No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Care Of Madison

Number One Autumn Court, Madison, VA 22727 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 92 certified beds · (540) 948-3054 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (540) 948-3054 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 2021
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
103 Rapidan Church Ln · (540) 948-6777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
114 N Main St · (540) 948-4400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2105 S Seminole Trl · (540) 948-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
150 Rapidan Church Ln · (826) 248-0660

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.1%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.5%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.4%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.1%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.0%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.1%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.3%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.4%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.841.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.281.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.9%CMS range 47.3–63.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.0–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
54.8%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-02-23)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2021-09-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. A total of three errors occurred out of 31 opportunities for error due to residents not receiving their medication for two residents (Resident (R)19 and R84) out of six residents observed for medication administration. In addition, one of six residents (R27) received a partial dose of medication. The facility medication error rate was 9.68%. This failure had the potential to affect the accurate dosing of medication administered to the residents and for residents not to receive the full beneficial effects of the prescribed medications.Findings include:1. Observations during medication administration on 04/23/26 at 8:16 AM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) 1 failed to administer R84's bumetanide (a medication used to treat excess fluid retention) 1 [one] milligram (mg) one tablet. Review of R84's Physician Orders, dated April 2026 and located under the Orders tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated there was a physician's order for bumetanide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician and the responsible party of changes in condition for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident # 3. The findings include: For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of a bruise on 12/19/24 and a fall on 12/25/24. The nurse's note dated 12/19/24 at 6:47 p.m. documented, Hospice CNA (certified nursing assistant) reported to this speaker that resident has bruising to R. (right) buttock. There is no documentation the physician or responsible party were notified of the bruise. The nurse's note dated 12/25/24 at 6:47 p.m. documented, Resident had unwitnessed fall in bathroom located beside commode, resident was sitting upward, Resident (+) (positive for) PEERLA (pupils, equal, round, reactive to light and accommodation), upper and lower extremities move at previous levels, respirations even and resident abdomen soft and non-tender resident denies pain and discomfort. There is no documentation the physician or responsible party…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was transferred to the hospital on 6/29/24 and did not return to the facility after her stay in the hospital. Resident was transferred elsewhere. Review of the clinical record revealed documented a physician note dated, 7/23/24, documented in part, Patient seen and evaluated for continuity of necessity of rehabilitation stay/skilled nursing/medication order review. Nurses' notes/vitals reviewed in PCC (initials of computer program), discussed patient status/progress with nursing staff. A second physician note dated, 8/27/24, documented in part, Patient seen and evaluated for continuity of necessity of rehabilitation stay/skilled nursing/medication order review. Nurses' notes/vitals reviewed in PCC, discussed patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 49 (R49). The findings include: For (R49) the facility staff failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a prn (as needed) pain medications, hydromorphone (1) and Tylenol (2) and failed to clarify the physician's orders for the use of the PRN pain medications. (R49) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to chronic pain. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/03/2023, (R49) scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating (R49) was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Under J0600. Pain Intensity it documented, A. Numeric Rating Scale (00-10). (R49) was coded a 7 (seven). The physician's order for (R49) documented in part, Hydromorphone HCl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #223. The findings include: For Resident #223 (R223), the facility staff failed to notify the resident's RP (responsible party) of a new physician's order for melatonin. A review of R223's clinical record revealed a note signed by the nurse practitioner on 1/27/23 that documented, 4) Insomnia - Acute. New recommendations given . A physician's order dated 1/27/23 documented an order for melatonin 5 milligrams by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. Further review of R223's clinical record failed to reveal the resident's RP was made aware of the resident's insomnia and new medication order. On 2/23/23 at 8:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #8. LPN #8 stated a resident's RP should be notified regarding any change in condition and new medication order. LPN #8 stated, You want the RP to know a change was made and this is a reason for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the required written documentation for a facility-initiated transfer, for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 64 (R64). The findings include: For (R64), the facility staff failed to evidence that written notification was provided to (R64) and (R64's) responsible party for a facility-initiated transfer on 02/10/2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/20/2023, (R64) scored three out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The facility's progress noted for (R64) dated 2/10/2023 at 7:35 a.m., documented in part, Situation: The Change In Condition/s reported on this CIC (change in condition) Evaluation are/were: Nausea/Vomiting . A. Recommendations: If resident has additional n/v (Nausea/Vomiting) please send to hospital for evaluation. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed provide a bed hold policy notice to the resident or the resident's representative, for a facility-initiated transfer of one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #64 (R64). The findings include: For (R64), the facility staff failed to evidence that a bed hold policy notice was provided to (R64) and (R64's) responsible party for a facility-initiated transfer on 02/10/2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/20/2023, (R64) scored three out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The facility's progress noted for (R64) dated 2/10/2023 at 10:05 a.m., documented. RT (Resident) sent to (Name of Hospital) at 0700 (7:00 a.m.) for vomiting and abnormal VS (vital signs). Review of the clinical record and the EHR (electronic health record) for (R64) failed to evidence a bed hold policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #38. The findings include: For Resident #38 (R38), the facility staff failed to code the quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/2/2023 for hospice services received during the assessment period. Review of the clinical record for R38 revealed the most recent MDS assessment to be a quarterly MDS with an ARD of 1/2/2023. Section O of the assessment failed to document R38 receiving hospice services during the assessment period. The physician orders for R38 documented in part, Admit to [Name of hospice] - Do Not Give Antibiotics, No Vital Signs or Weights, Do Not Send To ER (emergency room) or Hospital, Do Not Draw Blood, Collect Urine or XR (x-ray) Testing, Do Not Give Tube Feedings. Order Date: 06/28/2021. The comprehensive care plan for R38 documented in part, HOSPICE SERVICES: Resident is on Hospice services, (Name of hospice) (phone number])…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility policy review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for two of 28 residents in the survey sample, Residents #33 and #49. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to implement the care plan for obtaining weights per the physician orders for Resident #33 (R33). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly/Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/2/2023, the resident scored an eight out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. R33 has a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). The comprehensive care plan dated, 9/14/2022 and revised on 10/13/2022, documented in part, Focus: The resident has a potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) risk for malnutrition r/t depression, celiac disease, Vitamin deficiency, and duodenal ulcer. The Interventions documented in part, Weights per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #49. The findings include: For Resident #49 (R49) the facility staff failed to update the comprehensive care plan for activities to include (R49's) preference of being outside when the weather is good. (R49's) most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/12/2023, coded (R49) as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0-15, with 15 being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Under F0500. Interview for Activity Preferences it coded (R49) as it being Very important to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. The comprehensive care plan for (R49) dated 08/22/2022 documented in part, Focus: Activities: Resident prefers/enjoys the following activities: watching tv, spending time on social media and phone. Date Initiated: 08/22/2022.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed follow the physician's order for obtaining daily weights for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #33. The findings include: For Resident #33 (R33), the facility staff failed to obtain daily weights twice in December 2022 and three times in January 2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly/Medicare five day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/2/2023, the resident scored an eight out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. R33 has a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). The physician order dated, 11/17/2022, documented, Daily Weight. The December 2022 and January 2023, MAR (medication administration record) documented the above order for daily weights. The following dates were blank: 12/29/2022, 12/20/2022, 1/3/2023, 1/4/2023, 1/29/2023. Review of the Weights tab in the electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a new heel wound was assessed accurately, and a treatment was obtained and implemented timely, for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #33 (R33). The findings include: For R33, the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for a treatment to an opened heel blister, and, the heel blister was not assessed and staged as a pressure injury per the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) guidelines. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly/Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/2/2023, the resident scored an eight out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section M - Skin Conditions, R33 was not coded as having any pressure ulcers. The Weekly Wound Assessment dated 2/10/2023, documented in part, Wound type: other. Other wound type: open blister. Stage: N/A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide foot care for two of 28 residents, Resident #43 and Resident #7. The findings include: 1. For Resident #43 (R43), the facility staff failed to provide foot care services. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/19/2023, the resident scored 11 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Section G documented R43 requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene. Section I documented R43 having diagnoses including but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus (1). On 2/21/2023 at 12:29 p.m., R43 was observed lying in bed asleep. R43's right foot was observed outside of the blanket uncovered. The toenail on the great toe was observed to be uneven with thick jagged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 28 residents, Resident #43 and Resident #45. The findings include: 1. For Resident #43 (R43), the facility staff failed to properly store a BiPAP (1) mask in a sanitary manner when not in use. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/19/2023, the resident scored 11 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Section I documented R43 having diagnoses including but not limited to Obstructive Sleep Apnea. On 2/21/2023 at 12:29 p.m., an observation was made of R43 in their room. A BiPAP machine was observed on the nightstand to the right side of R43's bed. A mask with tubing was attached to the machine. The mask was observed to be uncovered and laying on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence consistent communication to the hemodialysis (1) center for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #35. The findings include: For Resident #35 (R35), the facility staff failed to evidence communication to the dialysis facility for nine of 32 dialysis appointments between 12/10/2022-2/23/2023. There was no evidence of dialysis communication from the facility to the dialysis center on 12/27/2022, 1/5/2023, 1/10/2023, 1/14/2023, 1/17/2023, 1/19/2023, 2/7/2023, 2/11/2023 and 2/16/2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/17/2022 the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Section O documented R35 receiving dialysis services while a resident at the facility. On 2/22/2023 at 9:22 a.m., an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain effective infection control for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #33. The findings include: For Resident #33 (R33), the facility staff failed to provide a treatment to a pressure ulcer in a manner to prevent infection. The physician order dated, 2/21/2023, documented, Cleanse right heel with wound cleanser and apply xeroform and dressing daily to open blister. On 2/23/2023 at 9:15 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #4 was observed providing a treatment to R33's right heel. LPN #4 was at the treatment cart where she got a 4x4 gauze packet, opened the packet by tearing it across one corner, used her hands to pull the gauze out of the packet and placed in on the outside of the packet. She proceeded to spray the gauze pad with wound cleanser. LPN #4 gathered the rest of her supplies; a xeroform dressing, a bordered gauze dressing, a 4x4 gauze pad, a red plastic bag, and a sterile field packet. LPN #4 entered the room. She placed the supplies on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to store food in the kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to properly dispose of dry goods that were past their expiration date, dispose of milk past it expiration date and date/label refrigerated juice not stored in it's original container. The findings include: On 9/14/2021 at approximately 11:00 a.