Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation Center
500 West Laurel Street, Frackville, PA 17931 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (570) 570-8740 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,678 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.9% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.3% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.9% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.9% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.5% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.1%CMS range 40.5–65.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.2–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.2–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.74 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 104.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff interviews, and observation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of safety interventions to prevent elopement for one resident (Resident 1). These failures placed 12 residents identified at risk for wandering and elopement (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12) in an Immediate Jeopardy situation in which the facility's noncompliance has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death.Findings include: A review of a facility policy for Elopement/Unauthorized \Absence Policy reviewed July 2, 2025, revealed the facility will identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. In the event of a resident elopement the facility will implement its policies and procedures promptly to locate the resident in a timely manner The policy defined elopement as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select incident reports and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident 25) out of 20 sampled residents was free from sexual abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 46). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse, last reviewed by the facility on March 24, 2024, revealed the facility will not tolerate abuse of residents by anyone. The policy defines sexual abuse as includes, but is not limited to, non-consensual sexual contact of any type, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (brain damage that results from a lack of blood), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a persistently low or depressed mood, decreased interest in pleasurable activities,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide enteral feedings as ordered to maintain acceptable nutritional parameters and prevent a significant unplanned weight loss for one resident out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 83). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included intracranial injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force) and cognitive communication deficit (brain damage that results in language and cognition impairment). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated February 12, 2024 revealed that Resident 83 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 03 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy, the facility's infection control log, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive infection prevention and control program.Findings included: A review of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy last reviewed January 9, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to maintain an organized, effective facility wide program designed to systematically prevent, identify, control, and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among employees, volunteers, visitors, and contract healthcare workers, to conduct surveillance of communicable diseases and infectious outbreaks, and to monitor employee health. This program involves the intersection of many programs, policies, and services within the facility and is designed to meet the intent of regulatory guidance. Particular focus of the program will be on conducting assessment, surveillance, reducing healthcare associated infections, limiting transmission of disease, immunization, promoting antibiotic stewardship,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the right to participate in the planning of their care and treatment, including failure to conduct care plan conferences and failure to invite residents to participate in the interdisciplinary care planning process, for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 80 and 36).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning Policy last reviewed January 19, 2026, indicated the interdisciplinary team (IDT) is responsible for resident care plans. The IDT includes, but is not limited to, the resident's attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident, a nursing assistant with responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition staff, to the extent practicable the resident and/or the resident's representative, and other staff as necessary to meet the needs of the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure effective pain management and failed to implement, monitor, and revise pain interventions to maintain each resident's highest practicable level of well-being for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 11 and 4). Findings include: A review of the facility's Pain Management Protocol, last reviewed January 19, 2026, revealed the facility would assess residents' pain to maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Evaluation of pain treatment effectiveness would be monitored and adjusted according to resident needs. Both medication and non-medication techniques would be utilized to maintain resident comfort to the extent possible. When medication-related interventions are required, documentation will be included in the resident's clinical record on the effectiveness or need to adjust treatment. Clinical record review revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the availability of required emergency dialysis supplies for one resident (Resident 5) and failed to plan individualized care for a resident receiving hemodialysis to ensure the resident's care plan was consistent with physician orders for one resident (Resident 14) out of two residents sampled who received hemodialysis.Findings include: According to the National Kidney Foundation, patients receiving hemodialysis (a machine that filters waste, salts, and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) should have access to emergency care supplies, including at bedside, to promptly respond to complications such as bleeding from the dialysis access site. For residents with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula, a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein commonly used for dialysis access, rapid access to emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of three medication storage rooms (first floor medication room).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, last reviewed by the facility January 19, 2026, indicated that if a multi-dose vial of an injectable medication has been opened or accessed, the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. An observation of the first-floor medication room on February 5, 2026, at 10:45 AM, in the presence of Employee 1, Registered Nurse (RN), of medication stored in the medication refrigerator, revealed three multi-dose vials of Aplisol (solution used for screening tuberculosis) that had been opened and available for use but not dated when initially opened. A review of the manufacturer's dosage and administration recommendation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures for smoking safety, as evidenced by two out of six residents sampled for smoking. (Residents 5 and 53).