No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Woodhaven Health & Rehab Center

2400 McGinley Road, Monroeville, PA 15146 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (412) 856-4770 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$37,480 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,480 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2570 Haymaker Rd · (412) 858-4150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9001 Rico Rd · (412) 457-1120 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4311 Northern Pike · (412) 858-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Fairview Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.7%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.7%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.2%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.1%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.2%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.3%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.8%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.8%9.5%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.8%CMS range 33.5–56.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 8.8–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified70.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 4.6–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 111.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-29)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility review of policy, manufacturer's instructions, clinical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) resulting in immediate jeopardy for six of 22 residents (R2, R11, R58, R73, R86, and R94). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Diabetic Protocol dated 6/1/25, previously dated 1/1/25, 1/1/24, indicated provider and staff will work together to give appropriate treatment to manage diabetes. The provider will follow up on any acute episodes associated with significant blood glucose level changes and deterioration of previous glucose control and document resident status at subsequent visits until the acute situation is resolved. The staff will identify and report complications such as hypoglycemia. Review of the facility Hypoglycemia Policy dated 6/1/25, previously dated 1/1/25, 1/1/24, indicated nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interview, it determined the facility failed to properly store food products in the Main Kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness in one of one deep freezer and one of one milk coolers and failed to maintain sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for cross contamination during lunch time tray line, which created the potential for food borne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Frozen Foods, dated 3/31/26, with a previous date of 1/1/25, indicated that frozen foods will be stored at appropriate temperatures and methods which promote food quality and safety. Review of the facility policy Storage of Refrigerated Foods, dated 3/31/26, with a previous date of 1/1/25, indicated that refrigerators will be maintained at temperatures of 41 degrees or below. Refrigerators in the facility shall be equipped with an internal thermometer. Review of the facility policy Employee Sanitary Practices , dated 3/31/26, with a previous review date of 1/1/25, indicated all food and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and a staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the availability of the most recent survey results and any plan of correction were accessible to residents and visitors in two of two areas (Lobby and Activity Department). Findings Include: The residents have the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors. Reports of surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made respecting the facility during the 3 preceding years and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. During observations on 5/28/26, at 11:00 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator and surveyor reviewed the facility posting, indicating the facility prior Department of Health's survey results are available for review in a binder located in the lobby and in the activity department. Upon inspection the binder located in the lobby did not contain the last full health survey results or plan of correction for 2025. There was no binder in the activity department to review. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident council interview, a confidential staff interview and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of fourteen of twenty-four residents (Residents R78, R83, R120, R700, R701, R702, R703, and R704, R705, R706, 707, 708, 709, and 710).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Call Light Resident Communication System Policy, reviewed on 3/31/26 with a prior review date of 1/1/25, indicated, attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Minimum staffing requirements imposed by the state are adhered to when determining staff rations but are not necessarily considered a determination of sufficient and competent staffing. Answer the resident's call light as soon as possible. Do what the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, resident interviews, resident council meeting minutes, resident choice menu selections and staff interview, was determined that the facility failed to provide resident selected menu items for 5 of 12 residents (Resident R707. R708, R709, R710 and R711). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Meal Identification and Preference Cards last reviewed on 3/31/26, with a previous review date of 1/1/25, indicated that a meal identification and food preference card will be used to properly identify each individual's needs including food and beverage preferences. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities, last reviewed on 3/31/26, with a previous review date of 1/1/25, indicated the facility will comply with all Resident rights. During the Resident Group Meeting on 5/26/26, at 2:00 p.m., the resident consensus indicated that the facility was not providing meals as indicated per menu, the menu had days of meals not identified and the facility failed to provide a special meal as indicated for Memorial Day. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make accessible grievance boxes to residents in two of two locations where grievances boxes are located (first and second floors). