Life Care Center of Tucson

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 151 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 60% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 84.2 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 78 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, review of facility documentation, clinical records and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #15) out of one sampled resident was free from preventable accident by failing to ensure appropriate safety measures during a transfer. The universe was sixty. The deficient practice could place other residents at risk for preventable falls and serous injury.Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included a historical fracture of the right shoulder girdle and need for assistance with personal care. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS also revealed that the resident required substantial assistance with transfers from the bed to the chair. The care plan initiated on January 30, 2026 revealed a focus area related to a risk for falls, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) was free from verbal abuse by a staff member. The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.Findings Include:-Regarding Resident #1:Resident # 1 (alleged victim) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcers, absence of left foot, morbid obesity, and mood disorder. A comprehensive care plan initiated on August 25, 2025 revealed that the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self care performance deficit due to activity intolerance. The care plan further revealed interventions that included toilet use requiring maximum assistance and requiring 2-person dependent assist with transfers. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating the resident is cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to protect the rights of one of three sampled residents (#119) to be free from abuse by another resident (#103). The deficient practice could lead to ongoing abuse, leading to harm to other residents.-Findings include:Regarding Resident #119Resident #119 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced fracture of the surgical neck of the right humerus, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, age-related cognitive, mood affective disorder, and insomnia.A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed that Resident #119 had exhibited no verbal or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate assessment, monitoring, and supervision to prevent elopement for one of the 5 sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in injury to residents.Findings Include:Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of Essential (primary) hypertension, hyperlipidemia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, stage 3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, occlusion and stenosis of left carotid artery, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) insufficiency, dysphagia following cerebral infarction.An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The elopement assessment was assessed as not a risk for the resident (#119).According to the progress notes dated August 25, 2025, it was revealed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY BBased on clinical record review, interviews, the State Agency's (SA) complaint portal, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure 4 out of 4 residents' (#47, #48, #52, and #53) medications were not misappropriated by nursing staff. The deficient practice resulted in the facility not keeping an accurate record of controlled substances. Findings include:Related to Resident #47-Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, generalized muscle weakness, stage 3 kidney disease and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 12 which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment. The same MDS also indicated the resident was taking opioids as part of his medication regimen.The care plan, revised on May 24, 2024, revealed Resident #47 was on a PRN (Pro Re…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, the State Agency's (SA) complaint portal, and review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#40) received medications according to physician's orders. The deficient practice could result in resident experiencing unnecessary pain.Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, fusion of the spine in the cervical region, and a fracture of the humerus in the right arm. The care plan, initiated on August 9, 2023, indicated Resident #40 was on pain medication therapy related to chronic pain syndrome. Interventions included administering analgesic medications as ordered by the physician and to observe for side effects and effectiveness of the medications.A physician's order, dated September 18, 2023, revealed an order for Dilaudid (Hydro-morphine HCI) Oral Tablet 2 MG (milligrams). The order indicated that .5 mg tablet was to be given every 4 hours as needed for pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate and comfortable temperature levels was provided to meet the needs of 14 residents (#4, #5, #8, #11, #20, #25, #34, #35, #41, #42, #43, #48, #56, and #167). The deficient practice could result in the resident's room not having a homelike and comfortable environment. The facility census was 58 and the sample was 14. Findings include: On the morning of July 15, 2024, between the hours of 6:45 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., surveyors experienced a notable difference in temperature perceived and felt when entering the facility. The temperature felt uncomfortably warm. During an interview with the Assistant Maintenance Technician (staff #33) conducted on July 15, 2024 at approximately 6:45 a.m., staff #33 mentioned that the generator did not kick in properly during the power outage yesterday evening. This resulted in the cooling tower (chiller) not activating to cool down the temperature in the facility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure multiple food items were stored at safe temperatures in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. The facility census was 58. Findings include: During an initial observation of the kitchen, conducted at 8:25 a.m. on July 14, 2024 with staff #15. In the walk-in refrigerator, the thermometers both inside and out registered a temperature displaying 45 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Inside the refrigerator were various food items including milk, eggs, yogurt, meat, cheese, and dressings. Staff #15 stated the temperatures are recorded on the log twice daily, morning and evening. Review of the monthly temperature log for July 2024 revealed the morning refrigerator temperature on July 14, 2024 was recorded at 36F. The evening temperature was recorded at 40F. The log includes a critical limit (CL) for temperature at 40F on the high end, and revealed that in the event of a temperature not within the required range, to notify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0906 — pattern
  Provide enough power supply for lighting all entrances and exits; equipment for fire detection and alarm systems, and extinguishers.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the emergency and standby power systems were functioning properly. Failure to implement an emergency and standby power systems plan during an emergency could lead to harm of the patients and/or staff. Findings include: Based on record review and staff interview on July 17-18, 2024, the facility failed to ensure the emergency generator was adequate for the facility needs during an emergency. The facility has had a rental generator since March 2, 2020. On July 14, 2024 the facility experienced a power failure and the temporary generator failed to turn on leaving the facility totally without power. Medical equipment, the elevator and facility walk-in refrigerator and freezer were none functioning during the total outage. The following are staff interviews: Monday, July 15, 2024, at approximately 0941 hours an interview was conducted with staff # 32, Maintenance Director. Staff #32 stated that he was notified at 1815 hours on July 14, 2024, that the power was out. Staff #32 stated that he responded to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and the facility's documentation and policies, the facility failed to ensure a safe and comfortable environment for residents: Findings include: Regarding safe environment: During the initial walk-through observation of the facility conducted on July 14, 2024 at 10:11 a.m., the following was observed: - Doorway frame missing in room [ROOM NUMBER], light brown paint is peeling, exposing the green pain underneath. It felt rough to the touch. - Corner handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER] was rough with gouges and the edges felt sharp enough to scratch/tear skin during an unintended contact. - Numerous doorframes on the second-floor hallway had paint peeling and has gouges that were sharp to the touch. - Numerous handrails on the second floor was rough with gouges that are rough/sharp to the touch. - Second floor nurse's station corner had a nail sticking out on the bottom corner. That same bottom corner had gouges that were rough to the touch. - Corner handrail on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on employee record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for annual training: abuse, resident rights, infection control, dementia training, and emergency preparedness for multiple staff (#50, #26, #43, #54, #38, #59, #32 and #110). The deficient practice could impact the safety, rights, and care provided to residents. Findings include: Review of the employee records for a registered nurse (RN/staff #50) revealed that abuse training was completed on June 15, 2022, completed resident rights on February 27, 2023, infection control training on June 15, 2022, and there was no documentation for emergency preparedness. -Review of the employee records for (RN/staff #26) revealed that abuse training was completed on October 6, 2022, resident rights completed on March 31, 2023, infection control completed on January 27, 2023, and emergency preparedness was competed on January 27, 2023. -Review of the employee record for Licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #43) revealed that abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,380 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