No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab Center

100 Woodmont Road, Johnstown, PA 15905 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (814) 255-1488 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 255-1488 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Dec 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (77) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
939 Menoher Blvd · (814) 255-7882 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1650 Menoher Blvd · (814) 255-2792 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
344 Goucher St · (814) 288-6918 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(814) 536-1674 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.2%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.0%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.0%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers13.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.3%68.7%79.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified65.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
56.2%
Total nursing turnover
64.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 92.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

77 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 67 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of policies, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to readmit a resident after his 15 day Medicaid bed-hold expired for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding transfers and discharges, dated [DATE] revealed that residents with a bed hold will be readmitted to their bed. Residents whose bed hold expired will be readmitted to the same bed, or the first available bed. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on February 20, 2026. Nursing note for Resident 1, dated February 21, 2026 revealed that the resident was transferred from the local hospital to a hospital with a higher level of care for surgery. Resident 1 had a 15 day Medicaid bed hold starting on February 20 and ending on [DATE]. Review of hospital documentation dated February 21, 2026 through [DATE] revealed that Resident 1 was non-compliant with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the sanitation of the kitchen regarding thermal coffee mugs. Findings include:The facility's policy for kitchen sanitation and cleaning, dated August 18, 2025, revealed that the food and nutrition services staff would maintain the sanitation of the kitchen.Observations in the main kitchen on March 4, 2026, at 09:16 a.m. revealed that 25 out of 39 maroon and/or black thermal coffee mugs observed had a moderate to large blackish brown removable substance inside. These mugs were on a rack beside the entrance door to the kitchen and beside the exit of the dishwasher.Interview with the Dietary Aide1 on March 4, 2026 at 9:19 a.m., who was running the dishwasher at the time, confirmed that the thermal coffee mugs observed were washed and in circulation and ready to be used for the residents. He also confirmed that they had a brownish black removable build up inside the cup. He was surprised and indicated that they should not be dirty since they were washed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for two of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 1 and Resident 11). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. Review of a facility policy for skin and wound best care practices dated August 18, 2025, indicated that communities may engage the services of a consulting wound care provider after consultation with the resident's medical provider and receipt of an order. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 9) who had pressure ulcers, and by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician and initiated timely for a resident with a worsening pressure ulcer (Resident 11). Findings include: Review of a facility policy for skin and wound best care practices dated August 18, 2025, indicated that pressure injuries will be treated with evidence-based interventions as ordered by the provider. Communities may engage the services of a consulting wound care provider after consultation with the resident's medical provider and receipt of an order. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and information provided by the facility, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was completed into the resident's and their family member's concern for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 102). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding complaint grievances, dated August 18,, 2025, revealed that residents have the right to vice grievances. If a corrective action was taken a summary of that action would be provided. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 103, dated November 7, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, was cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for transfers from bed to chair.Interview with a group of residents on January 6, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. revealed that the residents have to wait because there were only two lifts shared between the halls, and Resident 102's family member has filed grievances.A concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 10). Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated October 20, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated October 17, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 15 units of Novolog U-100 Insulin aspart (a man-made insulin used to control high blood sugar) before meals for diabetes; hold if the resident's blood sugar is less than 150.A review of Resident 6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November and December 2025 revealed that 15 units of Novolog U-100 Insulin aspart was administered to the resident on November 3, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. when the residents blood sugar was 128, on November 7, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. when the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff served the appropriate planned portion sizes, and failed to follow their pre-approved planned menu and recipes. Findings include:Interview with Resident 5 on January 5, 2026, at 10:32 a.m. revealed that she gets small amounts of food and that the serving sizes are not consistent. She stated that she has asked for substitutes or seconds and has been told that they ran out of food or that nothing else is available.Interview with Resident 6 on January 5, 2026, at 10:22 a.m. revealed that he doesn't feel he gets enough food or appropriate food for his diet.Interview with Resident 7 on January 5, 2026, at 10:32 a.m. revealed that his requests for alternative food choices get denied and they tell him that they have run out of those items.Interview with Resident 92 on January 5, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. revealed that he never gets double portions like he is supposed to get. He stated that he often receives even less food than other people he sits with at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include:The facility's policy regarding food temperatures, dated August 18, 2025, indicated that hot food should be at least 135 degrees F when plated. Hot food should be palatable at point of delivery.Interview with Resident 5 on January 5, 2026, at 10:32 a.m. revealed that she eats in her room and her food is often cold. Interview with Resident 7 on January 5, 2026, at 10:32 a.m. revealed that the food is usually served cold, and that requests for alternative food choices get denied.Interview with Resident 15 on January 5, 2026, at 2:32 p.m. revealed that the food is never warm, is often over cooked, and that he never receives enough food.Interview with Resident 35 on January 5, 2026, at 2:18 p.m. and again on January 6, 2026, at 12:38 p.m. revealed that the food he is served is often cold and over cooked. He stated that he has no appetite because of his dislike for the food that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions.Findings include:The facility's policy for food temperatures, dated August 18, 2025, revealed the temperature of potentially hazardous cold foods must be served at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below. Observations in the main kitchen on January 5, 2026, at 9:16 a.m. revealed the drink cooler containing individual cartons of milk did not have a thermometer in it to determine that the milk was being held to serve at a safe temperature.Interview with the Dietary Manager on January 5, 2026, at 9:16 a.m. confirmed that there should have been a thermometer in the drink cooler, however there was not. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary Services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in two of two outside dumpsters.Findings include:Review of facility policy for waste disposal, dated August 18, 2025, indicated that trash will be deposited into a sealed container outside the premises. Outside dumpster lids and doors will remain closed and secure when not in use. Observation of the facility's outdoor trash receptacle on January 5, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed that the smaller outside dumpster was overfilled with garbage and there was no lid on the dumpster. Observation of the facility's outdoor trash receptacle on January 6, 2025, at 2:24 p.m. revealed that the smaller outside dumpster was overfilled with garbage with no lid on the dumpster, there was garbage in the larger outdoor dumpster with no lid on it, there was one bag of garbage sitting on the cement dock and three bags of garbage on the ground in front of the dock and beside the larger dumpster. An interview with the Registered Dietician on January 6,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 67 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 92). Findings include:A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 92, dated October 30, 2025, revealed that the resident was always understood, always understood others, was cognitively intact, and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Interview with Resident 92 on January 5, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. revealed that he was moved from his room on another hall recently and that his personal belongings are being stored in his shared bathroom. Observations of Resident 92's bathroom on January 5, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. revealed that there were 4 boxes and one large black garbage bag filled with the resident's personal belongings stored on the floor around the toilet.Interview with the Social Services Director on January 5, 2026 at 11: 48 a.m. revealed that Resident 92's belongings should not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with self determination to have a room move for one of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 85).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding room changes, dated August 18, 2025, indicated that a resident or representative could request a room change. A reason for the request could include roommates being incompatible. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 85, dated December 2, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, was cognitively intact, and receives dialysis (life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that filters waste and extra fluid from your blood). Interview with Resident 85 on January 7, 2026, at 10:34 p.m., revealed that he wants his room changed. He stated that he asked the Social Services Director again yesterday and she said would look into it. Resident 85 explained that his roommate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs regarding medications for one of 36 residents (Resident 4) and regarding indwelling urinary catheters for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 13).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated August 18, 2025, revealed that care plans are reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the resident's needs, wishes, or a change in condition. Care plans are evaluated at least with each comprehensive and quarterly assessment. Changes to the care plan due to minor changes in the resident's status will be implemented as indicated. All staff caring for the resident will be familiar with the resident's plan of care.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated November 10, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated October 20, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnosis that included Crohn's disease (a bowel disease that causes inflammation anywhere in the digestive tract, leading to symptoms like abdominal pain), and was receiving scheduled pain medication. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated October 16, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive 50 micrograms (mcg) of Fentanyl transdermal patch (a narcotic pain medication administered through the skin) to be applied at bedtime every three days for pain. Physician's orders dated November 18, 2025, included to remove the old Fentanyl patch and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending December 12, 2024, as well as complaint surveys ending March 27, 2025, May 14, 2025, August 11, 2025, and November 13, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending September January 8, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to resident rights, inaccurate MDS assessments, care plan revisions, quality of care, pharmacy services, menus are followed, food that is palatable, and food storage.The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions. Findings include:The facility's policy for kitchen sanitation and cleaning, dated August 18, 2025, revealed that the food and nutrition services staff would maintain the sanitation of the kitchen.Observations in the main kitchen on November 13, 2025, at 09:54 a.m. revealed that eighteen out of eighteen coffee mugs as well as three coffee and two water pitchers had loose food particles and a removable brown film inside; six out of ten white dinner plates examined were noted to have a dried on egg and cheese substance on the face of the plate; three out of twenty clear plastic drinking glasses had food particles and grime on them; five out of five large full size sheet pans were noted to have dried on and loose food particles on them; two frying pans were examined, one had a build up of removable brown food particles inside and the other had a moderate amount (five inches by two inches) of a soft yellowish substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, as well as resident, staff interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve grievances presented by the Resident Council/Food Committee.Findings include: Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, dated June 12, 2025, revealed that residents were asked if meals are served hot. One resident stated that her coffee was not at her desired temperature. One resident stated that their French fries were not hot enough. A concern form was generated. Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, dated July 8, 2025, revealed that residents were asked if meals are served hot. Residents in attendance stated their food was not at their desired temperatures. A concern form was generated. Interview with Resident 2 on August 11, 2025, at 9:15 a.m. revealed that her food is not always at her desired temperature when she receives her meals, even with her eating in the main dining room for her lunch and supper meal.Interview with Resident 1 on August 11, 2025, at 9:29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of The Pennsylvania Code, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse assessment was completed with a change in condition for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated June 23, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, had diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle cannot pump…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at proper temperatures.Findings include:The facility's policy regarding food and nutritional services, dated October 24, 2024, revealed that food will be served at a palatable temperature.Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, dated June 12, 2025, revealed that residents were asked if meals are served hot. One resident stated that her coffee was not at her desired temperature. One resident stated that their French fries were not hot enough. A concern form was generated. Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, dated July 8, 2025, revealed that residents were asked if meals are served hot. Residents in attendance stated their food was not at their desired temperatures. A concern form was generated. Interview with Resident 2 on August 11, 2025, at 9:15 a.m. revealed that her food is not always at her desired temperature when she receives her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for peripherally-inserted central catheter catheters (PICC-long, thin tube inserted into a vein to deliver fluids or medication) for one of nine residents reviewed (Residents 3). Findings include: The facility's policy for Infusion Maintenance, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that staff were to measure the external catheter length of PICC catheters on admission, with each dressing change, and as needed. An annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 13, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance for personal care needs, received intravenous medication, and had diagnoses that included septicemia (a blood infection). Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated April 18, 2025, included orders for the resident's PICC line dressing and securement device to be changed once a day on Tuesdays and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to drink in accordance with the speech therapist's recommendations and/or physician's orders for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding adaptive equipment, dated October 24, 2024, revealed that adaptive equipment to meet the residents needs shall be determined by the therapist and be issued with a provider order (where required or needed). The primary therapist will disseminate the type of equipment and its function to other disciplines during team conference as necessary to increase carry over with proper use. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated May 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) following a stroke, and was on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 2, 9). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 7, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with showering/bathing herself. A care plan, dated April 14, 2025, revealed that the resident was to be showered twice a week, refused showers at times, and staff were to honor her wishes. The facility's current shower schedule indicated that Resident 2 was to receive a shower/bath on Tuesdays and Saturdays. The resident's bathing records for April and May 2025 revealed that there was no documented evidence that staff provided a shower/bath to the resident or that she refused a shower/bath on Tuesday, April 22 and Fridays, April 26 and May 24, 2025. Interview with Resident 2 on June 9, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Observations in the facility's kitchen area on May 12, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed a garbage can near the employee sink that was overflowing with garbage and a brown, removable substance streaked across the floor beside that garbage can. A garbage can near the dietary department entrance in the hallway was overflowing with garbage and an individual-sized syrup container was opened and spilled on the floor near a nonfunctioning upright cooler in the same area. A dirty glove was observed on the floor near two garbage cans in the cooking prep area. The dishwashing area of the dietary department had an unpleasant, musty odor and there were approximately eight broken floor tiles observed. Water was pooling under the broken floor tiles and a significant amount of water accumulated on the floor under the dishwasher, spreading to the back wall under a long sink,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a provider's order for treatments for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 1, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had one deep tissue injury (a type of injury caused by pressure where damage occurs beneath the skin's surface) on admission, and had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Observations in the facility's kitchen on May 12, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed an accumulation of water on the floor near the dishwasher because the garbage disposal under the commercial dishwasher was broken. A note on the upright hot box read unplug, won't shut off. A note on the steamer read awaiting parts. One of three steam tables was not functioning. A small upright cooler had water pooling inside of it, and the long sink in the dishwashing area had water leaking from two faucets. Interview with the Dietician on May 12, 2025, at 10:50 a.m. confirmed that the garbage disposal under the commercial dishwasher was not functioning, the hot box would not shut off and had to be unplugged to turn it off, the steamer had not been working since it was installed because it was installed with missing parts, one steam table was not working, the small upright cooler had water accumulating in it,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative was notified about a change in condition for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1). This was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy for a resident's change in condition, dated October 24, 2025, indicated that the physician/provider and family/responsible party will be notified as soon as the nurse has identified the change in condition and the resident is stable. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 1, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had one deep tissue injury (a type of pressure ulcer where damage occurs beneath the skin's surface) on admission, and had diagnoses that included a pelvic fracture. A nursing note for Resident 1, dated April 9, 2024, at 7:47 a.m., revealed that new orders were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated April 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for care needs. Review of Resident 2's smoking care plan, dated February 2, 2025, indicated that the resident was non-compliant with the facility's non-smoking policy and was able to go outside with one staff member; however, a smoking safety assessment for Resident 2, dated July 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was safe to smoke independently and did not require staff assistance. Interview with Resident 2 on May 12, 2025, at 11:50 a.m. revealed that he has always gone outside to smoke by himself and has never required a staff member. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with the services necessary to maintain good oral hygiene at bedtime for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5, 6). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding evening care, dated October 24, 2024, revealed that nursing staff would offer evening care to residents to promote personal hygiene, comfort, relaxation, and safety. Staff were to assemble oral care supplies and assist residents with oral care. A list of residents with dentures provided by the facility included Resident's 2, 5, and 6. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 2, dated December 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and required staff assistance for set-up with oral care. The resident's care plan, dated January 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was to receive Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party was given the opportunity to participate timely in the development and implementation of a person-centered care plan for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 2, dated December 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and required staff assistance for her Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Information provided by the facility revealed that the facility conducted a care plan conference with Resident 2 on October 25, 2024. Interview with the Social Worker and the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC - registered nurse in charge of the MDS assessments) on March 24, 2025, at 7:15 p.m. revealed that care plan conferences are held quarterly with the residents and resident's responsible party. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that the care plan is reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the resident's needs, wishes, or a change in condition. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 1, dated March 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was at risk for pressure sore development, and had a pressure-relieving device on his bed. The resident's current care plan indicated that the resident was to have an alternating pressure-relief mattress (air mattress that redistributes weight and improves circulation). Observations of Resident 1 on March 24, 2025, at 7:48 p.m. revealed that Resident 1 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for 35 of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 32, 34, 35, 36, 42, 43, 44, 47, 58, 60, 61, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 74, 75, 83, 84, 85, 86, 93). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that an annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) plus 14 calendar days. An annual MDS assessment for Resident 4, with an ARD of October 18, 2024, was due to be completed by October 31, 2024, but was not signed as completed until November 11, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for 37 of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 12, 13, 15, 18, 20, 21, 27, 28, 31, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 48, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 67, 68, 72, 73, 76, 78, 82, 85). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the completion date for a quarterly assessment is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the last day of an assessment's look-back period) plus 14 days. A quarterly assessment is due every 92 days (ARD of most recent assessment + 92 days). A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 1, with an ARD of November 2, 2024, was due to be completed on November 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents were provided with the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene, by failing to provide showers as scheduled for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated August 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, required extensive assistance from staff for personal hygiene, was dependent on staff for bathing, and had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease. The resident's current shower schedule indicated that he was to receive a shower weekly on Mondays. However, the resident's bathing records for August, September, October, November, and December 2024 revealed that the resident received only three showers since August 1, 2024. Interview with Resident 62 on December 9, 2024, at 11:20 a.m. revealed that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's weight was obtained and documented as per facility policy for a resident with tube feedings for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 1) and failed to ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, by failing to ensure timely intervention for weight loss for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 62). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was rarely/never understood, was dependent on staff for all care, was receiving tube feedings (delivers liquid nutrition through a flexible tube that goes directly into your stomach), and had diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury (disruption of normal function of the brain caused by an outside force). A facility policy for residents' weights revealed that weights are to be obtained routinely in order to monitor nutritional health over time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's written menus, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: The facility's policies regarding menu planning, as well as sanitization, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that regular and therapeutic menus will be written to provide a variety of foods served on different days of the week, adjusted for seasonal changes, and in adequate amounts at each meal to satisfy recommended daily allowances. The facility's written and posted weekly menu for the lunch meal on December 8, 2024, revealed that the residents were to receive baked fish. The recipe of baked cod, undated, indicated that the cod filets were to be baked with margarine, salt, and white pepper. A test tray completed on November 11, 2024, at 12:12 p.m. revealed that the pureed baked fish was snow white in color when compared to the regular diet portion of baked fish, and there were no seasonings added to the pureed fish. The regular diet portion of baked fished had visible seasonings and margarine added.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable. Findings include: Interview with a group of residents on December 10, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. revealed that the food delivered to the resident rooms was served cold. Observations in the kitchen for the lunch meal service on December 11, 2024, at 11:58 a.m. revealed that a test tray left the kitchen and arrived on the North hall at 12:00 p.m. The lunch meal on December 11, 2024, consisted of baked fish, broccoli rice casserole, jello, milk, and coffee. The pureed meal had pureed broccoli noodles instead of the casserole. Trays were passed to the residents in their rooms and the last resident was served and eating at 12:12 p.m. The test tray on December 11, 2024, at 12:12 p.m. revealed that the temperature of the baked fish was 114.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the pureed baked fish was 104.2 degrees F, the pureed broccoli was 102 degrees F, the pureed noodles was 105.3 degrees F, the broccoli rice casserole was 128.5 degrees F, the jello was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. Findings include: The facility's policies regarding storage of refrigerated foods, as well as sanitization, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that food would be stored in order to maximize food safety and quality, all refrigerated foods prepared and held for more than 24 hours would be marked to indicate the date the food would be consumed or discarded by, and that temperatures for refrigeration were to be between 35 to 39 degrees Fahrenheit with thermometers checked at least twice a day. Observations in the main kitchen on December 9, 2024, at 8:47 a.m. revealed that the walk-in refrigerator had three bags of brussel sprouts with one bag that had a use-by date of November 19, 2024, and the other two had a use-by date of November 25, 2024. The brussel sprouts appeared discolored and had increased moisture in the bags. There was an undated silver tray of cooked chicken tenders, and a bag of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 97). Findings include: Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) was not completed as of December 9, 2024. An admission nursing note for Resident 97, dated November 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had a diagnosis of chronic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (a blockage causing loss of kidney function), and had a nephrostomy tube (a small tube inserted into the kidney through the skin in the lower back to drain urine into a drainage bag). Observations of Resident 97 on December 9, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. revealed that the resident was being assisted with ambulation to the therapy department by Therapy Assistant 1. While assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a fall to rule out neglect and/or abuse for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 39). Findings include: The facility's policy for protection from abuse, neglect, or exploitation, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that the facility will report all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property, following federal and state regulations. There was to be immediate notification, but no later than two hours, to the facility's administrator, the Department of Health - Division of Nursing Care Facilities, Area Agency on Aging, and Protective Services if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, and notification within 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury. A facility policy for fall management, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for five of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 33, 39, 49, 88). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that Section J0100B was to be checked yes if the resident was administered any as needed pain medications during the seven-day assessment period. An annual MDS assessment for Resident 7, dated November 7, 2024, indicated that the resident did not receive as needed pain medication during the seven-day assessment period. Physician's orders for Resident 7, dated September 17, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 0.5 milliliters (ml) of morphine concentrate every two hours as needed for pain or respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized preferences regarding Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Parkinson's Disease, or dementia for two of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 62, 68). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated August 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included Parkinson's disease. Discharge instructions for Resident 62, dated September 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was diagnosed with vascular dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 62, dated September 2, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 25-250 milligrams (mg) carbidopa-levodopa three times per day (used to treat Parkinson's disease) and 5 mg donepezil nightly (for dementia). There was no evidence that Resident 62 had a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 39, 72). Findings include: A facility policy for comprehensive care planning, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that the care planning coordinator will add minor changes in the resident's status to the existing care plan on a daily basis. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated November 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, was receiving hospice care, and had diagnoses that included stroke. A care plan for Resident 7, dated December 25, 2023, indicated that the resident was receiving antidepressant medication. A care plan, dated November 1, 2023, indicated that the resident was receiving antianxiety medication. Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated November 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, was receiving hospice care, and had diagnoses that included stroke. Physician's orders for Resident 7, dated August 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to have her right dorsal (top) foot and right mid planter (bottom) foot cleansed with wound cleaner, swabbed with betadine (solution used to prevent infections), and secured with nonwoven gauze daily. Physician's orders, dated November 14, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 15 milligrams (mg) of immediate release morphine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to safely transfer one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 39) who required assistance from staff for transfers. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 39, dated September 17, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understood others, was dependent on staff for chair/bed-to-chair transfers, and had diagnoses that included flaccid hemiplegia affecting his left dominant side (condition where a person has a complete lack of voluntary movement in one side of their body). Physician's orders for Resident 39, dated October 8, 2024, included that the resident be transferred with the assist of two staff. A nurse's note for Resident 39, dated December 5, at 4:41 a.m., revealed that on December 4, 2024, at around 7:45 p.m. the resident was observed to be on the floor in his room between the bed and the window wall. He was assessed, had no injuries, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was timely physician notification and intervention for a significant weight loss for residents with a tube feed (surgically implanted tube for artificial feeding) for two of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 66, 78). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding tube feeds, dated October 24, 2024, revealed that staff would maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment for Resident 66, dated November 5, 2024, revealed that the resident is severely cognitively impaired, requires extensive assistance from staff for all daily care needs, had diagnoses that included stroke, and had a feeding tube (tube surgically inserted into the stomach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated October 28, 2024, revealed that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for care needs, and had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure. A care plan for Resident 5, dated July 26, 2024, indicated that the resident required oxygen therapy for chronic respiratory failure, and that staff were to explain the importance of keeping the oxygen at the prescribed setting, stressing more oxygen may not be better. Observations of Resident 5 on December 9, 2024, at 10:50 a.m. and December 12, 2024, at 12:59 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway with oxygen being administered at four liters per minute. Observations on December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, a pharmacy delivery schedule, a list of emergency medications kept at the facility, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding pain management, dated January 14, 2019, indicated that staff would implement the pain management program, including evaluation/re-evaluation for residents experiencing either acute or chronic pain. The policy also indicated that pain is whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever the experiencing person says it does. Staff were to obtain information from the evaluation process to determine what level of pain will interfere with the resident's quality of life and prohibit him/her from carrying out normal life activities. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated August 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually, based on hire dates, for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3, Nurse Aide 4, Nurse Aide 5). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 3 was due July 1, 2024. As of December 12, 2024, there was no documented evidence that the annual performance evaluation was completed as required for Nurse Aide 3. A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 4 was due July 1, 2024. As of December 12, 2024, there was no documented evidence that the annual performance evaluation was completed as required for Nurse Aide 4. A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 5 was due July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 76 residents reviewed (Resident 89). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding controlled substance disposal, dated October 24, 2024, indicated that the destroying/disposal of controlled drugs should be conducted according to federal and state regulations. Destruction of controlled medications should be documented on the controlled medication count sheet and signed by the registered nurse and a witnessing licensed professional. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 89, dated October 27, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, received an antianxiety medication, and had diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood the affects the brain). Physician's orders for Resident 89, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond timely to a pharmacy recommendation for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 72). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 72, dated November 3, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, received routine and as needed pain medication, and had diagnosis that included diabetes. Review of a pharmacy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendation for Resident 5, dated July 7, 2024, recommended that the physician consider ordering Senna (stimulant laxative to treat constipation) once daily at bedtime, while continuing to monitor for signs and symptoms of constipation. There was no documented evidence that the pharmacy recommendation was reviewed by the physician. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 12, 2024, at 1:38 p.m. confirmed that there was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending January 18, 2024; February 23, 2024; June 19, 2024; September 19, 2024; and October 21, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 12, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure provide notice of bed hold policy, failure to complete comprehensive assessments timely, failure to develop resident care plans, failure to provide activities of daily living care to dependent residents, failure to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's direction for use, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: Observations in the main kitchen on December 9, 2024, at 8:47 a.m. revealed that the steamer had a note that it was broken and not to use it. Interview with the Corporate Dietary Manager on December 10, at 1:38 p.m. revealed that she has been with the company for about one and a half years and the steamer has not worked since she has been there. The steamer was not repairable and the facility was in the process of reordering a new one. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 11, 2024, at 3:15 p.m. confirmed that the steamer was not functioning and that the facility was currently receiving price quotes about purchasing a new steamer. 28 Pa. Code 207.2 (a) Administrator's Responsibility.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of written menus and the residents' meal ticket, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's written menu for the breakfast meal on Monday, October 21, 2024, revealed that as part of the resident's meal he was to receive an egg, bacon and cheese croissant sandwich and two bowls of hot cereal. Observations of Resident 2's breakfast tray on October 21, 2024, at 8:25 a.m. revealed that his tray ticket indicated that he was to receive an egg, bacon and cheese croissant sandwich and two bowls of hot cereal However, his tray included scrambled eggs with cheese melted on top, two bowls of cold cereal, and two pieces of toast. Interview with Resident 2 on October 21, 2024, at 8:25 a.m. revealed that he often does not get what his tray ticket says, and that he has told the kitchen, and he does not understand what is going on in the kitchen. Interview with the Corporate Dietary Manager on October 21, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: The facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Equipment, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that the policy objective was to provide a safe, clean environment and equipment for residents. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated September 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with most daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease that effects the nervous system). Observation of Resident 3 lying on the bed in her room on September 19, 2024, at 4:10 p.m. with her wheelchair beside the bed revealed that there was a heavy accumulation of removable dust/debris on the wheels and the metal supports under the chair. There was also a white, stuck-on substance under the wheelchair seat cushion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication and failed to conduct neurological checks per policy after a fall for one of nine residents (Resident 4) reviewed. Findings include: A facility policy regarding neurological checks, revised July 9, 2024, indicated that a neurological check (a series of tests and questions that assess a patient's nervous system) would be provided by a licensed professional to all residents who have sustained a witnessed, unwitnessed, alleged, reported, or suspected head trauma following an unusual occurrence or change in resident neurological condition. Unless otherwise ordered by the physician, the frequency of neurological assessments will be once every shift for 72 hours post occurrence or change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated August 16, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, was cognitively impaired,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was in full working order for the residents on the North hall. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Call Lights: Resident Communication System Accessibility, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that the facility is to be adequately equipped with a call bell system that functions properly through the facility. Interview with Nurse Aide 3 on September 19, 2024, at 11:02 a.m. revealed that when a resident activates the call bell on North hall, the light above the resident's room comes on but the sound is not activated. She also revealed that the central call light for the North hall always stays on; this is a light on the ceiling by the nurse's station that makes the nurse aware that a call bell is going off. This light never turns off despite all call bells being answered. She further indicated that with the central light and bell tones not functioning properly, it has made it difficult to know when a bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for the care of a Peripherally Inserted Venous Catheter (PICC a type of long-term intravenous catheters) for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: A facility policy for intravenous catheters, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that dressings for PICC lines will be changed weekly or as needed per physician's orders. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated June 28, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for care, had a PICC line, and received intravenous (IV- administered directly into a vein) medication. Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated July 13, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive a PICC line dressing and cap change weekly on Mondays. There was no documented evidence in Resident 4's clinical record to indicate that the PICC line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated June 25, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive one 200 milligrams (mg) tablet of lacosamide (medication for seizures) twice a day. A nurse's note for Resident 1, dated July 19, 2024, at 11:30 p.m., revealed that the nurse administered two 200 mg tablets of lacosamide instead of one, and the physician ordered the resident be sent to the emergency room for observation. A nurse's note for Resident 1, dated July 23, 2024, at 4:31 p.m., revealed that the resident returned to the facility at 10:30 a.m. after being admitted to the hospital on [DATE], due to vomiting after receiving two 200 mg tablets of lacosamide. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 28, 2024, at 2:30 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's baseline care plan (includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident) was developed and implemented to include information regarding the resident's immediate care needs for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A facility policy for baseline care plans, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident including the minimum healthcare information necessary to care for a resident. The baseline care plan will be developed with 48 hours of admission. Review of clinical records for Resident 3 revealed that the resident was admitted to facility on June 14, 2024, with and order to receive an intravenous (administration of fluids and/or medications directly into a person's vein) antibiotic for cellulitis (a bacterial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the resident's preference for a shower for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bath/showering, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that residents will be bathed or showered according to their preferences to maintain healthy hygiene and skin condition. Each resident will be asked about his/her bathing preferences upon admission. Each resident will be scheduled to receive bathing a minimum of two times per week unless they prefer less frequent baths or state regulations requires more frequent bathing. The facility will develop and maintain a bathing/shower schedule for each unit. When the bath or shower is complete, the nursing assistant will document the activity on the shower sheet or in the electronic medical record. If the bath/shower cannot be given or if the resident refuses, the nursing assistant will promptly report this to the charge nurse. The charge nurse will speak with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and shower schedules, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers and/or showers as scheduled for three of eight residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 6). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bath/showering, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that residents will be bathed or showered according to their preferences to maintain healthy hygiene and skin condition. Each resident will be scheduled to receive bathing a minimum of two times per week unless they prefer less frequent baths or state regulations requires more frequent bathing. The facility will develop and maintain a bathing/shower schedule for each unit. When the bath or shower is complete, the nursing assistant will document the activity on the shower sheet or in the electronic medical record. If the bath/shower cannot be given or if the resident refuses, the nursing assistant will promptly report this to the charge nurse. The charge nurse will speak with the resident who refuses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-18 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for seven of 34 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 21, 51, 54, 56, 59, 61). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600), and that an annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) plus 14 calendar days. A comprehensive admission MDS assessment for Resident 18, with and ARD of November 14, 2023, was completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: The facility's policy for bed holds, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that the facility will track Medicaid bed-hold days and notify appropriate parties via a Medicaid bed-hold letter. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 30 dated December 13, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects the ability to move and maintain posture and balance). A nursing note for Resident 30, dated July 29, 2023, at 5:58 a.m. revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital for a change in condition. There was no documented evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan included resident-specific information necessary to properly care for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 74). Findings include: The facility's policy for baseline care plans (includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident), dated October 31, 2023, indicated that the facility would develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. The baseline care plan will include the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident and will be used until the comprehensive care plan is developed. A nurse's note for Resident 74, dated January 4, 2024, at 9:39 p.m., indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) (kidneys fail to work), congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood well enough to meet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, was rarely/never understood, was dependent on staff for all daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all four limbs and torso), seizure disorder, other specified disorders of the brain, and that she had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG - a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdominal wall to provide nutrition). Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated November 28, 2023, included an order to administer 250 milliliters (ml) of IsoSource HN 1.2 kilocalorie (kcal) (a liquid nutrient source) by PEG tube every four hours.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to clarify a physician's order for fluid restriction for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 58). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 58, dated October 14, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required moderate assistance from staff for daily care activities, had diagnoses that included end-stage renal (kidney) failure, and required hemodialysis (an invasive procedure that cleans the blood when the kidneys no longer function properly). Physician's orders for Resident 58, dated November 14, 2023, included an order for the resident to have a fluid restriction of 1500 milliliters (ml) per day. Physician's orders, dated December 29, 2023, included an order for the resident to have a fluid restriction of 1000 milliliters (ml)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for enteral feedings (feeding through a tube inserted directly into the stomach) were followed for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that the resident was severly cognitively impaired, required maximum assistance from staff for care, and had an enteral feeding tube. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated August 8, 2023, included an order for the resident's feeding tube to be flushed with 100 milliliters (mL) water every four hours and an additional 60 cubic centimeters (cc) free water before and 30 cc between medications and to record amounts every shift. Review of Resident 2's December 2023 and January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that there was no documentation of the amount of water administered in flushes each shift per physician's orders.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding preparation and medication administration, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that staff should document the administration of controlled substances in accordance with applicable law. The facility's policy regarding routine reconciliation of controlled substances, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that the facility should conduct routine reconciliation of controlled substances by comparing the total number of doses originally dispensed by the pharmacy to the number of doses administered according to the resident's medication administration record (MAR). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated November 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact; required substantial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that keys to the medication room were secured, failed to label multidose vials of tuberculin (solution used to detect tuberculosis infection), and failed to label multi-dose inhalers with the date they were opened in two of two medication carts reviewed (East cart and North cart). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that the facility should ensure that medication carts are always locked when out of sight or unattended. Observations on January 17, 2024, at 7:55 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 entered a resident's room while leaving the keys to the medication cart unsecured and lying on top of the medication cart in the hallway. The keys and the cart were out of her line of site while she administered medications to the resident. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 on January 17, 2024, at 7:55 a.m. revealed that she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 2, 2023, and August 8, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending January 18, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to quality of care and pharmacy services, procedures and records. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding quality of care, cited during the survey ending February 2, 2023, and August 8, 2023, revealed that quality of care would be monitored by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food labeling, dated October 31, 2023, indicated that all foods were to be properly dated and labeled to ensure food safety. The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated October 31, 2023, revealed that all food storage areas were to be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner, and food was not to be exposed or subjected to contamination by condensation or leakage. Observations in the walk-in freezer on December 27, 2023, at 8:15 a.m. revealed that there was a large accumulation of ice on the fan in the freezer and approximately one inch accumulation of ice on a box of undated beef liver that was stored below the fan. Interview with the Dietary Director on December 27, 2023, at 11:39 a.m. confirmed that there should not be ice build-up in the freezer, and the beef [NAME] should have been dated and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safe transfer equipment and techniques were used for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 6) who required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding falls, dated September 5, 2023, indicated that residents would be assessed for fall risks on admission, quarterly, after any fall, and as needed. If risks were identified, preventative measures would be put in place and care planned. All falls would be reviewed and investigated and individualized interventions would be implemented based on the assessment and care planned accordingly. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated August 1, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent for transfers, had limited range of motion on one side, and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 10, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assist with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included ulcerative colitis (inflammatory bowel disease) and atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heart beat). Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated June 23, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 2250 milligrams (mg) of balsalazide (an ulcerative colitis medication) three times daily with special instructions that three capsules were to be administered. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated June 23, 2022, included an order for the resident to receive 5 mg of Eliquis (blood thinning medication) twice a day. A review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR's)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than 5 percent. Findings include: Observations during medication administration on August 8, 2023, revealed that two medication administration errors were made during 31 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.45 percent. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated June 23, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 2250 milligrams (mg) of balsalazide (an ulcerative colitis medication) three times daily with special instructions that three capsules were to be administered. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated June 23, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 1000 (mg) of metformin (diabetic medication) twice daily with special instructions that two tablets were to be administered. Observations during medication administration on August 8, 2023, at 9:13 a.m. revealed that Registered Nurse 1 administered 750 mg of balsalazide (one capsule) and 500 mg of metformin (one capsule)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 6, 39). Findings include:The RAI User's Manual, dated October 2025, indicated that Section B0700 (make self-understood) should be coded with either clearly understood, usually understood, sometimes understood, or rarely/never understood. Section C0100 (should brief interview for mental status be conducted) should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method. Section C0100 was to be coded No (0) or Yes (1) to determine whether a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an assessment to determine a resident's cognitive status) should be attempted with the resident. The instructions for determining if a BIMS interview should be attempted indicated that if the resident was at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-12 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, responsible party, and Ombudsman, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 24, dated October 21, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 24, dated October 12, 2024, at 5:50 a.m., revealed that the resident had a large, liquid and brown emesis (ejection of stomach contents through the mouth). The physician was notified, and the resident was transferred to the hospital. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 24's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's responsible party and the Ombudsman regarding the reason for transfer. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 10, 2024, at 2:15 p.m. confirmed that the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate parties were notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: A facility policy for Bed Holds, dated October 24, 2024, included that the facility will track Medicaid bed hold days and notify appropriate parties via Medicaid bed hold letter for hospitalizations or therapeutic leave. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 24, dated October 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 24, dated October 12, 2024, at 5:50 a.m., revealed that the resident had a large, liquid and brown emesis (ejection of stomach contents through the mouth). The physician was notified, and the resident was transferred to the hospital. There was no documented evidence that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
BOBITSKI, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2024
GJURICH, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2024
BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020)OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
BNV DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
HILLTOP HEIGHTS RE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LUMENT REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
WESTERN PA MT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2026
WIW DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
ROSCOE, BRANDONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-32.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$801K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 1%Other / private 56%

This home reported $801K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$250per resident / day
operating cost
$7,602per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$189per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395812. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next