No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Life Care Center of Omaha

6032 Ville de Sante Drive, Omaha, NE 68104 · For profit - Partnership · 128 certified beds · (402) 571-6770 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$31,079 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $31,079 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
6829 N 72nd St, Medical Office Building One Ste 3100 · (402) 717-0750 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6005 N 72nd St · (402) 201-2729 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5934 Ames Ave · (402) 800-3682 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6502 Hartman Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5829 N 60th St · (402) 819-8941

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%4.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.4%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.7%19.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.3%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%20.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine55.3%75.9%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.0%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.3%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.791.811.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.781.921.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
86.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 86.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.2%CMS range 37.5–58.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.4–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge86.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 6.0–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
50.9%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-15)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of Wanderguard bracelet placement and function to prevent potential elopement from the facility for 1 [Resident 1] of 3 sampled residents at risk for elopement. The facility had a total census of 85. Findings are: A. A review of admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hemiplegia [severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body] and hemiparesis [mild or partial weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body] following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Observations on 4/1/24 at 5:58 PM revealed Resident 1 with a Wanderguard bracelet [a bracelet worn by a resident that triggers an alarm if resident attempts to exit a facility] on right wrist. RN [Registered Nurse]-B checked the bracelet with the tester machine and the braclet was functioning. A review of MDS [Minimum Data Set; a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) and 12-006.09 (H)(iii)(2). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement treatment and interventions to promote healing and prevent new pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident 3) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 94. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity and Pressure Ulcer Prevention dated 06-11-2025 revealed the purpose of the policy was to provide staff and licensed nurses with procedures to manage skin integrity, prevent pressure ulcers, complete wound assessments and provide treatment and care of skin and wounds utilizing professional standards of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Wound, Ostomy, Continent Nurses Society. Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge planning was completed for 1 resident (Resident 1) of 4 residents surveyed. The facility claimed a census of 44.A record review of the Facility Discharge Planning Process dated 5/6/2019 and revised 8/18/2022, revealed the following:The discharge planning process will address each resident's discharge goals and needs, including caregiver support and referrals to local contact agencies, as appropriate, and involves the resident and if applicable, the resident representative and the interdisciplinary team in developing the discharge plan.ProcedureIdentify the resident's needs and goals regarding discharge upon or as soon as practicable after admission.The discharge plan is incorporated into the interdisciplinary care plan. It originates on the baseline care plan and will be included on the resident's comprehensive care plan, once developed.Address the resident's goals and treatment preferences in the plan.Document the date and any updated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3) and 12-006.09(J).Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a tube feeding was running continuously for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 residents sampled and failed to provide treatment to a feeding tube insertion site according to the practitioner's orders for 1 (Resident 7) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 94. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Enteral Nutrition Therapy (Continuous) dated 09-05-2025 revealed the facility will provide continuous enteral nutrition therapy in accordance with physician's orders and professional standards of practice. Record review of the facility policy titled Treatment Orders dated 06-12-2025 revealed treatment orders are written per physician's orders. The physician orders are followed as are the manufacturer's instructions for use for each product ordered.A.Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tools used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information contained the required information related to the total number of actual hours worked per discipline. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The facility staff identified a census of 98.Record reviews of 30 days of past posted nurse staffing between 8/10/25 and 9/10/25 revealed the daily posted nurse staffing did not contain the total number of actual hours worked for the different types of staff.An interview on 9/15/25 at 1:02 PM with the facility Administrator confirmed the nurse staff posting information did not contain the total number of actual hours worked per discipline and that the hours had not been calculated or documented on the posted nurse staffing and should have been.