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Resident Grievances and Concerns Policy reviewed on 3/31/26 with a prior review date of 1/1/25, indicated the facility will make available to all residents via a posting in a prominent location in the facility, information of the right to file grievances orally or in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandates that grievance procedures be accessible to all residents, including those with disabilities, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). To ensure accessibility, the ADA Standards for Accessible Design recommend that operable parts, such as slots on grievance boxes, be mounted between 15 and 48 inches above the floor. This range accommodates individuals using wheelchairs and ensures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that current and accurate nurse staffing information was posted in the facility at the beginning of each shift for one of four observed days. Findings include: Observation conducted on 5/26/26, at approximately 9:30 a.m., revealed that nurse staffing information was posted in the main lobby on the reception desk. At that time, the nurse staffing information had the date of (4/3/26), resident census, and the staffing hours did not accurately reflect the current total number of hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for the current date. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 5/26/26, at approximately 10:00 a.m., the NHA confirmed the facility failed to post the required current facility information for staffing hours and the facility census. 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report allegations of abuse for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Prevention Policy dated 8/27/25, indicated all alleged violations involving abuse/neglect are promptly and thoroughly investigated. Documentation in the nurses' note should include the results of the resident's assessment, the notification of the physician and responsible party, and treatment provided. All allegations must be reported immediately to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON). If the event that caused the allegation involves an allegation of abuse or serious bodily injury, it should be reported to the DOH immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) assistance for five of eleven residents (Residents R19, R20, R23, R25, and R26).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Communication and Call Light Policy dated 6/27/24, indicated staff will respond to call lights promptly. During an observation on 1/12/26, at approximately 10:40 a.m. Resident R25 was seated in his wheelchair in front to the nurses' station wearing only a gown, tied at the neck, but pulled forward off of his shoulders. Resident R25's hair was unkempt and he had a crusted around his mouth. During an observation on 1/12/26, at 10:54 a.m. it was noted that a resident in Resident R19 and R20 was yelling for staff from behind a closed door. Observation at this nurse aides caring for residents and Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3 standing at the medication cart. During an observation on 1/12/26, at 10:57 a.m., it was noted that the nurses' station call light monitor revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection for 21 of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility, Transmission Based Precautions and Isolation Policy last reviewed 8/27/25, indicated, When Airborne Precautions cannot be implemented due to lack of AIIR (Airborne Infection Isolation Room): Resident should be placed in a private room with the door closed, and healthcare staff provided with N95 or higher respirators. Signage indicating the appropriate type[s] of precautions and indicating that visitors should stop at Nurses Station before entering, will be placed on the resident's door. Staff will educate visitors regarding donning appropriate Personal Protection Equipment while adhering to the resident's right for privacy protection. Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health Respiratory Virus Outbreak Toolkit dated 11/24/25, indicated, The LTCF (long-term care facility) should encourage masking of HCP (health care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during bed mobility for one of six residents (Resident R1). This was identified as past-noncompliance.Findings include:Review of facility Resident Incident Accident Report Policy dated 8/27/25, indicated that an incident/accident is any occurrence which is not consistent with the routine care of a particular resident and all incident/accidents involving residents will be analyzed and reported.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the admission Observation form dated 12/13/25, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), hypertension with heart failure (a condition where the force of blood against your artery walls is too high and making your heart work harder), and chronic kidney disease (a long term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to two of five residents (Resident R10 and R11).Findings include: Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated 6/1/25, indicated residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, Section G: Functional Abilities defined dependent as Dependent - Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or, the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity.Review of the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services related to heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles) for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings Include:Review of the Unites States National Library of Medicine information Heart Failure dated 3/11/25, indicated symptoms of heart failure can include: Shortness of breath. Fatigue or weakness. Coughing. Swelling and weight gain from fluid in the ankles, lower legs, or abdomen. Difficulty sleeping when lying flat. Nausea and loss of appetite. Swelling in the veins of your neck. Needing to urinate often. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/18/25, included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat), chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, physician documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents with intellectual disabilities receive appropriate services for one of three residents (Resident R2).Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents receive appropriate treatment and services for highest practicable mental and psychosocial services for one of three residents (Resident R28). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2023, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, physician records, documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule ordered appointments and failed to provide transportation for one of three residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration product information dated January 2021, indicated that Faslodex (fulvestrant) is an injectable medication for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Not taking Faslodex for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer can lead to the cancer progressing more quickly or returning sooner, potentially lowering the chances of extending life and improving symptoms. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2023, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:13-15: cognitively intact8-12:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) assessments were accurate and fully completed for five of twenty-six residents (Resident R14, R22, R25, R36, and R80). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments dated October 2024, indicated in: Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, or it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. Section D: Mood, Question D0100 Should Resident Mood Interview Be Conducted? should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, and or it should be coded 1, and the assessment should be completed if the resident is at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for resident and care needs for five of twelve residents (Resident R14, R22, R43, R73 and R85). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated 1/1/25, indicated an interdisciplinary plan of care will be established for every resident and updated in accordance with State, and Federal requirements and on an as needed basis. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/8/25, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right posterior cerebral artery (a stroke caused by a blockage or narrowing of a blood vessel in the brain, where the specific cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Activities Director accurately completed, and/or directed or delegated the accurate completion of the activities component of the comprehensive assessment and failed to attempt to obtain information on resident preferences from family, significant others, or staff interviews for residents with severe cognitive impairment for 28 of 28 residents (Residents R8, R13, R14, R15, R16, R24, R29, R42, R45, R54, R59, R62, R65, R66, R72, R73, R81, R82, R88, R90, R91, R93, R96, R206, R210, R211, R310, and R311). The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. Scores from a BIMS assessment suggests the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation of medication regimen reviews (MRR) completed at least monthly for two of five residents (Resident R22 and R34). This was identified as past non-compliance. Finding include: On 7/2/25, the MRRs for Residents R22 and R34 were requested, for the months of January through June 2025. On 7/3/25, the facility provided information that the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program members had identified that pharmacy recommendations were not being completed timely. Review of the performance improvement plan developed on 4/24/25, included: -The Director of Nursing (DON) will begin to receive all pharmacy reports and recommendations. -Medical Records staff will ensure any recommendations that re received are handed directly to the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) or the DON. -Once the recommendation is received, it will be reviewed by a physician and returned. The ADON/DON will review and complete adjustments as necessary. -Audits will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for two of sixteen residents (Resident R 21 and R312). Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities policy last reviewed 6/1/25, indicated it the facility's policy to comply with all Residents Rights. A listing of Resident and Facility Responsibilities for the specific state of residence, and federal rights will be provided to the resident/resident representative upon admission and when requested. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/17/25, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles) and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0579 — isolated
    Provide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined, the facility failed to display written information on applying for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid as required, on two of two nursing floors (First Floor and Second Floor). Findings include: During observations completed on 7/3/25, of the First Floor and Second Floor nursing units, failed to include information on how to apply for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid. During observations and an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), on 7/3/25, at approximately 8:23 a.m., the NHA confirmed that the facility failed to display written information on applying for Medicare and Medicaid benefits and receiving refunds for previous payments covered by Medicare and Medicaid as required, on two of two nursing floors (First Floor and Second Floor). 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e) Management.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor weight and nutrition status by failing to obtain weights or act upon weight changes for four of twelve residents (Residents R14, R36, R66, and R94). Finding include: Review of the facility policy, Resident Policy dated 6/1/25, and 1/1/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility to obtain weights routinely in order to monitor nutritional health over time. Each resident's weight will be determined upon admission/readmission to the facility, weekly for the first four weeks after admission/readmission, and monthly or more often if risk is identified, or as ordered. Review of Resident R14's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) assessment dated [DATE], included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and maintain oxygen equipment for one of three sampled residents (Resident R203). Findings include: The facility policy Oxygen Administration (all routes) Policy last reviewed 6/1/25 and 1/1/25, indicated licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence will administer oxygen via the specified route as ordered by a provider. In an emergency situation, clinicians may administer oxygen and obtain a provider's order as soon as practicably possible after patient stabilization or transfer. Review of Resident R203's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R203's Minimum Data Set (MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/18/25, indicated that she had diagnoses that included diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), COPD (Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for two of three residents (Residents R20 and R61). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hemodialysis Care Policy dated 1/1/25 and 6/1/25, indicates communication between the dialysis provider and facility staff will occur before and after each hemodialysis treatment and as needed. Pre-dialysis process: document assessment in the Dialysis Communication Tool vital signs, pre-treatment weight (unless performed at dialysis) medication adminstered before treatment, time of last meal, fluid intake and any additional alerts or information. Tool to be sent with resident to dialysis. Post-dialysis process: receive report from dialysis provider and or review Dialysis Communication Tool documentation by dialysis provider. Information post-dialysis will include: vital signs, post-treatment weight (unless to be completed by skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility documents, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care for one of eight residents (Resident R36).Findings include:Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], previously dated 2/27/25, indicated the facility will ensure resident health and safety by assessing needs and matching those needs to facility staff and other resources. Review of the facility provided, Medical Director's Responsibilities Checklist indicated that the Medical Director (MD Employee E6) will coordinate medical care in the facility and ensure the appropriateness and quality of medical care and medically related care.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the minimum MDS dated [DATE], included diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), anemia (too little iron in the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate behavioral health services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of eight residents (Resident R43). Findings include: The facility Behavior Management Program policy reviewed on 1/1/25 and 6/1/25, includes, the facility will assess and track a behavior(s) that negatively impacts each resident regarding their quality of life. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will conduct record review. The IDT will review newly identified behaviors during risk rounds to ensure appropriate documentation in in place for new behaviors and/or different behaviors for a resident. The IDT will conduct a clinical record review. The IDT will complete behavior/psychotropic review form and identify the root cause for the behavior utilizing the behavioral management care paths. The resident with identified behaviors will be followed at the weekly resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate behavioral health services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of eight residents (Resident R43). Findings include: The facility Behavior Management Program policy reviewed on 1/1/25 and 6/1/25, includes, the facility will assess and track a behavior(s) that negatively impacts each resident regarding their quality of life. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will conduct record review. The IDT will review newly identified behaviors during risk rounds to ensure appropriate documentation in in place for new behaviors and/or different behaviors for a resident. The IDT will conduct a clinical record review. The IDT will complete behavior/psychotropic review form and identify the root cause for the behavior utilizing the behavioral management care paths. The resident with identified behaviors will be followed at the weekly resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient and timely social services to meet the residents needs for one of eight residents (Resident R43). Findings include: Review of the facility's Social Service Job Description indicated the social worker: Plan develop, organize, implement, evaluate, supervise and direct the social services program of the community including coordination with all departments to provide suitable social services. Keep abreast of current federal and stat regulations, as well as professional standards of practice, and make recommendations on changes in policies and procedures to the administrator. Complete assessments and devise, review and revise comprehensive care plans. Ensure that all charted social service progress notes and all documentation is accurate, informative and descriptive of the services provided and of the resident's response to the services Coordinates ancillary services for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications and/or biologicals in one of two medication rooms (First Floor Medication Room). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals dated [DATE], previously dated [DATE], indicated that medications and biologicals that have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines are stored separate from other medications until destroyed. During an observation on [DATE], at 9:25 a.m. of the First Floor Medication Room the following was observed: (4) petroleum gauze dressing with an expiration date of 06/2023 (2) Aquacel Advantage dressing with an expiration date of [DATE] (3) Aquacel Extra dressing with an expiration date of [DATE] (1) tube Zinc Oxide ointment (1 ounce) with an expiration date of 04/2024 (1) Vacutainer Transfer Straw Kit with an expiration date of 01/2025 (5) Puracol Ultra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and care plan for self-administration of medications for three of twelve residents (Residents R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 6/7/24, indicated to observe resident consumption of medication. During an observation on 3/14/25, at 10:08 a.m. Resident R1 was reclined in bed. On her over-bed table a medicine cup was observed on its side, with one pill still in it and another pill on the over-bed table. During an observation on 3/14/25, at 10:08 a.m. Resident R2 was reclined in bed. On her over-bed table a medicine cup was observed with one pill still in. During an observation on 3/14/25, at 2:06 p.m. a pill was observed on the floor or Resident R3's room. Review of the clinical records for Resident R1, R2, and R3 failed to reveal an assessment for the self-administration of medications or a plan of care developed for self-administration of medications. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 16 of 22 residents (Residents R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Resident Communication and Call Light Policy dated 6/27/24, indicated staff will respond to call lights promptly. During an observation on 3/14/25, at 9:59 a.m. Resident R4 room smelled strongly of urine and Resident R4 had messy, unkempt hair. During an interview on 3/14/25, at 1:02 a.m. Resident R5 was observed to have messy, unkempt hair. During an interview on 3/14/25, at 10:03 a.m. Resident R6, when asked if call lights took a long time to be answered stated, Sometimes it takes a long time. Resident R6 further stated his medications have been 30-90 minutes late. During an interview with Residents R1 and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of four residents (Resident R7). Findings include: Review of facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration reviewed 6/27/24, indicated that prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to: Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident. Review of the National Library of Medicine information dated , indicated insulin aspart is an injectable medication used to treat diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). It further stated, If you are using insulin aspart suspension to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the family of a change in condition in a timely manner for one of nineteen residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Change in Condition Policy dated 6/27/24, indicated the responsible party or guardian is to be notified when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical condition. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar) with diabetic neuropathy (complication that can cause nerve damage in the hands and feet). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/21/25, indicated the diagnoses remain current.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, personnel records, clinical records and activity calendars, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Activities Department had a qualified director to oversee the activities program. Findings include: Review of the Life Enrichment Director job description indicated the qualifications were as required by State and Federal Regulations. Review of Life Enrichment Director Employee E2's personnel record indicated she was hired on 12/27/23. Review of Life Enrichment Director Employee E2's personnel record did not include evidence that Life Enrichment Director Employee E2 had proper qualifications as a Life Enrichment Director. The personnel record did not include education in therapeutic services, education as a social worker or occupational therapist, or a background in recreational services. Further review of resident records and facility activity calendars since Life Enrichment Director Employee E2 hire date, indicated she has been performing this job without any required oversight from an employee qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (written instructions such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R38,R57). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Advanced Directives on 1/1/2024, indicated the facility will comply with the requirements related to maintaining written policies and procedures regarding advance directives, including provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive. A review of the medical record indicated Resident R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes(high blood sugar), high blood pressure, congestive heart failure(chronic condition in which the heart doesn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document notification of changes in conditions for three of six residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Review of the facility, Resident Change of Condition Policy last reviewed 1/1/24, indicated the family/responsible party will be notified when there has been a accident or incident involving the resident, a discovery of an injury, a reaction to medication or treatment, a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition, a need to alter the resident's medical treatment including a change in provider orders, when there is a consistent refusal of treatment or medications, and a need to transfer the resident to the emergency room and/or admission to the hospital. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, resident record, observation, resident interview and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain adequate grooming and personal hygiene for ten of 18 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10). Findings include: Based on review of facility policy titled Resident Bath/Showering/Scheduling Policy dated 1/1/24, indicated residents will be bathed or showered according to their preferences in order to maintain health hygiene and skin condition. During in observation on 4/19/24, at 11:40 a.m. Resident R4 was noted to be seated in a wheelchair in the hallway, with unkempt hair and long facial hair. During an interview and observation on 4/19/24, at 11:43 a.m. Resident R5 confirmed that she had filed a grievance on 3/28/24, related to not receiving showers. Resident R5 stated she has missed multiple showers, and would like at least one per week adding, I don't want to look like a hag, just because I'm in a place like this. During an observation on 4/19/24, at 11:48 a.m. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on nursing unit observations, resident observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 18 of 23 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, and R18). Findings include: During an interview on 3/8/24, at 9:50 a.m., when asked if there were enough nursing staff to care for the residents Resident R1 stated, I have to wait forever and ever for an aide. They gather out in the halls and they ignore the call lights. Sometimes I'm wet from 8:30 on. They just lolly-gag. I don't get no showers, are you kidding? I get a bed bath, swish swish. I'm just here. When asked about call light response, Resident R1 stated, I have to lay on the light, and I mean lay on the light. They don't answer. We have to holler. During an interview and observation on 3/8/24, at 10:00 a.m., when asked if there were enough nursing staff to care for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on an observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary enviornment in the Main Kitchen. (Main Kitchen) Findings include: During an observation of the Main Kitchen on 2/13/24 at 10:15 am the following was revealed: the baseboards around the kitchen floor contain a build up of debris, the floor in the kitchen and storeroom had a build up of dirt and grime, the burners on the range top contained a food and debris, the steamtable wells contained dirty water, the steamtable well edges contained a build up of dirt and debris, the top of convection ovens contained a build up of dust, the convection ovens contained a build up of a brown substance on the doors and inside the ovens, the soap dispenser at the hand wash sink was empty. During an interview on 2/13/24, at 10:30 am Food Service Director Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to maintain the Main Kitchen in a clean and sanitary condition. Pa Code: 211.6 (c)(d)(f) Dietary services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to meet the physical, mental and psychosocial well being of the residents failing to provide beautician services to residents desiring to have hair grooming services and failed to notify the residents of a proper fee structure for beautician services for residents covered by Medicare and Medicaid insurance providers for eight of eight months. (7/23, 8/23, 9/23, 10/23, 11/23, 12/23, 1/24, and 2/24) . Finding include: Federal Regulation 483.10(f)(11) (i) indicates Services included in Medicare or Medicaid payment. During the course of a covered Medicare or Medicaid stay, facilities must not charge a resident for the following categories of items and services: (E) Routine personal hygiene items and services as required to meet the needs of residents, including, but not limited to, hair hygiene supplies, comb, brush, bath soap hair and nail services, bathing assistance, and basic personal laundry. During observations resident's personal grooming on 2/13/24, it was revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, documents, resident medical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications to six of six residents (Resident R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10) in accordance with physician orders and follow through to make certain that the facility corrected the causes for the medication errors. Findings include: A review of policy Medication Administration Times dated 1/1/24, indicated that the facility should ensure that authorized personnel, administer medications according to times of administration as determined by Facility's pharmacy committee and/or Physician/Prescriber, A review of Resident R5's medical record indicated that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of congestive heart failure, diabetes, dementia, depression, history of falls, prostate cancer and high blood pressure. A review of facility documents indicated that Resident R5's medications were not entered into the facility's medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility standardized recipes and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly prepare flavorful, palatable food products by failing to follow facility standardized recipes for the lunch meal on 2/13/24. (lunch meal 2/13/24). Findings include: During an observation of the lunch meal on 2/13/24, at 12 :20 pm the following was revealed: *the resident tray card indicated cheese stuffed shells, the facility served cheese stuffed shells with a meat sauce, * the resident tray card indicated Italian green beans, the facility served a heated marinated three bean salad that consisted of green beans, yellow beans and kidney beans in a vinegar dressing. * the resident tray card indicated beef taco, the facility served the taco wrapped in aluminum foil which caused the taco shell to be soggy and mushy. A review of the facility's standardized recipes revealed the following: * Cheese stuffed shell. A review of the recipe revealed that the cheese stuffed shells where to be heated and then served topped with a marinara sauce. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate meal trays for four of 10 residents ( Resident R1, R2, R3 and R4). Findings include: During an observation on 2/13/24, at 12:10 pm for tray accuracy during the lunch meal the following was revealed: Resident R1's tray card indicated that the resident was to receive double portion of the entree. Upon auditing Resident R1's lunch meal tray it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident R1 with double portions of the lunch meal entree. Resident R2's tray card indicated that the resident was to receive 8 ounces of 2% milk. Upon auditing Resident R2's lunch meal tray it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident R2 with 8 ounces of 2% milk. Resident R3's tray card indicated that the resident selected not to receive the Italian green beans vegetable offered on the menu. Upon auditing Resident R3's lunch meal tray it was determined that the facility failed to follow Resident R3's preference and served the resident a three bean salad medley. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow the displayed menu for the lunch meal on 2/13/24 as required. (lunch meal 2/13/24). Findings include: During an observation on 2/13/24, at 9:00 a.m., of the displayed menu on the bulletin board located at the entrance to the second floor nursing unit it was revealed that the menu for the lunch meal consisted of fried chicken, mashed potatoes, spinach, and cobbler. The alternate menu selection consisted of salisbury steak. During an observation on 2/13/24, at 9:05 a.m., displayed on the Activities Department's bulletin board outlining the daily activities for 2/13/24, also contained menu selection information that included the lunch menu consisted of fried chicken. During an observation on 2/13/24, at 11:45 a.m., of the lunch meal tray line operations it was revealed that the menu selections being served to the residents consisted of stuffed shells with meat sauce, Italian green beans, and garlic bread. The alternate menu selection consisted of beef taco and corn. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for the Thanksgiving Holiday meal (Thanksgiving Holiday Meal). Findings include: During resident interviews on 12/13/23, Residents R2 and R3 revealed that the facility served the Thanksgiving Holiday meal using disposable styrofoam containers which they determined to not in the spirit of the holiday. During an interview on 12/13/23, at 11:30 am Food Service Director Employee E1 confirmed that the facility utilized disposable styrofoam containers to serve the resident's their Thanksgiving Holiday meal which failed to provide a dignified dining experience. PA Code: 201.29(j) Resident Rights

