No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bryn Mawr Extended Care Center

956 Railroad Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 · For profit - Corporation · 160 certified beds · (610) 525-8412 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations$35,925 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,925 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
933 E Haverford Rd Ste 150 · (610) 520-5200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
30 N Bryn Mawr Ave · (610) 525-0443 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Acme0.4 mi
601 W Lancaster Ave · (610) 525-1950 · Call to confirm hours
Park
110 County Line Rd · (610) 645-6220 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.4%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.8%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.9%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine11.6%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%9.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.081.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.311.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.5%CMS range 27.2–47.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.9–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge22.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 2.9–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
37.7%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 151.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-29 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of established guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), review of facility's policies, residents' clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that CPR was provided in accordance with established facility policy for one of eleven residents reviewed (Resident 207), creating a situation in which the residents were placed in Immediate Jeopardy related to failure to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation immediately. (Resident 207) Findings include: Review of guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA), dated 2020, revealed, the AHA urged all potential rescuers to initiate CPR unless a valid Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order was in place; if there were obvious clinical signs of irreversible death present, including rigor mortis (stiffness of the limbs and body that develops 2 to 4 hours after death and may take up to 12 hours to fully develop), dependent lividity (reddish-blue discoloration of the skin resulting from the gravitational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the operations of the Food and Nutrition Department, reviews of policies and procedures, interviews with staff and reviews of chemical manufacturer's specifications, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the dish machine dispensed the proper level of sanitizing solution to sanitizing food service equipment. The facility failed to ensure that there was proper water pressure to maintain water in the three compartment sink, to sanitizing the food service equipment (pots, pans, dishes, utensils, bowls, cups, dome lids, meal trays). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of one kitchens serving 128 residents. (Kitchen) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled dish machine use and three compartment sink use dated April 1, 2013, for the Food and Nutrition Services Department indicated that dietary employees were responsible for following standards of practice to ensure that all food service equipment, utensils and dishes are washed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R3, was adequately secured during transportation in the facility's contracted transportation service van. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R3 who sustained a fracture of right tibial plateau, for which the treatment involved surgical procedure for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R3) Findings Include: Review of Resident R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated January 9, 2026, revealed Resident R3's diagnoses included Hemiplegia (total paralysis of one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness or partial loss of muscle movement on one side of the body, both resulting from brain or spinal cord damage), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA-stroke), Psychotic Disorder (mental health condition that causes a person to lose touch with reality, making it difficult to distinguish between what is real and what is not), Seizure Disorder (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-11-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, review of hospital records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assess resident's pain and timely obtain pain medication for adequate pain management for one of 28 residents reviewed. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R381 whose pain to the left foot was not properly relieved and managed and continued to experience uncontrolled pain. (Resident R381). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Emergency Medication Supplies (Emergency kit) revised December 2023 stated the pharmacy may provide the facility with Emergency Medication. Emergency medications shall be accessed by authorized facility staff when a medication is medically necessary to be administered before the next scheduled pharmacy delivery and for New Admissions. Review of the facility's pain management policy revised August 2024 stated the policy of this community to ensure any resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse the State Survey Agency as required for one of eight records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include:Review of clinical records for Resident R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of quadriplegia (paralysis that affects of limbs), and schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by a loss of reality contact). Review of grievance logs for the facility revealed that Resident R1 had filed a complaint with the facility that (his/her) roommate, Resident R2, had hit (him/her) on May 1, 2026. Review of documentation submitted to