No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

222 West Edison Avenue, New Castle, PA 16101 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (724) 652-6340 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$8,281 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,281 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1211 Wilmington Ave · (724) 656-6161 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1210 Wilmington Ave · (724) 652-0750 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1700 Wilmington Rd · (724) 498-2004 · Call to confirm hours
Park
601 W North St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
703 Sampson St · (724) 656-4904

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.1%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.2%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.0%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.4%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine27.5%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.8%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.4%9.5%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.9%CMS range 24.6–55.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.4–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.8–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
55.3%
Total nursing turnover
64.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 94.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documentation, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient safety interventions and supervision to prevent elopement (unauthorized leave from the facility). This failure placed residents at the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of four residents reviewed who were at risk for elopement from the facility (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Elopement Unauthorized Absence Policy, dated 9/02/25, defined elopement as leaving the premises or a safe area without authorization (i.e., an order for discharge or leave of absence) and/or any necessary supervision to do so. The policy also indicated that the facility would: identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the residents through development and implementation of safety interventions. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/03/23, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (generalized dysfunction of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility documents, facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an elopement for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include:A facility policy entitled, Pennsylvania Resident Abuse Policy dated 9/02/25, indicatedThe facility will investigate all allegations of neglect immediately and report all such allegations to the Administrator (NHA) and the NHA will immediately begin an investigation.The facility defines neglect as the failure of the facility, it's employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or coercion.Once the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) are notified, an investigation of the allegation will be conducted.Conduct interviews with the resident, and all witnesses.Witnesses include anyone who witnessed or heard of the incident, anyone who came in close contact with the resident the day of the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and job descriptions, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that proper supervision and elopement prevention interventions were effectively implemented in the facility.Findings include:The NHA's job description revealed that the NHA's primary purpose is to lead, direct, and manage the overall operations of the community in accordance with policies and procedures; current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the community. To organize, develop and direct resources to maintain the highest degree of quality care is maintained for each resident at all times.The DON's job description specified that the DON is responsible to organize, develop, manage, and direct the overall operations of the Nursing Department in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the community. Work directly with the Administrator and the Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents for two of two nursing care units (Second and Third floor nursing care units). Findings include: Observations on 3/9/2026, between 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. of the Second and Third floor nursing care units revealed the following: Stock of clean linen on the Second floor nursing care unit revealed no wash cloths, no bed sheets, no towels for use. Observations of the clean storage room on the second floor had no stock available of bedding supplies. Stock of clean linen on the Third floor nursing care unit revealed one cart to have only 1 sheet, 3 pillow cases, zero towels and zero wash cloths for use. Observation of the Third floor clean storage room revealed no further supply of linens for use. Observations of rooms on the Third floor revealed:room [ROOM NUMBER] window: bed was not made, no sheetsroom [ROOM NUMBER] window: bed not made, no sheets room [ROOM NUMBER] no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in one of one main kitchens and failed to monitor resident's personal refrigerators for temperatures for one of two residents reviewed with personal refrigerators (Resident R78). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Storage of Refrigerated Foods Policy dated 9/2/25, indicated that Perishable foods will be stored in order to maximize food safety and quality. and Refrigerated, TCS (time / temperature control for safety) foods, prepared and held for more than 24 hours will be marked to indicate the date the food will be consumed or discarded. Review of a facility policy entitled Food Brought in From Outside the Facility with a policy review date of 9/2/25, indicated that, Resident room refrigerators: The refrigerator where the food will be stored will have an internal thermometer. Units will maintain safe internal temperature in accordance with state and federal standards for safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for one of 20 residents rooms reviewed (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, General/Routine Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection Policy dated 9/2/25, revealed, Proper cleaning and disinfecting of environmental surfaces is necessary to break the chain of infection. Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from surfaces through the physical action of scrubbing with detergents/surfactants and rinsing with water; Process for Environmental cleaning and disinfection includes: Cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces immediately if surface(s) are visibly soiled. Daily cleaning and disinfection for high touch surfaces in resident rooms; Household surfaces should be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur, and when surfaces are visibly soiled (floors, tabletops, resident care areas, dining rooms, common areas, shared shower rooms and bathrooms, hair salons, activities, etc.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R8).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Planning Policy dated 9/2/25, indicated that An interdisciplinary plan of care will be established and updated as indicated for every resident in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. And The care plan is reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the resident's needs, wishes or change in condition. At a minimum this will occur with each comprehensive and quarterly assessment in accordance with Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) requirements. Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/15/21, with diagnoses that included stroke (occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or a blood vessel inside or on the surface of the brain bursts causing brain cells to die often times, but not always leading to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R5 and Closed Record CR91).Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Enteral Feeding Tube Policy dated 9/2/25, indicated Flush tube according to physician direction. Review of a facility policy entitled Dietary Enteral Nutrition Care Policy dated 9/2/25, indicated The use of an enteral nutrition tube has a major impact on a resident and his or her quality of life. Enteral nutrition tubes will be utilized only after assessment determines that the clinical condition of the resident makes the use of the feeding tube medically necessary. Review of a facility policy entitled Resident Change in Condition dated 9/2/25, indicated The Physician/Provider and Resident/Family/Responsible Party will be notified when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. Review of a facility policy entitled Post Mortem Care Policy dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was adequately working for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R49). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Call Light Resident Communication System Policy with a policy review date of 9/2/2025 , revealed that it is the policy of the facility to provide residents with a means of communicating with staff. A call system is installed in each resident room and toilet/bath areas. The facility responds to resident needs and requests. Observation in Resident R49's room revealed the call bell system in the corridors did not illuminate when resident call bell button was pressed. There was also no signal to the front desk area that the call light was activated. Resident R49 revealed that there are constantly long wait times when he/she calls for help of over 60 minutes and last night nobody came to assist him/her at all.During an observation and interview on 1/10/26, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, pharmacy contract/agreement, clinical records, and facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain ordered medications in a timely manner for two of four residents reviewed (Residents R3 and R4). Findings include: A facility policy entitled New Admission/readmission Process revised on 3/19/25, revealed the process included review of orders; physician verification of orders noted, transmitted to pharmacy, and transcribed to the electronic medication administration record/treatment administration record (eMAR/eTAR). Pharmacy contract/agreement effective 7/01/24, included: all controlled substance orders should be communicated to the pharmacy as follows: If the medication is needed before the next scheduled delivery, facility staff should indicate the exact time by which the medication is needed; If the controlled substance is needed before the pharmacy can make arrangements for a timely delivery, the facility should fax a request to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for eight of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R5, R10, R11, R12 and Resident R17). Findings include: During wound dressing observations on 3/26/25, from 8:45 a.m. through 9:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse Employee E1, the daily wound dressings for Residents R1, R2, R3, R5, R10 and R12 were noted to be absent. During this time, Licensed Nurse Employee E1 confirmed the absence of the wound dressings and that the dressings were to be changed and reapplied daily. A review of these resident's clinical records revealed each had physician's orders to change and apply a new wound dressing daily. Additionally, review of R17's clinical record revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and physician's orders for daily wound dressing changes were present. Resident R17 also verified that staff failed to complete daily wound dressing changes as physician ordered. During interviews on 3/26/25, from 8:45 a.m. through 11:35 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents are able to voice their concerns at the meetings, and that the meeting concerns are recorded for timely follow-up and resolutions to resident concerns for seven of seven Resident Council attendants (Residents R9, R14, R56, R62, R67, R73, and R85). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Resident Council Policy dated 9/2024, indicated that the Life Enrichment Director or designee may attend the Resident Council Meeting to act as a liaison between the group and the facility if requested by the Council. Any additional facility personnel will attend the meeting upon request of the residents. The Activity Director will attempt to accommodate the resident recommendations to the extent practicable and provide follow-up to the Resident Council. Resident Council will document minutes of each meeting along with attendance on the Resident Council Meeting Minutes Form. Resident issues or concerns will be documented on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, staff and resident interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping services to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 14 of 94 resident rooms (Rooms 207, 209, 210, 217, 220, 223, 224, 226, 303, 307, 310, 319, 321, and 325 ), and for one of two dining rooms. Findings include: Facility policy, General/Routine Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection Policy dated 9/2024, revealed proper cleaning and disinfecting of environmental surfaces is necessary to break the chain of infection. Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from surfaces through the physical action of scrubbing with detergents/surfactants and rinsing with water. Process for Environmental cleaning and disinfection includes: working from clean to dirty; working from top to bottom. Cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces immediately if surface(s) are visibly soiled. Daily cleaning and disinfection for high touch surfaces in resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to promote the physical and mental well-being and meet the needs of nine of 24 residents interviewed (Residents R149, R19, R226, R9, R56, R67, R62, R73, and R85). Findings include: During interviews on 1/06/25, from 10:05 a.m. through 1:00 p.m. revealed that Residents R149, R19 and R226 expressed concerns of poor call bell response times, indicating that they often had to wait nearly an hour after activating the call bell, to have their needs met. Obervations on 1/06/25, at 2:17 p.m. revealed an activated call light for Resident R226. The call light remained unaddressed until 2:30 p.m. During interview at 2:25 p.m., Resident R226 stated they activated the call light as they had been left on a bedpan which was causing considerable discomfort while waiting for assistance. At this time, staff members were observed seated at the nursing station where the call bell system was alarming audibly and visually lighted. Interviews during the Resident Council meeting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices regarding enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for two of two resident units (200 and 300 units). Findings include: A facility policy, Transmission-Based Precautions and Isolation Policy, dated 9/2024, revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) - EBP are intended to prevent transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) via contaminated hands and clothing of healthcare workers to high risk residents. EBP are indicated for high contact care activities for residents with chronic wounds and indwelling devices (such as central lines, urinary catheters, and trachs) and for all those colonized or infected with a MDRO currently targeted by the CDC. Other MDROs may be included at the discretion of the facility Infection Control Committee unless required by state guidance. Observations on 1/07/25, at 12:05 p.m. revealed Certified Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to comprehensively assess pressure ulcers/injuries (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R42). Findings include: A facility policy Pressure Injury Prevention and Treatment Policy dated 9/2024, revealed Residents admitted with existing pressure injuries will receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection. New pressure injuries will not develop unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable. Pressure injuries identified will be assessed initially and at least weekly thereafter, until closed. All assessments will include the following elements: Location and stage [Stage one-nonblanchable redness of an area. Stage Two-shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed without slough or bruising. Stage Three-full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly reorder and store medications for two of eight residents reviewed during medication pass observations (Residents R72 and R73). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications last revised 8/01/2024, revealed that upon discovery that facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a resident, facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication form the pharmacy. If the medication shortage is discovered at the time of medication administration, facility staff should immediately notify the pharmacy. Resident R72's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/23/24, with diagnoses that included history of falls, fracture of the left femur, and aftercare for joint replacement therapy. R72 had a physician's order for Oxycodone (pain medication) 5 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours as needed for pain with a start date of 10/14/24, and last administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents for two of two nursing care units (Second and Third floor nursing care units). Findings include: Observations on 8/20/2024, between 1:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. of the Second and Third floor nursing care units with the Director of Laundry and Housekeeping Services revealed the following: Stock of clean linen on the Second floor nursing care unit revealed four wash cloths and six towels on the clean linen carts and storage closet. Stock of clean linen on the Third floor nursing care unit revealed zero wash cloths and towels on the linen carts and storage closet. Soiled linen rooms on the Second and Third floor nursing care units revealed bagged soiled linens that were stored from the morning and had not been sent to the laundry room for washing. Laundry room revealed clean linen that was ready to be sent back to the nursing care units for the second shift. The stock of towels and wash cloths did not appear to be enough to supply the census of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable for taste and temperature on two of two units for 17 of 18 residents interviewed (Residents R1 through R13, R15, and R24 through R27). Findings include: Upon request, there was no policy provided regarding the expectations/requirements during meal service for timeliness of meal delivery and the palatability of food served to residents. During resident interviews on 7/9/24, during the lunch meal service, 17 of 18 alert and oriented residents interviewed, elicited complaints regarding their meals. Residents R1 through R13, R15, and R24 through R27 expressed frustration that their meals were not palatable because the food was usually cold when delivered by staff, due to the trays sitting in the hall for long periods of time until they are delivered. Additionally, they reported that the food overall was of poor quality and tasted terrible. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary food service operations for one of one kitchens. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Dish Machine Use, last reviewed 1/17/2024, revealed Prior to use, verify temperature and/or chemical sanitizer concentration are within specifications provided by the dish machine manufacturer (see note). If requirements are not met, immediately discontinue use of the dish machine and notify the person in charge. Review of facility policy entitled, Storage of refrigerated foods, last reviewed 1/17/2024, revealed All refrigerated items must be stored at least six inches above the floor and eighteen inches from the refrigerator ceiling and sprinkler heads. Store all food/leftovers in covered, approved, food grade containers. Refrigerated, TCS foods, prepared and held for more than 24 hours will be marked to indicate the date the food will be consumed or discarded. Prepared TCS foods will be held a maximum of seven days with the day of preparation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain infection control and prevention measures related to laundry services. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, General Linen Handling Policy, dated 1/17/24, revealed The facility will handle all used linen as potentially contaminated and will employ standard precautions in handling such linen. Linen will be handled in a manner which reduces the likelihood of contamination. Contaminated laundry/linens will be bagged or contained at the point of use or collection. Leak resistant bags or containers will be used for any linens contaminated with blood or body substances. Observations in the laundry area on 2/07/24, at 10:20 a.m. revealed dirty linen and clothing covered with feces in a large laundry cart that was utilized for a collection device from bags delivered via the laundry chute. Soiled wash cloths and towels with large amounts of feces were observed in a garbage bag to be discarded related to the large amount of feces on them. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and policy, review of clinical records, and the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide use to plan the provision of care for residents), observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's dignity was maintained for nine of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R11, R13, R26, R36, R44, R48, R66, and R78). Findings include: Review of Resident Rights Inservice provided by the Registered Nurse (RN) Regional Director on 2/07/24, at approximately 11:00 a.m. revealed The Residents' [NAME] of Rights, The Nursing Home Reform Act established the following rights for nursing home residents: The right to be treated with dignity; The right to exercise self-determination; The right to communicate freely; Receive adequate and appropriate care; To be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity; and Participate in community activities, both inside and outside the nursing home. Review of the facility policy, Resident Communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, which includes a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the resident's discharge status, reconciliation of all medications, and post-discharge plan for two of three closed records reviewed (Resident CR108 and Resident CR159). Findings include: Review of a facility policy dated 1/17/24, entitled Discharge Planning Policy indicated that when a discharge is anticipated, the facility will develop a Discharge Summary that includes summaries of the resident's stay, the resident's status at discharge, medication reconciliation, and summary of the resident's post-discharge plan of care. Resident CR108's closed clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/17/23, with diagnoses that included diabetes (condition related to inadequate insulin and high blood sugars), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition that obstructs air flow in the lungs with symptoms of difficulty breathing, coughing and shortness of breath), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents and clinical records, and the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide use to plan the provision of care for residents), observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents are assisted with meals for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R40 and R105). Findings include: No policy was provided regarding the facility's responsibility to ensure a dependent resident receives care/treatment. Review of the Resident Rights Inservice, provided by the Regional Director on 2/07/24, approximately 11:00 a.m. revealed The Residents' [NAME] of Rights, The Nursing Home Reform Act established the following rights for nursing home residents: Receive adequate and appropriate care, Right to Dignity, Respect, and Freedom; and to be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity. Resident R40's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/02/22, with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (caused by a disease or injury that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R78). Findings include: Review of facility policy, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 1/17/24, revealed 1. Facility staff should comply with Facility policy, Applicable Law and the State Operations Manual when administering medications. 3. Dose Preparation: Facility should take all measures required by Facility policy and Applicable Law, including but not limited to the following: 3.10 Facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended. 5. During medication administration, Facility staff should take all measures required by Facility policy and Applicable Law, including, but not limited to the following: 5.10 Observe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of tuberculin solution (used to test for the disease tuberculosis) with the date they were opened in one of two medication storage rooms (Third Floor medication room). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Storage and Expiration dating of Medication, Biologicals dated January 2022, indicated that staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened. The packaging for the tuberculin solution indicated that any unused solution was to be discarded after 28 days once opened. Observation on 2/05/24, at 12:32 p.m. of the Third Floor medication room refrigerator revealed an opened multi-dose vial of tuberculin solution without a date when it was opened. At that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E6 confirmed that the multi-dose vial of tuberculin solution did not identify an open date. The LPN was able to confirm at that time that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule an appointment for outside services for one of 24 residents reviewed in a timely manner (Resident R99). Findings include: Resident R99's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/27/2023, with diagnoses that inlcuded cervical (neck) spinal problems, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, cervical spinal fusion and pain disorder. During an interview on 2/6/2024, at 1:55 p.m. Resident R99 revealed that facility staff were to schedule an appointment within one week of admission with an orthopedic surgeon (medical doctor that focuses on bones, muscles, joints, and nerves) specializing in spinal care, but that they failed to make the appointment until nearly a month after admission, prolonging their stay at the facility. Resident R99's clinical record also contained hospital discharge/admission orders which directed the facility to make an appointment with an orthopedic surgeon specializing in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, and review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bath/shower as resident preference for six of six residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, and R7). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Resident Bath Showering/Scheduling Policy dated 1/17/23, revealed Residents will be bathed or showered according to their preferences in order to maintain healthy hygiene and skin condition. Staff who have demonstrated competence may bathe the resident via shower, tub bath, whirlpool bath, or bed bath. Bed linens will be changed on baths days and as needed, but minimally once weekly. (A) Each resident will be asked about his/her bathing preferences upon admission (type of bath, preferred days and times). (B) Each resident will be scheduled to receive bathing a minimum of two times per week unless they prefer less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — pattern
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for two of two resident bathing rooms observed (Floors 2 and 3). Findings include: No water temperature policy for bathing was provided by the facility. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/28/21, with diagnoses that included presence of left artificial elbow joint, history of falling, muscle weakness, and other reduced mobility. During an interview on 1/10/24, at 11:45 a.m. Resident R2 indicated he/she does not receive showers often, but when he/she does, the water is hot, then cold, making the shower a horrible experience. Resident R2 indicated he/she received a shower earlier in the day and the water temperature went from hot to cold and stayed cold for the rest of the shower. Resident R2 indicated he/she told staff to stop and give him/her a bed bath, because he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and policy, review of clinical record, and resident representative and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with medically related social services related to the grievance process, and psychosocial services for one of ten residents interviewed (Resident representative R1). Findings include: Review of facility documentation Job Description for a Social Worker on 1/11/24, revealed that the primary purpose of the job position is to assist in planning, organizing, implementing, evaluating, and directing the overall operation of our facility's Social Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Director of Social Services and/or Administrator, to assure that the medically related emotional and social needs of the resident are met/maintained on an individual basis. Essential function, duties, and responsibilities include: participate in discharge planning, development and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Resident's R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/17/23, with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a urinary condition involving bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem), diabetes mellitus (a disease that affects how blood sugar is regulated in the blood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of Resident R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician order with start date of 5/18/23, for Anoro Ellipta (umeclidinium-vilanterol--medicines to treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD-progressive lung disease]) blister with device; 62.5-25 microgram (mcg)/actuation one puff, inhale orally one time a day for wheezing. Observation of the 2 [NAME] Medication Cart on 1/09/24, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed the training to properly care for resident's needs for one of 21 days reviewed (12/29/23). Findings include: Review of the Job Description for Charge Nurse RN/LPNLVN, dated 11/25/23, for RN Employee E4, and 11/27/23, for RN Employee E5 indicated the primary purpose of your job position is to provide direct nursing care to the residents, and to supervise the day-day nursing activities performed by nursing assistants. Such supervision must be in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility, and as may be required by the Director of Nursing Services or Nurse Supervisor to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times. As Charge Nurse you are delegated the administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability necessary for carrying out your assigned duties. You are responsible for the independent supervision of the delivery of care to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medical records on each resident were accurately documented for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Resident's R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/17/23, with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a urinary condition involving bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem), diabetes mellitus (a disease that affects how blood sugar is regulated in the blood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of Resident R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician order with start date of 5/18/23, for Anoro Ellipta (umeclidinium-vilanterol--medicines to treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD-progressive lung disease]) blister with device; 62.5-25 microgram (mcg)/actuation one puff, inhale orally one time a day for wheezing. Observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow proper sanitation procedures for the dish machine operation and maintaining kitchen equipment and failed to ensure all staff wore proper hair restraints in one of one main kitchens. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Dish Machine Use dated 1/17/23 revealed Prior to use verify temperature and/or chemical sanitizer concentration are within specifications provided by the dish machine manufacturer . The chemical sanitizer concentration testing results were to be within a range of 10-200 parts per million (ppm). Review of the facility policy entitled, Employee Sanitary Practices dated 1/17/23, revealed Food Nutritional Service staff are required to wear hair restraints .should cover all hair on the head and/or face while in the food preparation area. Observations on 11/13/23, 9:35 a.m. revealed the following in the main kitchen: Observation of the dish machine operation area revealed that there were two large stand up fans with dust and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at proper temperatures. Findings include: Observations on 8/16/2023, at 11:40 a.m. of the lunch meal service revealed the meal was pizza and green beans. Observations also revealed that the meal trays were prepared and placed on the service racks to be transported to the nursing care units for distribution. The plates had lids on the tops covering the food, but the thermal plate warmer bases were not being used. During an interview with the Kitchen Manager/Cook on 8/16/2023, at 11:50 a.m. it was confirmed that the thermal plate warmer bases were not used because they were understaffed in the kitchen and forgot to turn on the warmer, it takes about 25 minutes to heat up the bases for use. During an interview on 8/16/2023, at 12:15 p.m. the Regional Dietary Manager confirmed that the thermal plate warmer bases should be used for the meals to be kept warm until distribution to the residents on the nursing care units. During interviews with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike resident environment on one of two resident care nursing units observed (Second Floor). Findings include: Observations on 8/16/2023, at approximately 12:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. of the Long Hall corridor on the Second Floor nursing care unit revealed a soiled linen hamper with linen in the hamper with no lid or cover on the hamper. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Maintenance and Housekeeping on 8/16/2023, at about 3:00 p.m. confirmed that all soiled linen hampers were to be covered when not in use in the corridors. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely offer nutritious snacks as desired for six of seven residents interviewed about snacks (Residents R9, R14, R56, R67, R73, and R85). Findings include: A facility policy, Meal Times and Frequency Policy, dated 9/2024, revealed there will be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day, except when a nourishing snack is served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day if a resident group agrees to this meal span. A nourishing snack means items from the basic food groups, either singly or in combination with each other. Adequacy of the snack will be determined both by individuals in the group and evaluating the overall nutritional status of those in the facility. Interviews with alert and oriented Residents R9, R14, R56, R67, R73, and R85 on 1/07/25, at 1:00 p.m. revealed that snacks are not routinely offered in the evening,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store and contain refuse. Findings include: Initial observation of the dumpster located at the side of the facility by the parking lot on February 5, 2024, at 11:45 a.m., revealed that the dumpster was full of garbage bags with flies flying around the dumpster bags. The dumpsters do not have a privacy fence around the dumpsters exposing them to the parking lot. The sliding doors on both sides of the dumpster were observed to be open exposing the waste to visitors or employee parking. Open waste bins also expose the facility to possible pest and rodent issues. During an interview with the Registered Dietitian on February 5, 2024, at 11:50 a.m., it was confirmed that the dumpster doors were open exposing the garbage to the facility parking lot, and possible pest infestation. During an observation of the dumpster on February 6, 2024, at 8:45 a.m., it was observed that the dumpster doors were again left open exposing garbage to the parking lot area and potential pests. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,281 — penalty dated 2026-04-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHIO PENNSYSLVANIA PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
BOBITSKI, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2024
DELP, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/29/2024
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2005
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2019
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/26/2023
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2026
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2026
ANGROOLA, AMARDEEPIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$927K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 3%Other / private 10%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $927K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$299per resident / day
operating cost
$9,090per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$268per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395536. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next