Azalea Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 245 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 78.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident, staff, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from being left unsupervised in the facility ' s transportation van when Transporter #1 left the resident in the van with the doors and windows closed and the engine turned off midday in the summer heat ([DATE]) for approximately 10 to 30 minutes. The temperature outside was between 92 and 94 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility staff did not identify Resident #1 was not in the facility until his family member arrived at the facility and was unable to locate him. Resident #1 indicated he was yelling for help, he was panicked, became short of breath, was scared, and thought he was going die. Resident #1 did not sustain any physical injures, but there was a high likelihood of suffering serious harm that included heat stroke (a medical emergency that can result in permanent disability or death). This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for transport in the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-05-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, Nurse Practitioner, and resident interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect when Nursing Assistant (NA) #2 spoke to Resident #1 in a manner that made her cry, feel nervous, anxious, and as if she was going to have a panic attack. Resident #1 was observed by staff crying inconsolably (unable to be comforted) following an interaction with NA #2. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity and respect. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with anxiety, worsening generalized weakness, peripheral numbness, and recurrent falls. Review of Resident #1's 3/19/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment indicated resident was cognitively intact with no hallucinations or delusions, no behaviors and was coded as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Resident #1 received an antianxiety medication. Review of Resident #1's care plan which was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly review the hospital discharge summary and clarify physician orders for a newly admitted resident (Resident #231) resulting in the failure to transcribe and administer an intravenous (a catheter inserted into a vein for medication administration) antibiotic medication listed on the discharge summary. Penicillin G (antibiotic) was not administered from 03/29/25 through 03/30/25 resulting in 6 missed doses of the antibiotic treatment. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors. Findings included: Resident #231 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone), and discitis (an infection in the intervertebral disc space). Review of the Discharge summary dated [DATE] from the hospital on page 1 revealed Resident #231's discharge diagnoses was discitis / osteomyelitis of the thoracic region and to continue intravenous (IV)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to hold a blood pressure medication according to the physician ordered parameters and administered the blood pressure medication unnecessarily to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication administration (Resident # 55). Findings included: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact. A physician order written on 12/28/24 revealed an order for Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), 25 milligrams (mg) one tablet once a day. Hold for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) less than 110 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of the April 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed to administer Metoprolol Succinate 25 mg and hold for SBP of less than 110 mm/Hg with a section to include the recorded blood pressure. On 04/12/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff and Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate medication administration record related to a blood pressure medication. This was for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included high blood pressure. A physician order written on 12/28/24 revealed an order for Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), 25 milligrams (mg) one tablet once a day. Hold for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) less than 110 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of the April 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed to administer Metoprolol Succinate 25 mg and hold for SBP of less than 110 mm/Hg with a section to include the recorded blood pressure. On 04/19/25, Resident #55's blood pressure was recorded as 105/60 mm/Hg and the medication was signed off as given by Nurse #3. Review of the May Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by not ensuring Nurse #1 documented the vital signs in the medical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical record accuracy. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included debility and dementia. A progress note written by the Nurse Practitioner as a late entry on 07/08/24 at 1:10 PM for 07/05/24 at 3:50 PM documented she had been notified by staff and nursing that [Resident #1] was left on the facility van upon return from an appointment for a period of time up to 10 minutes. Nursing requested that she evaluate [Resident #1]. An interview was conducted with the Nurse Practitioner on 07/15/24 at 3:55 PM. She stated she had assessed Resident #1 when he was brought back into the facility after he had been left in the van unsupervised. She stated her assessment did not include vital signs but recalled she had instructed Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-02 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to ensure meals were delivered at the posted mealtimes. This failure had the potential to impact 74 of 74 residents who received oral nutrition. The