No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

403 Hazle Township Boulevard, Hazleton, PA 18202 · For profit - Corporation · 297 certified beds · (570) 454-8888 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0741, F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$171,403 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $171,403 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
149 N Vine St · (570) 454-0500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
316 Laurel Mall · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N Pine St & E Hemlock St · (570) 459-4960 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
345 W Diamond Ave · (215) 533-1370

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.4%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.7%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.3%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.4%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.501.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.701.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
28.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 28.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.9%CMS range 36.5–50.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 7.0–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge28.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge24.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge20.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.3–9.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
36.2%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 297 beds and averages 226.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 70 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-07)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision and effective safety measures to monitor a resident's whereabouts and prevent an elopement by one resident (Resident 181) out of 14 sampled residents, placing the 65 residents out of 238 residents residing in the facility, identified at risk for elopement, including Resident 142, in immediate jeopardy to their health and safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Elopement/ Unauthorized absence, last revised by the facility February 6, 2024, revealed that elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization and/or any necessary supervision to do so. The facility will identify residents with potential/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. In the event of a resident elopement the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, observations, facility-provided investigative documentation, security camera evidence, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision and implementation of safety interventions to protect a resident from accident hazards (medications) and elopement from the facility. This failure resulted in actual physical harm for one out of 10 residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Elopement/Unauthorized Absence, last reviewed by the facility on August 15, 2025, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to identify residents with potential or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the residents through development and implementation of safety interventions. Further review revealed that in the event of a resident elopement, the facility will implement its policies and procedures promptly to locate the resident in a timely manner. Elopement occurs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and select investigative reports, and interviews with staff, residents and resident representatives, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from sexual abuse and resultant psychosocial harm (Resident 16) and that one resident (Resident 106) was free from physical abuse out of 11 residents sampled for abuse prohibition. Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's diet manual and select facility incident reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident identified with swallowing difficulties was consistently served food in a form to meet the resident's individual needs, which caused a choking incident and aspiration (when food, drink, or foreign objects are breathed into the lungs) requiring hospitalization of one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 196). Findings Include: Review of Resident 196's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of resident's current care plan dated March 5, 2024, and in effect on April 21, 2024, revealed the resident required the assistance of one staff person with eating. Resident 196's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and select investigative reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that six residents (Residents 212, 93, 203, 178, 487, and 152) were free from physical abuse perpetrated by other residents (Residents 3, 188, 225, 212, 221, 213, and 56) out of 41 residents sampled for abuse prevention, which resulted in serious harm and injury to one resident, a fractured leg and hip (Resident 203). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records, information submitted by the facility, and select investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to assure that one resident (Resident 2) out of 15 sampled were free from physical abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed by the facility on November 12, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's Plan of Correction from the survey ending February 7, 2025, the results of the revisit survey conducted on March 27, 2025, clinical record review, facility-submitted documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and sustain corrective actions through its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent the recurrence of deficiencies related to abuse prevention for one resident out of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings include: As a result of the deficiencies cited under the requirements related to abuse prevention during the survey of February 7, 2025, the facility developed a plan of correction to serve as their allegation of compliance, which included a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure solutions were sustained. The corrective plan was to be completed and functional by March 11, 2025. However, during the survey ending March 27, 2025, continuing deficient facility practice was identified with these same requirements. According to the facility's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy, facility grievance forms, and resident, family and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve grievances and the provision of timely follow-up with residents and/or their representative regarding the status update on the resolution progress of a grievance for three of seven residents reviewed (Residents 107, 15 and 4). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Grievances and Concerns Policy last reviewed by the facility on November 12, 2024, indicated that upon receipt of an oral, written, or anonymous grievance submitted by a resident, the Grievance Official will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated, if indicated. The grievance review will be completed in a reasonable time frame consistent with the type of grievance, but in no event will the review exceed thirty (30) days. If the Grievance Committee/Grievance Official determines that a resident rights violation has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records, information submitted by the facility, and select investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to assure that two residents (Residents 366 and 52) out of 35 sampled were free from physical abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 180). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed by the facility on November 12, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 35 sampled (Resident 179 and Resident 159). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders and personality changes). A review of Resident 179's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Section E-Behavior, item E0900, was coded as 0-Behavior not exhibited, indicating the resident did not exhibit wandering behaviors. However, a review of the clinical record revealed documentation of wandering behavior. A progress note dated November 6, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility investigative reports, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement effective safety measures to prevent an injury during transfer for one out of the 35 sampled residents (Resident 157). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include but not limited to arthritis (a disease that causes swelling and tenderness in one or more joints) and morbid obesity (a chronic disease that's characterized by a body mass index of 40 or higher, or a body mass index of 35 or higher with obesity-related health issues). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 3, 2024, revealed that Resident 157 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status-a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility investigative reports, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records, in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of 35 sampled residents (Resident 266). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. According to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to offer and/or provide the influenza immunization, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been immunized, to one resident out of five residents reviewed for administration of the flu vaccine. (Resident 110). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Resident Vaccination Policy, last reviewed November 12, 2024, revealed that each resident is to be offered an influenza immunization unless the immunization is medically contraindicated. Nursing staff will provide educational information to the resident/authorized representative prior to the administration of each vaccine. Once education has been completed, a signed consent form is to be obtained prior to the administration of the vaccine. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (a chronic or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to monitor and evaluate weight and hydration requirements of a resident to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status are maintained to the extent possible for one resident out of six sampled (Resident A1). Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Weight Policy last reviewed December 2024 indicated weights must be obtained routinely to monitor nutritional health over time. Each resident's weight will be determined upon admission/readmission to the facility, weekly for the first four weeks after admission/readmission, and monthly or more often if risk is identified, or as ordered. Review of the Resident Hydration Policy last reviewed December 2024 indicated residents will be offered/administered sufficient fluid intake to maintain hydration. A variety of fluids will be offered to residents, depending on preference and nutritional/diagnosis considerations. A dietitian will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and select investigative reports, and interviews with staff, residents, and resident representatives, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their established procedures for responding to an incident of sexual abuse of one resident (Resident 16) perpetrated by another resident (Resident 91) out of 11 residents reviewed for abuse prohibition. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of select facility incident reports and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and maintain an environment free of accident hazards to prevent a minor injury (a cut to the thumb) sustained by one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 65). Findings include: A review of clinical record revealed that Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic alcoholism and hypertension. A review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated June 10, 2024, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 8 (a score of 8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment). A review of the resident's current care plan revealed that the resident did have a self-care deficit and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets to conduct a thorough resident assessment of residents following an incident of sexual abuse involving two out of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 16 and Resident 91) Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse last reviewed by the facility August 2023, indicated that after an allegation of sexual abuse The resident's attending physician should be notified if an incident has occurred requiring physician involvement. If appropriate, the facility should send the resident to the hospital for an examination. The facility will contact the police for any allegation of misappropriation of resident property. Administrator or designee will notify police when the facility receives a complaint of, or suspect sexual abuse, serious bodily injury or suspicious death in Allegations of Sexual Abuse every effort will be made to preserve evidence on both the resident and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey of April 19, 2024, and the findings of the survey ending July 10, 2024, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective action plans to prevent a continued quality deficiency related to abuse prohibition to ensure that plans designed to improve the delivery of care and services were consistently implemented to effectively deter future quality deficiencies. Findings include: During a standard survey completed at the facility on April 19, 2024, deficient facility practice was identified under the requirement for residents to be free from abuse and neglect. In response to this quality deficiency the facility developed a plan of correction, to include a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure that solutions were sustained. This plan was to be completed by May 14, 2024. In response to the quality of care deficiency cited during the survey of April 19, 2024, related to the facility's failure to prevent resident abuse the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, investigate reports, and employee job descriptions it was determined the facility's administration failed to effectively use its resources to promote resident safety by failing to implement established procedures to monitor resident whereabouts and prevent an elopement for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 181 ). Findings include: Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision and effective safety measures to monitor a resident's whereabouts and prevent an elopement by one resident (Resident 181) out of 14 sampled residents, placing the 65 residents out of 238 residents residing in the facility, identified at risk for elopement, including Resident 142, in immediate jeopardy to their health and safety. A review of the job description for the Administrator of the facility revealed that the Administrator leads and directs the overall operations of the facility in accordance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment, which promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance as reported by two residents out of 14 residents sampled (Residents 14 and Anonymous Resident 1). Findings include: During interview On May 31, 2024, at 11:40 AM with Anonymous Resident 1 ( resident who preferred to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation), the cognitively intact resident stated that over the past weekend on the second shift he/she waited an hour for staff to answer the call bell to be answered and his/her brief to be changed. The resident stated that wait times seem to be longer when agency staff are working. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes and hypertension. The resident was cognitively intact. During interview on May 31, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select incident reports, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dependent residents with the necessary feeding assistance to promote safe swallowing for one of 14 residents sampled (Resident 196). Findings include: Review of Resident 196's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to have included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 196's care plan initiated March 5, 2024, revealed the problem of self-care deficit with an intervention for staff assistance of one person for eating. The resident had a physician order dated March 27, 2024, for a pureed texture diet, nectar consistency liquids. Review of an incident revealed that the resident was coughing during the dinner meal on April 21, 2024, and the resident coughed up a small piece of shrimp. The incident report included employee witness statements, and none of the employees interviewed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of a nourishing (satisfying to the resident) evening snack for one resident out of 14 sampled (Resident 14). Findings include: Review of the facility Nourishment and Supplement Policy last reviewed August 21, 2023, indicated that the facility will assure a supply of nourishments such as snacks between meals, and supplements that have been ordered are available. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes and hypertension. During an interview with Resident 14 on May 31, 2024, at 12:00 PM the resident stated that he has diabetes and feels that a bedtime snack would be beneficial to help control his blood sugars and to keep him from getting too hungry between supper and breakfast the next day. Resident 14 stated that he had requested a bedtime snack over the last four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and one of five resident pantries. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Review of the facility policy titled Food Brought in from Outside the Facility last reviewed by the facility January 16, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and orderly environment on four of five resident units (Nursing Unit 2, 3, 4, 5 in the blue and white buildings) Findings include: Observations on April 16, 2024, at approximately 11:15 AM of the Unit 4 second floor of the blue building revealed the following: The closet door handles were broken off and the door was unable to open or close properly with several items on the floor inside the closet of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were two large bags observed on the floor that contained several personal items that included food. The bathroom had a strong urine smell. In the hallway exiting this room there was a strong odor of feces. A ceiling block was missing directly above an occupied resident bed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was an unattended wheeled cart, a toolbox, tools and the ceiling block with dirt and debris covering the floor in this room room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have two large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of select facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make information and forms accessible regarding the facility's grievance/complaint process and the residents' rights to file a grievance anonymously in prominent locations on four of seven floors in the facility (blue and white buildings). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Concern Resolution and Grievance Procedure last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2024, indicated that each resident has the right to file grievances orally (spoken) or in writing, and the right to file grievances anonymously. If choosing to report anonymously, residents can fill out a Concern/Grievance Form located on each floor in each lobby. Once the form is completed, residents can place it in the black boxes located on each floor on each lobby. Observation of the Blue building first-floor nursing unit on April 19, 2024, at 10:10 AM revealed there were no postings to indicate the location of grievance forms, the process of filing a grievance, the expectation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently administer oxygen as ordered and maintain sanitary oxygen delivery systems for six out of 35 sampled residents (Resident 8, 26, 48, 59, 64 and 124). Findings included: According to the American Thoracic Society, O2 is a medication that requires a prescription from a healthcare provider. The provider will prescribe your O2 at a specific flow rate and a specific number of hours per day. It is very important that O2 is used as prescribed. Using too little O2 may put a strain on the heart and brain, causing heart failure, fatigue, or memory loss. Using too much O2 can also be a problem. For some patients, using too much O2 can cause