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Smoking Policy, last reviewed by the facility on January 19, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to establish resident smoking processes that consider both smoking and non-smoking residents and that comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety. The policy indicated that any resident that chooses to smoke will be further assessed for smoking safety awareness and the need for reasonable physical or safety accommodations. The assessment is completed thereafter on readmission, quarterly, and with any significant change in the resident's condition. A clinical record review of Resident 5 revealed the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered per physician's orders for one resident out of 25 sampled (Resident 45).Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy, last reviewed January 19, 2026, revealed it is facility policy that licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence will administer oxygen via the specific route as ordered by a provider. Further review of the policy revealed that staff should perform hand hygiene and apply gloves when administering oxygen or when in contact with oxygen equipment. Other infection control measures included changing the tubing, mask, or cannula weekly. A clinical record review revealed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included asthma (a chronic lung disease causing inflammation and narrowing of the airways), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely act upon a recommendation to reduce an antianxiety medication (medication used to calm the nervous system and balance brain chemistry) for one of 25 residents sampled (Resident 9). Findings include: A review of the facility Psychoactive Medication Policy(medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors, includes antianxiety medication) last reviewed January 19, 2026, indicated that all residents receiving psychoactive medications will have their behaviors, effectiveness of interventions (pharmacological and nonpharmacological) and potential for a gradual dose reduction of psychoactive medication monitored and documented. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a left calcaneus fracture (broken heel bone in the left foot) and anxiety. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment in resident areas on two of two resident floors (first floor shower room and second floor dining room and residential units).Findings included:An observation on November 19, 2025, at 8:55 AM in the first-floor shower room revealed a large hole in the wall along the baseboard trim near the toilet and a missing ceiling tile in front of the privacy curtain. An observation on November 19, 2025, at 12:00 PM on the second floor East Wing revealed a 4-inch brown stain, resembling a water stain, with noted black stains within the brown on a ceiling tile near the nurses station.An observation on November 19, 2025, at 12:35 PM of the second floor East Wing dining room revealed three ceiling tiles that contained large brown stains, resembling water stains.An observation on November 19, 2025, at 12:40 PM of Resident 5's room revealed a used rubber glove, a used plastic cup, a towel, and multiple crumbs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of nursing staffing hours and staff to resident ratios, resident census, clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure that each resident received timely, person-centered care, services, and supervision necessary to maintain the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident population for five of 18 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 7, and 9).Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (stroke) with left-sided weakness and dementia (A condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment used to plan resident care) dated September 14, 2025, revealed the resident required staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of select facility policies, review of job descriptions, documentation provided by the facility, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility's administration failed to effectively use its resources to ensure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical and mental well-being of residents. The facility failed to ensure that measures were implemented to prevent one of twelve residents identified as being at risk for wandering (Resident 1) from exiting the building unattended into an unsafe environment. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk for harm and resulted in immediate jeopardy to residents' health and safety.Findings include:A review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) dated and signed September 12, 2024, indicated the administrator will lead and manage the overall operations of the facility in accordance with policies, procedures, and current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations. The NHA's essential duties…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records, information submitted by the facility, and select investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to assure that three residents (Residents 2,3, and 4) out of 3 sampled were free from physical abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed by the facility on May 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility not to tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A separate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to reasonably accommodate residents' need for call bell accessibility for four out of 30 residents sampled (Residents 35, 77, 75, and 83) and to ensure the accessibility of resident room display boards as expressed by 2 out of 6 residents during a resident group interview (Residents 24 and 45). Findings include: Observation on April 8, 2025, at 10:41 AM in resident room revealed that Resident 77 and Resident 75 were in their respective beds and unable to reach or access their call bells to summon staff assistance if needed. The call bells for both residents were observed on the floor, behind the head of the bed, and out of the residents' reach. Observation on April 8, 2025, at 10:50 AM revealed Resident 35 seated in a wheelchair along the right side of his bed in his room. The resident's call bell was on the floor on the left side of the bed, behind the headboard, and out of the resident's reach. During an interview at the time of the observation, Resident 35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) consistently was provided showers as planned to maintain good personal hygiene and failed to provide a resident dependent on staff for ADLs, the necessary services to maintain good nutrition for two residents out of 30 sampled (Residents 35 and 103). Findings include: A review of Resident 35's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (a stroke caused by a blockage of blood flow to the brain, leading to tissue damage and potential cell death), and type 2 diabetes (trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by long-term high blood sugar levels). A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and a review of employee personnel records it was determined the facility failed to ensure the qualified part-time professional activities director responsibilities included directing the development, implementation, supervision and ongoing evaluation of the activities program, which includes the completion and/or directing/delegating the completion of the activities component of the comprehensive assessment; and contributing to and/or directing/delegating the contribution to the comprehensive care plan goals and approaches that are individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. Findings include: Interview with the administrator on April 11, 2025, at approximately 10:00 AM revealed that the previous full-time qualified activities director resigned on September 20, 2024. The administrator stated that a qualified activities director from a sister facility was assisting with coverage until December 6, 2024. Since December 6, 2024, Employee 5 (activities director) has been the activity director with remote oversight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered care for diabetes management and professional standards of practice for one resident out of 30 sampled (Resident 45). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Diabetic Protocol, last reviewed on March 20, 2025, indicated the provider and staff will work together to give appropriate treatment to manage diabetes, and for residents who have or are suspected to have diabetes, the provider will order pertinent testing. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include diabetes (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of sugar in the blood and urine) and end-stage renal disease dependent on dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one resident out of 30 sampled (Resident 36). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Pain Management Policy, last reviewed by the facility on March 20, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy to ensure any resident admitted to the facility is assessed for pain and potential for pain in order for the resident to reach and maintain his or her highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. The policy indicated a pain evaluation will occur with an onset of new pain. The evaluation will include the presence of indicators of pain or active pain, including type, intensity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures for smoking safety, as evidenced by three out of the three residents sampled for smoking.(Residents 45, 51, and 79). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Resident Smoking Policy, last reviewed by the facility on March 20, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy to establish resident smoking processes that take into account both smoking and non-smoking residents and that comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety. The policy indicated any resident that chooses to smoke will be further assessed for smoking safety awareness and the need for reasonable physical or safety accommodations. The assessment is completed thereafter on readmission, quarterly, and with any significant change in the resident's condition. A clinical record review of Resident 45 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 30 sampled (Resident 106). Findings include: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual (an assessment tool utilized to gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan, and the RAI also assists staff to evaluate goal achievement and revise care plans accordingly by enabling the facility to track changes in the resident's status) dated October 2024, Section A2105: Discharge Status indicates to review the medical record, including the discharge plan and discharge orders, for documentation of discharge location. A clinical record review revealed Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on January 22, 2025. A review of the discharge return not anticipated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect their current needs and services required by one of 30 residents sampled (Resident 101). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (a condition characterized by periodic, intense emotional states affecting a person's mood) and diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces). A review of Resident 101's psychiatric consult dated March 18, 2025, at 1:22 PM indicated the assessment and plan included monitoring and documenting any signs of depression, anxiety, mood swings, paranoia, hallucinations, delusions, irritability, lack of motivation, and changes in sleep or appetite. A review of Resident 101's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals for one out of the 30 residents sampled (Resident 36). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Discharge Planning Process, reviewed by the facility on March 20, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that when a resident's discharge is anticipated, the facility will develop and implement a discharge plan that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. The policy indicates if the resident is interested in returning to the community, then the facility will document any referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities made for this purpose. If the discharge to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of 30 residents sampled (Resident 105). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of the nerves), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and dementia (chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of a nurse's note dated February 22, 2025, at 8:35 AM, indicated Resident 105 was assessed following staff reports of labored breathing. The note documented the resident was lethargic, responsive to verbal stimuli but quickly fell back asleep.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to timely notify the physician of abnormal lab results for one resident out of 30 sampled (Resident 96). Findings included: A review of facility policy entitled Resident Change in Condition Policy, last reviewed on March 20, 2025, indicated that nursing will recognize and intervene in the event of a change in resident condition and the physician and family/responsible party will be notified as soon as the nurse has identified the change in condition, including the most recent labs. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that include diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces) and malignant neoplasm of the brain (a cancerous growth in the brain that typically grows rapidly, invades surrounding brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, payor source data, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide timely and necessary dental services for one resident who is a Medicaid recipient (Resident 35) out of 30 residents reviewed. Findings included: A review of Resident 35's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (a stroke caused by a blockage of blood flow to the brain, leading to tissue damage and potential cell death), and type 2 diabetes (trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by long-term high blood sugar levels). A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated February 2, 2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (brief interview for mental status, a tool to assess the residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of Food Committee Minutes (completed in addition to Resident Council meetings) and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during resident group meetings, including those voiced by three of the six residents interviewed during a group interview (Residents 32, 62, and 69) and one resident out of the 20 sampled (Resident 54). Findings include: A review of minutes from Food Committee meeting dated March 20, 2024, with 12 residents in attendance, revealed that residents brought up a concern that they were not being provided snacks prepared by the baker and a choice or variety of snacks were not being provided by the facility. A review of minutes from Food Committee meeting dated April 22, 2024, with 7 residents in attendance, revealed that residents brought up a concern that nighttime were not being offered. During a resident group interview on May 8, 2024, at 10:00 AM, three of the six residents in attendance (Residents 32, 62,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 20 sampled (Residents 7 and 13). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual dated October 2023, Section A 1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is to be completed if the type of assessment is an admission assessment, significant change, or annual assessment. The annual MDS Assessment of Resident 7 dated October 1, 2023, revealed Section A 1500 was coded as 0, indicating that the resident was not considered by the state to require a Level II PASRR process, to have serious mental illness, and/or intellectual disability, mental retardation, or a related condition. A review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed that a Level I PASRR was completed on March 7, 2018, indicating that the resident met the criteria for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for bowel protocol for two residents out 20 sampled (Residents 89 and 50) to promote normal bowel activity to the extent possible Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians {The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine} the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement, and the secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week). The facility policy titled Bowel Tracking Protocol, last reviewed by the facility, March 24, 2024, indicated the facility will record and monitor bowel activity of residents each shift and address issues identified. In the absence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to promote the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being of two of the 20 residents reviewed (Residents 46 and 54). Findings include: According to regulatory guidance under §483.40(d) Medically-related social services means services provided by the facility's staff to assist residents in attaining or maintaining their mental and psychosocial health, which include providing or arranging for needed mental and psychosocial counseling services and identifying and promoting individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care that meet the mental and psychosocial needs of each resident. A clinical record review revealed Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (brain damage that results from a lack of blood), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a persistently low or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, a review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and use by dates for multi-dose medication and herbal supplements on one of three medication carts and one of three medication storage rooms observed (west short cart, first floor storage room - Residents 9, and 77). Findings include: The facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, with a policy review date March 24, 2024, indicated that facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container (vial, bottle, inhaler) when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened or opened. If a multi-dose vial of an injectable medication has been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured), the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. Observation of [NAME] Short medication cart at approximately 9:13 AM, on May 7, 2024, in the presence of Employee 4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the facility's smoking policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement established procedures to accurately assess residents for safe smoking ability for three residents out of three identified as a current smoker (Resident 50, 54, and 58). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Smoking Policy last reviewed by the facility March 24, 2024, indicated that a smoking assessment would be completed with readmission, quarterly and with any significant change in resident's condition. During entrance conference meeting on May 7, 2024, at 9:18 AM the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided a list of residents at the facility that currently smoke, which included three residents, Resident 50, 54, and 58. Review of Resident 50's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include diabetes and depression. The most recently completed quarterly smoking assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) according to the resident assessment for one of six residents reviewed related to PASRR assessments (Resident 58). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the Level 1 PASRR determined that the person is a targeted person with mental illness or an intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 58). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of review on May 10, 2024, did not identify the resident's PTSD symptoms or triggers related to this diagnosis and resident specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address, this resident's diagnosis of PTSD according to standards of practice to promote the resident's emotional well-being and safety. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review clinical records and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment, which promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' request for assistance as evidenced by experiences reported by seven residents out of 15 interviewed (Residents 8, 21, 22, 23, 73, 74, and 102). Findings include: A review of resident clinical record and a facility provided BIMS (brief interview mental status - a tool that assesses cognitive status) report and random interviews conducted on October 17, 2023, with 15 alert and oriented residents, to include 8 residents residing on the 100 unit, and 7 residents residing on the 300 unit, revealed that 7 residents' interviews voiced concerns regarding staff's failure to respond to their requests for assistance and provide needed care and services in a timely manner. During interviews, the residents relayed that they feel the facility is not adequately staffed because they wait extended periods of time for staff to respond to their requests for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and orderly environment on three of the three nursing units (Nursing Units 1, 2 and 3). Findings include: During an environmental tour of the facility on October 17, 2023, at approximately 2:35 PM, the front face panel of the heating unit located in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was off the unit and on the floor, resting against the unit, exposing the inner workings, coils with surrounding aluminum fins and electrical wiring. Interview with Employee 1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), on October 17, 2023, at approximately 2:40 PM, stated that the panel came off in the recent past, and is known to happen. Employee 1 stated that resident passes by the heating unit with her wheelchair and hits the unit and the face panel falls off. Staff then notifies maintenance staff to reapply the face panel to the unit. An observation on October 17, 2023, at 9:10 AM in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility provided documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: An observation on October 17, 2023, at 9:00 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed flying insects on the side wall of the resident bathroom and flying about the room. An observation on October 17, 2023, at 9:10 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a cylindrical standing fly trap with several flies attached and free-flying insects flying around the trap. Flies were also observed on the window-side bed, on the resident privacy curtains, on the window-side wall, and on the resident's television. An observation on October 17, 2023, at 9:30 AM of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a white fly trap with flies adhered inside. Flies were observed on the windowsill and flying about the room. An observation on October 17, 2023, at 11:00 AM revealed flies in the Unit 1 hallway outside of the facility conference room. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on test tray results and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve foods at palatable temperatures. Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. Random interviews with residents during the survey of September 8, 2023, revealed that six cognitively intact residents, (Residents 10, 43, 60, 68, 94, and 98) voiced concerns that the food is not served at palatable temperatures. Resident 10 stated that cold foods are served warm and hot foods are served cold. Resident 43 stated that hot foods are served cold, stating soup is always cold, coffee is cold. Resident 60 stated that the hot food is served cold. Resident 68 relayed that hot food is served cold and the cold food is warm. The resident stated that the milk for cereal is warm, jello was liquid. Resident 94…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record and select incident report review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions planned on the comprehensive care plan for preferred diversional activities to promote resident safety and deter falls for one resident out of four sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 1 revealed admission to the facility on March 31, 2023, with diagnoses, which included abnormality of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, lack of coordination, and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning {thinking, remembering, and reasoning} to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A nurses note dated April 2, 2023, at 1:19 PM revealed that the resident was trashing his room. Nursing noted that the resident was opening, and closing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized pain management programs, consistent with professional standards of practice and follow physician orders when administering pain medication for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Interagency Task Force, Executive Summary Final Report May 6, 2021, for Pain Management Best Practices the development of an effective pain treatment plan after proper evaluation to establish a diagnosis with measurable outcomes that focus on improvements including quality of life (QOL), improved functionality, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Achieving excellence in acute and chronic pain care depends on the following: · An emphasis on an individualized patient-centered approach for diagnosis and treatment of pain is essential to establishing a therapeutic alliance between patient and clinician. · Acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and controlled drug medication sheets, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting of controlled medications for one of four residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a compression fracture of the lumbar vertebrae. Resident 1 had a physician order initially dated April 4,2023 for Oxycodone HCL (a narcotic opioid pain medication) 5 mg tablet every 4 hours as needed for pain level 4 to 10. A review of the controlled medication record accounting for the above narcotic medication revealed that on April 4, 2023, at 11:30 PM, April 5, 2023, at 4:00 AM, April 6, 2023, at 2:30 AM and 6:30 AM, April 8, 2023, at 11:30 PM, and April 14, 2023, at 12:00 AM and 4:00 AM nursing signed out a dose of the resident's supply of Oxycodone 5 mg. However, the administration of the controlled drug to the resident was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled according to accepted labeling requirements for two of five residents sampled (Resident 54, and 95). Findings include: A review of Resident 54's clinical record revealed she was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). A physician order dated [DATE], was noted Oxycodone - Acetaminophen (an opioid pain medication) 5-325 milligram (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for pain, and give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for break through pain, severe 7-10, for 14 days. A controlled medication utilization record was labeled with Resident 54's name, and the medication Oxycodone - Acetaminophen 5-325 mg, dated [DATE], noting one tablet by mouth three times dailyroutine chronic pain. A line was drawn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending September 8, 2023, and the outcome of the activities of the facility's quality assurance committee it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a quality assurance plan, which was able to identify and correct ongoing quality deficiencies related implementing procedures to promote accurate accounting of controlled medications for one of five residents sampled (Resident 54). Findings include: As a result of the deficiencies cited under the requirements related to pharmacy procedures - records, during the survey of September 8, 2023, the facility developed a plan of correction to serve as their allegation of compliance, which included a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure that solutions were sustained. This corrective plan was to be completed and functional by September 20, 2023. However, during the survey ending September 27, 2023, continuing deficient facility practice was identified with this same requirement. According to the facility's plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-10 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required advance notice, a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS 10123-NOMNC), regarding the termination of Medicare services for one of the three residents sampled (Resident 241). Findings include: A review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 revealed that the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare-covered services end or on the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. A clinical record review revealed that the facility provided Resident 241 with a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS 10123-NOMNC) letter dated April 24, 2024. The notice indicated that Medicare would likely not pay for the resident's skilled services after April 26, 2024. Further clinical record review revealed that Resident 241's effective date for current skilled nursing facility services ended on March 26, 2024, not April 26, 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,678 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $15,940 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- $29,738 — penalty dated 2024-05-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020) | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| BNV DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2018 |
| WIW DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2023 |
| OHI ASSET (PA) FRACKVILLE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2019 |
| PEARLSTEIN, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/03/2025 |
| SAKALAS, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/06/2024 |
| THOMPSON, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/09/2024 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2018 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2018 |
| RKL LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/26/2023 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/12/2019 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2018 |
| SHG BOA LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/31/2026 |
| SHG MT, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/31/2026 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395286. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.