findings included: An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 03/25/24 at 11:45 AM. He stated that two of his kitchen staff called out that morning, leaving one kitchen aide and himself to prepare both breakfast and lunch, as well as clean-up. He revealed he was struggling to obtain and maintain staff, due to other facilities paying more. The DM disclosed having an understaffed kitchen staff meant meals were not served on time according to the schedule, but dietary staff were doing the best they could. An interview was conducted on 03/25/24 at 12:43 PM with the Dietary Manager (DM). He stated due to kitchen budget cuts he was having to schedule the kitchen staff short, months in advance, which he said, it is what it is. He stated that the dietary department needed staff, which was why there was only 1 dietary aide and himself…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to: 1) store the hand-held plastic scoops outside of 2 of 3 dry food bins holding flour and sugar 2) wash dishes in hot water and sanitize dishes in the facility's three-compartment sink per Food and Drug Administration Food Code recommendations in a quaternary sanitizing solution of at least 50-parts per million (ppm) and maintain sanitizing solutions used in the kitchen at the strength recommended by the manufacturer and maintain a clean and sanitized kitchen area for food preparation. These practices had the potential to affect 74 of 74 residents' food quality and kitchen sanitation safety. Findings included: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 3/25/24 at 11:00 AM, an observation was made of the flour and two sugar bins. Hand-held plastic scoops were stored directly in the food items. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 03/25/24 at 11:10 AM. He stated it was his expectation that hand-held plastic scoops be stored in a closed container outside of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the area surrounding dumpsters remained free of garbage and debris and to close and/or replace all missing doors to the dumpsters that contained waste for 1 of 2 dumpsters reviewed. These failures had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings included: An observation of the dumpster area with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 03/26/24 at 12:20 PM revealed scattered debris, branches, and leaves around the sides and back area of the dumpster enclosure area. Both the right dumpster sliding door and the right half of the gate to the dumpster enclosure area were both missing, leaving trash contents and large amounts of debris to build-up around and behind the dumpsters, open to the elements, available to pests and rodents. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager on 03/26/24 at 12:30 PM. He stated it was the responsibility of the Environmental Services Department to keep the dumpster area clean and trash can lids closed. An interview was conducted with the Environmental Services Department -Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide effective leadership and implement effective systems to ensure the facility was able to obtain 60-gallon, 30-gallon, and 10-gallon plastic can garbage liners, toilet tissue, paper towels, and 30 ml. plastic medication cups to meet residents' needs. This failure result affected 74 of 74 residents reviewed for Administration. Findings included: Review of facility's grievances revealed an anonymous grievance filed 09/05/23 regarding; The facility ran out of supplies often. The workers were having to ration trash bags, straws, and medication cups due to the facility not obtaining the supplies. The complainant did not know what the facility was doing to obtain the supplies but said that staff had a difficult time finding supplies to work with. An interview was conducted on 03/26/24 at 3:00 PM with the Medical Records/Central Supply Manager (CSM). She stated the supply delivery truck comes once a week. CSM looks in each of the three supply rooms to assess the needs of the residents then asks the residents/staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put in place following a Focused Infection Control survey and complaint investigation completed on 06/23/23, a recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 12/09/22, a Focused Infection Control survey and complaint investigation completed on 06/03/22, a recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 09/23/21, and a revisit survey and complaint investigation completed on 04/28/21. This was for 5 deficiencies cited in the areas of Quality of Care (684), Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance (692), Labeling and Storing Drugs & Biologicals (761), Sufficient Dietary Support Personnel (802), and Food Procurement, Store, Prepare, and Serve (812). These deficiencies were subsequently recited during the recertification and complaint investigation survey of 04/02/24. The continued failure during six federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) (form 10055) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services (Resident #18 and Resident #66) and failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (form 10123) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services (Resident #324) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary protection review. The findings included: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility 9/26/23 and admitted to Medicare Part A services. Resident #18's Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 10/22/23 and she remained in the facility. The SNF ABN reviewed revealed Resident #18's name, the date services were to end, and the estimated cost of the services. There were no options checked for the decision made about continuing Medicare Part A services. An interview was conducted with the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,470 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,452 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC