No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gastonia Health & Rehab Center

1770 Oak Hollow Road, Gastonia, NC 28054 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (704) 853-8175 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (704) 853-8175 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Sep 20232 actual-harm citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,808 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Sep 2023
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,808 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (85%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
760 N New Hope Rd, Gastonia, NC 28054 · (704) 864-5969 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2211 N New Hope Rd · (704) 671-4811 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.7 mi
2211 N New Hope Rd · (704) 866-7022 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1200 Modena St · (704) 866-6847 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.6%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%7.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.2%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%18.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.0%21.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%5.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.7%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%14.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.5%78.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.2%22.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
33.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.2–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay8.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
84.6%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 85% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1). Resident # 1 reported she started to cry, was scared, was upset the aide was hurting her. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, hypertension, lack of coordination, and renal failure. Diagnoses further revealed Resident #1 had a fracture to the right tibia dated 06/30/23 with orders to wear a brace. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required two plus assist with transfers. The MDS further revealed Resident #1 was not coded for behaviors. Resident #1's care plan revised on 05/05/23 revealed Resident #1 had limited physical mobility due to weakness. The goal was for Resident #1 to remain free of complications related to immobility, including contractures, thrombus formation, skin-breakdown,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy for protection and reporting. Nurse Aide (NA) #2 failed to protect the resident from further abuse and immediately report abuse to the Administrator. This deficient practice affected one of one resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). The findings included: A review of the facility policy and procedure titled North Carolina Resident Abuse, with a revised date of 10/03/22 read in part facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator/ Abuse Coordinator. The Administrator/ Abuse Coordinator will immediately begin an investigation and notify the applicable local and state agencies in accordance with the procedures in this policy. In the section Protect the Resident, the policy read in part, If the resident is injured as a result of the alleged or suspected incident, the facility should take immediate action to treat the resident. A.) staff should report all incidents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident, staff, manufacturer 's representative, Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to: a.) supervise Resident #1 during a shower when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 turned away from Resident #1 to gather supplies on 09/18/25 and Resident #1 fell from the shower chair to the shower room floor. No pain or injury was noted from this incident; b.) provide a safe transfer for Resident #1 when NA #1 was transferring the resident from the bed to wheelchair using the mechanical lift. During the transfer and while Resident #1 was suspended approximately 4 to 5 feet from the floor, the lift tilted to one side and the resident fell while still in the sling onto the floor on her back. Then the mechanical lift fell on top of Resident #1 with the lift bar striking her on the top of her head. Resident #1 was evaluated at the hospital and diagnosed with a left calcaneal fracture (fracture of the heel bone) and a left anterior talus (the bone in the foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, resident, family member, visitor, and staff interviews, the facility failed to lower a resident's bed before leaving the resident alone after care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Resident #3's bed was left in the high position and the resident rolled off the air mattress onto the floor and sustained a laceration to her right forehead measuring 3 centimeters (cm) by 1 millimeter (mm) that required 6 sutures to repair and an acute right comminuted (a bone that is broken in at least 2 places), non-displaced (broken bone that retains proper alignment) femoral neck fracture that was conservatively managed (no surgical intervention). The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, malnutrition, and aphasia. Review of Resident #3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents with new mental health diagnoses for 6 of 6 residents (Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #18, Resident #19, Resident #22, and Resident #42) reviewed for PASRR.The findings include:a. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed PASRR level I was completed on 3/06/24 prior to admission with a recommendation to resubmit paperwork for PASRR level II if a new mental health diagnosis was suspected or if there was a significant change in the resident's condition. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.There was no evidence in the medical record that a request was submitted for an evaluation for Level II PASRR. b. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed PASRR level I was completed on 2/03/25 prior to admission to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Nurse Aide Registry forms, and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor the North Carolina (NC) Nurse Aide Registry to ensure that 1 of 37 Nursing Assistants (NA) that were employed at the facility remained listed on the on the NC Nurse Aide Registry with an active Nurse Aide I recertification (NA#1).The findings included:NA #1 was hired by the facility on [DATE] to work with residents in need of care and treatment. Review of NA #1's personnel file indicated that NA #1's Nurse Aide Certification had expired on [DATE]. A review of the staffing schedule sheets from [DATE] to [DATE] revealed NA #1 had worked with an expired Nurse Aide Certification during the timeframe of schedules reviewed. On [DATE] the Administrator was notified that NA#1's Nurse Aide Certification had expired on [DATE], and NA #1's timecard for [DATE] was requested. Review of NA #1's timecard for [DATE] revealed NA #1 had worked the following days and time at the facility after her Nurse Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident prior to her wetting through her brief, turn sheet, and bed sheet for 1 of 3 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #1). The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, decreased mobility, osteoarthritis and non-Alzheimer's dementia.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact with no behaviors and no impairment of her upper or lower extremities and used a wheelchair for mobility. The assessment also revealed the resident was dependent for toileting, required 2 persons assistance with toileting and was incontinent of both bladder and bowel.A urinary incontinence care plan last revised on 10/14/25 revealed Resident #1 was incontinent of urine. The goal was for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive individualized care plans in activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #47). Findings included: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia. Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had moderately impaired cognition and displayed no moods or rejection of care. He was coded for partial assistance with oral hygiene. Resident #47's care plan dated 6/30/24 had a problem category for ADL Functional Status related to weakness and limited mobility. Approaches included assisting with activities of daily living, dressing, grooming, toileting, feeding and oral care. There was no denture care noted on the care plan. Resident #47 was not interviewable. An interview with Nurse #1 conducted in conjunction with an observation of Resident #47 on 10/22/24 at 12:49 PM revealed she was unaware if Resident #47 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide oral care for 1 of 4 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #47). Findings included: Resident # 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia. Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had moderately impaired cognition. He was coded for partial staff assistance with oral hygiene. He was coded for no behaviors or rejection of care. Resident #47's care plan dated 6/30/24 had a problem category for ADL Functional Status related to weakness and limited mobility. Approaches included assisting with activities of daily living to include oral care. There was no other oral care or denture care noted on the care plan. Resident #47 was not interviewable. An interview with Nurse #1 conducted in conjunction with an observation of Resident #47 on 10/22/24 at 12:49 PM revealed she was unaware if Resident #47 had dentures. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to remove an unidentified resident's medications, failed to remove loose and unsecure pills and failed to remove debris of paper shavings and rubber bands from medication cart (medication cart #2) and failed to remove loose and unidentified pills and debris of paper shavings and rubber bands from medication cart (medication cart #1) for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: a. On 10/23/24 at 3:12 PM an observation was made of medication cart #2 along with Nurse #1. Stored in the narcotic drawer was a resident's personal weekly medication container that contained no resident name or information that had 6 pills in the Thursday's slot, 7 pills in the Friday's slot and 7 pills in the Saturday's slot. The medication cart also had 21 loose and unidentifiable pills in the bottom of the drawers along with debris of paper shavings and rubber bands. An interview was conducted with Nurse #1 on 10/23/24 at 3:12 PM. The Nurse explained that the medication container was in the narcotic box…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the recertification and complaint investigation surveys that occurred on 02/17/22 and 07/12/23. This failure was for two deficiencies that were originally cited in the areas of Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance (F692) and Infection Prevention and Control (F880) and were subsequently recited on the current complaint investigation and revisit survey of 09/13/23. The repeat deficiencies during multiple surveys of record show a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QA program. The findings included: This tag is cross referred to: F692: Based on observations, record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician order for a nutritional supplement for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #2). During the recertification and complaint investigation survey conducted on 07/12/23, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their COVID-19 Testing Guidance within their Policy and Procedure when the staff failed to provide testing of residents and staff after a positive COVID-19 test was obtained on a symptomatic resident (Resident #5) on 09/02/23 at 1:30 AM. The findings included: Review of the facility's COVID Testing Guidance under section Testing Summary - under the column Testing Trigger - newly identified COVID-19 positive staff or resident in a facility that is unable to identify close contacts/Broad Based approach. Under the column Staff/Healthcare Personnel (HCP), the guidance read, Test all staff, regardless of vaccination status, facility-wide or at a group level if staff are assigned to a specific location where the new case occurred (e.g., unit, floor, or other specific area(s) of the facility). If negative, test again 48 hours later, and if negative 48 hours after the second test. In general, testing should continue every 3-7 days until 14 days have passed without any new cases. Under the column…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician order for a nutritional supplement for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #2). The findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A care plan dated 05/25/23 had a focus area for increased nutrition/hydration due to poor by mouth intake. The goal was for the resident to be adequately nourished within limits of her end stage illness. Interventions included providing supplements per order. An annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. The resident was coded as receiving a therapeutic diet. Resident #2 was not coded for weight loss or weight gain. A Physician order dated 12/01/22 read, Nutritional supplement three times a day 90 milliliters three times daily, offer non-vanilla flavor, unable to swallow vanilla. Resident #2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2023 revealed a physician order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep a urinary catheter bag from touching the floor to reduce the risk of infection or injury for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed with indwelling catheters. The findings included: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 was currently being followed by Hospice and had an indwelling urinary catheter for comfort. A review of Resident #40's care plan dated 03/21/2023 revealed a focus area for indwelling urinary catheter. The interventions included check tubing for kinks each shift, and position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and provide a privacy cover. A review of Resident #40's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive to total assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) except eating and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of the physician orders for Resident #40 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to follow a physician order for a nutritional supplement for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #20 and Resident #7). The findings included: 1. Resident #20 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was alert and oriented. The resident was coded as receiving a therapeutic diet. Resident #20 was not coded for weight loss or weight gain. A care plan dated 05/25/23 had a focus area for increased nutrition/hydration due to poor by mouth intake. The goal was for the resident to be adequately nourished within limits of her end stage illness. Interventions included providing supplements per order. Resident #20's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2023 revealed a physician order dated 12/01/22 which read, Nutritional supplement three times a day 90 milliliter's three times daily. On 07/12/23 Nurse #1 documented Resident #20 had refused the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a continuous supply of supplemental oxygen for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen therapy (Resident #246). The findings included: Resident #246 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with exacerbation and abnormalities of breathing. A physician order dated 07/03/23 revealed Resident #246 was ordered supplemental oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuously every day and night shift. The admission evaluation dated 07/05/23 revealed Resident #246 was alert and oriented and required one person assist for majority of activities of daily living (ADL). The admission evaluation further revealed Resident #246 was coded for oxygen use. An observation and interview conducted with Resident #246 on 07/10/23 at 11:50 AM revealed Resident #246 was sitting in her bed with oxygen running through nasal cannula. Resident #246 stated she had told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,808 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $4,940 — penalty dated 2025-10-23
  • $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-10-23
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-15 for 49 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHI ASSET NC GASTONIA LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2026
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
HOPPING, DARINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
LAWSON, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2025
RADER, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2026
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2026
WALKER & ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2023
CORDOVA, ALDOIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$600K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 3%Other / private 49%

This home reported $600K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,990per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345441. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next