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted. Observation of the kitchen's dry storage area revealed an opened 24 ounce bag of french fried onions approximately three-quarters full with no open date on the package and a manufacturer's date on the package documenting Best used by 19:35 Jun (June) 24 2021. A second 24 ounce bag of french fried onions was observed on the shelf unopened with a manufacturer's date on the package documenting Best used by 19:33 Jun 24 2021. Observations of the kitchen's walk in refrigerator revealed an approximately two quart sized clear plastic pitcher filled with a red liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was immediately reported to the administrator, State Agency and other officials for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #609. The facility staff failed to immediately report an injury of unknown origin for Resident #609 that was first observed on 12/23/2020. The injury of unknown origin was not reported to the director of nursing until 12/24/2020 and the director of nursing failed to immediately report the injury to the administrator. Resident #609's injury of unknown origin was not reported to the administrator until 12/28/20 and to the appropriate agencies or the responsible party until 12/28/2020. The findings include: Resident #609 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to osteoarthritis (1) and dementia without behavioral disturbance (2). Resident #609's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to submit an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #49. Resident #49's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 8/20/2021, in Section O failed to code Resident #49 as receiving oxygen during the assessment period. The findings include: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to congestive heart failure (1) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2). Resident #49's most recent MDS, a quarterly assessment with an ARD of 8/20/2021, coded Resident #49 as scoring a 14 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 14 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O failed to coded Resident #49 receiving oxygen during the assessment period. On 9/14/2021 at 2:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #49. Resident #49 was observed in bed wearing a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator. Resident #49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42. The facility staff failed to clarify a physician's order to include the size of Resident #42's Foley urinary catheter (1). The findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #42's diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic kidney disease, bladder disorder and muscle weakness. Resident #42's significant change in status minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 8/19/21, coded the resident's cognition as moderately impaired. Section H coded Resident #42 as having a urinary catheter. Review of Resident #42's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 6/4/21 to change the resident's catheter as needed. Review of all physician's orders active as of 9/15/21 failed to reveal a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. The facility staff implemented bed rails for Resident #51 without a documented clinical need. The findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #51's diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, high blood pressure and malnutrition. Resident #51's significant change in status minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 8/27/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Section G coded Resident #51 as totally dependent on two or more staff with bed mobility. On 9/14/21 at 1:49 p.m. and 9/15/21 at 8:21 a.m., Resident #51 was observed lying on her back in bed with bilateral one forth bed rails in the upright position. Review of Resident #51's clinical record revealed a bed rail assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete an annual CNA (certified nursing aide) performance review for one of five CNA record reviews. The facility staff failed to complete an annual performance review for CNA #3. The findings include: CNA #3 was hired on 8/8/18. Review of CNA #3's record revealed the last performance review was completed on 10/1/19. On 9/15/21 at 10:53 a.m., an interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the director of nursing). ASM #1 stated usually the director of nursing is responsible for completing CNA's annual performance reviews. ASM #2 stated she had only been employed at the facility for approximately three weeks and had not completed performance reviews. ASM #1 stated annual performance reviews should be completed based on a monthly report ran by human resources and CNA #3's annual performance review was missed. ASM #1 was made aware this was a concern. On 9/15/21 at 1:00 p.m., ASM #1 stated the facility did not have a specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident # 73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to high blood pressure and anxiety [1]. Resident # 73's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE], coded Resident # 73 as scoring a three on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Review of Resident # 73's clinical record failed to evidence an advance directive. Further review of the clinical record revealed a Care Plan Conference Summary dated [DATE]. The Care Plan Conference Summary documented in part, Topics Discussed: Adv. Dir. [Advance Directive/Code Status: Discussed with Res. Rep [Resident Representative]. Comments DNR [Do Not Resuscitate]. Further review of the Care Plan Conference Summary failed to evidence a review was conducted to provide Resident # 73 and/or Resident # 73's representative with the opportunity to develop an advance directive.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately complete a MDS (minimum data set) resident assessment for one of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident #77. The facility staff failed to accurately complete the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) regarding the use of psychotropic medications for Resident #77 with the ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/31/2020. The findings include: Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to anxiety disorder (1), schizoaffective disorder (2) and major depressive disorder (3). Resident #77's most recent MDS, a quarterly assessment with an ARD of 01/31/2020, coded Resident #77 as scoring a 12 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 12, 12 - being moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Review of the clinical record revealed a list of Resident #77's MDS assessments. The list revealed that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 42 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 23. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #23's comprehensive care plan to include the use of a spirometer. The findings include: Resident # 23 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pulmonary edema [2], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [3]. Resident # 23's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/06/19, coded Resident # 23 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Resident # 23 was coded as requiring supervision of one staff member for activities of daily living. On 02/11/20 at 11:40 a.m., 02/11/20 at 1:00 p.m., and 02/12/20 at 8:10 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards for two of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 79, and Resident #50. The facility staff obtain a physician's order for the use of an [NAME] machine post Resident #79's total knee replacement, and failed to administer the prescribed dosage of the scheduled Calcium/Vitamin D during the medication administration observation for Resident #50 on 02/12/2020 at 8:00 a.m. The findings include: 1. Resident # 79 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: aftercare following joint replacement [knee] surgery, and muscle weakness. Resident # 79's admission MDS (minimum data set), could not be completed before they were discharged to another facility. The facility's nursing admission assessment for Resident # 79 documented in part, admission: [DATE]. 16:55 [4:55 p.m.]. Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for one of 42 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 75. The findings include: Resident # 75 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: sacral [tail bone] pressure ulcer and obstructive uropathy [2]. Resident # 75's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/31/2020, coded Resident # 75 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Resident # 75 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. Section H Bladder and Bowel coded Resident # 75 as having an indwelling catheter. On 02/11/20 at 11:46 a.m., an observation of Resident # 75 revealed the resident was in bed. Observation of the bed revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 42 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 23. The facility staff failed obtain a physician's order for Resident #23's use of an incentive spirometer and failed to store the resident's incentive spirometer in a sanitary manner. The findings include: Resident # 23 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pulmonary edema [2], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [3]. Resident # 23's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/06/19, coded Resident # 23 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status, of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Resident # 23 was coded as requiring supervision of one staff member for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a drug regimen free from unnecessary medication for one of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 73. The facility staff failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of the prn [as needed] pain medications Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen and Tylenol to Resident #73. The findings include: Resident # 73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to high blood pressure and chronic pain. Resident # 73's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/30/2020, coded Resident # 73 as scoring a three on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section J Health Conditions coded Resident # 73 as having frequent pain with a pain level of seven on a scale of zero to ten with ten being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure an expired three milliliter multi-dose vile of Humalog [1] was not available for use for one of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47. The findings include: Resident # 47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus without complications [2]. Resident # 47's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/04/2020, coded Resident # 47 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section N Medications coded Resident # 47 as 0 [zero] under N0300 Injections. Record the number of days that injections of any type were received during the last 7 [seven] days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days. If 0 ---skip to N0410 Medications Received. Under N0350 Insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner and discard food past its expiration date in two of two facility nourishment rooms observed. The findings include: On 2/11/20 at 3:15 p.m., an observation was made of the South unit nourishment room was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing. Observation of the refrigerator revealed a white paper bag inside of the bottom drawer. There was no name or date observed to be on the bag. Upon inspection by ASM #2 it was determined that the bag contained a white Styrofoam bowl with potato written on the lid. The bowl was observed to not contain a date or name on it. Further observation of the drawer revealed a second white paper bag without a date or a name. Upon inspection by ASM #2 it was determined that the bag contained a white Styrofoam bowl with vegetable beef written on the lid. The bowl was observed to not contain a date or name on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the development and spread of infection for two of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23 and Resident #42. Resident #73's incentive spirometer was observed stored in an unsanitary manner. The spirometer was observed uncovered on the residents over the bed table during separate observations. Resident #42's catheter bag was observed resting directly on the floor during separate observations. The findings include: 1. Resident # 23 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pulmonary edema [2], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [3]. Resident # 23's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/06/19, coded Resident # 23 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHG AUTUMN, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2016
OHI ASSET (VA) MADISON, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 03/01/2016
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
HOPKINS, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
JENKINS, CHELSIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2024
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2021
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2026
WALKER & ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$859K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 5%Other / private 92%

This home reported $859K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$299per resident / day
operating cost
$9,104per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495244. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-02-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next