No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

University Manor Health & Reha

2186 Ambleside Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106 · Non profit - Corporation · 149 certified beds · (216) 721-1400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,801 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11100 Euclid Ave · (216) 844-1922 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10617 Frank Ave · (216) 231-6441 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11214 Stokes Blvd
Park
Woodstock Ave &, Martin Luther King Jr Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2222 Stokes Blvd · (216) 791-8411

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.6%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.5%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
47.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 140.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-05)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE ON-SITE INVESTIGATION Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident representative interview, law enforcement interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of police reports, review of police body camera footage, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run reports, review of hospital records, review of the Facility Assessment, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse from Resident #2. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm on 03/12/24 at approximately 5:00 A.M. when Resident #1 was found on the floor in a prone position (face down on the stomach) in his room with blood coming out of the left side of his head and face. The resident was transported to the emergency room. Upon further investigation by hospital staff and law enforcement, it was determined Resident #1 was physically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility Elopement/Unauthorized Absence policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and individualized and comprehensive interventions to prevent Resident #101 from eloping from the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the likelihood of actual harm on 08/29/23 at approximately 9:48 A.M. when Resident #101, who was cognitively impaired and assessed to be at high risk for elopement, exited the facility grounds without staff knowledge, during a supervised smoke break. Staff failed to identify Resident #101 was missing until approximately 12:15 P.M. when the resident was not available for lunch. On 08/29/23 at 5:14 P.M. Resident #101 was found by police, approximately 2.8 miles away from the facility on a street corner. The resident was transported to the hospital for evaluation. This affected one resident (#101) of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents. This facility identified 14 residents (#3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not maintain an ambient temperature in resident rooms and common areas. This finding had the potential to affect all 42 residents residing on the second floor and all 25 residents residing on the third floor. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Interview on 01/22/25 at 4:11 P.M. with Security #801 stated he felt it was cold in the facility the last two days. Interview on 01/22/25 at 4:15 P.M. with the Administrator indicated the problems with the heat started with the boiler system in the basement. The Administrator indicated she was aware the temperatures were off. Interview on 01/22/25 at 4:16 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated it was cold in the facility on 01/21/25. The DON stated the facility put heaters at the end of the halls. Interview on 01/22/25 at 4:23 P.M. with Resident #38 indicated it was cold in the facility on 01/21/25 and 01/22/25. Interview on 01/22/25 at 4:25 P.M. with Resident #110 revealed the facility had been cold. Observation of the resident at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #74 was free from physical abuse. This finding affected one (Resident #74) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: Review of Resident #701's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/06/25 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, diabetes and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #701's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #701's progress note dated 01/04/25 at 9:30 A.M. (recorded as a late entry on 01/05/25 at 2:45 A.M.) authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #814 revealed the writer was informed of resident involvement in a physical altercation with Resident #74. The resident was removed from the room and placed in staff view. An assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were prepared and administered for one resident at a time. This had the potential to affect the 35 residents living on the fifth floor (Resident #8, #10, #13, #15, #20, #23, #25, #28, #31, #38, #40, #43, #50, #57, #59, #60, #64, #66, #71, #72, #74, #80, #82, #83, #84, #87, #90, #91, #97, #98, #107, #108, #114, #124, and #126). The total census was 144. Findings include: Observation on 01/02/25 at 9:06 A.M. of the fifth floor medication carts with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #901 revealed LPN #901 had assembled 13 medication cups containing varying amounts of pills and wrote resident names on the cups with marker so she could later administer those pills to the respective residents. These cups were set on the high and low medication carts for the fifth floor, and LPN #901 was working at these medication carts removing the pills and placing them into the labeled cups. Interview with LPN #901 at the time of the above observation confirmed the above findings. LPN #901 said she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who resided on the fifth floor were provided activities as scheduled. This affected 34 residents (Residents #2, #4, #9, #14, #18, #19, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #27, #29, #31, #34, #38, #41, #43, #44, #46, #58, #61, #65, #68, #78, #79, #90, #91, #93, #97, #102, #107, #119 and #123) who resided on the fifth floor secured unit. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Observation on 12/02/24 at 2:01 P.M. revealed Activity Director (AD) #459 counting money for residents on the fifth floor. Residents were observed in their rooms and in the common area. The television was on and music was playing in the common area. No formal activities were observation the fifth floor in the afternoon. Interview on 12/03/24 at 11:45 A.M. with AD #459 revealed she was the only activity staff member working on 12/02/24 and the afternoon/evening activities were not completed as scheduled for the fifth floor residents including the 2:00 P.M. Hydration Hour, 3:00 P.M. Griddle Goodies and 6:00 P.M. Table Games. AD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of monthly pharmacy recommendations, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician timely. This affected four residents (Residents #10, #19, #75, and #92) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen reviews. The facility census was 148. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 10/04/11. Diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, convulsions, restlessness and agitation, and post traumatic stress disorder. Review of the 10/30/24 significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #10 revealed he was cognitively intact, and was receiving insulin, antipsychotics, anticonvulsant, and antidepressants. Resident #10 was noted to have delusions and rejection of care. The last gradual dose reduction (GDR) for antipsychotics was attempted on 09/24/13 and the last time a GDR was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment on the fourth floor was maintained in good repair. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents (#1, #3, #6, #7, #11, #12, #16, #36, #37, #39, #45, #49, #51, #52, #56, #57, #60, #64, #72, #73, #77, #80, #83, #85, #87, #89, #92, #98, #106, #108, #109, #111, #112, #114, #120, #128, #133, #137, #140, #144, #145, and #148) who resided on the fourth floor. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Observation on 12/03/24 at 12:04 P.M. revealed Resident #72 was in bed. The wall the bed was against was caved in and in disrepair. Interview at the time of the observation with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #300 verified the observation and stated the damage to the wall was from the bed. CNA #300 asked Resident #72 how long the wall had been that way and the resident responded it was like that when he moved to this room about four months ago. Observation of the shower room on the fourth floor located to the right of the vending machine on 12/03/24 at 1:07 P.M. revealed the back of the sink was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #198's monies from the authorized resident fund account (RFA) were dispersed timely upon the resident's death. This affected one (Resident #198) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. Findings include: Review of Resident #198's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses including other specified schizophrenia and pulmonary heart disease. Resident #198 expired in the facility on [DATE] at 12:28 A.M. Review of Resident #198's medical record revealed the RFA dispersal check was dated [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 11:25 A.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #402 confirmed Resident #198's RFA monies were not dispersed timely upon the resident's death as required. Review of the Resident Personal Funds Management Policy revised [DATE] revealed if the resident expired, personal funds deposited, would be refunded within 30 days with an accounting of these funds to the individual, probate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurate and readily available. This affected three residents (#87, #99 and #143) of four residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 148. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 03/24/23. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage three, edema, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #87's physician orders for December 2024 revealed an active order for code status of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) dated 07/17/24. Further review of Resident #87's medical record revealed there was not a completed and signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form. Interviews on 12/03/24 at approximately 9:20 A.M. and 3:52 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #308 verified a completed and signed DNR form was not in Resident #87's medical record. LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Residents #29, #43 and #47 and/or their resident representatives, at the time of transfer or in cases of emergency transfer within 24 hours, written information which explained the duration of the bed-hold and the reserve bed payment policy including the resident's return to the next available bed. This affected three (Residents #29, #43 and #47) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and violent behavior. Further review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident's insurance payor source was Medicaid. The medical record did not reveal evidence Resident #29 or the resident's representative were provided a bed hold notice upon the residents transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the appropriate state agency (The Ohio Department of Mental Health) of a significant change in a resident's mental health condition as required. This affected one resident (#106) of one resident reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR). The facility census was 148. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 04/25/22 with a diagnosis of dementia. Further review of the resident's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, mild or moderate severity dated 05/21/23, bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, moderate dated 05/23/23, schizoaffective disorder dated 07/26/23, and paranoid schizophrenia dated 10/24/23. Further review of a Notice of PASARR level II outcome dated 04/21/22 revealed Resident #106 was ruled out from further PASARR review related to dementia, Alzheimer's or other neurocognitive disorder. There were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure individualized care plans were developed and accurate for three residents (#40, #92, and #133) of 29 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 148. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #133 revealed an admission date of 02/02/24. Diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and schizophrenia. Further review of Resident #92's medical record on 12/03/24 at 8:56 A.M. revealed no care plan related to PTSD. On 12/04/24 the facility provided a copy of Resident #133's plan of care. Review of this plan of care revealed it was created on 12/04/24 and indicated Resident #92 had a diagnosis of PTSD. The care plan indicated Resident #40 (another resident) has or had potential for intrusive thought, flashbacks, avoidance behaviors, negative changes in mood and cognition. The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44's care plans were updated to reflect the resident's behaviors and interventions which required the resident to sleep on a flat yoga mat on the floor with no furniture in the room. The facility also failed to ensure Residents #13 and #29's care conferences were conducted at least quarterly. This affected three (Residents #13, #29 and #44) of four residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid personality disorder and schizophrenia. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 had a legal guardian who was the emergency contact and responsible for the resident's finances. Review of Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #29's Care Conference Report form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, bathing/showering documentation review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing/showering was completed as required for one Resident #110 who required total assistance with activities of daily living. This affected one (#110) of one resident reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 07/22/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #110's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #110 had intact cognition and was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADLs) including bathing. Review of Resident #110's care plan last reviewed on 11/18/24 revealed Resident #110 had a self-care deficit and required total assistance with ADLs. The care plan did not include specific information related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessment and monitoring of a wound to Resident #79's left great toe. This affected one (Resident #79) of four residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #79's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #79's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/22/24 to cleanse the great toe of the left foot with normal saline, pat dry, apply an abdominal dressing and wrap with a gauze roll until healed once daily on night shift. Further review of Resident #79's medical record revealed no evidence of monitoring or assessment of Resident 79's left great toe wound. Observation of Resident #79 on 12/02/24 at 11:50 A.M. with Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis communication was completed. This affected two residents (#100 and #133) of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 148. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #100's medical records revealed an admission date 04/07/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and acute kidney failure. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 11/18/24 revealed Resident #100 required dialysis. Review of physician orders for December 2024 revealed an order to complete Resident #100's dialysis observation tool prior to dialysis and print and send with resident to dialysis. Interview on 12/04/24 at 8:05 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #425 revealed dialysis communication was to be completed prior to residents leaving for dialysis and was to be sent with the residents. Review of dialysis communication forms for Resident #100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's as-needed antipsychotic medications were limited to fourteen days until the physician evaluated the resident, and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering as-needed antipsychotic medications. This affected one (Resident #19) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and generalized anxiety. Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem and received antipsychotic medications. Review of Resident #19's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/11/24 for olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg intramuscularly (IM) every six hours as needed for agitation. There was no stop date on the order. Review of Resident #19's Pharmacy Consultation Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the coordination of services to make certain residents received the correct diets. This affected two residents (#19 and #29) of seven residents (#19, #29, #31, #100, #119, #134, and #143) reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Observation of lunch on 12/02/24 at 12:50 P.M. revealed Resident #29's meal ticket indicated regular double protein diet and listed beef stew, mixed vegetables, biscuit, margarine, tropical fruit cup, whole milk, and beverage of choice. Observation of Resident #29's meal revealed no double protein. Medical record review revealed Resident #29 was to receive double protein with meals. Interview on 12/02/24 at 12:55 P.M. with Agency Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #500 confirmed Resident #29 did not have double protein for his meal. Observation of lunch on 12/03/24 at 12:30 P.M. revealed Resident #19's meal ticket indicated regular, renal diet and listed cheese pizza, salad garden with dressing, fortified potatoes, chocolate chip cookie, two percent milk,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #95 was provided education and offered the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. This affected one (Resident #95) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential hypertension, other chronic pain and history of falling. Review of Resident #95's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Further review of Resident #95's medical record did not reveal evidence the resident was offered or educated on the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Interview on 12/05/24 at 11:03 A.M. with Registered Nurse Infection Preventionist #320 and Regional Registered Nurse #467 confirmed Resident #95 was not offered or educated on the influenza or pneumococcal vaccines. Review of the Influenza Vaccine Policy (Resident) revised 08/19/20 revealed all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent an incident of staff to resident emotional abuse, based on the reasonable person concept, when State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) 314 posted a video showing Resident #5 on social media. This affected one resident (#5) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident # was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe intellectual disabilities, seizures, schizophrenia, and dementia The resident was discharged on 10/04/24 to a group home. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #5 had behaviors including delusions, physical behavioral symptoms directed at others,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure garbage was properly disposed of to prevent the harborage pests. This had the potential to affect all 144 residents. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Observation on 08/28/24 at 9:30 A.M. with Maintenance Director #539 revealed the three outside dumpsters near the facility kitchen doors did not have lids covering trash, a sour smell permeated around the dumpsters with wet boxes and leaf and twig debris piled up around the dumpsters. Maintenance Director #539 verified the findings on 08/28/24 at 9:30 A.M. and stated it was difficult to get behind the dumpsters to pick up the boxes and clean the area, and there should be lids to cover the trash. Interview with Exterminator #646 on 08/28/24 at 12:31 P.M. revealed garbage containment and sanitation was important to prevent and control pests. Review of the facility policy titled Pest Control dated 8/12/18 revealed routine pest control would be placed to prevent pest infiltration. Maintenance of the garbage storage area to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure the physician and/or nurse practitioner was notified of abnormal laboratory results for Resident #113. This affected one resident (#113) of three residents reviewed for physician notification of laboratory results. The facility census was 144. Findings include : Review of the medical record for Resident #113 revealed an admission date of 02/22/24. Diagnoses included intracranial hemorrhage, hyperparathyroidism, cocaine abuse, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage four, and hemiplegia. Review of the Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition was intact and the resident needed substantial assistance to walk ten feet, transfer from the toilet, and transfer from bed to chair. Review of physician orders dated 07/17/24 revealed an order for CBC ( complete blood count) with differential,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of the Facility Assessment, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate behavioral health services and person-centered care planning were in place to address the individualized needs of residents with history of mental disorders and history of violent behaviors against other residents. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 143. Findings Include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder, anxiety disorder, and violent behavior. Review of Resident #2's admission paperwork prior to arriving at the facility on 02/18/20 revealed Resident #2 was placed in a psychiatric hospital for physically assaulting another resident and staff person at another nursing facility causing broken arms in both the staff person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer wound care as ordered. This affected two (#48 and #56) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified 13 residents (#26, #46, #48, #50, #56,#57, #60, #65, #69, #80, #95, #99, and #135) with wounds. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/23/23. Diagnoses included wounds of the scrotum and testes and Fournier Gangrene (necrotic tissue of the genitalia). Review of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had intact cognition. Resident #56 required supervision with bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #56 had a stage four pressure ulcer (deep wound that exposes muscle or other structures). Review of Resident #56's care plan dated 07/28/23 revealed Resident #56 had a potential for skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Interventions included administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to use appropriate infection control techniques when providing wound care. This affected two (#48 and #56) of two residents observed for wound care. The facility identified 13 residents (#26, #46, #48, #50, #56,#57, #60, #65, #69, #80, #95, #99, and #135) with wounds. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/23/23. Diagnoses included wounds of the scrotum and testes and Fournier Gangrene (necrotic tissue of the genitalia). Review of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had intact cognition. Resident #56 required supervision with bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #56 had a stage four pressure ulcer (deep wound that exposes muscle or other structures). Review of Resident #56's care plan dated 07/28/23 revealed Resident #56 had a potential for skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Facility Assessment, personnel record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health training on hire. This had the potential to affect all 138 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Facility assessment dated [DATE] included under staff training, education and competencies training would be provided for caring for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, as well as residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder and implementing non-pharmacological interventions. Review of personnel record for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #526 revealed a hire date of 12/21/22 with no documentation of behavioral training. Review of personnel record for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #439 revealed a hire date of 08/28/23 with no documentation of behavioral training. Review of personnel record for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #550 revealed a hire date of 02/06/23 with no documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #140 was free from abuse. This affected one resident (#140) of two residents two residents reviewed for physical abuse. The facility census was 138. Findings include: Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/23 and a readmission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses that included but not limited to altered mental status, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of Resident #32's care plan dated 04/28/23 revealed Resident #32 had a psychiatric disorder with a goal of no behaviors or maintain behavioral manifestation to a minimum. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired and had hallucinations. Review of Resident #32's nursing note dated 07/10/23 at 2:03 A.M. revealed Resident #32 had a history of physical aggression. Resident #32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure their abuse policy was implemented to prevent abuse toward Resident #140, to ensure Resident #140 was assessed properly after being abused, and to ensure the allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency. This affected one resident (#140) of two residents two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/23 and a readmission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses that included but not limited to altered mental status, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of Resident #32's care plan dated 04/28/23 revealed Resident #32 had a psychiatric disorder with a goal of no behaviors or maintain behavioral manifestation to a minimum. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired and had hallucinations. Review of Resident #32's nursing note dated 07/10/23 at 2:03 A.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the State Agency timely. This affected one resident (Resident #140) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/23 and a readmission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses that included but not limited to altered mental status, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of Resident #32's care plan dated 04/28/23 revealed Resident #32 had a psychiatric disorder with a goal of no behaviors or maintain behavioral manifestation to a minimum. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired and had hallucinations. Review of Resident #32's nursing note dated 07/10/23 at 2:03 A.M. revealed Resident #32 had a history of physical aggression. Resident #32 was standing inside another resident's room near the doorway. Resident #32 was told by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure tuberculosis screening was completed for newly hired employees as required. This affected six facility employees of nine employees whose personnel files were reviewed and had the potential to affect all 119 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a hire date of 07/06/21. Review of the personnel file for the Activity Director (AD) #590 revealed a hire date of 05/17/21. Review of the personnel file for Human Resources (HR) #506 revealed a hire date of 02/01/22. Review of the personnel file for Business Office Manager (BOM) #543 revealed a hire date of 02/14/22. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #531 revealed hire date of 05/17/21. Review of personnel files for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #557 revealed hire date of 03/23/22, STNA #559 revealed hire date of 09/15/21, and STNA #572 revealed hire date of 02/05/21. Review of the employees' personnel files revealed no tuberculosis screening had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate timely spend-down notifications and assistance for two of five residents reviewed for facility-managed funds (Resident #68 and #11). The total census was 119. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #68 had $3401.24 in their personal funds account as of 05/16/22. Review of his last quarterly statement revealed from January 2022 through March 2022 his balance maintained consistently between $2,600 and $4,000. No evidence could be found of any significant effort to spend the accumulated money. 2. Record review revealed Resident #11 had $10,598.00 in their personal funds account as of 05/16/22. Review of his last quarterly statement revealed from January 2022 through March 2022 his balance maintained consistently between $9,000 and $12,000. No evidence could be found of any significant effort to spend the accumulated money. Review of a facility e-mail dated 05/13/22 revealed a list of residents (including Resident #11 and #68) were in need of a spend-down to bring them below $2,000.00 in their accounts.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received quarterly care-plan conferences. This affected one of one residents reviewed for care plan conferences (Resident #15). The total census was 119. Findings include: Record review of Resident #15 revealed he was admitted to the facility 04/05/2007. A social work progress note dated 12/09/21 saying a care plan conference was scheduled for 12/13/21. No documentation of a care conference on this or any later date could be found. Interview with Licensed Social Worker #588 on 05/18/22 at 2:47 P.M. confirmed the above findings. She verified she had no recollection of a care plan conference for Resident #15 and could not find any information indicating one was done in the last six months.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to draw recommended and ordered blood labs to monitor the nutrition status of Resident #105. This affected one of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The total census was 119. Findings include: Record review of Resident #105 revealed he was admitted to the facility 08/06/19 and had diagnoses including anemia, bipolar disorder, dependence on renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism. His most recent dietary assessment dated [DATE] noted he had 'no new labs.' Record review of Resident #105's lab draw orders revealed the following: An order was in place for an HGBA1C (monitoring effectiveness of diabetes control) lab every six months, with a start date of 03/01/21. An order was in place for a CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), and valproic acid lab every six months with a start date of 11/01/20. An order was in place for a CBC, CMP, valproic acid, and TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) every six months,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor lab values for Resident #105, including those needed to track the effectiveness of medications. This affected one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The total census was 119. Findings include: Record review of Resident #105 revealed he was admitted to the facility 08/06/19 and had diagnoses including anemia, bipolar