Life Care Center Of South Las Vegas
2325 E. Harmon Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89119 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (702) 798-7990 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,378 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-27)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.1% | 12.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.4% | 5.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 2.0% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.5% | 13.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.5% | 22.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 89.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 15.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 80.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.1% | 23.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 9.6% | 12.0% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.74 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.6%CMS range 34.4–57.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.5%CMS range 8.9–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 36.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.4%CMS range 5.2–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) blood glucose (BG) levels were obtained on admission, 2) discharge summary recommendations for diabetes management were discussed or clarified with the attending physician, and orders for BG monitoring and Insulin sliding scale were obtained for a resident with type one diabetes mellitus, 3) BG levels were obtained during a change of condition, and 4) the facility had a clear diabetes management process or protocol for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 161). The deficient practice potentially resulted in diabetic-related complication requiring hospitalization.Findings include:Resident 161 (R161) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type one diabetes mellitus, and encounter for surgical amputation of right toe due to gangrene.1) On [DATE] at 3:35 PM, a Registered Nurse (RN) recalled admitting R161 on the evening of [DATE]. The RN explained when residents with diabetes were admitted , a baseline blood glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-27 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician conducted an independent, thorough review of a hospital discharge summary for a resident admitted with Type one diabetes mellitus for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 161). The deficient practice resulted in the resident experiencing diabetic-related complications which required rehospitalization. Findings include:Resident 161 (R161) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type one diabetes mellitus, and encounter for surgical amputation of right toe due to gangrene.The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed R161 underwent amputation of the right third toe on [DATE]. R161 was receiving Insulin Glargine (long-acting) twice a day (BID) and Insulin Humalog (fast-acting) before meals (AC) and at bedtime (HS) following a sliding scale. R161's BG was monitored twice a day with the Insulin Glargine administration and before meals and at hour of sleep for the Insulin Humalog…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for an indwelling catheter for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 2). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for a urinary tract infection (UTI).Findings include:Resident 2 (R2) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including paraplegia, obstructive uropathy and urine retention.On 05/18/2026 in the morning, R2 was rolled to right side while the wound care nurse provided treatment to a sacral wound. A covered urinary bag was observed hanging on the right side of the bed.A physician order dated 04/07/2026, documented indwelling catheter to straight drainage. Size: 18 French Bulb: 10 cubic centimeters. Change for infection, obstruction or when the closed system was compromised as needed for stage four sacral wound.A physician order dated 04/07/2026, documented to perform catheter care every shift.On 05/21/2026 at 9:35 AM, the Unit Manager explained R2 was a paraplegic with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge was completed including a home health referral was accepted by an agency prior to discharging for a resident requiring wound dressing changes for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for wound complications including infection. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cellulitis of right lower limb and polyneuropathy.A physician's order dated 04/01/2026 documented the resident may to discharge home on [DATE] and follow up with their primary care physician in one week. The order indicated the resident may go home with current medications on hand. Staff were to provide instruction on medication administration. Home Health services were ordered, including occupational therapy, physical therapy, and nursing for wound care evaluation and treatment.Instructions to cleanse the chronic wound on the left ankle with normal saline, pat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled showers were provided for residents who were assessed to require assistance with showers for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 3, 4 and 5). The deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact on the residents' quality of life.Findings include:Resident 3 (R3) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of right fibula, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing and sprain of the superior tibiofibular joint and ligament and right knee.The admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R3 had intact cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance for bathing.On 04/13/2026 at 7:55 AM, R3 lay in wheelchair wearing night gown and reported being told their shower days were scheduled for Wednesdays and Saturdays on day shift. R3 reported they had only been provided two showers since admission. R3 indicated looking forward…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for computed tomography (CT) scan was carried out for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to delay or negatively impact the resident's plan of care.Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side.A physician order dated 12/10/2026, documented to have CT scan (a fast, non-invasive imaging procedure which uses X-rays to create detailed three-dimensional images of bones, organs and tissues) to exclude ascending aortic aneurysm.The medical record lacked documented evidence R1's CT scan was completed.On 04/13/2026 at 1:17 PM, the Unit Manager explained diagnostic procedures which could be done inside the facility including X-rays, kidney, ureter, bladder (KUB), and electrocardiogram (EKG). Procedures which could not be done in the facility and would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to properly date resident drink containers in 2 of 2 nourishment refrigerators and employee food stored in the resident freezer. This deficient practice has the potential to lead bacterial growth and foodborne illnesses. Findings include: On 06/10/2025 at 8:37 AM, in the nourishment refrigerator located on the 100 and 200 hall there were three containers of juice, which had no start or end dates. On 06/10/1025 at 8:38 AM, the nourishment freezer contained employee personal food items which included a TV dinner, breakfast burrito, yogurt, strawberries, and an ensure. On 06/10/2025 at 8:42 AM, in the nourishment refrigerator located on the 300 and 400 hall there was one container of apple juice, which had no start or end date. On 06/10/2025 at 8:44 AM, the Kitchen Director, stated food and drink items should be dated with a start and end date before items are placed in the refrigerator and employees are not allowed to store personal food items the resident's nourishment refrigerators. On 06/12/2025 at 11:45 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 362). The deficient practice had the potential to result in unnecessary disclosure of resident care needs and failed to promote respect and individuality. Findings include: Resident 362 (R362) R362 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and atrial fibrillation. On 06/10/2025 at 9:19 AM, a handwritten sign posted on the wall above R362's bed documented Feeder Please. A Physician order dated 05/30/3035 documented one to one assistance with meals. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R362 required maximal assistance with eating: (the ability to use suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and swallow food and/or liquid once the meal is placed before the resident). On 06/11/2025 at 8:26 AM, a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) acknowledged the handwritten sign posted on the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an incident of resident elopement was reported to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 84). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for further incidents and to not be adequately protected. Findings include: Resident 84 (R84) R84 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, and displaced fracture of left tibia. On 06/09/2025 the State Agency received an anonymous complaint alleging the facility had a resident elopement from the facility which was not reported as required. On 06/12/2025 at 1:00 PM a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verbalized during shift change, the CNA would walk down hall with previous CNA and updates were given regarding residents. The CNA explained the front inside automatic door was always locked and would have to be buzzed out or press button on wall adjacent to the front door prior to doors opening. The CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident baseline care plan fit the needs for 1 of 24 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to significantly impact the resident's well-being and safety. Findings include: Resident 316 Resident 316 (R316) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of altered mental status. On 06/10/2025 at 2:15 PM, observed the resident calling out for assistance in Spanish and did not understand how to utilize the call light. On 06/11/2025 at 1:25 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated the resident is confused and not aware of the surroundings. The CNA voiced the resident does not understand how to utilize the call light and expressed the resident screams for assistance in Spanish. The CNA entered into the resident's room and asked the resident to push the call light button and verified the resident did not understand how to use the call light. On 06/11/2025 at 1:42 PM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided to a dependent resident who was soiled, wet, and had requested assistance for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 111). This deficient practice had the potential to result in skin breakdown, infections, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Resident 111 (R111) R111 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 04/02/2025 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, difficulty walking, and need for assistance with personal care. On 06/04/2025 the State Agency received a report detailing concerns related to R111. The report alleged R111 had been left in a soiled incontinence brief for several hours on 03/17/2025 while at the facility. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R111: - no mobility devices - dependent on toileting - dependent with lower body dressing - dependent with mobility On 06/13/2025 at 10:00 AM, the Unit Manager indicated being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 84 and Resident 51) and schedule a follow-up appointment as recommended for 1of 24 sampled residents (Resident 51). The deficient practice had the potential for inappropriate discharge and to delay treatment and healing of a fracture. Findings include: Resident 84 (R84) R84 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, and displaced fracture of left tibia. The medical record lacked documented evidence of a physician order to discharge for R84. The medical record lacked documented evidence of a physician order for use and monitoring of a wander guard for R84. On 06/12/2025 at 1:13 PM, the unit manger explained wander guards were used for residents who were difficult to redirect, had exit seeking behaviors, and were impulsive with decision making. Wander guards required a physician order to be