South Boston Health & Rehab Center
103 Rosehill Drive, South Boston, VA 24592 · For profit - Individual · 216 certified beds · (434) 572-4906 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,172 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-04)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.5% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.3% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 20.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.4% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.4% | 14.2% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.3% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.3% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.2%CMS range 34.2–54.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.1–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 216 beds and averages 123.0 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 93 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure the environment was free of accident hazards to prevent residents from exiting the facility without staff knowledge and resulted resulting in one resident (Resident #3- R3) having eloped the facility for an undetermined amount of time. The deficient practice had the potential to affect residents identified at risk for elopement residing on two of the three occupied units, which resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and substandard quality of care. Immediate jeopardy began on 1/17/25 and when removed on 12/4/25, the scope and severity was lowered to a level two, isolated (D). The findings included: On 12/3/25 at 11:45 AM, R3 was observed in the hallway outside of his room and was observed to self-propel his wheelchair without any staff assistance. R3 propelled himself into his room to converse with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-01-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician for a need to alter treatment for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #313. The facility failed to notify the physician that Resident #313 had not received physician ordered IV (intravenous) antibiotics for 5 days, and failed to notify the physician that the IV antibiotic medication was not available for administration, which resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (Level 4-Isolated) on 01/25/2022 at 4:25 PM. Findings include: Resident #313 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #313 included, but were not limited to: cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, hypotension, collapsed vertebrae/fracture, acute kidney failure, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, compression fracture (L-5) secondary to discitis and osteomyelitis, discitis of lumbosacral region, and closed compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (type 2), chronic kidney disease, diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, vascular dementia, left above knee amputation and urinary tract infection. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #88 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. A medication pass observation was conducted on 1/26/22 at 7:41 a.m. with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #11 administering medications to Resident #88. Among the medications administered was metformin 500 mg (milligrams). Resident #88 took the medicines including the metformin orally with water but no food. LPN #11 did not prompt or offer food with the administration of the metformin. Resident #88 did not eat food until breakfast was served over an hour after the metformin administration. A breakfast tray was served to Resident #88 on 1/26/22 at approximately 8:45 a.m. On 1/26/22 at 8:49 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for one resident (Resident #8 - R8) in a survey sample of 10 residents, which resulted in harm for R8. The findings included: On 10/22/24, during an entrance conference conducted at 1:45 p.m., the facility administrator was asked to provide any and all information the facility had with regards to a sexual assault. Following the entrance conference, the facility administrator stated that the incident binder with the facility's investigation and response to the sexual assault had been misplaced following a fire the facility had in August 2023. The administrator provided the surveyor with a binder and stated that it contained the information they had been able to re-create. According to the binder, R8 was the victim and R9 was the alleged perpetrator, identified as Resident #9 (R9). The survey team was also provided with a listing of current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure residents received mail timely and on weekends for three of three nursing units. The findings included: On 5/20/25 at 2:45 p.m., a group interview was conducted with fourteen residents in attendance. During the meeting, multiple residents residing on three of three nursing units, expressed concern and frustration that many times they do not receive mail on Fridays or weekends. One resident said that he doesn't get his Friday newspaper until Monday. On 5/20/25 at 3:27 p.m., an interview was conducted with the activities director (AD). The AD stated that her department is responsible for passing out resident mail. The AD said, On Fridays, the mail has been running later. So, the Saturday person passes it out, or they put the mail in my box, and the part-timer [part-time activity assistant] doesn't know where that is. So, sometimes it is Monday before it is passed out. AD confirmed that there are times that residents do not receive their newspaper from Friday until Monday. On 5/21/25 at 10:31 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to label and store medications properly on three of five medication carts inspected. The findings included: The facility staff was storing new insulin pens in the medication cart and not in the refrigerator per instructions on the label and was not putting an opened date on an eye drop bottle. On 5/20/25 at 3:40 p.m., an observation was made of the three medication carts on unit 300. A registered nurse, RN#1, assisted unlocking medication cart #1 on