them to slow their breathing to dangerously low levels. It is important to wear O2 as your provider ordered it. If the patient starts to experience headaches, confusion, or increased sleepiness after using supplemental O2, the patient may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records and facility investigations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff, providing direct services to residents, who possess the necessary competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as evidenced by three residents out of 35 sampled (Residents 213, 214, and 188). Findings include: Review of clinical record of Resident 213 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia. A 5-Day/admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process completed at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated February 14, 2024, indicated that Resident 213 was severely cognitively impaired with had a BIMS (brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of select facility policy, clinical records and reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and/or implement individualized plans to manage residents' dementia-related behavioral symptoms to promote resident safety and highest practicable physical and mental well-being for four residents out of 35 sampled (Residents 138, 213, 221 and 225). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Dementia Care Services Policy with a review date of January 16, 2024, indicated that residents who are diagnosed with forms of dementia will receive the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical/mental/psychosocial wellbeing. Staff will demonstrate competencies and skills to support residents through the implementation of individualized approaches to care (including direct care and activities) that are focused on understanding, preventing, relieving and or accommodating a resident's distress or loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of the facility's assessment and the medical, psychiatric, and mental health conditions of the resident census it was determined that the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment, which identified the specific resources necessary to care for its specific resident population. Findings include: At the time of the survey ending April 19, 2024, the facility had completed a facility assessment to determine the specific and unique needs of its resident population. Following surveyor inquiry, the facility provided a Facility Assessment document last reviewed January 9, 2024, which identified that the facility's average daily census was 232 residents. The number/average or range of residents with behavioral health needs was 20 to 30. A review of facility documentation as of the date of the survey ending April 19, 2024, revealed that there were 73 residents with Alzheimer's disease/dementia and 54 residents with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition. Review of facility documentation revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to incorporate preferred resident schedules into the residents' daily routine and to allow resident to make choices about aspects of their life that were important to them as evidenced by three of 35 sampled residents (Resident 19, 26 and 64). Findings include: Review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) unspecified side and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD]a respiratory disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and cough). An annual Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated August 20, 2023, at 12:03 PM revealed that it was somewhat important to the resident to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. Review of Resident 19's current care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of review on April 19, 2024, did not identify the resident's PTSD symptoms or triggers related to this diagnosis and resident specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address, this resident's diagnosis of PTSD according to standards of practice to promote the resident's emotional well-being and safety. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one resident out of (Resident 103) out of 35 sampled. Findings included: A review of the clinical record review revealed that Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified psychosis, and dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain) with agitation. Resident 103 had a physician order, initially dated February 22, 2024, for risperidone (antipsychotic drug) tablet 0.25 mg give one tablet in the evening, and a physician order, initially dated March 14, 2024, for Asenapine (antipsychotic drug) transdermal patch 3.8 mg/24 hours, apply one patch transdermal at bedtime when available; discontinue the risperidone. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, investigate reports, and employee job descriptions it was determined the facility's administration failed to effectively use its resources to promote resident safety by failing to implement established procedures to prevent physical abuse of six out of 41 sampled residents (Residents 212, 93, 203, 178, 487, and 213). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A review of facility reports and clinical records between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review clinical records, facility provided documentation, grievances lodged with the facility, and the minutes from Resident Council meetings, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment, which promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance as reported by 15 residents out of 33 interviewed (Residents 6, 17, 24, 27, 43, 53, 54, 58, 72, 77, 112, 113,117, 141 and 163). Findings include: A review of the minutes from the Resident Council meeting dated January 23, 2024, revealed that the residents in attendance voiced concerns that staff do not answer their requests for assistance, via the nurse the call bell system, in a timely manner. A review of grievances lodged with the facility revealed a grievance filed on January 23, 2024, on behalf of a resident, indicating that the resident's call bell was on for an extended period of time with no response from staff. A grievance was lodged with the facility on January 30, 2024, indicating that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on four of five nursing units (Blue Building Unit 200, 300, [NAME] Building Unit 100 and 200). Findings included: An observation of resident lounge area on the third floor of the Blue Building on March 20, 2024, at 12:51 PM, revealed a dried brown fecal-like substance on the seat cushion of a teal-colored dining chair, that had a foul odor. An observation of resident dining area on the second floor of the Blue Building on March 20, 2024, at 12:55 PM, revealed a large soiled area from an unknown substance on the seat cushion of a teal-colored dining chair. An observation of resident sitting area on the second