disorder, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism. Record review of Resident #105's lab draw orders revealed the following: An order was in place for a HGBA1C (monitoring effectiveness of diabetes control) lab every six months, with a start date of 03/01/21. An order was in place for a CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), and valproic acid lab every six months with a start date of 11/01/20. An order was in place for a CBC, CMP, valproic acid, and TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone, monitoring the dose of levothyroxine) every six months, with a start date of 04/19/22. Record review of Resident #105's medications revealed he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident snacks were stored in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent contamination and/or potential food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 143 of 143 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen and snack areas on 04/15/19 from 9:07 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. with Kitchen Manager (KM) #400 and Registered Dietitian (RD) #401 revealed the following: The fifth floor snack refrigerator had a temperature of 49 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and no temperature log. Two sandwich halves, a cake and sausage links were not labeled or dated. The fourth floor snack refrigerator did not have a temperature log. A bottle of Pepsi (soda) had been placed in the freezer compartment of the refrigerator and had burst, covering the freezer and refrigerator in a sticky brown substance. Sauerkraut, fruit salad, pickles and hummus were not labeled or dated. A can of pineapple had been opened and the food had been stored inside the can and this was not labeled or dated. An expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for all residents. This had the potential to affect all 143 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 4/15/19 at 11:54 A.M. of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a wooden chair with the arm broken off exposing a jagged wood post extending up from front end of the cushion. Interview on 4/15/19 at 11:55 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #175 verified above findings and revealed he did not know how long the chair was broken. Observation during an environmental tour of the facility on 04/18/19 from 2:28 P.M. through 3:05 P.M. with the Environmental Director revealed the following: The second floor had a tile that was cracked and partially missing in the hallway. The dinning room had large gouges in the wall that need patching and to be repainted. A window sill in the dining room had dust and dead insects. The brown paint on the hand rails had worn off in areas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis and diabetes. The quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 01/09/19 revealed the resident required the extensive assistance from one person for dressing and personal hygiene. The resident was assessed to have mild cognitive impairment. Record review revealed no evidence of resistance to any personal hygiene care in the care plan. Observation on 04/16/19 at 9:17 A.M. revealed Resident #23 was in a wheelchair waiting to be picked up for an appointment. The resident had a large amount of long facial hair on her chin. Interview on 04/16/19 at 9:17 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed she did not want to have chin hair and had not realized it was that long. The resident stated her daughter would often take care of it when she had time. Interview on 04/17/19 at 8:40 A.M. with STNA #404 revealed the STNA stated she had offered to remove the resident's chin hair but the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff followed menu spreadsheets as written. This affected five residents receiving pureed meals (Resident #9, #41, #86, #106 and #295) and 10 residents receiving mechanical soft meals (Resident #6, #7, #16, #33, #60, #65, #90, #120, #126 and #292) who resided on the second floor during the dinner meal service on 04/16/19. The facility census was 143 residents. Findings include: Review of the menu spreadsheet titled, Week Four, Day Three which correlated to 04/16/19 revealed residents on pureed diets were to receive a #10 scoop of pureed chicken, a #8 scoop of pureed macaroni and cheese, a #10 scoop of pureed stewed tomatoes and a #20 scoop of pureed bread. The spreadsheet showed residents on a mechanical soft diet were to receive a #10 scoop of mechanically-altered chicken and a #20 scoop of pureed bread in addition to the regular consistency half cup of macaroni and cheese and half cup of stewed tomatoes. Observation of the dinner meal on the second floor with Kitchen Manager (KM) #400 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #138, who was dependent on staff for personal care received appropriate and complete incontinence care. This affected one resident (Resident #138) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #138 revealed he had diagnoses including chronic embolism, paraplegia, and bipolar disorder. Record review revealed the resident was assessed to be totally dependent on staff for toileting assistance. Interview with Resident #138 on 04/15/19 at 10:54 A.M. revealed he was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, including incontinence care. The resident stated staff did not always provide adequate cleaning when he had bowel movements, resulting in fecal matter remaining after their care. Observation of an incontinence care procedure by State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #205, STNA #206, and Registered Nurse (RN) #202 for Resident #138 on 04/17/19 at 11:32 A.M. revealed that during the procedure, the staff brushed soiled towels used to clean fecal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan to address Resident #114's dementia. This affected one resident (Resident #114) of two residents reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: Review of Resident #114's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/01/16 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, heart disease, delusional disorders, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), psychotic disorder with delusions and Parkinson's disease. Review of Resident #114's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/12/19 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for