unit 300. Observed one bottle of eye drops that had no open date on the eye drop bottle. On medication cart #2, observed two unopened insulin pens that were being stored in cart instead of being in the refrigerator, according to the directions on the label. A licensed practical nurse, LPN#4 assisted with unlocking medication cart #3. Observed three insulin pens that were being stored in the medication cart and not in the refrigerator, as the label instructed. On 5/20/25 at 3:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN#1. RN#1 stated that she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. The findings include: On 5/20/25 at 9:04 a.m., accompanied by the dietary manager (other staff #4), the main kitchen was inspected. Stored and available for use in the dry storage area were four 8-quart containers of dry cereal, not in the original packaging. The cereal had no label indicating the date opened or a discard date. There were two partially used packages of gravy mix and an opened package of corn meal with no date label indicating when opened. Eighty-four 8-ounce cartons of whole milk were stored and available for use in the walk-in refrigerator with expiration date of 5/18/25. The 3-compartment since was observed in use with pots/pan soaking in the wash and sanitizer sections of the sink. The dietary manager checked the sanitizer concentration at this time with the concentration measured at 100 ppm (parts per million). There was no supply of sanitizer connected to the sink pump at this observation. The dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement an infection control program that included infection surveillance, affecting residents on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: On 5/21/25 at 3 p.m., an interview and meeting was conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP), who was designated as the responsible person over the infection control program. Review of the facility's infection control management program and documentation revealed that the facility only a system of tracking residents who had infections treated with an antibiotic and completed logs titled, Antibiotic Use Tracking Sheet. The IP confirmed that no logs had been completed for the current month of May as it was their process and is only done as a look-back after the end of the month. The IP also confirmed that residents who develop signs or symptoms of infection are not tracked, only if they are prescribed an antibiotic is the antibiotic use tracked. When questioned about the purpose of infection surveillance and monitoring, the IP confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which affected residents on three of three units and failed to follow antibiotic stewardship for two residents (Resident #16-R16 and Resident #61-R61), who were actively receiving antibiotics. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to implement a facility wide antibiotic stewardship program to reduce the risk of development of antibiotic-resistant organisms. On 5/21/25 at 3:06 p.m., the surveyor met with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) who oversees the facility's infection control program. The antibiotic stewardship program was reviewed. The IP was asked to explain the purpose and importance of antibiotic stewardship and stated, If we suspect someone has a UTI [urinary tract infection] or other type of infection, we start an event in the computer, the nurse or unit manager can contact me and I will start the event, the event uses McGreer criteria and determines if we should start an antibiotic. If they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer the COVID-19 vaccines to three residents (Resident #147-R147, Resident #145-R145, and Resident #146-R146) in a survey sample of five residents selected for immunization review. The findings included: For R145, R146, and R147, the facility staff failed to have evidence of providing education regarding the benefits and risks of the vaccine and offer the COVID-19 vaccine. On 5/21/25, a sample of five residents was selected for review for immunization status. A clinical record review was conducted for each resident. The review revealed the following: According to the preventative health care tab of R145, R146, and R147''s clinical record there was no information regarding their COVID-19 vaccination status or that they had received any education or been offered the COVID-19 vaccines. On 5/21/25 at 3 p.m., an interview was conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP), who was also a registered nurse. The IP stated immunizations are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints and unnecessary psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #63-R63) in a survey sample of 23 residents. The findings included: For R63, who had an increase in psychotropic medication doses and the addition of new psychotropic medications, the facility staff failed to have supporting documentation to warrant the increase in medications and failed to have adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication use, which resulted in R63 having unnecessary psychotropic medications. On 5/20/25, in the mid-morning, R63 was visited in her room. R63 was lying in bed, was observed to be very confused and unable to answer questions appropriately. On 5/21/25 and 5/22/25, a clinical record review was conducted of R63's chart. R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to physician orders and medication administration records (MAR) from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to include initial care needs for a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) and a suprapubic catheter in the baseline care plan for one of twenty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident #145). The findings include: Resident #145 (R145) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus), hematuria, history of sepsis, anemia, bladder cancer, diabetes, hypertension and rhabdomyolysis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R145 as cognitively intact. R145's clinical record documented that the resident was admitted with a PICC for administration of intravenous