the State survey agency for May 2026 revealed no documented evidence that State Survey Agency was notified or the allegation of resident to resident abuse.Interview with Employees E1, the Nursing Home Administrator, and Employee E2, the Director of Nursing, on May 12, 2026, at 11:30 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the self-determination in regard to a room change for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 157).Findings Include: Review of facility policy Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities Policy reviewed October 7, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to comply with all Resident Rights, and to communicate these rights to residents and their designated representatives in a language that they can understand. Review of Resident Rights Room Assignments & Changes revised July 2011, revealed during the course of a residents stay, room changes may be necessary for the welfare of each resident. The facility will try to give the Resident and Resident Representative reasonable notice, prior to change, including an explanation for the change. Review of Resident R157's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit the required initial comprehensive MDS assessment for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R153)Findings include:Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic assessment of resident needs) transmission data for Resident R153 revealed an admission MDS was transmitted on October 28, 2025. A quarterly assessment was transmitted on February 28, 2026. An initial comprehensive assessment was not found to have been transmitted.An interview with Employee E1, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that no MDS assessment was transmitted between October 28, 2025, and February 28, 2026. 28 Pa. Code S 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans in accordance with resident needs for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R134). Findings Include: Review of Resident R134's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 13, 2026, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of aphasia (communication deficit). Review of Resident R134's comprehensive care plan dated August 27, 2025, revealed the resident had potential for falling related to limited mobility and impaired balance. Intervention dated August 10, 2025, specified scoop mattress in place. Observations and interview on March 12, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. with Registered Nurse, Employee E12, revealed Resident R134 did not have a scoop mattress. Resident R137 had a regular pressure reduction mattress in place. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure physician orders were followed related to wound treatment for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed that the resident was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blood clot or other obstruction in the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of the right dominant side, aphasia (inability to speak) following stroke. Review of March 2026 physician orders revealed wound treatment orders obtained March 9, 2026 toCleanse right ischium (hip area) with NSS (normal saline solution), pack with calcium alginate (a special type of dressing that absorbs excess fluid to keep the wound dry) and cover with CDD (clean dry dressing) once a day.and Cleanse sacrum (tailbone) with NSS, pack with calcium alginate and cover with CDD once a day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete dialysis records related to dialysis communication for two of two Dialysis-Residents reviewed (Residents R3 and R16).Findings include: Review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). Review of Resident R3's physician order, dated August 14, 2024, revealed; Resident R3 received dialysis treatment at an outpatient dialysis facility on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. The physician ordered a special instruction for the dialysis communication tool, to be completed. Review of Resident R3's Hemodialysis Communication Record named; Dialysis Communication Tool, revealed that on uncountable days, in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and interviews with staff, residents, and resident representatives it was determined that the facility failed to have available a thermometer to heat of food brought from home by a family member for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R162).Findings Include: Review of facility policy Food Brought in From Outside the Facility reviewed November 2024, revealed staff outside the dietary department will store and handle food in accordance with food safety standards when residents or their friends/family bring food into the facility. Further review of facility policy revealed if food needs to be reheated, reheat food in microwave so that all parts of the food reach a temperature of at least 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). After reheating the food, staff should take the temperature to confirmed food has reached an internal temperature of 165 degrees. Staff should allow food to cool to 130-155 degrees F when served to residents. Review of Resident R162's comprehensive care plan dated March 6, 2026, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that appropriate infection control practices were maintained during wound care for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include:Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health document Checklist for Infection Control, last updated January 2026, revealed that, Gloves should be changed and hand hygiene performed when moving from dirty to clean wound care activities (e.g. after removal of soiled dressings, before handling clean supplies, and Aseptic non-touch technique .aims to prevent the transmission of microorganisms to the wound. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed that the resident was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blood clot or other obstruction in the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of the right dominant side, aphasia (inability to speak) following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell system was functioning for one of 33 residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of Resident R2's quarterly assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident R2 was cognitively intact. The assessment also indicated that this resident required moderate assistance with toilet transfers, sit to standing positioning, chair to bed/ bed to chair transfers and to walk ten feet. This assessment said that Resident R2 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident R2's nursing notes dated November 19, 2025, indicated Resident R2 was found sitting on the floor near the bed. The nursing note indicated that Resident R2 was asked to use the call bell system to alert the nursing staff to assist with transfer needs for toileting. Review of nursing note dated December 19, 2025, indicated Resident R2 was witnessed standing up from the wheelchair to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record, and review of facility policy, it was determined that facility did not ensure that residents received treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice related to medication administration for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R16)Findings include:Review of facility policy 'General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration,' revised November 15, 2024, indicates that prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to the following: 3.1 verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident.Review of Resident R16's audit electronic medication administration record (e-MAR), revealed artificial tears drops are scheduled to be administered at 8:00 a.m. and were administered at 12:34 p.m. on October 1, 2025.Further review of e-MAR indicates artificial eye drops were scheduled to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interests and physical, mental and psychosocial well-being on two of two nursing units. (1st and 2nd Floor) Findings include Review of facility policy titled Life Enrichment Programming Policy last revised May 4, 2023 revealed that it is the facilities policy to maintain an ongoing resident centered life enrichment program based on comprehensive assessments and care plans. The program will be designed to meet the interest including hobbies and preferences, and the abilities of each resident including their physical common mental, emotional, social, spiritual, psychosocial and leisure needs. This life enrichment (activities) program will create opportunities for each resident to have a meaningful life by supporting his or her domains of wellness. The life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records, and the review of facility documentation and policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for one of 28 resident records reviewed (Resident R46). Finding includes: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised on July 11, 2024, states that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents. The same policy defines verbal abuse as a use of oral language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within hearing distance , regardless of their age, ability comprehend, or disability. Resident R46 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with high blood pressure chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit, history of transient ischemic attack (TIA- cerebral infarction) without residual deficits, delusional disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with resident and staff and review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed with interventions to prevent pressure injury or trauma for one resident diagnosed with diabetes of 28 residents reviewed. (Resident R86) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Comprehensive Care Planning revised March 2025 states, The facility will develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable goals and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. The policy further states that a baseline care plan will be developed within the first 48 hours of admission to ensure the residents needs are met until the comprehensive care plan is completed. Review of Resident R86's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- is a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate resident functional status, cognitive abilities, and health conditions to develop care plans for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record review, interview with staff, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse maintained professional standards of quality of care for one of four residents reviewed. This failure resulted in delay of medical treatment relating to one resident not receiving medications timely. (Resident R 41) Findings include: Review of facility document titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration revised April 4, 2024, revealed that prior to medication administration , the facility staff should take all measures required by the facility policy and applicable law, including but not limited to verifying each time a medication is administered and that it is the correct medication, correct dose correct route at the correct rate, at the correct time and for the correct resident. Further review of this policy states that medication must be administered within timeframes specified by the facility policy or manufacturers information. Review of facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely provide assistance with incontinence care for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R9). Findings Include: Review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 28, 2025, that indicated the resident was able to make her needs known, cognitively intact, and had diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and muscle weakness. Further review of Resident R9's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident was always urinary/bowel incontinent (loss of bowel and bladder control) and required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with toileting hygiene (the ability to maintain perineal hygiene, adjust clothes before and after voiding or having a bowel movement). Interview on April 8, 2025, at 10:33 a.m. with