dressing, hygiene and toilet use. Review of Resident #114's plan of care revised 02/27/19 revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function related to a diagnosis of dementia and noted cognitive impairment. Listed interventions included administering medications as ordered with monitoring side effects/effectiveness; assess, document and report to physician any changes in cognitive function;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The medication error rate was calculated to be 32 percent and included eight medication errors of 25 medication administration observations. This affected two residents (Resident #63 and #291) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Observation of medication administration by Registered Nurse (RN) #202 for Resident #63 on 04/16/19 at 8:46 A.M. and subsequent record review revealed the nurse did not administer an ordered dose of one tablet, Potassium chloride 20 milliequivalents, due at 9:00 A.M. The surveyor reviewed the above finding with RN #202 on 04/16/19 at 9:03 A.M. RN #202 confirmed she should have given the Potassium and had accidentally missed it. Following surveyor intervention, RN #202 administered the potassium to Resident #63. 2. Observation of a medication pass by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #203 for Resident #291 on 04/16/19 at 9:46 A.M. and subsequent record review revealed the nurse did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained in a complete and accurate manner for all residents. This affected one resident (Resident #138) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care, one resident (Resident #39) of one resident reviewed for edema and one resident (Resident #240) of two residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #138 revealed the resident had diagnoses including chronic embolism, paraplegia, and bipolar disorder. He had active orders in his chart dated 12/04/18 for zinc oxide cream to be applied topically to his buttocks every shift and as needed. Review of his treatment administration record (TAR) for the month of 04/2019 revealed no documentation of any administration of this order. The above findings were confirmed with the administrator on 04/18/19 at 10:12 A.M. 2. Record review for Resident #39 revealed she had diagnoses including dementia, obesity, lymphedema, and hypothyroidism. She had active orders in her chart dated 09/05/18 for Tubigrips (a brand of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-04-22 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure state tested nurse aides (STNAs) were given yearly performance evaluations as required. This affected two (#291 and #296) of two STNA's personnel files reviewed who were employed for more than one year at the facility. This had the potential to affect all 143 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 143. Findings Include: 1. Review of the personnel record for STNA #291 revealed a hire date of 12/23/22. There was no evidence of a yearly performance evaluation completed for STNA #291 for the last year. 2. Review of the personnel record for STNA #296 revealed a hire date of 01/13/22. There was no evidence of a yearly performance evaluation completed for STNA #296 for the last year. Interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) #350 on 04/16/24 at 11:30 A.M. verified no yearly performance reviews were completed as required for STNA #291 and STNA #296. This deficiency is based on incidental findings discovered during the course of the complaint investigation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-05-19 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit resident discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected four residents (#1, #2, #4 and #5) out of five reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 119. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, depression, anxiety disorder, and cellulitis of right orbit. Resident #1 discharged from the facility on 12/07/21. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and was independent with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on unit, dressing, eating, toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #1's discharge instruction assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 discharged from the facility on 12/07/21 to a residential living setting. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-04-18 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident council interview, staff interview and review of the local post office website, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered on Saturday. This has the potential to affect all 143 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the resident council meeting held on 04/15/19 from 1:00 P.M. until 1:35 P.M. the residents present at the meeting verbalized concerns that they do not receive mail on Saturday but would receive package delivery. Interview with Business Office Manager #176 on 04/17/19 at 4:30 P.M. revealed packages were delivered to residents on Saturday. However, most of the bulk mail delivered on Saturday was held and until Monday unless the residents specifically expressed they were expecting a letter/item, those items would then be given when delivered. Review of the Cleveland Heights, Ohio post office website revealed there was mail delivery on Saturday.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-04-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 54.0-3.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA 2 of 5Crawford Manor Healthcare CenterCleveland, OH

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHIO AVIV THREE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2026
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
CEKANSKI, CYNTHIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/25/2021
KNOWLES, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2024
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2002
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2026
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2026
HALL, GREGORYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 37%Medicare 1%Other / private 62%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$284per resident / day
operating cost
$8,619per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365832. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next