antibiotics and that the resident had a suprapubic urinary catheter. The resident's baseline care plan dated 5/13/25 included no mention of the PICC or the suprapubic catheter. Initial care needs regarding bowel/bladder included toileting assistance but made no mention of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #144 was not administered medications as ordered by the physician. Resident #144 (R144) was admitted with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), lung cancer, congestive heart failure, anxiety, depression, hypertension, respiratory failure and atherosclerotic heart disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R144 as cognitively intact. On 5/20/25 at 10:22 a.m., R144 was interviewed about quality of care since her admission to the facility. R144 stated she was admitted on [DATE] around 6:00 p.m. and that she did not receive her heart and sleep medications on the evening of her admission. R144 stated around 8:30 p.m., she asked the certified nurses' aide (CNA #3) caring for her about getting her medications. R144 stated the CNA told her that the nurse would be in shortly to give medications. R144 stated she never received the evening/bedtime medications. R144's clinical record documented physician orders for medications that included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility did not provide a rationale for a gradual dose reduction of Seroquel for Resident #59 (R59). The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R59 included; Dementia, major depression, and mood disorder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/8/25. R59 was assessed with a cognitive score of 8 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired. Review of R59's current medications indicated R59 was ordered 12.5 MG of Seroquel (antipsychotic) every night for mood disorder. The order was dated 11/6/25. Review of pharmacy recommendations indicated, through consultation reports, a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of seroquel on 2/18/25 and 5/16/25 had been recommended. On the Consultation Report, the physician had placed a check mark indicating not to do a GDR. The form asks for a patient-specific rationale descibing why a GDR attempt is likely to impair function or cause psychiatric instability . On the Consultation Report dated 2/18/25, the rationale for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete clinical record for one resident (Resident #63-R63) in a survey sample of 23 residents. The findings included: 1. For R63, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete clinical record to include pharmacy recommendations and the provider's response to the recommendation. On 5/20/25 in the morning, R63 was visited in her room. R63 was observed lying in bed and was noted with significant cognitive impairments and was not able to answer questions appropriately, responded with non-sensical responses. On 5/21/25, a clinical record review was conducted. This review revealed that R63's current and active physician orders included the following medications: Ativan 1 mg twice daily, Citalopram 10 mg/5 ml, give 7.5 ml (15 mg) every day, and Depakote Sprinkles 125 mg, give 2 capsules (250 mg) twice daily. According to the census tab and progress notes, R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R63 was on Ativan and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have evidence of residents being provided education and offered flu and pneumococcal immunizations for two residents (Resident #145-R145 and Resident #146-R146) in a survey sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The findings included: For R145 and R146, the facility staff failed to educate residents on the benefits and potential side effects of immunization and offer flu and pneumococcal immunizations as ordered by the physician. On 5/21/25, a sample of five residents was selected for review for immunization status. A clinical record review was conducted for each resident. The review revealed the following: According to the preventative health care tab of R145's clinical record, there was no information regarding R145's flu or pneumococcal vaccination status, that they had received any education or been offered the pneumococcal vaccine. R145's physician orders included orders dated 5/13/25 that read, Immunizations: Offer high dose flu vaccine annually unless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have credible evidence of a complete and thorough investigation being conducted following an incident of sexual assault involving two residents (Resident #8- R8 and resident #9-R9) in a survey sample of 10 residents. The findings included: For R8, who was sexually assaulted by R9, the facility staff failed to have credible evidence of a complete and thorough investigation of the incident. On 10/22/24, the survey team was provided with a listing of current residents, it was noted that R8 and R9, were neither a current resident of the facility and therefore were not able to be interviewed. On 10/22/24, during an entrance conference conducted at 1:45 p.m., the facility administrator was asked to provide all information the facility had with regards to a sexual assault. Following the entrance conference the facility administrator stated that the incident binder with the facility's investigation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0917 — isolatedMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to provide functional furniture appropriate for resident use in 2 rooms (rooms 208 & 323), on 2 of 4 units. The findings included: On 10/24/24 a tour and observations of the nursing units 2 and 3 was conducted. The observation revealed that the closet door in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken hinge, preventing the closet door from closing. The closet door handle was also broken. During the tour, it was also observed that the closet door in room [ROOM NUMBER] was ajar. Closer inspection noted that the hinge was broken, preventing the closet door from being closed. On 10/24/24 at 11:45 a.m., a meeting with the administrator, director of nursing, and the regional director of clinical services was conducted. When these above findings were reported to the facility staff, the administrator stated, We have been painting the building and trying to replace the door handles and hinges as we go along. On 10/24/24 a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a safe, clean, homelike environment on two of four units. Rooms on unit 1 and unit 3 had damaged call bell panel boxes that were loose and/or pulled from the wall in addition to, a dirty/damaged heat unit panel and scraped wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The findings include: On 1/25/22 at 12:51 p.m., the call bell box in room [ROOM NUMBER] above bed #3 was observed damaged. The box near the head of bed #3 was pulled completely from the wall leaving the inside of the wall visible. Conduit and wiring to the panel were visible in the gap between the wall and the displaced box. A stainless panel on the wall above the bedside table adjacent to this bed had an exposed black and yellow wire and a broken piece of plastic loosely attached beside the light switch. The front cover of the heat unit in this room was dislodged with a gap along the top right edge. The cover to the heat unit controls was bent and unable to close. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee personnel files, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their Virginia Resident Abuse Policy for the screening of new employees, for 11 of 25 personnel files reviewed. Eleven of 25 employee personnel files did not include a Sworn Statement. The findings were: On 1/26/2022, the Director of Nursing (DON) was provided a list of 25 employees who were identified as new employees in the last two years. Information requested for each employee included the Sworn Statement, Criminal Record Check, License (if applicable), and References. Review of the personnel files revealed 16 of 25 did not have a Sworn Statement. The DON was given a list of the 16 employee files that were missing the Sworn Statement. The DON subsequently provided a Sworn Statement for five of the 16 employee files. The DON also provided a copy of an email addressed to the Human Resources Director of the facility's former owner asking for the Sworn Statements. Review of the facility's Virginia Resident Abuse Policy, revised on 7/14/2020, noted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, group interview, facility document review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure call bell response was timely on three of four nursing units. Interviews with residents from unit 1, unit 2 and unit 3 revealed call bell response times greater than 20 minutes. The findings include: 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, vertigo, hypertension, major depressive disorder and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #57 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 1/25/21 at 1:49 p.m., Resident #57 requested to speak to a surveyor about poor call bell response on her unit (unit 1). Resident #57 stated she frequently waited from 30 minutes to an hour for staff response to call bells especially at night. Resident #57 stated she required assistance with brief changes and rang the bell frequently when she was wet. Resident #57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide a timely response to pharmacy recommendations for 4 of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #87, #110, #14, and #149. The facility staff failed to act upon pharmacy recommendations regarding the need for the shingles vaccine for Residents #87, #110, #14; for the use of the medication Singular with diagnosed psychiatric conditions that included major depression and anxiety for Resident #14; and a recommendation for a dose reduction and/or discontinuation of medications related to falls for Resident #149. The findings include: 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included healing for lumbar fracture, schizophrenia, edema, hypertension, hypokalemia, and muscle weakness. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #87 as severely impaired for daily decision making with a score of 3 out of 15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was completed for one of 36 in the survey sample, Resident #110. Resident #110's physician signed a GDR pharmacy recommendation for the antidepressant, Escitalopram (Lexapro) to be decreased from 15 mg (milligrams) daily to 10 milligrams daily. The order was not completed for over 4 months. The findings include: Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, history of falls, anorexia, dementia, and major depressive disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #110 as severely impaired for daily decision making, having long and short term memory problems. Resident #110's clinical record was on 01/27/2022. A pharmacy recommendation dated September 13, 2021 through September 15, 2021 documented the following: (Resident #102) has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices on one of four units, and failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #121. Facility staff failed to don required personal protective equipment (PPE) and perform required hand hygiene during meal tray service on the yellow (warm) quarantine section of unit 1. On multiple days of the survey, Resident #121's nebulizer mask was observed on the floor with no protective cover. The findings include: 1. A meal observation was conducted on 1/25/22 at starting at 12:30 p.m. on unit 1. Staff were observed at this time, serving meal trays to residents on the warm COVID-19 quarantine unit. The warm unit included rooms 104 to 109 and had signs stating full PPE (gown, gloves, N95 mask, face shield) was required when going into resident rooms. On 1/25/22 at 12:34 p.m., patient care aid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) status was followe for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 213. Resident # 213 had an advance directive for a DNR and facility staff initiated emergency services for CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). Findings include: Resident # 213 was admitted to the facility [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: dementia, GERD, and hypertension. The annual MDS dated [DATE] had the resident assessed with long term and short term memory, and severely impaired in daily decision making skills. The resident expired in the facility [DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:30 p.m. the DON (director of nursing) was interviewed. The DON stated That absolutely happened. The nurse making rounds (who no longer works here) reported that she thought the resident was choking. It actually was the resident taking her last breath. We did a FRI (Facility Reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to respond to a resident grievance regarding lost and/or missing clothing for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #149. Findings include: Resident #149 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #149 included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type II, high blood pressure, history of tumor on kidney, history of ovarian cancer, history of pulmonary embolism, osteoarthritis, chronic pain, GERD (reflux), and increased lipids (hyperlipidemia). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 13, indicating Resident #149 was cognitively intact for daily decision making skills. Resident #149 was assessed as requiring extensive assistance of one or two staff members for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene, with total dependence upon staff for toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 36 residents was free from verbal/mental abuse, Resident #121. A certified nurses' aide (CNA) made derogatory remarks/comments to and about Resident #121. CNA #1 berated Resident #121 along with use of a hand gesture regarding the resident's slow consumption of breakfast in the presence of a state surveyor and two roommates. The findings include: Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, dysphagia, protein-calorie malnutrition, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, left below knee amputation, history of osteomyelitis, hypertension, lymphedema, diabetic retinopathy with impaired vision, anemia, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular disorder of bladder, congestive heart failure and morbid obesity. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #121 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure physician's orders for care of a central venous access device was in place upon admission, for one of 36 residents, Resident #313. Findings include: Resident #313 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #313 included, but were not limited to: cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, hypotension, collapsed vertebrae/fracture, acute kidney failure, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, compression fracture (L-5) secondary to discitis and osteomyelitis, discitis of lumbosacral region, closed compression fracture of sacrum, and IV Ertapenem for prolonged therapy. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment, which was in progress and not complete. An admission assessment dated [DATE] at 7:15 PM documented, .arrival date & time: 01/20/22 7:15 PM from hospital .Reason For admission: IV antibiotic administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #61 and #18. Resident #61 had no plan of care regarding a colostomy. Resident #18 had no plan of care developed regarding use of insulin. The findings include: 1. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, pneumonia, protein-calorie malnutrition, rectal cancer with colostomy, hypertension, benign prostatic hypertrophy, anemia, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease and heart failure. The minimum data set (MDS) dated 11/15/21 assessed Resident #61 with severely impaired cognitive skills. Section H of this MDS documented the resident had a colostomy. Resident #61's clinical record documented physician orders dated 3/10/21 for colostomy care every shift and a wafer change to the colostomy each week. The resident's treatment administration record for January 2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #155 and #94. Resident #155's plan of care was not revised to reflect discontinued use of bed/chair alarms. Resident #94's plan of care was not updated to reflect a change in resuscitation status. The findings include: 1. Resident #155 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #155 included cerebral palsy, cognitive communication deficit, left wrist contracture, cardiomyopathy, anemia, obstructive sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, seizure disorder, fractured left femur, chest wall abscess and pneumonia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #155 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. Resident #155's clinical record documented the resident had a history of frequent falls.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered, IV (intravenous) antibiotic medication was available for administration for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #313. Findings include: Resident #313 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #313 included, but were not limited to: cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, hypotension, collapsed vertebrae/fracture, acute kidney failure, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, compression fracture (L-5) secondary to discitis and osteomyelitis, discitis of lumbosacral region, and closed compression fracture of sacrum. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was the admission assessment, which was in progress and not complete for Resident #313. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] at 7:15 PM documented, .arrival date & time: 01/20/22 7:15 PM from hospital .Reason For admission: IV antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide dental services for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #57. Resident #57 had no follow-up dental services provided regarding acquisition of dentures. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, vertigo, hypertension, major depressive disorder and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #57 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 1/26/21 at 3:40 p.m., Resident #57 was interviewed about quality of care in the facility. Resident #57 stated she had seen a dentist a couple of months ago and had impressions made for dentures. Resident #57 stated she had heard nothing else about getting her dentures. Resident #57's clinical record documented a dental consultation dated 12/1/21 stating, Patient in need of Dentures. took impressions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen of the facility. The findings include: On 01/25/2022 at 12:03 p.m., accompanied by the dietary manager, the facility's main kitchen was inspected. Stored in the stand-up cooler #6 was one half-pint carton of Maola reduced fat milk with an expired date of 01/24/22 and one half-pint carton of Maola whole milk with an expired date of 01/22/22. . On 01/25/2022 at 12:15 p.m., the dietary manager was interviewed about the cartons of the expired milk. The dietary manager stated kitchen employees were supposed to check the refrigerators and stand-up coolers units daily for expired items and discard them as needed. The dietary manager was asked for a policy regarding food storage and expired items. A review of the policy Freezers and Refrigerators Policy (revised 06/09/2021) documented the following: .8. Food and Nutrition Services Director and Staff will be responsible for ensuring food items in refrigerators and freezers are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility staff failed to properly calibrate glucometers on two of four nursing units, Butterfly Path and Serenity. The findings include: 1. On 1/27/2022 at approximately 8:50 a.m., during an inspection of a medication cart on the Butterfly Path Unit, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) # 1, who was using the cart, was asked about the glucometer in the cart. LPN # 1 said she had not used the glucometer, that Glucometer checks are done on third shift. Asked when the glucometer was calibrated, LPN # 1 said she did not know. At 9:30 a.m. on 1/27/2022, RN (Registered Nurse) # 3, the Unit Manager on the Butterfly Path Unit, was asked about the calibration of the glucometers on the unit. RN # 3 said there were two glucometers on the unit, one on each medication cart, and that glucometer checks are done on the third shift. Asked if she knew how to calibrate the glucometers, RN # 3 said she did not. RN # 3 was asked for the log documenting the calibration of the glucometers, but was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and privacy of the resident's clinical record for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 76. A nursing Progress Note in Resident # 76's clinical record included the names of three other residents. The findings were: Resident # 76 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, aphasia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, ataxia, tremors, and hypothyroidism. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set, a Quarterly review with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/23/2021, the resident was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as being severely cognitively impaired, with a Summary Score of 00 out of 15. Review of the Progress Notes in the resident's Electronic Health Record revealed the following entry, dated 1/10/2011 at 15:15 (3:15 p.m.): Resident was attempting to take (name of first resident) walker and (name of first resident) was telling her to move and leave it alone but (name of Resident # 76) would not leave it alone,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure professional standards of practice by a hospice provider for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #122. Records of weekly hospice visits for Resident #122 were not provided to the facility as required in the hospice services agreement. The findings include: Resident #122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, facial weakness, pneumonia, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, aphasia, and hospice care. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a significant change and assessed Resident #122 as severely impaired for daily decision making having long and short term memory problems. Under Section O - Special Treatments and Programs, the MDS assessed Resident #122 as receiving hospice services. Resident #122's clinical record was reviewed on 01/26/22. Observed on the order summary report was the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and facility training record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 182 employees were up-to-date for abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. Findings include: Beginning 1/27/22/at 4:00 p.m. the facility training records for on abuse, neglect, and exploitation were reviewed for all staff. Two staff did not have proof of the required training. The DON (director of nursing) was present, and asked about the two employees with no record of yearly training for this requirement. The DON stated, The CNA (certified nursing assistant) tells me she has done that; the housekeeping staff doesn't think he completed it. The CNA says she can provide that information, so I told her to have it here as soon as possible. The DON was advised the CNA could provide the proof as soon as possible. The DON was also asked for a copy of the policy for the training. The housekeeping staff electronic signature for the training was dated 10/14/20. The CNA electronic signature was 10/16/20. The policy Virginia Resident Abuse Policy was reviewed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and training hours review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 44 CNA's (certified nursing assistant) had the required 12 training hours per year. Findings include: On 1/27/22 beginning at 4:00 p.m. training records for CNA staff were reviewed for 12 hours of training per year. The DON (director of nursing) was present during the review, and was advised of the CNA with only 10.25 hours of required training. The DON stated the CNA was sure she had documentation of the training, and would provide the documentation. On 1/28/22 at 9:30 a.m. the DON stated (Name of CNA) was not able to provide documentation of the training hours. All I have for her is what I gave you. No further information was provided prior to the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dining observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a dignified dining experience in one of three dining room in the facility. Approximately twelve residents residing on the Season's unit (a memory care unit), were seated together at two tables and served at different times. Findings were: On 10/08/2019 at approximately 11:30 a.m., during initial tour of the facility, the dining room/kitchen area of the Season's unit was observed. The dining area contained two rectangular tables. There was a kitchen area with a warming table used to keep food hot when brought from the main kitchen. LPN (licensed practical nurse) #4, was asked how meal time was handled. She stated, The trays for the 'feeders' come down from the kitchen already prepared. We bring them to the dining room first and give them their trays. Then the kitchen brings down pans of food for everyone else. We plate that up and serve it in the dining room. At approximately 1:00 p.m., the trays and food in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to apply physician ordered protective sleeves for one of 37 residents in the survey sample (Resident #13); and failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for one of 37 residents in the survey sample (Resident #345). The findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, dementia, high blood pressure and chronic knee pain. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #13 with severely impaired cognitive skills and as requiring the extensive assistance of one person for dressing. On 10/8/19 at 1:45 p.m., Resident #13 was observed in bed. The resident had no protective geri-sleeves on her forearms. The resident was observed again on 10/8/19 at 4:20 p.m. and on 10/9/19 at 2:00 p.m. without geri-sleeves in place. Resident #13's clinical record documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a safe, homelike environment on two of five nursing units. A resident room on unit 2 had constantly running water in the sink, a malfunctioning bathroom door, holes in the bathroom wall and a broken air freshener holder. A resident room on unit 1 had a broken/missing toilet paper holder and holes in the bathroom wall. The findings include: On 10/8/19 at 11:30 a.m., the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was inspected. There were multiple holes in the bathroom wall. The toilet paper bracket was broken and missing on one side with the toilet paper positioned in the floor. A private sitter (other staff #2) working in this room was interviewed about the broken bathroom item. The sitter stated the toilet paper bracket had been broken for about 3 weeks. The sitter stated she previously reported the broken bracket but it had not been fixed. On 10/8/19 at 11:53 a.m., Resident #135 was interviewed about quality of life in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for tube feeding for one of 37 Residents, Resident #396. The findings Include: Resident #396 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #396 included; Alzheimer's disease, dementia, diabetes, and placement of a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube). The most current MDS (minimum data set) was not completed at the time of the survey due to Resident #396 being a new admission. On 10/9/19 Resident #396's medical record was reviewed and indicated that Resident #396 was newly admitted with a feeding tube. Review of Resident #396's baseline care plan documented a check mark beside feeding tube, but did not indicate any goals or interventions for the care of Resident #396's feeding tube. On 10/09/19 at 9:26 AM, MDS coordinator (registered nurse, RN #1) was interviewed. RN #1 stated that an initial MDS had not been completed as Resident #396 was a new admission and that after the MDS was complete then a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for treatment and care of skin integrity for two of 37 resident's. Resident #86 did not have heels floated or elbow protector while in bed per physician o5rders, and Resident #13 did not have a properly functioning air matress in place. The Findings Include: 1. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #86 included: Hemiplegia, sepsis, bed confinement status, and cerebrovascular accident. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/13/19. Resident #86 was assessed as moderately cognitively intact. On 10/9/19 Resident #86's medical record was reviewed. An active physician's order set dated 10/1/19 through 10/31/19 included orders to use heel protectors on while in bed and to apply an Elbow Protector to LT [left] Elbow While In Bed. On 10/9/19 at 9:30 AM and again at 1:50 PM Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, family interview, resident interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure podiatry services for one of 37 residents, Resident #110. Findings were: Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses, but not limited to: Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/19/2019, assessed Resident #110 as severely impaired in his cognitive status with a summary score of 05. On 10/08/2019 at approximately 11:55 a.m., Resident #110 was observed sitting in the day room with his wife. They were interviewed regarding life at the facility. Resident #110's wife stated, It is lovely here, we are very pleased with his care. The staff is wonderful. The only problem I have is that they ordered him new shoes and they haven't gotten here yet. They've been at the foot doctor's office for five weeks .they said his shoes he has are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement fall interventions to prevent accidents for 1 of 37 in the survey sample. Resident #15, who was identified as having a history of falls was observed without a fall mat beside the bed. The findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, diabetes, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, left-side hemiplegia, and seizures. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #15 has having long and short term memory problems, severely impaired for daily decision making, and having continuous periods of inattention and disorganized thinking. Further review of the 09/25/19 MDS revealed under Section G - Functional Status, Resident #15 was assessed as not ambulating in his room or on the unit; as being total dependent for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, eating, hygiene, bathing and locomotion on and off the unit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure physician's orders for the care and maintenance of a PICC (Peripherally inserted central catheter) line for one of 37 residents, Resident #346. Findings include: Resident #346 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: CAD (coronary artery disease), high blood pressure, cellulitis of the right foot, osteomyelitis of the right foot, positive MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) screen and diabetes mellitus. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an entry assessment dated [DATE], this MDS did not provide complete information on the resident. Resident #346's admission assessment dated [DATE] and timed 5:00 PM was reviewed and documented, .reason of admission: therapy/ABT [antibiotics] .osteomyelitis (R) foot, PAD [peripheral artery disease] .MRSA . Resident #346 was assessed as being alert and oriented to person, place, time and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for one of 37 residents in the survey sample. Resident #13's clinical record inaccurately documented a physician's order for restorative dining services. The findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, dementia, high blood pressure and chronic knee pain. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #13 with severely impaired cognitive skills. On 10/9/19 at 8:30 a.m., Resident #13 was observed eating breakfast in her room, unattended by staff. Resident #13's clinical record documented a physician's order signed by the physician on 9/30/19 for restorative dining services. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] listed the resident required set up and cueing only for eating. On 10/9/19 at 2:08 p.m., the certified nurses' aide (CNA #3) caring for Resident #13 was interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices to identify and control infections for two of 37 residents, Resident #195 and Resident #346. Findings include: Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for this resident included, but were not limited to: High blood pressure, osteoporosis, history of prostate cancer, high blood pressure, history of colon cancer, BPH (benign prostatic hypertrophy) with obstructive uropathy, chronic indwelling Foley catheter and ESBL (extended spectrum beta-lactamase) infection. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a 14 day admission assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident as having a cognitive score of 9, indicating the resident had moderate impairment in daily decision making skills. The resident was also assessed as requiring extensive assistance of one for toileting and hygiene. The resident was also assessed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform a bed safety inspection prior to installation of a specialty mattress for one of 37 residents in the survey sample. A specialty air mattress was installed and in use by Resident #13 without a prior inspection for bed safety to minimize entrapment risks. The findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, dementia, high blood pressure and chronic knee pain. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #13 with severely impaired cognitive skills. On 10/10/19 at 7:50 a.m., Resident #13 was observed in bed with specialty air mattress in use. Quarter length side rails were in the raised position on both sides near the head of the bed. Resident #13's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 10/9/19 to discontinue use of an alternating air pressure pad and initiate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 37 in the survey sample. Resident #15's care plan was not revised to reflect the discontinued nutritional shake. The findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, diabetes, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, left-side hemiplegia, and seizures. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was a quarterly assessment and assessed Resident #15 has having long and short term memory problems, severely impaired for daily decision making, and having continuous periods of inattention and disorganized thinking. Resident #15's clinical record was reviewed on 10/09/19 at 9:45 a.m. Observed on the current physician order sheet was the following order: TX: HIGH KCAL SHAKE W/LUNCH FOR WT MANAGEMENT. A line was drawn through the order and D/C 9/27/19 was handwritten beside the order. A telephone order was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,172 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $10,983 — penalty dated 2025-12-04
- $17,189 — penalty dated 2024-10-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020) | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| BNV DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| WIW DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| OHI ASSET (VA) SOUTH BOSTON LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2026 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2020 |
| JONES, SABRINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/02/2024 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/08/2026 |
| SHG BOA LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2026 |
| SHG MT, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2026 |
| TCF NATIONAL BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/02/2022 |
| WALKER & ASSOCIATES PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| DANNER, JAMES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/14/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $788K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495372. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.