Resident R9 revealed the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records, and facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of diabetic wound. This failure placed Resident R86 at risk for developing a diabetic wound to the right heel, requiring debridement and antibiotic therapy for one of 28 clinical records reviewed (Resident R86). Finding includes: Review of Resident R86's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized assessment tool used to evaluate resident functional status, cognitive abilities, and health conditions) dated February 26, 2025, revealed the resident was assessed as cognitively impaired with fluctuating inattention, and disorganized thinking. Continued review of the MDS revealed the resident had bilateral lower extremity impairment, and used a wheelchair to ambulate. Resident R86 needed substantial assistant for hygiene (able to do less than half the effort) and needed partial or moderate assistance with bed mobility. Review of Resident R86's MDS assessment included diagnoses of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, resident and staff interview and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that is free from accident and hazards relating to adequate supervision and smoking safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled resident smoking policy last revised December 20, 2022 revealed facility has established residents smoking processes that take into account both smoking and non-smoking residents and that comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding smoking areas and smoking safety. Review of facility policy reveal resident who smoke will be required to sign a safe smoking and agree to abide by the rule regarding safe smoking or they will forfeit the privilege. Residents may only smoke on designate locations. Required supervision will smoke only at designated times independent smokers may smoke at any time but must sign out. Residents who smoke or desire to smoke will be required to sign a safe smoking contract and agree to abide by the rules…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a follow- up appointment was scheduled with an urologist for a resident with an an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 28 resident records reviewed (Resident R121). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Continence Management Program revised on June 7, 2023, states the facility will provide services to restore or improve normal bladder function. Resident R121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with benign prostate hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (an enlarge prostate gland that can cause various urinary problems). Review of Resident R121's nursing note dated December 14, 2024 stated Resident R121 failed to urinate for eight hours on the 7-3 shift. The nurse assessed the resident's abdomen noting it was distended and painful when palpated. The nurse received orders to straight catherize Resident R121 (to manually insert a tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the identified pharmacy review irregularities were implemented for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R63). Findings Include: Review of facility policy on Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Section Procedure, #9 revealed that the facility should encourage the physician/provider or other responsible parties receiving the MRR (Medical Record) and the Director of Nursing to act upon the recommendations contained within the MRR. #9.1 For those issues that require physician/prescriber intervention, facility should encourage physician/prescriber to either accept and act upon the recommendations contained within the MRR or reject all or some of the recommendations contained in the MMR and provide an explanation as to why the recommendation was rejected. #9.2 The attending physician should document in the resident's health record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what if any action is taken to address it. #9.2.2 If the attending physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served timely for one of 28 residents reviewed (Residents R47) Findings include: Review of Resident R47's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes (failure of the body to produce insulin), and Anemia (low red blood count). Review of Resident R47's quarterly MDS (minimum data set- a federally required assessment completed at a specific interval) dated March 11, 2025, section C0500 BIMS (brief interview for mental status) revealed a score of 15 suggesting that Resident R47 was cognitively intact. Review of physician's order revealed an order dated August 21, 2024, to: Monitor meal consumption during mealtimes. Further review of physician's order revealed an order dated March 21, 2025, for No added salt large portion diet. Review of April 2025 MAR (Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and review of clinical records, it was determined the facility failed to provide outside services for one of 28 resident records reviewed (Resident R117). Findings include: Resident R117 was admitted [DATE] diagnosed with Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR a rheumatic inflammatory disorder characterized by muscle pain and stiffness, primarily in the shoulders and hips, often accompanied by fatigue and systemic symptoms, like fever and weight loss.) Review of Resident R117's progress note dated March 26, 2025 indicated the resident's physiatrist recommended a rheumatology consultation. The note further stated the physician was in agreement. Continue review of Resident R117's clinical record revealed no evidence an appointment for a rheumotolgist was scheduled. This was confirmed with the Unit Manager Employee E5 on April 9, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with staff, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that hospice documentation was complete for one of 28 residents reviewed. (Resident R54) Findings include: Resident R54 was readmitted to the facility [DATE], with diagnosed with Senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified, Major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, Unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, hypertension, Unspecified glaucoma, Vitamin B deficiency, unspecified, Muscle weakness (generalized), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident R54 physician orders revealed the resident was placed on hospice, [DATE]. Review of the most resent hospice plan of care, and recertification period had expired. Continue review of Resident R54's hospice documentation revealed incomplete/missing correspondence from the hospice staff providing care. The Nursing home administrator confirmed on [DATE], at 2:00 p.m. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to establish an effective infection control program related to use of personal protective equipment with enhanced barrier precautions for two of four residents reviewed. (Resident R499 and R10) Findings include: Review of Resident R499's clinical record revealed that this resident has diagnosis' including sepsis, acute kidney failure, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) peritoneal abscess (collection of pus in the abdominal cavity) delirium (disturbance in mental abilities that result in confused thinking) retention of urine(A blockage that prevents urine from leaving the bladder) and malnutrition . Review of Resident R499's care plan dated April 4, 2025, revealed that resident has a diagnosis of Clostridium Difficile. (C-Diff-highly contagious bacteria that can cause serious infections of the colon). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure personal privacy and confidentiality related to signage for enhanced barrier precautions for 5 of 8 residents on transmission based precautions (Residents R56, R126, R117, R88 and R61). Finding include: Review of facility policy, title Resident Rights, revised September 3, 2020, revealed, It is the facility's policy to comply with all Resident Rights, and to communicate these rights to residents and their designated representatives in a language they can understand. Review of facility policy, Transmission Based Precautions and Isolation policy, last revised April 14, 2024 revealed: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). EBP are intended to prevent transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) via contaminated hands and clothing of healthcare workers to highrisk residents. EBP are indicated for high contact care activities for residents with chronic wounds and indwelling devices (such as central lines, urinary catheters and trachs) and for all those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 10 of 28 clinical records reviewed (Resident R32, R35, R43, R57, R99, R122 and R440R40, R59 and R109). Finding include: During lunchtime on October 29, 2024, at 1:08 p.m. Resident R109 complained that she did not order the chicken she was served and was given cranberry juice that she stated she was unable to drink. Review of Resident R109's lunch ticket indicated the resident requested roast beef, brown gravy, creamed spinach, and egg noodles. Also included on the lunch ticket was a request that indicated no cranberry juice. Interview with Resident R59 on October 29, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. stated he always gets the wrong meal and never gets what he asks for. Review of the grievance log revealed Resident R40 complained the kitchen serves the wrong food. Interview with Resident R40 on October 30, 2024, confirmed this still continues. During resident council on October 30, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. with seven residents ( Resident R32, R35,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify resident's physician of a fall with injury resulting in hospitalization during a leave of absence from the facility for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Resident Change in Condition Policy dated June 27, 2024, revealed The licensed nurse will recognize and intervene in the event of a change in resident condition. The Physician/Provider and the Family/Responsible Party will be notified as soon as the nurse has identified the change in condition and the resident is stable. A Significant Change of Condition is a decline or improvement in the resident's status that: 1. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical intervention[s]; and/or one that 2. Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; and/or one that 3. Requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete a resident assessment related to discharge status for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R129). Findings include: Review of Resident R129's progress note revealed a nursing note dated July 31, 2024, which stated, resident discharged to home. Review of Resident R129's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident care needs) dated July 31, 2024, revealed that the residents discharge status was coded, Short term general hospital (acute hospital). Interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator, conducted on November 1, 2024, at 11:30 a.m. confirmed that the MDS discharge status, dated July 31, 2024, for Resident R129 was coded inaccurately. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 2 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of clinical records and interviews with family and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure resident requiring continuous oxygen therapy received such services per the physician orders for one of 28 resident records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted to the facility in September 2022 for acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the grievance log revealed Resident R1's family indicated during a visit they observed the resident without the oxygen mask, stating it was the third time this month. Review of the Resident R1's October 2024 physician orders revealed an order for 2 liters of oxygen to be given continuously via nasal canula and to check the concentrator to endure functioning and appropriate setting. Statement received by the nursing assistant indicated on May 14, 2024, she removed the oxygen mask while giving care and forgot to replace the mask. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory studies were promptly obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 28 clinical records reviewed (Resident R107). Findings include: Review of Resident R107's physician progress note dated October 18, 2024, indicated that resident had complained of headache, dizziness, and lightheadedness. Resident's nurse practitioner was notified and ordered for lab work, CBC (complete blood count), CMP (complete metabolic panel), Urine culture and sensitivity, and electrocardiogram (EKG). Further review of Resident R107's clinical records revealed the staff collected the urine sample on October 19, 2024, at night shift however it was not set to the lab in a timely manner. Continued review of Resident R107's clinical records revealed the staff recollected the urine sample on October 21, 2024, and sent to the lab. Review of clinical record for Resident R107 revealed no evidence that the staff obtained the result or inquired about the result of urine test result sent on October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policies, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's physician was notified about abnormal laboratory test results for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident R107). Findings include: Review of Resident R107's physician progress note dated October 18, 2024, indicated that resident had complained of headache, dizziness, and lightheadedness. Resident's nurse practitioner was notified and ordered for lab work, CBC (complete blood count), CMP (complete metabolic panel), Urine culture and sensitivity, and electrocardiogram (EKG). Review of Resident R107's progress note dated October 19, 2024, indicated that the lab work was obtained, and the results were pending. Review of resident's clinical record including paper record and electronic record available at the facility revealed no evidence that the lab results which was ordered on October 18, 2024, were available to review. Interview with the Registered Nurse, Employee E5 on October 31, 2024, at 11:28 a.m. stated the lab work was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident bathrooms were equipped with the appropriate call bell system for one out of 28 residents reviewed (Resident R21) Findings include: During an observation in Resident R21's on rooms on October 29, 2024, at 1:44 p.m. revealed that there was no wired call bell in residents' room, the wires were removed from the wall. Further observation revealed that there was a tap bell in the room across from resident's foot of the bed, which was out of reach for the resident who was laying in the bed. Resident R21 stated she uses the bell to call for staff and no one responds. Further observation revealed that resident pressed the tap bell at 1.49 p.m. Resident stated she needed to be changed as she had an incontinence episode. Staff did not respond until 1:58 p.m. and the surveyor observed staff at the nurse's station. Employee E4 who was assigned staff for Resident R21 stated she saw the bell sitting across from the resident when she was in her room before, but she thought the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received at least 12 hours of continuing education per year as required for three of five nurse aide personnel files reviewed (Employees E6). Findings include: A copy of five nurse aide employee educational record was requested to the facility administrator on November 1, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. Review of personnel files for Employees E6, Certified Nursing Assistant, revealed that there was no evidence that the employees completed at least 12 hours of continuing education per year as required. Interview on November 1, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator revealed that there were no 12-hour educational records for Employees E6 at the time of the survey. 28 Pa Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures 28 Pa Code 201.20(d) Staff development

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of facility documentation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe and comfortable environment was maintained on one of four nursing care units (B wing). Findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident R1 on August 22, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. The resident's assigned room in on the B wing, located on the first floor of the facility. The resident stated that the temperature in the hallway was uncomfortable cold and that she has to keep her room door closed. The resident confirmed that she communicated her concern to the nursing supervisor and also during a resident council meeting. An observation tour was conducted of the B wing nursing care unit on August 22, 2024 in the company of the director of maintenance. The temperature of the hallway was checked and it registered at 69 degrees. The director of maintenance stated that the fire doors at each end of the B wing hallway were closed due to the magnetic door lock system malfunctioning. This created a compartment that prevented airflow and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to ensuring that Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was provided in accordance with established facility policy for one of eleven residents reviewed (Resident 207), which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed under positron summary that the NHA is to lead and direct the overall operations of the nursing faciltiy in accordance with the community policies and procedures, customer and resident needs, and both State and Federal guidelines. To maintain excellent care for the residents/patients and achieve the faciltiy's business objective. Monitoring each department's activities, ensuring that each department attains and maintains compliance with State and Federal requirements. Review of the job…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator failed to effectively manage the facility related to ensuring that the dish machine dispensed the proper level of sanitizing solution to sanitizing food service equipment. The facility failed to ensure that there was proper water pressure to maintain water in the three compartment sink, to sanitizing the food service equipment which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of one kitchens serving 128 residents. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator revealed that the Nursing Home Administrator is to lead and direct the overall operations of the nursing faciltiy in accordance with the community policies procedures, customer and resident needs and both Sate and Federal guidelines. To maintain excellent care for the residents/ patients and achieve the faciltiy's business objective. As the Administrator, you are delegated to administrative authority, responsibility and accountability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of facility menus, meal tray tickets and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that menus were not prepared in advance to meet the nutritional needs of each resident and followed for seven of ten residents reviewed with specific food adversions. The facility failed to ensure that food was availble for the facility emergency menu as planned. (Residents R78, R119, R99, R17, R22, R97, R28 and R68) Findings include: A review of the facility's menus for October 2023 through Janaury, 2024 with the registered dietitian, Employee E5, at 1:15 p.m., on January 30, 2024 revealed that the facility had breakfast meats planned periodically for service to the residents. The menus only offered pork sausage and bacon or pork gravy for the planned breakfast meats throughout October, 2023 to January 2024. There were no substitutes of turkey, chicken or beef for the breakfast meats. Interview with the registered dietitian, Employee 5 and the dietary cook Employee E13 at 1:30 on January 30, 2024 revealed that the facility purchases pork products only for breakfast meats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews of policies and procedures and clinical records, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at satisfying temperatures for six of 32 residents reviewed (Residents R125, R63, R5, R68, R17 and R131). Findings include: A review of the policy titled Food and nutrition: food production and food safety dated June 10, 2022 it was indicated that the dietary staff were responsible for serving hot foods to the residents at a temperature range of 130 to 155 degrees Fahrenheit. This policy also indicated that cold foods were to be served to the residents at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit. The goal of the dietary services were for hot food and beverages and cold foods and fluids to be palatable at point of delivery to the residents. A review of Test Tray Form, revealed that the standard temperature for hot foods, including entrée and starch, on tray line was 135…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean, comfortable, and homelike condition on one of two nursing floors (First Floor) and a feeding pump was maintain in sanitary condition for on one of two tube feedings pumps observed (Resident R47). Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the facility on January 29, 2024, revealed the following concerns: Observations on January 29, 2024, at 10:25 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the chair rail behind bed (window bed) was broken revealing sharp, jagged edges, and the raised commode seat over the toilet was soiled in several places with dark brownish substance, especially on the grey chute in the center. Observations on January 29, 2024, at 10:35 a.m., in the hallway in B wing revealed a tan colored hand rail with several spots that had deep groves and scratches on the surface and a dark brown colored paint on these areas in five or more spots along both sides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observations of care and services and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for one of five residents reviewed for activites of daily living. (Resident R98) Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R98 revealed that this resident was dependant on staff for activities of daily living (transfer, mobility, dressing, toileting, bathing, grooming, oral care). The occupational therapy department documented on July 26, 2023 that the nursing staff were educated about passive range of motion exercises, chair and bed positioning and how to use orthotic devices for Resident R98. Review of the resident's current care plan revealed that there was no care plan developed for transfers out of bed. Resident R98 was observed spending time in bed during the days of the survey Janaury 29, 2024 through February 1, 2024. Continued review of the resident's care plan revealed that there was no care plan developed for PROM (passive range of motion) stretching for upper and lower extremities as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was transferred out of bed as ordered by the physician for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R110) Findings include: Review of clinical record review for Resident R110 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (one of the most common forms of bone infection (osteomyelitis) where the bacteria travel in the bloodstream from another infected site and get lodged into the bone.) Further review of Resident R110's physician's orders revealed an order dated July 21, 2023, for the use of a hoyer lift (mechanical device use to transfer a person from one surface to another) for functional transfers. Review of Resident R110's care plan revealed an intervention initiated on January 26, 2023, for Hoyer lift for transfers. Interview with Resident R110 on January 29, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that she had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services necessary to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for two out of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R26 and R129). Findings include: Review of clinical records of Resident R26 indicated that R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Paranoid Schizophrenia (positive symptoms of schizophrenia, including delusions and hallucinations; these debilitating symptoms blur the line between what is real and what is not, making it difficult for the person to lead a typical life), and Anxiety Disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). During an interview on January 29, 2024, at 9:59 