Bath Manor Special Care Centre
2330 Smith Road, Akron, OH 44333 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (330) 836-1006 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,433 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-08)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 63.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.0%CMS range 31.3–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.0–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.3–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 108.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review of a police report and medical examiner information, personnel file review, review of narcotic/controlled drug sheets, review of Medscape drug reference information, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #117 was free from a significant medication error and failed to ensure the error was reported immediately so that timely and appropriate medical intervention could be provided. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/death of Resident #117 when on [DATE] at approximately 6:56 A.M. LPN #381 administered Resident #56's medications that included Methadone (medication used to treat opioid use disorder) 40 milligrams (mg) and likely hydromorphone (potent opioid used to treat severe and chronic pain) eight mg to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility Self-Reported Incident review, hospital record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive fall risk assessment with individualized interventions was in place for Resident #83 and failed to timely assess and properly treat the resident after a fall. Actual harm occurred on 04/29/24 when Resident #83, who was at risk for falls did not have individualized interventions in place to address the risk, fell in her room and was not thoroughly assessed before being returned to bed. This resulted in the resident experiencing severe pain to her leg and a delay in immediate treatment. The resident was subsequently transferred to the emergency room for treatment of a femur fracture requiring surgical repair. This affected one resident (#83) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/10/24 and a readmission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate and timely incontinence care was provided. This affected one resident (#53) of three observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 111.Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical records revealed an admission date of 08/04/25. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, need for personal care assistance, and morbid obesity.Review of the care plan dated 08/05/25 revealed Resident #53 had self care deficits. Interventions included to utilize two staff members for assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #53 had requested no male caregivers for personal care. Interventions included only females to provide personal care.Observation of incontinence care on 12/22/25 at 7:52 A.M. for Resident #53 with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #283 revealed Resident #53 was incontinent of a large amount of stale smelling urine that had soaked through two incontinence briefs and her linens and had required an entire bed change. Interview with Resident #53 at time of observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices during medication administration to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#16) and had the potential to affect eight (8) residents (#19, #23, #25, #35, #77, #100, and #118) residing on 100 hall and 300 hall who were identified by the facility to require blood glucose monitoring. The facility census was 113.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), suicidal ideations, delusional disorders, and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Signficant Change in Status assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had impaired cognition.Review of the physician's orders for December 2025 for Resident #16 revealed an order to monitor blood glucose levels twice a day (BID) at 5:00 A.M. and at 4:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on kitchen observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified six Residents (#30, #57, #60, #75, #119, and #269) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 112. Findings include: Observations on 05/05/25 (Monday) at 9:03 A.M. of the facility kitchen with Food and Nutrition Services Director (FNSD) #633 revealed in the reach-in refrigerator near the steam table there was two undated or labeled salads and approximately 10 bagged sandwiches without labels or dates. FNSD #633 indicated they usually disposed of salads and sandwiches after the weekend. There was dried food splatter on the preparation table for the food processor and a container of applesauce and a spoon on floor under the table. Observation of the kitchen hood revealed the metal grates and fire suppression system had a coating of built-up dust. FNSD #633 indicated there was an outside company who cleaned the kitchen hood every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of Resident #269 medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinsonism, primary pulmonary hypertension, protein-calorie malnutrition, acute respiratory failure, other rheumatic mitral valve diseases, pressure ulcer stage 4, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, dysphagia and muscle weakness. Further review of the medical record revealed an order dated 04/18/25 for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Observation on 05/07/25 at 11:34 A.M. revealed a sign outside Resident #269's room for Enhanced Barrier Precautions with instructions stating Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure clean linen rooms and common shower rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected 25 (#43, #33, #220, #24, #15, #48, #400, #219, #45, #78, #51, #97, #220, #225, #107, #44, #79, #221, #112, #113, #80, #269, #270, #114, and #63) of 112 facility residents. Findings include: Environmental tour on 05/12/25 from 2:06 P.M. to 2:37 P.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #806 and Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) #620 revealed the floor of the 300-unit clean linen room was covered with old, dried spills, scuffs marks, paper scraps, straw covers, large dust bunnies, and multiple Chetos. Observation of the 300 hall shower room revealed a toilet, sink, shower area, bathtub, storage cabinet, bedside commode, and a shower bed. A tee shirt was on the floor. A cigarette butt, pillow without pillow case, two plastic parts of a bedside commode, a fitted sheet that was wet with a large reddish brown stain and when lifted a strong urine odor was noted, a multicolored sweater, three wet wash cloths, a bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a dignified dining experience. This affected one (#220) resident of one resident reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #220 revealed an admission date of 04/09/25 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan dated 04/10/25 revealed Resident #220 had a self-care deficit with interventions that included, but not limited to, assistance from staff. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #220 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 that indicated she was alert and oriented to person pace, and time. Observation and interview on 05/06/25 at 8:30 A.M. revealed Resident #220 was lying in bed with her over-the-bed table positioned above her with her breakfast meal. Resident #220's breakfast meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly statements for resident funds accounts were mailed to the individuals who were identified as the guardian or primary financial contact for residents. This affected three residents (#33, #71,#93) out of six residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility identified 50 residents (#1 to #3 , #5, #6, #9, #11, #15 to #19, #21, #24, #26 to #28, #30 to #33, #35, #37, #39, #40, #42, #46, #47, #49 to #55, #61, #62, #64, #68, #69, #71, #72, #81, #82, #86, #89, #93, #94 , and #121) as having a personal funds account. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 06/12/19 and the mother of Resident #33 was listed as the primary power attorney for healthcare and the primary financial contact. Review of the Resident Fund Management Service Authorization Agreement to Handle Resident Funds, revealed on 10/25/19, the mother had signed to set up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide notice to Resident #94 when his resident funds account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person and failed to ensure Resident #226's account funds were dispersed timely after expiration. This affected two residents (#94 and #226) of six residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 112 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and Medicaid was a payor source. The resident was the primary financial contact and was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #94's resident fund account's quarterly statement for the period of [DATE] through [DATE] revealed a balance of $8,266.94 and for the period of [DATE] through [DATE] revealed a balance of $8,087.63. Review of the facility's document Trial Balance, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #94 had a current balance of $3,797.16. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a person- centered care plan related to the consumption of alcohol. This affected one (#44) of one resident reviewed for alcohol consumption. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, cellulitis of left lower limb, and acute kidney failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 that indicated he was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Review of the MDS assessment also revealed Resident #44 required some assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of Resident #44's current physician orders revealed no orders for alcohol consumption. Review of Resident #44's current care plan revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed and an order was in place for administering oxygen. This affected one (#221) of one resident for respiratory care. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #221 revealed an admission dated of 04/28/25 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and congestive heart failure. Review of the progress note dated 04/29/25 timed 2:03 P.M. revealed Resident #221 had oxygen established in the home. Review of Resident #221's current physician orders revealed no orders for oxygen. Review of Resident #221's care plan dated 04/30/25 revealed no current interventions related to oxygen administration. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #221 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 that indicated he was alert and oriented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly secured and permit only authorized personnel to have access. This affected one (#221) of one resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #221 revealed an admission dated of 04/28/25 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and congestive heart failure. Further review of Resident #221's medical record revealed there was no assessment indicating Resident #221 was safe to self-administer medication. Review of the progress note dated 04/29/25 timed 11:08 A.M. revealed Resident #221 had multiple scattered tinea areas on bilateral arms with discoloration. Review of the care plan dated 04/30/25 revealed Resident #221 had tinea corporis located on the left and right posterior forearm. Review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Prehospital Care Report and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify the Guardian of Resident #18 when a significant change in condition occurred. This affected one resident (#18) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 12/31/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with early onset, schizophrenia, mood disorder, impulse disorder, restlessness and agitation, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review revealed Resident #18 had a Legal Guardian. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent upon staff for transfers, used a wheelchair, and was dependent for mobility. Review of the progress note for Resident #18 dated 12/27/24 at 2:29 A.M. completed by Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide A.M. care to include washing face and hands and oral care for Residents #76 and #106. This affected two residents (#76 and #106) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 109. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 10/27/24. Diagnoses included spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, cervical disc disorder, blindness in the left eye, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the care plan dated 10/28/24 revealed Resident #76 had an ADL self-care and mobility deficit related to multiple sclerosis, weakness, debility, cerebral palsy, and impaired mobility. Interventions included assistance with hygiene/bathing hygiene, dressing, grooming, toileting, feeding, and oral care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Prehospital Care Report, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to Resident #18, who had a significant change in condition with an altered mental status, difficult to arouse, and periods of unconsciousness. Resident #18 was administered by mouth routine medications to include psychotropic medications while being difficult to arouse and prior to notifying the physician of the change in condition. Once contacted, the physician requested Resident #18 to be transported to the emergency room. Resident #18 was not transported to the hospital emergency room per direction of the physician, Resident #18 was administered Narcan for a potential drug overdose then resided at the facility. There were no labs obtained to determine the cause for the potential drug overdose nor was the pharmacy utilized to review medications related to the potential drug overdose. This affected one resident (#18) of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Prehospital Care Report, the facility failed to involve pharmacy services related to a possible overdose involving Resident #18 who was administered Narcan. This affected one resident (#18) of three residents reviewed for a potential overdose. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 12/31/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with early onset, schizophrenia, mood disorder, impulse disorder, restlessness and agitation, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review revealed Resident #18 had a Legal Guardian. Resident #18 had no known allergies. Review of the care plan dated 07/15/24 revealed Resident #18 had behavioral symptoms not directed to others verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds, and refused to be shaved. Interventions included when the resident yells out, ask the resident if he needs anything. Provide encouragement and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure blood sugars were assessed prior to meal for Residents #82 and #112 as ordered by the physician to ensure accurate dosage of the sliding scale insulin and failed to ensure Resident #18's medication was administered correctly, (not to be crushed). This affected three residents (#82, #112, and #18) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 109. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 01/06/25. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 was cognitively intact. Resident #82 used a wheelchair for mobility and was dependent upon staff for transfers. Active diagnosis included diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician order dated 01/19/25 for Resident #82 included insulin lispro solution 100 units (u) per milliliter (ml)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the label directions on the cleaning wipes and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained while assessing Residents #82 and #112's blood glucose levels via fingerstick. This affected two residents (#82 and #112) and had the potential to affect an additional 19 residents (#1, #7, #13, #14, #17, #21, #31, #49, #50, #53, #63, #65, #66, #69, #74, #80, #91, #94, and #97) identified by the facility as receiving blood glucose levels via fingerstick. The facility census was 109. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 01/06/25. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician order dated 01/19/25 for Resident #82 included insulin lispro solution 100 units (u) per milliliter (ml) subcutaneously per sliding scale with meals scheduled at 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. Observation on 01/22/25 at 8:42 A.M. of a blood sugar assessment via glucometer revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #418 took the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation of photographic evidence, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure communication and coordination of services with the dialysis center regarding the care of Resident #119's dialysis catheter. This affected one resident (#119) of four residents reviewed and observed for dialysis catheter care. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of Resident #119's closed medical records revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Resident #119 had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and was dialysis dependent. Resident #119 expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #119's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #119 had impaired cognition. Review of Resident #119's care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #119 required dialysis. Interventions included providing access site care as ordered and monitor and report signs of infection. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of death of the legal guardian for Resident #119. This affected one resident (#119) of three residents who were reviewed for notification of significant incidents or changes in condition. The facility census was 118. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #119 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, end stage renal disease, thrombocytopenia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, myxedema coma, dysphagia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Further review of the medical record revealed a discharge date of [DATE] after expiring in the facility. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on [DATE] revealed Resident #119's cognitive function was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, interview, review of drug information on triamcinolone 0.1% cream (a topical corticosteroid) on Drugs.com, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure ongoing care and services remained appropriate and failed to address repeated concerns voiced by state tested nurse aides (STNAs) regarding a black discoloration in Resident #82's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a surgically placed feeding tube into the stomach) resulting in the resident being transferred to the hospital related to a clogged PEG tube with maggots noted in the tube. This affected one resident (#82) of three residents reviewed for tube feedings and had the potential to affect twelve residents (#67, #68, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #81, and #82) whom the facility indicated were receiving nutrition via an enteral feeding tube. The facility census was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure and allegation of verbal abuse towards Resident #23 was thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (Resident #23) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/30/15 and a readmission date of 11/14/23. Resident #23's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left dominant side, repeated falls, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #23's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) tracking number 246669 dated 04/23/24 included the category of allegation, suspicion was neglect by facility staff. The initial source of the allegation, suspicion was a visitor, family member. Resident #23 provided meaningful information when interviewed. The Administrator received an allegation Resident #23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #125's physician was provided accurate information regarding a discharge Against Medical Advice to ensure the safest discharge possible. This affected one resident (Resident #125) out of three residents reviewed for a safe discharge. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of Resident #125's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/27/23 and diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, and disorder of the brain, unspecified. Review of Resident #125's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #125 was independent for self-care, needed some help with ambulation, and used a walker. Review of Resident #125's physician orders dated 09/27/23 revealed Resident #125 may go on LOA (leave of absence) with supervision. Review of Resident #125's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #125 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #125's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely ensure a comprehensive treatment plan was in place to properly drain, monitor, and dress Resident #125's chest tube. This affected one resident (Resident #125) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 03/14/24 and a discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic diastolic heart failure, end stage renal disease and cardiomyopathy. Review of the hospital discharge orders dated 03/15/24 revealed the orders did not identify how to care for the chest tube or how often it should be drained and how often the dressing should be changed. Review of an email dated 03/15/24 from the admission Director to the facility care team revealed the facility was aware Resident #125 had a chest tube upon admission. Review of the care plan initiated on 03/17/24 revealed a goal to manage Resident #125's diagnosis of congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #121's incontinence care was completed timely. This affected one resident (Resident #121) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was Findings include: Review of Resident #121's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/13/23 and diagnoses included altered mental status, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #121's care plan dated 04/14/23 included Resident #121 was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Resident #121 would receive assistance with toileting, maintained comfortable, clean and dry, and free from skin breakdown. Interventions included to provide incontinence care as needed, and monitor peri-area for redness, irritation, skin excoriation and breakdown. Resident #121 had noncompliance related to history of noncompliance at home with not taking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified 12 residents (#2, #13, #15, #41, #62, #77, #80, #88, #94, #96, #420, and #670) that had a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Observations of the facility kitchen on 12/04/23 at 8:22 A.M. revealed a fan located by the ice machine covered in dust. The ice machine had a white colored build up at the gaskets and the down sides. There was an unidentified brown substance on the inside of the ice machine. There were juice concentrate boxes (cranberry, fruit punch, orange, and apple) on the floor in front of the juice and coffee preparation table. Observation of the dish machine area revealed the walls were splattered with dried on food debris/drips. The floor of the dish machine area had a sticky residue with food debris throughout. There was a strong odor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Observation on 12/04/23 at 8:45 A.M. revealed three dumpsters. One dumpster was propped open with a white post. Observation behind and around the sides of the dumpsters revealed significant debris including gloves, boxes, plastic bags, plastic cups, a gas can, a wheelchair, stack of wooden pallets, and an upholstered chair. Interview on 12/04/23 at 8:47 A.M. with Dietitian #817 confirmed the findings. Dietitian #817 indicated she was unsure of who was responsible for keeping the area clean and clear. Review of the facility Waste Disposal Policy dated 06/05/18 revealed trash bags would be sealed prior to removing them from the facility. Trash would be deposited into a sealed container outside the premises. Outside dumpster lids and doors would remain closed and secure when not in use.