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was completed for 1 (Resident 28) who received a psychotropic medications (drugs that alter mental processes, emotions, and behavior), failed to monitor for side effects for 1 (Resident 54) who received Depakote (a drug used to treat bipolar disorder, seizures, and prevent migraines) and Lexapro (a drug used to treat depression and anxiety), failed to ensure a sleep diary or test was completed for 1 (Resident 28) who received Zolpidem Tartrate (Ambien, a drug used to treat sleep disorders), failed to ensure as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications (drugs used to treat mental health conditions) had a stop date of 14 days after first issuance for 1 (Resident 30), and failed to perform baseline and ongoing Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) testing for the use of antipsychotics for 1 (Resident 71) for a total of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 98. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(G) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge plan for 1 (Resident 102) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 98. Findings are:A record review of Resident 102's Progress Notes dated 09/11/2025 revealed the resident was discharged to home on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 102's Notice Of Resident Transfer Or Discharge dated 08/18/2025 revealed the resident discharged to home and the box was marked that the resident's health had improved sufficiently and no longer needed the services provided by the facility. A record review of Resident 102's Discharge Summary Information dated 08/18/2025 revealed the resident was discharged to home. The reason for discharge was patient request. The resident was educated on the discharge process and was not expected to return. A record review of Resident 102's Care Plan with an admission date of 08/08/2025 did not reveal a Focus area or interventions for the discharge plan. A record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.06(A) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to 3 (Residents 7, 100, and 111) of 3 sampled residents on hospital transfer and failed to notify the State Long term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals complaints) of a facility-initiated transfer on 3 (Residents 7, 100, and 111) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 98. Findings are: A record review of facility's Bed-Hold Policy with a reviewed date of 09/05/2024 revealed the facility was obligated to provide two notices related to bed-holds. The first notice is given on admission well in advance of any transfer, i.e., information provided in the admission packet. Reissuance of the first notice would be required if the bed-hold policy under the State Plan or the facility's policy were to change. The second notice must be provided to the resident, and if applicable the resident's representative, at the time of transfer, or in cases of emergency transfer, within 24 hours. It is expected that facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) for 1 (Resident 13) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 98. The findings are:Record review of Resident 13's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact.-required limited assistance with upper body dressing.-required extensive assistance with bed mobility and lower body dressing.-required total assistance with toileting, bathing, and transfers-oral and dental status including edentulous and loosely fitting dentures were not present. An observation on 09-08-2025 at 10:36 AM revealed Resident 13 was edentulous. During the observation a interview conducted with Resident 13 with Resident 13 reporting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan related to fluid restriction for 1 (Resident 1) of 22 residents sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 98.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plans and Revisions dated reviewed 9/11/2024 revealed: -The facility will ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of individuals who have knowledge of the resident and his/her needs, and that each resident and resident representative, if applicable, is involved in developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care. -Procedure: -1. The facility should monitor the resident over time to help identify changes in the resident condition that may warrant an update to the person-centered plan of care. -2. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete neurological evaluations after an unwitnessed fall for 1 (Resident 71) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 98. The findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Neurological Checks dated 08-29-2025 revealed a neurological check list shall be initiated when indicated by the resident assessment such as a head injury, post fall or neurological decompensation. Record review of Resident 71's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 08-22-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 3. According to the MDS Manual a score of 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment. - required set up assistance with dressing, toileting and hygiene.-was independent with dressing, toileting and ambulation.- was taking an antipsychotic medication.-had 2 or more falls in the last 3 months. Record review of the facility's incident log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the potential for accidents on 2 (Residents 9 and 111) of 7 sampled residents. The facility census was 98. Findings are:A. A record review of the facility's “Transportation Coordination and Services” policy with a reviewed date of 05/15/2025 revealed the facility would ensure safety and infection control procedures were followed in accordance with state and federal guidance. A record review of the facility's “Suicide Precautions” policy with a reviewed date of 09/06/2024 revealed that residents who made attempts should be transferred to an acute setting for evaluation and reported in accordance with state regulation. Provide one to one supervision (1:1)(one staff with the resident at all times) until resident was transferred to an acute inpatient setting (hospital). A record review of Resident 111's “Clinical Census” dated 09/10/2025 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to monitor lab values related to thyroid medication for 1 (Resident 30) of 5 residents sampled and failed to hold blood pressure medication when the blood pressure was outside of parameters for 1 (Resident 71) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 98. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility policy titled Unnecessary Medication dated 08-30-2022 revealed the facility will ensure only medications required to treat the resident's assessed condition are being used, reducing the need for and maximizing the effectiveness of medications. The facility's medication management process will support and promote the monitoring of medications for efficacy and adverse consequences. Record review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 08-08-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-BIMS was scored as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less as evidenced by 2 medication administration errors out of 25 opportunities for error, resulting in an error rate of 8%. The facility census was 98. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Administered through an Enteral Tube (feeding tube) dated 11-15-2024 revealed medications are administered by authorized and qualified facility staff, as prescribed, in accordance with standard nursing principles and practices. Insert medication syringe into the appropriate port and pour each medication through the syringe. Medications should be prepared and given separately. Do not mix medications together in a medication syringe. Record review of Resdient 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-required total assistance with eating, hygiene, bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a report to the receiving healthcare institution after an emergent transfer from the facility for 2 (Resident 1 and 3) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 95. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -was alert and oriented to person, place and time. -was receiving dialysis. -required extensive assistance with transfers. -required limited assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and hygiene. -had an active infectious disease that required transmission-based precautions. Record review of Resident 1's progress notes dated 05-24-25 revealed Resident 1 and spouse wanted to be sent to the hospital due to body pain and had declined treatment for this at the facility. Furthermore, the progress note reveals the on-call supervisor was notified and 911 was called and an ambulance arrived at the facility to take Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to train licensed staff on an external cardiac defibrillator, prior to providing care to 1 (Resident 1) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 95. The findings are: Record review of Resident 1's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -was alert and oriented to person, place and time. -was receiving dialysis. -required extensive assistance with transfers. -required limited assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and hygiene. -had an active infectious disease that required transmission-based precautions. Record review of Resident 1's discharge orders from the hospital revealed an order for a life vest (an external defibrillator designed to protect individuals at risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest by monitoring heart rhythms and delivering a shock when abnormal rhythms are detected) was to be worn at all times. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.06(E & F), 12-006.18(B) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to utilize contact precautions for 1(Resident 2) of 3 residents sampled and failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions for 2 (Resident 3 and 4) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 95. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 04-16-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13 to 15 indicate a person is cognitively intact. -was legally blind -had a C. Difficile infection (a bacterium that can cause inflammation of the colon and diarrhea) -was on isolation for an active infection. -required supervision and minimal assistance with toileting, bathing and transfers. -was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. An observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(a) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer enteral tube feedings and water flushes according to the practitioner's orders for 1 (Resident 5) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 99. The findings are: Record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 12-24-2024 revealed the facility the following about the resident. -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 3. According to the MDS Manual a score of 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment. -had a diagnosis of Protein Calorie Malnutrition -required total assistance with eating, hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, transfers and bed mobility. -had a feeding tube and was receiving 51% or more of the daily total calories through the feeding tube. Record review of Resident 5's order summary printed on 03-13-2025 revealed an order Nepro enteral feeding at 45 milliliters (ml) per hour through the feeding tube for 24 hours a day continuously. Additionally, the order summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observation of 29 medications administered revealed 3 errors resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34%. The medication errors affect 2 (Resident 2 and 3) of 4 residents. The facility census was 99. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) printed on 03-13-2025 revealed the following medications to be administered for 8:00 AM: -Amlodipine Besylate (medication used for blood pressure management) 10 milligrams (mg) -Baclofen (muscle relaxant) 15 mg -Calcium Carbonate Chewable 500 mg -Culturelle Capsules 1 capsule -Donepezil (medication used to improve mental function) HCl 10 mg -Fluticazone Propionate Nasal Suspension 1 spray each nare -Gabapentin (anticonvulsant medication) 300 mg -Isosorbide mononitrate ( ER 30 mg -Refresh Tears Solution 0.5 % 1 drop in both eyes. An observation on 03-13-2025 at 7:35 AM of Registered Nurse (RN) B administering medications for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(iii) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 10 insulin pens were labeled with the date opened for Residents 5, 6 and 8 during an observation of 1 medication cart sampled. The facility census was 99. The findings are: Record review of the facility policy Guidance for Using Insulin Products revealed the following information: -insulin products should not be used if they were frozen. -Before opening all unused vials, pens, and cartridges of insulin are best stored in a refrigerator between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit and can be kept until the expiration date printed on the packaging. -Storage of unopened insulin products outside of the refrigerator is permissible but results in an earlier expiration date. -Upon opening all vials, cartridges, pens should be dated and stored away from direct heat or light. Insulin pens should not be refrigerated once opened. -Lantus insulin opened and stored at room temperature will expire in 28 days. -Lispro insulin opened and stored at room temperature will expire in 28 days. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to include the resident/ family member in the quarter care planning process for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 90. Findings are: Record review of a Order Summary Report printed on 10-28-2024 revealed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the section identified as census revealed Resident 2 discharge from the facility on 8-23-2024. Further review of Resident 2's EMR revealed the last quarter care planning process was completed on 10-24-2023. There was no indication a quarter care planning process was conducted as of 10-29-2024. On 10-28-2024 at 10:10 AM an interview was conducted with a Family Member (FM) of Resident 2's. During the interview Resident 2's FM reported not being invited or being aware of the quarterly care planning process. Resident 2's FM reported being involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Refernce Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(l) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement assessed interventions to prevent accidents/falls for 3 (Resident 1,3 and 4) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a censu of 90. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) printed on 10-28-2024 revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident 1's CCP revealed Resident 1 had a fall initiated on 7-03-2023. According to Resident 1's CCP the goal for Resident 1 was Resident 1 would not sustain a serious injury requiring hospitalization. Interventions to meet this good were as follows: -Anticipate and meet the residents needs. -Call light in reach. -Complate a fall risk assessment. -Fall mate next to the bed. -Parameter mattress to the bed. Observation on 10-28-2024 at 7:26 PM revealed Resident 1 was in bed and did not have a fall mat in place. On 10-28-2024 at 7:28 PM Licensed Practical nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observation of 34 medication revealed 4 errors resulting in an error rate of 11.76%. The medication errors effect 3 (Resident 10,11 and 13) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 90. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 revealed Resident 10 practitioner had ordered Atorvastation(medication to treat high cholesterol level) 20 milligrams (mg) and Metamucil 4 in 1 fiber oral packet to be given 4 times a day. According to Resident 10's MAR for October 2024, the Atorvastation was schedule to be given at 5:00 PM. Observation on 10-28-2024 at 7:33 PM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A prepared Resident 10 medications that included the Atorvastatin 20 mg. In addition LPN A scooped out 1 scoop of the Metamucil using a plastic spoon and place the medication into a plastic cup. LPN A took the medications and administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a serious mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care, requires that all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for a serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability, be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs, and receive the services they need in those settings) Level II was completed on a resident with a serious mental disorder for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed (Resident 6). The facility identified a census of 81. Findings are: Record review of Resident 6's PASARR Level I screening determination notification dated 6/1/2023 revealed the following statement: There were no signs of a serious mental illness, intellectual disability or a related condition found during the Level I screen. No further clinical review or onsite evaluation is needed. Record review of Resident 6's Census Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan (a person-centered plan developed and implemented to meet the resident's needs) on admission for 1 (Resident 79) of 29 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 81. Findings are: Record review of Resident 79's (Electronic Medical Record) EMR revealed the admission date of 06/21/2024. Record review of Resident 79's baseline care plan that was initiated in (Point Click Care, a system for documenting clinical information on residents) PCC on 06/21/2024 revealed the facility staff had not developed a baseline care plan for Resident 79. Interview concluded on 07/18/2024 at 1:29 PM with the (Assistant Director of Nursing) ADON confirmed that baseline care plans should be completed within 48 hours of admission. The ADON confirmed Resident 79 baseline care plan in PCC were blank and had no information about Resident 79's physical or medical needs, goals or interventions to maintain or improve Resident 79's health or physical needs. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to complete a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, the plan of care is developed from a comprehensive assessment to ensure the resident achieves optimal functional status.) for Resident 79 after the completion of the comprehensive assessment. This affected 1 (Resident 79) of 29 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 81. Findings are: Record review of Resident 79's (Electronic Medical Record) EMR revealed the admission date of 6/21/24. Record review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06/28/2024 identify Resident 79 used a wheelchair and a walker. The MDS section GG- Functional Abilities and Goals, identified Resident 79 needed setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene. Further review of Resident 79's MDS revealed Resident 79 was dependent for showering, toileting, and lower body dressing. Resident 79 required substantial/maximal assistance with transferring from one surface to another per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 006.09(H)(vi)(2) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to meet resident needs and interests for 1 [Resident 63] of 1 sampled resident. The facility had a total census of 81 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 63's electronic medical record revealed Resident 63 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase [difficulty swallowing], and anoxic brain damage [brain injury caused by lack of oxygen]. A review of Resident 63's annual MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 5/17/24 identified the following: -Brief Interview for Mental Status was not completed -Resident 63 was identified as having short-term and long-term memory problems -The following activities were identified as being very important to Resident 63: listening to music, doing things with groups of people, going outside to get fresh air when the weather is good A review of annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent potential falls were implemented for 1 [Resident 63] of 3 residents sampled for falls. The facility had a total census of 81 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 63's electronic medical record revealed Resident 63 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase [difficulty swallowing], and anoxic brain damage [brain injury caused by lack of oxygen]. A review of Resident 63's annual MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 5/17/24 revealed Resident 63 has had 2 falls with no injury since admission/entry or reentry or prior assessment whichever is more recent. A review of Resident 63's care plan identified of focus area dated 5/17/23 of being at risk for falls related to confusion, incontinence, and unaware of safety needs with a goal of Resident 63 not sustaining a serious injury that required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was provided in accordance with physician order for 1 [Resident 63] of 1 resident sampled for enteral feeding. The facility had a total census of 81 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 63's electronic medical record revealed Resident 63 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase [difficulty swallowing], and anoxic brain damage [brain injury caused by lack of oxygen]. A review of Resident 63's annual MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 5/17/24 revealed Resident 63 received greater than 51% of total calories from enteral tube feeding. A review of Resident 63's 7/2024 MAR [Medication Administration Record] revealed the following orders: -Jevity 1.5 [tube feeding formula] 300 cc [cubic centimeters] bolus via G-tube [a tube inserted in resident's stomach], flush with 50 ml [milliliters]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.02 (8) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report to Adult Protective Service and submit investigation to state agency within 5 working days 2 elopements involving 1 [Resident 1] of 4 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 85 residents. Findings are: A. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A review of the MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 2/8/24 revealed Resident 1 had a BIMS [Brief Interview for Mental Status is used to get a quick snapshot of how well you are functioning cognitively at the moment] score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's Care Plan revealed a problem of being at risk for elopement with history of attempts to leave facility unattended and impaired safety awareness dated 7/27/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure reference: 12-006.04B2a Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 [Nurse Aide C and D] of 5 sampled nurse aides had completed 12 hours of yearly in-service training and failed to complete dementia and abuse in-service training for 1[ Nurse Aide C] of 5 sampled nurse aides. The facility had a total census of 85 residents. Findings are: A review of employee list with an effective date of 3/7/24 revealed a hire date of 11/28/17 for Nurse Aide-C. A review of Nurse Aide-C's completion certificates revealed Nurse Aide-C completed 1.95 hour of continuing education between service dates of 11/28/22 to 11/28/23. The completion certificates did not include any training on abuse prevention or dementia for the service year. A review of employee list with an effective date of 3/7/24 revealed a hire date of 10/5/18. A review of Nurse Aide-D's completion certificates revealed Nurse Aide D completed 1.03 hours of continuing education between service dates of 10/5/22-10/5/23. In an interview on 4/3/24 at 10:30 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Nurse Aide-C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to investigate and report within 5 working days of a potential allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled Resident. The facility staff identified a census of 90. Record review of the facility Abuse-Identification of Types policy and procedure dated 10-04-2022 and a policy review date of 7-18-2023 revealed the following: -Neglect: -Neglect is defined as a failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. a. neglect includes cases where the facility's indifference or disregard for the residents care, comfort or safety, result in or could have resulted in, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect may be the result of a pattern of failures or maybe the result of one or more failure of one resident and one staff person. b. Neglect of goods or services may occur when staff are aware, or should be aware,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D4 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure complete personal cares for 1 (Resident 3) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 90. Findings are: Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 12-13-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 3's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) as a 15. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 13 to 15 indicates the resident is cognitively intact. Further review of Resident 3's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following information about resident 3: -Dependent for toilet use, personal hygiene and transfers. -Required substantial to maximal assistance with rolling side to side, sitting and laying and dressing upper body. -Limited range in motion to the upper and lower extremities. Observation on 1-08-2024 at 11:20 AM revealed Nursing Assistant (NA) A entered Resident 3's room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility staff failed to implement pain management interventions for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 90. Findings are: Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 12-13-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 3's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13 to 15 indicated the resident is cognitively intact. Further review of Resident 3's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following information about Resident 3: - dependent for toilet use, personal hygiene and transfers, - required substantial to maximal assistance with rolling side to side, sitting and laying and dressing upper body, - limited range in motion to the upper and lower extremities, - frequent pain that affected [gender] sleep at times and occasionally interfered with day to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to apply Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a manor to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 on the west section of the facility. This had the potential to effect 54 of 88 facility residents. The facility staff identified a census of 88. Findings are: On 8-21-2023 at 8:55 AM the facility Administrator reported the facility was in an outbreak status related to residents in the facility testing positive for COVID-19 and that N 95 mask were required when in the facility. Observation on 8-21-2023 revealed the following information: - 11:25 AM, Licensed Practical nurse (LPN) C standing at nursing station with mask below nose - 11:40 AM, Housekeep E was in the 400 hall with the mask below the chin. - 11:40 AM, Occupational Therapist I in room [ROOM NUMBER] with resident with mask below chin. - 11:42 AM, Certified Medication Assistant (CMA) D in hall 400 with mask below nose. - 11:52 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to notify a family representative of the discontinuation of tube feeding treatment for 1 (Resident 9) of 1 resident. The facility staff identified a census of 88. Findings are: Record review of a Order Recap Report (ORR) printed on 8-21-2023 revealed Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Depression, Diabetes and Hypertension. Further review of the OOR printed on 8-21-2023 revealed Resident 9's practitioner ordered a diet of regular texture with fluids at a thin consistency. Record review of a ORR printed on 8-22-2023 revealed Resident 9 had been receiving tube feedings of a feeding formula two times a day. Further review of the OOR printed on 8-22-2023 revealed the tube feeding was discontinued on 8-01-2023. Record review of Resident 9's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 7-31-2023 revealed Resident 9 had been refusing all tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D2b Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility staff failed to implement assessed intervention and additional interventions for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment for 2 (Resident 4 and 16) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 88. Findings are: A. Record review of a Order Summary Report (OSR) printed on 8-22-2023 revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included Diabetes, Hypertension,Chronic Respiratory Failure and absence of right leg below the knee. Further review of Resident 4's OSR printed on 8-22-2023 revealed an order Resident 4 was to wear a Prevalon boot (protective foot wear) to the left foot at all times. Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6-14-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 4's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) as a 15. According to the MDS [NAME] a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Nebraska Food Code 4-602.13 Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to maintain a fan, air conditioner units and ceiling ventilation covers in clean condition in the facility kitchen. This had the ability to affect 87 of 91 residents who ate food prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Observation on 6/26/23 of the facility kitchen between 6:35 AM and 6:55 AM revealed the following: - A fan was present in the facility dish room. The fan was on and blowing toward the clean side of the facility dishwasher. The exterior of the fan cover had a gray substance present that resembled dust. - Two air conditioners that were in the wall in the main kitchen over the food prep areas had covers that were coated with a gray, dark fuzzy substance that resembled dust. The air conditioners were on and blowing into the kitchen toward the food preparation areas, the stove, and oven and the steam table areas. - 2 large ceiling ventilation covers over the food preparation area in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain walls, fixtures, ceiling tiles, outlets, baseboards and doors in 21 ( Rooms 100, 102, 105, 107, 200, 201, 204, 205, 303, 306, 402, 407, 409, 410, 505, 604, 605, 606, 700, 707, 708) of 101 occupied resident rooms. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Observation on 06/28/23 between 1:00 PM and 2:01 PM with the Director of Environmental Services and the Director of Maintenance [DM] revealed the following concerns with the facility environment: - The caulking surrounding the sink was cracked and broken and the sink was pulled away from the wall in resident bathrooms in rooms 100, 105, 107, 201, 205, 605 and 700. - There were scrapes present in the drywall on walls by beds in resident rooms 102, 107, 200, 205, 407 and 606. - There were stained, brown areas present around the base of the toilet in resident bathrooms in rooms 105, 204, 409, 410, 604, 707 and 708. - The ceiling tile was cracked and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed between glove changes for 2 residents (Resident 54 and 19) of 2 sampled residents, and failed to perform hand hygiene during catheter care for Resident 19. The facility staff identified a census of 91. Findings are: A. Record review of facility policy on Hand Hygiene dated 6/13/23 revealed Associates perform hand hygiene (even if gloves are used) in the following situations; a) before and after contact with the resident, b) after contact with blood, body fluids, or visibly contaminated surfaces, c) after contact with objects and surfaces in the resident's environment, d) after removing personal protective equipment (e.g. gloves, gown, eye protection, facemask), e) before performing a procedure such as an aseptic task (e.g. insertion of an invasive device such as urinary catheter, manipulation of central venous catheter, and/or dressing care). Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident for 1 (Resident 5) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Observation on 6/26/23 at 9:32 AM of Resident 5's toenails revealed both great toenails approximately 2 centimeters (cm) above the tip of the toe, yellow in color, and curved in towards 2nd toe on each foot. The observation further revealed the rest of Resident 5's toenails approximately 1 cm above the tip of the toe, yellow in color, and the 2nd toe on Resident 5's right foot grown into the tip of the toe. Interview on 6/26/23 at 9:32 AM with Resident 5 revealed that Resident 5 experienced pain due to the length of Resident 5's toenails, experienced increased pain when a sheet rubbed against Resident 5's toenails, that Resident 5 had not been offered to see a podiatrist (a doctor that treats the foot, ankle and related structures of the leg) and that staff had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide emergency care for Resident 13 as evidenced byt he facility contacting an ambulance transport company as opposedd to calling 911 for immediate transport for emergency services. This affected 1 of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Record review of Resident 13's admission Record revealed that Resident 13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain, not caused by trauma), Other Symptoms and Signs Involving Cognitive (thinking) Functions Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Other Reduced Mobility, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Resident 13 also had Hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and Hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) Following Unspecified Cerebrovascular (blood flow in the brain) Disease Affecting the Right Dominant Side. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to monitor a hemodialysis access (is a way to reach the blood) site for 1 resident of 1 (Resident 8) sampled. The facility identified a census of 91. Findings are: Record review of facility Policy on Dialysis dated 11/23/22 revealed general guidelines to monitor vascular access site for signs of clotting every 8 hours. Monitor for any complaints of pain or discomfort at vascular site. Notify physician of any change in mental or physical status. Avoid taking blood pressure and performing venipuncture on the arm with the shunt in place. Document in the clinical nursing record: dialysis treatment completed, order changes, condition of shunt site, complaints from resident if applicable, and whether physician and responsible part notification. Record review of resident 8's Face Sheet revealed diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease in which the resident requires hemodialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-04-03 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure posting of daily nursing staffing. The facility had a total census of 85 residents. Findings are: Observations on 4/2/24 at 1:00 PM revealed daily nursing staffing posting was dated 3/13/24. A review of facility staff posting revealed the census and staffing hours were from 3/13/24. In an interview on 4/2/24 at 1:11 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the daily nursing staffing positing was not up-to-date. The Administrator reported that a new scheduler had just been hired.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$31,079 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $31,079 — penalty dated 2024-04-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.4-2.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Life Care Center Of TullahomaTullahoma, TN

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FUND I INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF96%since 08/23/1995
EKLUND, AMBERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/16/2024
SMITH, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/06/2024
STYGAR, PETERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/21/1994
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/02/2020
HENRY, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
LAY, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/09/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2011
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/22/2000
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE FUND I LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/1990
HCF INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/23/1995
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/1990
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/06/2025
SATTAR, ARIFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
CRHC LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2017
DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/23/1995
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 8%Other / private 14%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$334per resident / day
operating cost
$10,145per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285137. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next