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to meet the physical, mental and psychosocial well being of the residents by failing to provide beautician services for residents desiring hair grooming services for six months (7/23, 8/23, 9/23, 10/23, 11/23, and 12/23). Findings include: During observations of resident's personal grooming on 12/13/23, it was revealed that residents were in need of beautician services such as hair cuts and hair styling. During an interview on 12/13/23, at 8:55 am the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility had failed to provide beautician services since 7/1/23. PA Code: 211.10(d) Resident Care Policies

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facilities four week cycle menu, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to approve the four week cycle menu prior to implementation (Week one, Week Two, Week Three, and Week Four) and provide food products as listed on the menu for the lunch meal on 12/13/23. (Lunch meal 12/13/23). Findings include: A review of facility policy Food and Nutrition Services Menus and Diets adopted for the period of January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 indicated that menus menu planning will be completed two weeks in advance of service. A Registered Dietitian (RD) will approve all menus. Posted menus shall indicate any menu substitutions in a timely manner. During an observation on 12/13/23, at 11:30 am it was revealed that the menus failed to provide evidence of the RD approving the menu for implementation by signing and dating the reviewed and approved menus. During an interview on 12/13/23, at 11:35 am the Food Service Director Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that the RD approved the Four Week…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents, observations, test tray audits, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to to serve food products at palatable temperatures for the lunch meal on 12/13/23. (lunch meal 12/13/23) Findings include: A review of facility policy Food and Nutrition Services Food Production and Safety adopted for the period of January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 indicated that Hot foods may not fall be low 135°F (farenheit) while holding after cooking. Hot foods should be palatable at the time of delivery. The temperature of potentially hazardous cold foods must be served at 41° F or below. A review of facility document Dining Observation/Test Tray form indicated that cold food is served at a maximum temperature of 41° F and Hot food is served at a minimum of 135°F. During an observation of a test tray audit conducted by Food Service Manager Employee E1 on 12/13/23 at 1:10 pm food temperatures were as follows: Corn Chowder 133.9°F Fish Taco 106°F Salsa 74.8°F Churro 110°F Chicken tender 110°F French Fries 108°F Coffee 132°F 2%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of six residents. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the face sheet indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility 4/28/23. Review of Resident R1's minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/5/23, indicated the diagnoses of stroke ( blood flow to the brain is blocked), hypertension (force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), peripheral vascular disease (slow and progressive circulation disorder) and diabetes mellitus (amount of sugar in the blood is elevated). Review of Resident R1's physcian orders dated 10/13/23 NPO, Enteral feeding Diabetisource AC 75 ml/hr x 18 hours via enteral tube. Review of Resident R1's progress notes indicated on 8/31/23, at 2:32 p.m. that feeding tube was sucking into stomach. Review of Resident R1's progress notes indicated on 9/1/23, at 12:39 a.m. that feeding retracted back into stomach, only approximately one inch of tube showing, RN Supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility dish machine temperature logs dated from May 2023 through July 2023, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store foods in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential for food borne illness, maintain a sanitary environment in the main kitchen, failed to maintain necessary equipment in proper functioning order and failed to make certain the dish machine was running at proper temperatures. Findings include: During an observation on 8/31/23, at 8:50 a.m., the following was observed in the main kitchen: A small milk cooler in front of the food trayline area had a foam cup of crackers uncovered, a plastic milk crate with several packages of unopened cookies, a cloth apron and two bananas, and inside the cooler was a cup of pudding with a spoon in it sitting on top of a tray over cartons of milk with seven cups of pudding and applesauce undated. A cart was placed beside the milk cooler with a staff cup of coffee on top shelf of the cart and a foam container with a half eaten breakfast sandwich on the bottom shelf . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,480 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $37,480 — penalty dated 2025-07-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
BOBITSKI, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2024
KOWALKZYK, TIFFANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/09/2023
BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020)OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
BNV DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
WESTERN PA MT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2025
WIW DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
WOODHAVEN RE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
KOPERWAS, MATTHEWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$903K
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 4%Other / private 22%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $903K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$400per resident / day
operating cost
$12,151per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395653. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next