Tallmadge Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer program to ensure necessary and timely interventions were initiated for Resident #96 who was identified to have skin breakdown in the hospital just prior to admission. The facility also failed to timely identify changes in skin integrity and implement necessary wound care to promote wound healing and prevent infection.Actual harm occurred on 07/31/25 when Resident #96, who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, was transferred to the hospital due to a change in condition. The resident was subsequently assessed by hospital staff to have an unstageable sacral wound with a significant amount of purulence in the tissue consistent with a necrotizing soft tissue infection. Hospital staff also documented the resident had a pressure injury to the right buttock, a pressure injury to the right heel (assessed to be black), a pressure injury to the upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital documentation, review of staff schedules, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and effective pain management program for Resident #90, at the time of admission including adequate and accurate assessment and administration of physician ordered pain medication resulting in a re-hospitalization for the resident due to unrelieved pain. Actual harm occurred on 08/16/24 following Resident #90's admission to the facility for post-operative care when the resident experienced excruciating pain, was yelling out in pain and requesting pain medication that was not timely addressed. The resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital and re-admitted due to abdominal pain. This affected one resident (#90) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed and admission date of 08/16/24 and a discharge date of 08/17/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and policy review the facility failed to provide Resident #83 requested pain medication prior to pressure ulcer/injury wound care. Actual harm occurred on 04/12/24 at 10:11 A.M. when Registered Nurse #100 was observed to provide Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) pressure ulcer/injury wound care to Resident #83, who had a physician order for narcotic pain medication as needed, despite the resident reporting pain and inquiring if she received pain medication prior to the wound care. Resident #83 voiced multiple complaints of pain during the procedure, rated her pain a level eight on a scale of one to 10, and was observed to have facial grimacing (due to the increased pain). This affected one resident (#83) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/17/2023 with diagnoses including a pressure ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain accurate and timely medication records of controlled substances and other medications according to acceptable standards of practice. This affected three residents (#1, #17 and #20) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis, shoulder pain, and need for assistance with personal care.Review of the care plan dated 09/18/25 revealed Resident #20 had chronic pain related to arthritis with a goal of pain reduction. Interventions included administering medications as needed, monitoring complaints of pain, and record alleviating factors. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 06/05/25 for tramadol tablet (an opioid pain reliever) 50 milligrams (mg) as needed (prn) for moderate to severe pain every eight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, photograph review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored, prepared, and administrated properly. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing on the 100 and 200 hall in the facility. Findings include:Review of the two photographs revealed the first photo dated 11/03/25, at 8:50 P.M. had fourteen (14) medication cups with pills in them and stacked on top of each other unlabeled, and the second photo dated 10/09/25 at 8:12 P.M. had nine (9) empty medication cups, unlabeled on the medication cart. Interview on 12/22/25 at 7:57 A.M. with Resident #22 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #215 is preparing medications on night shift ahead of time without labeling them and stacking them. Interview on 12/24/25 at 8:48 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed a nurse on night shift is preparing medications on ahead of time without labeling them and stacking them. Interview on 12/30/25 at 8:12 A.M. with Confidential Individual #400 confirmed the first photo with the fourteen (14) medication cups with pills in them and stacked on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2's gastric tube was properly assessed, monitored, and cared for. This affected one resident (Resident #2) out three residents reviewed for feeding tubes. Review of medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/28/25 with diagnosis included but not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, other artificial openings of gastrointestinal tract status, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, gastrostomy infection, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, dependence on respirator, and tracheostomy status.Review of the care plan dated 09/02/25 and last revised 09/11/25 revealed Resident #2 was at nutrition risk related to gastric tube related to chronic respiratory failure on ventilator, tracheostomy, and end stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis. Goal to include Resident #2 will be free of complications related to presence of feeding tube daily.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 received proper care and assistance in managing his ostomy and tube feed needs. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of three residents reviewed for dependent resident care.Findings include:Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/31/25 and a return date of 08/31/25. Resident #39's diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Rett's syndrome, Todd's paralysis (post epileptic), and epileptic seizures related to external causes, not intractable, with status epilepticus.Review of Resident #39's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status was not completed because he was rarely or never understood. Resident #39 was dependent for activity of daily living (ADL), the ability to roll from lying on his back to the left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, tasting of meal test tray, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals provided were palatable and served at an appetizing temperature. This affected seven residents (Resident #10, #21, #26, #28, #30, #41, and #69) and had the potential to affect all 82 residents receiving meals from the facility. The facility identified three residents (#25, #65, and #281) who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Interview on 03/17/25 at 10:44 A.M. with Resident #21 revealed the food is frequently cold and the coffee is cold. Interview on 03/17/25 at 1:16 P.M. with Resident #10 revealed the food tasted horrible and stated other residents have said they can't eat it as the food made them nauseous. Interview on 03/17/25 at 1:37 P.M. with Resident #28 revealed the facility frequently served cold food, especially on the weekends, and the food tasted terrible. Resident #28 stated staff do not use the plate warmer, instead they place food on the plate and cover it.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident refrigerators were maintained in a safe and sanitary condition, free from expired food. This affected one (Resident #10) of three resident refrigerators observed. The facility identified 29 residents with refrigerators in their rooms. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the facility resident council meeting minutes dated 01/23/25 revealed a concern related to resident refrigerator having items that are not being labeled or dated and should only be kept for three days and then discarded. Observation and interview on 03/19/25 at 12:36 P.M. with the Administrator of Resident #10's room refrigerator revealed the following concerns: - A 16-ounce (oz.) bottle of Italian dressing with an expiration date of 02/11/25. - A 16-oz. bottle of honey mustard dressing with an expiration date of 02/13/25. - A 16-oz. bottle of ranch dressing with an expiration date of 12/14/24. - A 32-oz. bottle of strawberry jam with an expiration date of 06/20/24. -A 16-oz. opened bag of mild…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, medical record review, observation of resident council, review of resident rights, and review of the formal complaint from residents at the facility, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected four residents (#3, #69, #285, #28) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the formal complaint filed by several residents on 11/24/24 revealed the residents felt like staff members were immature, untrained, lacked common sense, and were not compassionate, yet were hired to care for the elderly. The resident questioned why can't staff be friendly or smile, and noted small talk would be nice. The residents further noted they wanted staff to quit being uncaring and unfriendly, and wanted staff to stop talking down to residents and family members. The written complaint revealed some residents in wheelchairs feel belittled by staff. The complaint went on to say the facility staff, especially nursing and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), were very…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of email correspondence, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were addressed in manner that provided a resolution to their concerns. This affected two residents (#10 and #21) of four residents reviewed for concerns. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Interview on 03/20/25 at 9:23 A.M. with Resident #21 revealed he was the president of resident council and stated he had many residents who had expressed concerns related to their care. Resident #21 stated he had shared those concerns with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON), however, their concerns had not been addressed and they had not seen any changes. Resident #21 stated he had sent his letter of concerns to the corporate office, and stated he had not received or seen any resolution or effort to address the residents' numerous concerns. Resident #21 further stated when he had brought issues to the Administrator, she would then go to the staff members he had complained about and then those staff members would ignore him and not assist him with care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, medical record review, personnel file review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by failing to immediately remove a staff member accused of emotional abuse during the investigation. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. A second example of no actual harm with the potential for minimal harm occurred when the facility failed to ensure reference checks were completed on new employees upon hire. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 11/13/24. Diagnoses included type one diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, obesity, Aspergers syndrome, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and needs assistance with personal care. Continued review revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's nursing progress note dated 02/23/25 at 8:30 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #543 stated Resident #3's brother came to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #56 was accurately completed upon the resident's admission to the facility. This affected one resident (#56) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 12/12/24. Diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and dementia. The record indicated the residents had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #56's PASARR dated 12/13/24, the day after admission to the facility, revealed the PASARR was completed due to no previous PASARR records. The PASARR did not include the residents' diagnoses of PTSD, anxiety, or dementia. Interview on 03/19/25 at 1:25 P.M. Social Service Designee #579 verified when Resident #56 was admitted to the facility she did not have a PASARR. She stated she completed the PASARR but not include the resident diagnoses of PTSD,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,839 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH