No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Life Care Center Of Gray

791 Old Gray Station Road, Gray, TN 37615 · For profit - Corporation · 133 certified beds · (423) 477-7146 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0603, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$10,039 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0603, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2024
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,039 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-12)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
122-1-1 Old Gray Station Rd · (423) 477-2020 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4729 N Roan St · (423) 283-0911 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4703 N Roan St · (423) 203-1733 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Bentley Parc · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.4%14.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.9%6.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%13.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication52.9%31.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.8%16.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.7%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.2%79.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%22.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.651.671.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.311.561.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
90.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 90.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.7%CMS range 26.1–50.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.7–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge90.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.2–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 56.0 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-09-19)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2019-12-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-12 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for abuse/involuntary seclusion. On [DATE], Resident #1 was observed by staff to be secluded in the dining/day room of the secured unit for an unspecified amount of time. Resident #1, a vulnerable and severely cognitively impaired resident, was found in the dining/day room with the doors closed and 2 wheelchairs with their wheels locked blocking the doors when a staff member made rounds early in the morning on [DATE]. The facility's failure to ensure freedom from involuntary seclusion placed Resident #1 and other residents on the secured unit in an Immediate Jeopardy situation, (A condition in which facility noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has resulted in or is likely to result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death and must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, witness statement review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #1, a vulnerable and severely cognitively impaired resident, was found in the dining/day room with the doors closed and 2 wheelchairs with their wheels locked blocking the doors when a staff member made rounds early on the morning of [DATE]. The facility's failure to report an allegation of abuse placed Resident #1 and other residents on the secured unit in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (IJ), (A condition in which facility noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has resulted in or is likely to result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death and must be immediately corrected). The facility's failure to report an allegation of abuse had the potential to impact all residents on the secured unit. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, witness statement review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. On [DATE], a staff member observed Resident #1 barricaded in the dining/day room of the secured unit for an undetermined amount of time with wheelchairs blocking the doors. Resident #1, a vulnerable and severely cognitively impaired resident, was found in the dining/day room with the doors closed and 2 wheelchairs with their wheels locked blocking the doors when a staff member made rounds early in the morning on [DATE].The facility's failure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse placed Resident #1 and other residents on the secured unit in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation, (A condition in which facility noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has resulted in or is likely to result in serious injury, harm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-12 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, witness statements, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment which enhanced the resident's quality of life. The facility's failure to provide an environment for quality of life resulted in 1 resident (Resident #1) of 6 sampled residents being secluded in the dining/day room area of the secured unit for an unspecified amount of time on [DATE]. Resident #1, a vulnerable and severely cognitively impaired resident, was found in the dining/day room with the doors closed and 2 wheelchairs with their wheels locked blocking the doors when a staff member made rounds early in the morning on [DATE].The facility's failure to provide an environment that humanized and individualized each resident's quality of life placed Resident #1 and other residents on the secured unit in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation, (A condition in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interviews the facility failed to maintain or enhance 1 resident's (Resident #4's) dignity and respect when 1 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) cursed in front of the resident while providing care of 11 residents observed for resident rights. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 9/25/2023, revealed .Resident Rights .The resident has a right to a dignified existence . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia with Anxiety, Abnormal Involuntary Movements, Depressive Disorder, and History of Falling. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 scored a 1 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 revised 6/11/2024, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, witness statement review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a behavioral and wandering care plan. The facility's failure to implement a behavioral and wandering care plan resulted in 1 of 6 (Resident #1) sampled residents being secluded in the dining/day room area of the secured unit for an unspecified amount of time. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Protection of Residents: Reducing the Threat of Abuse & Neglect, showed .All residents have the right to be free from .unreasonable confinement .It is the policy and practice of [Named Facility] that all residents will be protected from abuse .Abuse means .unreasonable confinement .Definitions .the willful .unreasonable confinement .Involuntary Seclusion Separation of a resident from other residents .or confinement .with or (without roommates) against the resident's will or of the responsible party . Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, and interview the facility failed to maintain sanitary kitchen equipment, failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment as evidenced by undated and unsealed food observed in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and 1 of 1 kitchen preparation (prep) table, failed to ensure 1 of 4 kitchen staff wore protective beard coverings while preparing food, which had the potential to affect 70 of 70 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Procurement, Diets, Menus, and Production, dated 4/26/2023, showed .Food safety requirements the facility must .Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety . Review of the facility's policy titled, Associate Conduct and Dress Code, dated 3/28/2023, showed .The facility will ensure all food service associates adhere to the company's established code of conduct and dress code .Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety .Dietary staff must wear hair restraints .beard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 residents (Residents #21, #38, #56 and #270) of 28 residents reviewed on the secure unit. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Belongings and Home Like Environment, reviewed 7/17/2023, showed .The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment .The resident has a right to a clean, comfortable and homelike environment .ENVIRONMENT .Refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by residents, including .resident's rooms, bathrooms .It is the responsibility of all facility staff to create a homelike environment and promptly address any cleaning needs . Review of the facility policy titled, Residents Rights, reviewed 10/6/2022, showed .The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to make a referral, to the state-designated authority, for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) after a newly identified mental health disorder was diagnosed for 1 resident (Resident #59) of 24 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), revised 10/6/2022, showed .Referring all level II residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment .A nursing facility must notify the state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority, as applicable, promptly after a significant change in mental or physical condition of a resident who has a mental illness or intellectual disability for resident review . Review of Resident #59's Level I PASARR dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure informed consent for use of Psychotropic medication was obtained prior to administration for 1 resident (Resident #120) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent Policy, dated 10/4/2022, showed .The facility will obtain consent or refusal to the use of Psychotropic Medications. This documentation will reflect the intended or actual benefit is understood by the resident and, if appropriate, his/her family and/or representative . Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Disease, and History of Falling. Review of a Physician's order dated 5/5/2023, showed an order for .Haldol [anti-psychotic medication] 5 mg [milligrams] .q [every] 8 hours as needed for anxiety . Continued review of the Medication Administration Record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly contained in 2 of 3 dumpsters observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated 9/8/2022, showed .Facility will have a process in place to properly dispose of garbage and refuse .Garbage and refuge containers are in good condition . During an observation and interview on 9/17/2023 at 11:15 AM, the garbage storage area showed 2 dumpsters had a quarter-sized opening, at the drain plug site, in the bottom corner of both dumpsters. The drain plugs were not present and had not been replaced. The quarter-sized opening allows for waste materials to leak out and rodents or pests' entry. The CDM confirmed the dumpsters did not have drain plugs that had caused a quarter-sized opening to exist. During an interview on 9/17/2023 at 10:29 AM, the General Supervisor of Solid Waste (GSSW) stated he was over the facility's dumpster and waste service and had not been contacted by the facility to apply new drain plugs to 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain infection control during medication administration for 1 resident (Resident #23) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Preparing for Medication Administration, undated, showed .Hand Hygiene .During the medication pass, perform hand hygiene and use gloves . Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fracture of Right Arm, Fracture of Right Humerus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Overactive Bladder. Review of a physician's order dated 6/22/2023, showed Resident #23 had an order for .oxybutynin [medication for overactive bladder] 5 mg [milligrams] .give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day . During an observation and interview on 9/18/2023 at 7:43 AM, showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 preparing medications for administration for Resident #23. LPN #1 noted the oxybutynin 5 mg was not in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the medication pass error rate was below 5% effecting 4 residents (#3, #66, #131, and #132) of 9 residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: Review of facility policy, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, revealed .Facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct . Medical record review revealed resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Heart Disease. Medical record review of the current Physician recapitulation orders for October 2018, revealed .vitamin B12 (type of vitamin) 500 mcg (micrograms) . Observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 10/31/18 at 7:33 AM, on the 300 hall, revealed the LPN obtained a stock bottle of vitamin B12 1000 mcg and administered the B12 to resident #3. Interview with the LPN on 10/31/18 at 8:20 AM, on the 300 hall,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-31 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority of a new serious mental illness diagnosis (SMI) for 1 resident (#35) of 34 residents reviewed. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Unspecified Psychosis, and Anxiety Disorder. Medical record review of .Demographics .Diagnosis . form revealed .Bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features .Onset 8/09/18 . Further medical record review revealed no documentation of notification of the state mental health authority of the new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. Interview with the Business Office Manager on 10/31/18 at 8:48 AM, in the Business Office, confirmed the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority of a SMI diagnosis for Resident #35.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-31 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors for 1 resident (#61) of 5 residents reviewed for dementia of 26 residents sampled. The findings include: Review of facility policy Behavioral Health Management revised 10/3/17 revealed .To promote resident safety, attain highest practicable mental / psychosocial well-being and reduce behavior related events . Medical record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Anxiety Disorder, Psychosis and Depression. Medical record review of the care plan dated 6/18/18 revealed .Risk for decline in mood and or behavior .monitor behavior . Medical record review of Resident #61's behavior/intervention monthly flow record dated 8/1/18 through 8/31/18 revealed the resident had occasional episodes of continuous anxiety with worsened outcomes after redirection and 1:1 supervision. Medical record review of a psychiatric evaluation dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2018-10-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for all residents on 4 of 4 halls observed in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Preventive Maintenance- Exhaust Fan Inspection, revealed .all exhaust fans will be inspected on a monthly basis or more often if needed . Observations made 10/29/18 through 10/31/18 during the survey revealed multiple rooms on 4 of 4 hallways with a large amount of dust and debris in the residents' bathroom exhaust fan vents. Interview with the Maintenance Director on 10/31/18 at 12:50 PM, in the hallway, confirmed the exhaust fan vents were in need of cleaning and were not on a set cleaning schedule.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-04-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.4-2.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Life Care Center Of TullahomaTullahoma, TN

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 07/01/2006
LEE, ASHLEYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/11/2009
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/24/2004
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/24/2004
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/24/2004
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/24/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 7%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$273per resident / day
operating cost
$8,287per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$294per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445479. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next