The first notice could be given well in advance of any transfer, i.e., information provided in the admission packet. Reissuance of the first notice would be required if the bed-hold policy under the State plan or the facility's policy were to change. The second notice must be provided to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-08 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for three of ten staff members (Employee E8, E9, and E10).Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on resident rights. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E8 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Dietary Employee E10 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for three of ten staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-08 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for three of ten staff members (Employee E8, E9, and E10).Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on QAPI. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E8 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Dietary Employee E10 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI for three of ten staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-08 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on compliance and ethics for three of ten staff members (Nurse Aide Employees E8 and E9, and Dietary Employee E10).Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on compliance and ethics. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E8 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Dietary Employee E10 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on compliance and ethics for three of ten staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-08 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for three of ten staff members (Nurse Aide Employees E8 and E9 and Dietary Aide Employee E10).Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on behavioral health. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E8 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. Dietary Employee E10 had a hire date of 7/1/23, failed to have compliance and behavioral health education between 7/1/24, and 7/1/25. During an interview on 1/8/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for three of ten staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$35,138 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $29,845 — penalty dated 2025-01-13
- $5,293 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2023 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2023 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| BROOKS, GLENN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2025 |
| MEENAN, CODY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020) | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| BNV DYNASTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| RIVERSIDE RE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/30/2023 |
| RKL LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| WESTERN PA MT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/22/2025 |
| WIW DYNASTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| LUBIN, FRITZ | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $667K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395719. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.