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed. This affected four (Residents #4, #52, #93 and #112) of four residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The facility census was 123. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 09/03/21 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, depression and adult failure to thrive. Review of the physician's orders for November 2023 revealed Resident #4 had an order for a regular diet dated 08/11/23. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 revealed under section K0520 that she did not have a feeding tube or parenteral/intravenous feedings. However, section K0710 was documented as receiving 25% or less total calories through parenteral or tube feeding as well as 500 cubic centimeters (cc)/day or less fluid intake per day by IV or tube feeding. Section K0710 stated to complete K0710 only if checked in section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure space heaters were not used by residents in the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #116) and had the potential to affect an additional 28 residents (Residents #1, #10, #17, #25, #26, #39, #50, #54, #58, #63, #66, #67, #82, #84, #85, #101, #107, #110, #120, #470, #471, #472, #473, #474, #475, #476, #477 and #670) residing on the 300 hall. The census was 123. Findings include: Observation on 12/05/23 at 9:00 A.M. revealed a space heater in use in Resident #116's room. Interview with Resident #116's wife at the time of the observation revealed the space heater was used to keep the room warm. An interview on 12/05/23 at 1:45 P.M. with the Administrator revealed space heaters were prohibited in the building. The administrator stated the space heater had since been removed. Review of the Census form revealed 29 residents resided on the 300 hall including Residents #1, #10, #17, #25, #26, #39, #50, #54, #58, #63, #66, #67, #82, #84, #85, #101, #107, #110, #116, #120, #470, #471, #472, #473, #474, #475, #476, #477…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #470's call light was available and accessible for the resident's use. This affected one (Resident #470) of 18 residents (Residents #4, #10, #11, #48, #50, #52, #53, #54, #63, #85, #107, #112, #118, #470, #471, #472, #475 and #570) who were observed for call lights within reach. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of Resident #470's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, shortness of breath and acquired clubfoot. Review of Resident #470's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #470 exhibited intact cognition. Observation on 12/04/23 at 8:30 A.M. revealed Resident #470's call light was not plugged into the wall for Resident #470 to call the nursing staff for assistance. Interview on 12/04/23 at 8:30 A.M. with Resident #470 revealed they had not had a call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #82's and #470's bathrooms were maintained at a comfortable ambient temperature. This affected two (Residents #82 and #470) of nine residents (Residents #10, #54, #55, #78, #82, #116, #470, #471 and #473) whose bathroom temperatures were checked. The census was 123. Findings include: Interview on 12/04/23 at 9:00 A.M. with Resident #82 revealed the resident's bathroom was cold. Resident #82 was observed in bed across from the bathroom with three blankets on and was wearing a stocking cap. Resident #82 stated cold air blew on them from the bathroom. Upon entering the bathroom it felt cold. Interview on 12/04/23 at 9:15 A.M. with Resident #470 revealed the resident's bathroom was cold. Interview and observation on 12/06/23 at 8:10 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #856 revealed the ambient temperature on the 300 hall was 73.9 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The temperature in resident rooms was controlled by the thermostat in room [ROOM NUMBER].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for residents. This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 09/03/21 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan for Resident #4 dated 05/11/23 revealed she was incontinent of bladder. Staff were to provide incontinence care as needed. Review of the physician's orders for December 2023 revealed Resident #4 had an order for staff to check and change Resident #4 every two to three hours and as needed dated 08/11/23. Review the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for October 2023 revealed staff had not documented that they had checked and changed Resident #4 every two to three hours on 10/05/23 and 10/15/23 for the 7:00 P.M. shift. Review of the TAR for November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #107's tube feeding was infused per the physician's orders. This affected one resident (Resident #107) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, gastrostomy status and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #107's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/01/23 for Isosource 1.5 at 60 cubic centimeters (cc) via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG) for 20 hours per day. Turn off the tube feed solution at 12:00 P.M. and turn back on at 4:00 P.M. Review of Resident #107's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 12/07/23 at 9:45 A.M. revealed Resident #117 in bed. The tube feeding pump was turned off. The end of the tube was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained timely from the pharmacy and were administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #48) of three residents reviewed for pain medications being administered as ordered. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/28/23 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, epilepsy, restlessness/agitation, polyneuropathy, and diffuse traumatic brain injury (TBI) with loss of consciousness. Review of the physician's order dated 06/29/23 revealed an order for hospice services related to TBI with loss of consciousness. Review of the plan of care dated 06/29/23 revealed Resident #48 had chronic pain related to TBI and polyneuropathy. Interventions included to administer pharmacological interventions as ordered. Review of the physician's order dated 06/30/23 revealed an order for Hydromorphone Hydrochloride (HCl) eight milligrams (mg) every four hours for pain. Review of the plan of care dated 07/02/23 revealed Resident #48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of medications when they expired. This affected two (Residents #30 and #69) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 123. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes mellitus and depression. Review of the physician's orders for [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had an order for Humalog KwikPen 100 units/milliliter (mL), inject six units with meals for diabetes dated [DATE]. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had received Humalog medication at meals on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:10 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #919 of the medication cart for the 200 hall revealed Resident #30's Humalog Kwik Pen to be expired as it stated on the pen date opened on [DATE]. LPN #919 verified the insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10's medical record was complete and accurate. This affected one resident (#10) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and osteomyelitis. Review of Resident #10's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/04/23 for Vancomycin intravenous solution (antibiotic) infuse 1.5 grams intravenously every 12 hours for osteomyelitis until 11/20/23 and an order dated 11/04/23 for piperacillin sod-tazobactam intravenous solution (antibiotic) 3.375 grams infuse 3.375 grams every eight hours for osteomyelitis until 11/20/23. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #10's medication administration records (MARS) from 11/04/23 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during administration of medications to residents. This affected one (Resident #6) of six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 12/02/22 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety and altered mental status. Review of the physician's orders for December 2023 revealed Resident #6 had orders for venlafaxine (medication for depression) 150 milligrams (mg), furosemide (diuretic) 40 mg, clonazepam (medication for anxiety) 1 mg and oxybutynin chloride (medication for overactive bladder) 5 mg. Observation on 12/05/23 at 8:05 A.M. of the medication administration to Resident #6 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #917 revealed LPN #917 pulled the clonazepam medication card from the narcotic drawer, popped the pill in her hand and placed the card back in the narcotic drawer. When asked to see the medication card and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to store and prepare foods under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen except eight residents (#9, #25, #26, #35, #38, #45, #105 and #109) who did not receive food/nutrition by mouth. The facility census was 109. Findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 11/15/21 at 6:10 A.M. with [NAME] #417 revealing multiple sanitation concerns. In the large, walk-in cooler there was a large, steam-table pan of cooked, breaded chicken loosely covered with tin foil leaving it open to air and dated 11/07/21. The breading on the chicken looked like it was partially hardened on top yet the bottom pieces appeared to be decomposing in a liquid substance throughout the pan. A soft ball sized chuck of white meat was dated 11/04/21 and the bag was open to air. Two rotting half onion pieces were inside a bag with ham floating in cloudy water and random tomato slices dated 11/06/21. An approximate one pound block of yellow cheese was open to air and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-23 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility did not ensure menus were posted in a highly visible area and/or ensure residents received a copy of the menu to support individual food choices each day. This affected four residents (#19, #52, #68, and #95) of 24 residents who were reviewed for choices. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Record review was conducted of the facility's four week cycle menu titled Spring/Summer 2021 Week 3 for the date range of 11/14/21 to 11/20/21. For each lunch and dinner there was one meal being prepared without a second entree option. For lunch on 11/16/21 the menu read Celebration Day, starch of choice, vegetable of the day, margarine, dessert of the day and beverage of choice. Observations and interviews were conducted on 11/15/21 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:30 A.M. on the 200 unit and 400 unit of the facility and in the adjoining common areas. There was no evidence of a posted menu in the common areas nor in resident rooms. Interviews revealed Resident #68 had no idea what food was going to be served to her each day because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-23 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to serve meals in a timely manner. This affected 21 residents (#2, #3, #5, #11, #16, #19, #23, #28, #31, #46, #52, #59, #65, #68, #76, #86, #88, #89, #99, #100 and #114) residing on the 200 unit and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except eight residents (#9, #25, #26, #35, #38, #45, #105 and #109) who did not receive food/nutrition by mouth. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 11/15/21 beginning at 9:00 A.M. on the 200 unit. Patient Care Aide (PCA) #423 was working on the unit and said the meals were often late due to staffing problems in the kitchen. PCA #423 said breakfast should come to the unit around 8:30 A.M. Resident #68 said they sometimes don't get breakfast until 9:30 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. The tray cart arrived to the unit at 9:14 A.M. and PCA #423 was passing all the trays by herself. Residents #76 and #100 were sitting in their doorways asking where breakfast was. Both said breakfast was supposed to be served at 8:30 A.M. but had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach at all times for Resident #89 who had limited mobility. This affected one of 24 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Record review was conducted for Resident #89 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, heart failure, major depression and memory deficit related to cerebrovascular disease. The Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had difficulty hearing unless the speaker raised voice volume, was totally dependent on staff for transfers and toileting, did not walk, needed extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility and hygiene and could feed herself after tray set up. Review of the plan of care with a date initiated of 06/19/15 indicated she had self care deficits related to weakness and being nonambulatory and her call light should be kept within reach so she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to conduct predialysis and postdialysis blood pressure checks and assessments for Resident #2 and Resident #56. This affected two of nine residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 109. Findings include: 1. Record review was conducted for Resident #2 who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, protein-calorie malnutrition, heart failure, primary hypertension, atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease with dependence on hemodialysis. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was independent for his activities of daily living, had no cognitive impairment, no significant weight gain or loss and was receiving hemodialysis treatments. Review of a physician order dated 07/20/21 revealed he would receive dialysis treatments three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. A physician order dated 09/24/21 revealed he was to have vital signs taken daily.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure narcotics were reconciled every shift. The facility also failed to ensure accurate accounting of narcotics were maintained in one of four medication carts reviewed. This affected one (Resident #55) of eight (Residents #32, #53, #55, #70, #73, #74, #91 and #117) residents who had narcotics in the 100 hall medication cart. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 09/16/21 with diagnoses including hypertension, schizophrenia and burns involving 40-49% of his body surface. Resident #55's physician's order dated 09/09/21 for Methadone HCl (a narcotic used for pain) 5 milligrams (mg) stated to give three tablets via peg-tube (a tube inserted into the stomach for providing nutrition and medications) four times a day (qid) for pain. The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 11/16/21 revealed the resident did receive three tablets of Methadone as prescribed. Observation on 11/16/21 at 10:43 A.M. of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-23 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered for Resident #2 who was receiving hemodialysis treatments. This affected one of 23 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Record review was conducted for Resident #2 who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, protein-calorie malnutrition and chronic kidney disease with dependence on hemodialysis. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was independent for his activities of daily living, had no cognitive impairment, no significant weight gain or loss and was receiving hemodialysis treatments. Review of a physician order dated 07/20/21 revealed he went to hemodialysis three times a week. On 07/23/21 a renal, regular texture diet with a 2000 cubic centimeter (CC) fluid restriction was ordered. On 07/27/21 large portions was added to the diet orders. Review of the plan of care with a date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure administered medications were consistently documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This affected one (Resident #55) of 13 (Residents #21, #25, #27, #30, #36, #51, #52, #55, #102, #106, #112, #120 and #320) residents whose MARs were reviewed. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 09/16/21 with diagnoses including hypertension, schizophrenia and burns involving 40-49% of his body surface. Resident #55's physician's order dated 09/09/21 for Methadone HCl (a narcotic used for pain) five milligrams (mg) stated to give three tablets via peg-tube (a tube inserted into the stomach used to provide nutrition and/or medications) four times a day for pain. Review of the Controlled Drug Receipt Record Disposition Form revealed Methadone was administered on 11/06/21 at 6:00 A.M., 11/13/21 at 6:00 P.M. and 11/14/21 at 6:00 P.M. However, staff did not sign off on the MAR indicating the medications were given.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-11-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOWARD, MELVYN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 08/17/2021 |
| NELSON, CRAIG | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/26/2021 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/15/2022 |
| SUMMIT COUNTY ALZHEIMER CARE CENTER, INC. | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/21/1989 |
| ALZHEIMER SPECIAL CARE CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/08/1990 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365847. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.