floor of the Blue Building on March 20, 2024, at 12:56 PM, revealed multiple brown and white stained areas of from an unknown substance on the seat cushion of a teal-colored chair. An observation of resident sitting area on the second floor of the [NAME] Building on March 20, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of grievances lodged with the facility and the minutes from Residents' Council meetings and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by five alert and oriented residents out of 16 sampled (Residents 1, 2, 11, 16, and 17). Findings include: A review of the minutes from the Resident Council meeting August 22, 2023, revealed that the residents in attendance voiced concerns about waiting over two hours for staff to respond to their call bells when assistance is needed. A review of a grievance filed with the facility dated September 7, 2023, revealed that a resident complained that he rang the call bell to get staff assistance to be changed, and staff responded initially, but never returned to provide the needed care. A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated September 18, 2023, revealed that the residents in attendance raised concerns about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement a resident's plan of care to assure the use of the necessary level of staff assistance and assistance device to perform safe transfers of one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 11). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include radiculopathy (an injury or damage to nerve roots in the area where they leave the spine). A nursing progress note dated October 12, 2023, at 3:50 PM, indicated that the resident requires two staff for transfers. The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated October 18, 2023, revealed that Resident 11 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool to assess cognitive function; a score of 13-15 indicates cognition is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and facility investigative reports, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of the eight sampled residents was free from physical abuse (Resident 2). Findings including: A review of a facility policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to permit a resident to remain in the facility and not discharge the resident except for defined necessary reasons and failed to ensure the presence of necessary documentation supporting the specific reasons for discharge of one resident out of three residents reviewed (Resident 2) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was transferred to the emergency room on September 16, 2023, due to aggressive behavior. Review of the resident's Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that the resident's discharge date from the facility was September 16, 2023. The reason for the resident's discharge was the resident's aggressive behavior. The resident's clinical record contained no physician documentation of the specific reasons why the resident could not be treated at the facility and documented evidence of the facility's attempts to meet this resident's needs. There was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a policy and procedure to ensure that a resident transferred from the facility with the expectation of returning to the facility was permitted to return or met the specific requirements for a facility initiated discharge for one out of three discharged residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was transferred to the emergency room on September 16, 2023, due to aggressive behavior. Review of the resident's Discharge summary dated [DATE], noted that the resident's discharge date from the facility was September 16, 2023. The reason for discharge was noted to be due to the resident's aggressive behavior. The hospital attempted to discharge the resident back to the facility, and facility would not open the doors and let the resident back in. The resident's clinical record contained no physician documentation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store resident care equipment and supplies in a sanitary and orderly manner. Findings include: An observation of the facility's central supply area, located across from the main entrance to the facility, September 6, 2023 at 10 AM. revealed that the exterior door was door open to the outside. On the wooden shelving unit to the left of the door was an opened cardboard box of facial tissues, one opened box of facial tissues, a can of wasp insect spray, a can of WD40 lubricant spray, mechanical tools, a roll of plastic and an unbagged resident CPAP machine. On the next shelving unit there were multiple open boxes of resident incontinence briefs. Loose single briefs were observed out of their original packaging strewn about on the shelf and the floor. There were additional opened cardboard boxes containing resident supplies with a broom placed on top of these boxes of resident care supplies. Opened boxes and containers of resident care supplies were observed throughout the entire room, with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations during a tour of the dietary department equipment storage area and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable food services sanitation practices for the preparation and service of food. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During a tour of the dietary department equipment storage area on September 6, 2023, at approximately, 10:30 a.m., with the Nursing Home Administrator, the following sanitation issues, with the potential to introduce contaminants into food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to store drugs and pharmacy supplies in a safe and sanitary manner. Findings include: An observation September 6, 2023, of the facility central supply area revealed two metal cabinets containing over the counter non prescription medications. The doors to the central supply area was unlocked and opened and both cabinets were observed to be open and unlocked. The the floor of central supply area, in which this cabinet of OTC drugs were stored, was observed to be coated with a build-up of direct and accummulation of cobwebs. Paper and plastic debris was observed on the floor surrounding the cabinet. Dirt and debris was observed on the bottom shelf of the cabinet, in front of, and underneath the cabinet. Brown stains were observed on multiple ceiling tiles located above the cabinet of medications. During an interview at the time of the observation, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the observation and stated the maintenance department stated that there had been several roof leaks above the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and two of three resident pantries. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). The initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the facility's Dietary Managers and Registered Dietitian (RD) on May 9, 2023, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of minutes from Resident Council meetings and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings, including those voiced by five (5) of seven (7) residents (Residents 98, 104, 121, 128, 174, 189, and 208). Findings include: A review of the minutes from the Resident Council meetings held from May 2022 through April 2023 revealed that residents in attendance at those resident group meetings voiced their concerns regarding resident care and facility services during the meetings. During the September 13, 2022, Resident Council meeting, the residents raised concerns with the timeliness of staff response to their requests for assistance via the nurse call bell system. During the January 10, 2023, Resident Council meeting, the residents again voiced concerns with the timeliness of staff response to their requests for assistance via the nurse call bell system. During the March 21, 2023, Resident Council meeting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards in one resident's room (Resident 70) and failed to timely and adequately address factors contributing to repeated falls for one resident (Resident 182) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of Resident 70's clinical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to have included dementia without behavioral disturbances, acute fracture of the patella, and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan dated April 5, 2021, and revised on April 6, 2023, identified that the resident was non-compliant with care and that she pocketed disposable gloves in her mouth. It was noted that Resident 70 spoke Romanian and had a diagnosis of dementia and the planned interventions were to offer the resident activities to meet her needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate timely and consistent monitoring of nutritional paramaters, resident weights, and timely assessment of resident's nutritional status and needs to ensure prompt implementation of measures to prevent continued weight loss for two residents out of four sampled with significant weight loss (Resident 41 and 211) Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Weights Policy that was last reviewed by the facility on January 17, 2023, indicated that upon admission/readmission, the resident will be weighed as soon as practicably possible, but no later than 24-hours after admission/readmission. After admission weight is obtained, the individual will be weighed for 4-weeks, or more often as per provider order. All weekly weights will be obtained the same day of each week and the facility will designate a specific day of the week for weekly weights (can vary for each unit).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff consistently provided a functional communication system to maintain the resident's ability to communicate for two residents out of 35 sampled (Residents 140 and 70). Findings included: A review of clinical record revealed that Resident 140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia, schizophrenia, and depression. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan a resident's care) dated March 16, 2023, revealed that Resident 140 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 00 (Brief Interview for Mental Status - a tool to assess cognitive function - a score of 0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired). The assessment noted that the resident's preferred language was Spanish, and that the resident needed an interpreter to communicate with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility investigations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess and evaluate a resident's bladder and bowel habits and toileting needs to develop individualized approaches to maintain continence and meet the resident's needs for toileting assistance to the extent possible for one resident (Resident 182) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and dementia. A review of Resident 182's Evaluation for continence and retraining/ scheduled toileting dated April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident required the use of a cane for physical functioning and was placed on a 72-hour bowel and bladder tracking to evaluate voiding pattern. However, there was no documented evidence that the 72-hour tracker was fully completed. Resident 182's care plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of 12 residents sampled (Resident 40). Findings include: Review of clinical record of Resident 51 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows (depression), and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Further review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed that the resident exhibited multiple behaviors, including resident to resident altercations, crying, verbal behaviors towards staff, urinating in hallway, and sexually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of five residents (Resident 36) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include depression and anxiety. Review of clinical record revealed resident was newly diagnosed, March 7, 2023, with dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of the resident's current care plan in effect at the time of the survey ending May 12, 2023, revealed no documented evidence that the facility had developed an individualized person-centered plan for the resident's dementia care, which maximized the resident's dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization, independence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$171,403 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $171,403 — penalty dated 2024-03-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-20 for 39 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2018
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SAKALAS, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/06/2024
SHUTT, PATRICEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2023
BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020)OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BNV DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2022
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2018
DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
MOUNTAIN CITY RE GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2022
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/26/2023
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2018
SHG RECS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2022
WIW DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BENYO, PHILIPIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.5M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 3%Other / private 7%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,267per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$302per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395582. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next