a.m., Resident R26 stated that the resident did not get a bath on January 29, 2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater. Findings include: On January 30, 2024, at 10:01 a.m., observed that Employee E12, a Licensed Nurse, administered Mucinex DM 600 mg- 30 mg-extended release 12 hr, to Resident R100. Review of physician order for R100 indicated an order for Mucinex Oral Tablet Extended Release 12 Hour (Guaifenesin), Give 600 mg by mouth two times a day for cough. Further review of Physician order for R100 indicated an order, dated August 14, 2023, to administer Insulin Lispro Injection Solution 100 Unit/ML (Insulin Lispro), Inject as per sliding scale If 60-150+)U, Call MD if <60; 151-200= 2U: 201-250=4U; 251-300=6U; 301-350=8U;351-400=10U; Over 400 call MD; Subcutaneously before meals for DM2 (Diabetes Mellitus). Review of Medication Administration Record on January 30, 2024, at 10:11 a.m., revealed that the insulin was not administered to R100, as ordered on January 30, 2024, at 8 a.m., or at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and policy and procedure reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were accurate for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R121) Findings include: Review of Resident R121's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] wit the diagnoses of high blood pressure, heart failure altered mental status, Type Two Diabetes, morbidly obese, unspecified psychosis and chronic pulmonary disease. Review of the psychiatry note dated January 30, 2024, revealed an order for Risperdal solution for bipolar disorder. Review of Resident R121 clinical record revealed no documentation to indicate that the resident had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe discharge for one of three clinical records reviewed (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIVC, is a hollow metal needle positioned inside a catheter, generally inserted in superficial veins) Removal, Revised June 1, 2021, states that a short PIVC must be removed/replaced when clinically indicated, such as at the completion of IV therapy. Review of Resident R1's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE], from the hospital where he was being treated for a urinary tract infection and sepsis (an infection of the blood stream resulting in a cluster of symptoms such as drop in a blood pressure, increase in heart rate and fever), and that the treatment included IV (intrvenous) antibiotics. Further review of Resident R1's electronic medical record revealed a November 3, 2023, physician's order to start a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect one of seven residents reviewed for exploitation of resident's personal funds. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of clinical records of Resident R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder (it involves persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), Depression (Depression causes feelings of sadness and/or a loss of interest in activities an individual once enjoyed), and Cerebral Palsy (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). Review of Social Service Initial Assessment note, dated October 16, 2023, revealed Resident R1 was alert, awake, and oriented to person, place, and time, able to make needs known, and independent with decision making. On October 24, 2023, R1 complained that one of the nurses had made copies of his Credit Cards and Driver's License. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of the resident who was on a blood thinner medication of bleeding from a skin tears for one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of clinical records of Resident R2 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with Anxiety Disorder (it involves persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), Cerebral Infarction ( it occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it. A lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off), and End Stage Renal Disease (is a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). Review of the Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, review of clinical documents and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide alternative food options and the facility failed to provide milk substitute that accommodates resident intolerances for for one of thirteen residents observed . (Resident R1) Findings: Review of facility policy on Meal Identification and Food Preferences Policy with revision date of September 21, 2022, revealed that under section Policy A meal identification and food preferences card will be used to properly identify each individual's needs including food and beverage preferences. Meal ID Cart/ticket will be printed timely from a data base and disposed of after meal. Under section Procedure The director of food and nutrition services or designee will visit a newly admitted individual to obtain food and beverage preferences, dislikes and food allergies/intolerances before a permanent meal ID card/ticket is written, a temporary meal ID card/ticket containing individual's name, room number, and diet order may be used until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,925 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-11-01
  • $23,877 — penalty dated 2024-02-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BHG AVIV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/01/2016
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2019
CARROLL, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/25/2024
TALIAFERRO, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/11/2024
BNV DYNASTY LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
WIW DYNASTY LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2011
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/26/2023
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
TCF NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2019
GRAF, ANDREWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 4%Other / private 12%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,561per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395311. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next