applied. The wander guard could not be pulled off or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained in accordance with physician's order for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 3). The failure potentially delayed identification of a significant weight change, nutritional re-assessment by a Registered Dietitian (RD) and appropriate interventions by the inter-disciplinary team (IDT). Findings include: Resident 3 (R3). R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition and difficulty swallowing. The medical record revealed the following weights documented for R3: - on 05/20/2025 111 lbs. (pounds) - on 06/09/2025 95 lbs. Accounting for a 14.1% weight loss from 5/20/2025 to 06/09/2025. The medical record lacked documented evidence of any further weights obtained. A physician order dated 05/19/2025 documented to obtain weekly weights for one month and then monthly weights. On 06/12/2025 at 11:42 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) explained the CNAs on the unit were only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to: 1) follow a physician order for intravenous (IV) site care and 2) obtain a physician order for the use or removal of IV access for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 9 and 261). This deficient practice had the potential to result in infection, phlebitis, infiltration, and compromised venous access. Findings include: 1) Follow Physician order Resident #9 (R9) R9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left and right lower limb. On 06/10/25 at 9:13 AM, R9 was observed lying in bed, alert and oriented, with a midline IV access site located in the right inner bicep. The dressing was dated 05/21/25. A physician order dated 05/21/25 documented the following: - IV: Midline Catheter - Change needleless connector every day shift every 7 days. - IV: Midline Catheter - Change transparent dressing every day shift every 7 days. Change catheter securement device with dressing change. Measure external…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) for four residents (Resident 88, 29, 361, and 94). The deficient practice posed a potential risk of injury or harm to the resident. Findings include: On 06/12/2025 in the morning, a Medication Administration Pass observation was performed with 30 opportunities observed and revealed five errors. The medication error rate was 16.67%. Resident 88 (R88) R88 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of kidney, acute renal failure, and iron deficiency. On 06/12/2025 at 7:28 AM, during the Medication Administration Pass observation, a Registered Nurse (RN) prepared and administered the following medications for R88: - Carvedilol 25 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth - Levetiracetam 500 mg one tablet by mouth - Ferosul 325 mg one tablet by mouth - Losartan 100 mg one tablet by mouth A physician order dated 05/05/2025 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to dispose expired medications. This deficient practice has the potential to cause adverse reactions or worsened health conditions to residents. Findings include: On 06/13/2025 at 9:28 AM, the medication refrigerator contained five expired Covid-19 vaccines, 0.5 milliliter (mL) single dose pre-filled injectable syringes dated 06/08/2025. On 06/13/2025 at 9:35 AM, the medication cabinet contained five expired 3000 milliliter (mL) normal saline irrigation bags for a discharged resident dated 03/08/2025. On 06/13/2025 at 9:40 AM, the Unit Manager verified the medications were expired and should have been disposed. 06/13/2025 at 9:49 AM, facility policy titled destruction of medication dated 03/04/2025, documented the facility will destroy discontinued or outdated medications in accordance with federal, state, local laws and regulations for pharmaceutical waste disposal.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in 1 of 2 central supply rooms. The deficient practice had the potential risk of unauthorized access to medications, theft, or misuse of medication within the facility. Findings include: On 01/22/2025 at 10:28 AM, the central supply room, across from the nurse's station, on the 100-hall had the door propped open with a silver dumbbell weight. The central supply room contained a variety of items such as: medication and wound care dressings. There were two medication carts located on the right side as you enter the room. A brown medication cart was located under a wall mounted cabinet. The medication cart was unlocked with keys hanging out of the cart lock. The top drawer of the brown medication cart contained the following: - Vitamin C (nutritional supplement): five bottles. - Vitamin B12 (nutritional supplement): two bottles. - Coenzyme Q10 (nutritional supplement): three bottles. - Floranex (probiotic): seven bottles. The second drawer contained the following: - Benadryl…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to complete a nutritional assessment including food preferences within 72-hours of admission per facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 2). The failure to honor resident food preferences could potentially cause residents to lose interest in eating their meals. Findings include: Resident 2 Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/10/2024, with diagnoses including lupus and mild kidney injury. Review of the resident's medical record revealed a nutrtional assessment and food preferences were not documented. A physician's order dated 12/05/2024, documented a regular diet, regular texture, thin liquid consistency. On 01/22/2025 at 2:55 PM, the Dietary Director verbalized a dietary staff member would meet with a newly admitted resident within 24 hours to obtain the resident's food preferences. The information obtained about food preferences would be documented in the resident's medical record. On 01/22/2025 at 3:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge was planned and occurred for 2 of 2 unsampled residents (R214 and R219). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to be placed in an improper home setting and not receive the required care. Findings include: Resident 214 (R214) R214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including heart failure, unspecified dementia, mood disturbances, Type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness and difficulty walking. At the bottom of the Face Sheet under Miscellaneous Information, it was documented the resident was discharged to a private home/apt with home health services on 01/09/2024. A Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented the resident was discharged to Home and Other. The Summary detailed the group home address, transportation company, and reason for discharge which noted cleared for discharge. The summary further included the Home Health company name; telephone number listed along with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record and document review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were implemented for the management of falls for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 50). The deficient practice had the potential for staff not to provide personalized care for the resident. Findings include: Resident 50 (R50) R50 was a long-term resident at the facility, with diagnoses including cholecystectomy and dementia. R50's medical records revealed a fall at the facility on 03/10/2024 at 1:15 PM. R50's comprehensive care plan revised on 03/10/2024, addressed the resident's fall and goals and interventions. The comprehensive care plan lacked implementation to monitor and care for the resident fall management. R50's medical records revealed a physical therapy consultation was suggested in the care plan on 03/10/2024, to consult for strength and mobility. On 08/08/2024 at 1:10 PM, the director of rehabilitation (DOR) explained during the Clinical Inter Disciplinary Team (IDT) meeting, if it is suggested for a therapy screening, the screen request gets put into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled showers were provided to dependent residents for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 246) and 2 unsampled residents (Residents 215 and 213). This deficient practice could potentially compromise resident hygiene and comfort, and increase the risk of skin breakdown and infections. Findings include: A facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living dated 02/12/2024, indicated residents would receive assistance as needed to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), including bathing. Any change in the ability to perform ADLs would be reported to the nurse. Resident 246 (R246) R246 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. A Care Plan dated 07/24/2024, documented a self-care performance deficit for R246 related to dementia and disease process. Interventions included substantial assistance from one person. A Care Plan dated 07/25/2024, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a urinary catheter had appropriate diagnosis and a bladder training program was implemented for 1 of 24 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential for increased risk of infection. Findings include: Resident 203 (R203) R203 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) without lower urinary tract symptoms. On 08/06/2024 at 3:29 PM, R14 was sitting in room with catheter and verbalized being treated for wound on foot and was not able to explain why catheter was needed. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented resident was admitted with indwelling catheter and was not participating in a bladder training program. On 08/09/2024 at 8:01 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated when resident was admitted with catheter, would ask for bladder training, urology consult. Diagnosis should be entered with the physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the ordered fluid restriction was followed for a dialysis dependent resident and the actual fluid intake or consumption was monitored for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 14). The deficient practice could have the potential to result in adverse health outcomes, including fluid overload, increased blood pressure, and complications related to the resident's dialysis treatment. Findings include: Resident 14 (R14) R14 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, atrial fibrillation, mitral valve insufficiency, and the presence of a cardiac pacemaker. A physician's order dated 08/01/2024, documented a fluid restriction of 1000 milliliter per day (ml/day). The distribution was as follows: 240 ml for breakfast, 240 ml for lunch, and 240 ml for dinner from Dietary; 140 ml for days and 140 ml for nights from Nursing, each shift, for managing R14's excessive fluid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to account for narcotics (opioid) signed out on the controlled drug record for one unsampled resident (R213). The deficient practice had the potential to delay a resident's pain management and increase the risk for physical and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident 213 (R213) R213 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/27/2024, with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left-dominant side, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. The physician's order dated 11/28/2023, documented Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a controlled substance/opioid) Oral Tablet 5-325 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain level 4-6 (moderate). On 08/07/2024 at 3:20 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated the Controlled or Antibiotic Drug Record (narcotic log) for R213's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 mg for November 2023, December 20, 2023 to December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order to discontinue medication was completed for 1 of 24 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential for adverse effects on the resident and unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 14 (R14) R14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis. A pharmacist consultation report documented R14 medication regimen was reviewed on 07/23/2024 with the recommendation to discontinue the medication Spironolactone as it was contraindicated for residents on dialysis. A physician response dated 07/29/2024 documented agreement with pharmacist recommendation and indicated the medication would be discontinued on 07/29/2024. The medication administration record indicated Spironolactone was a current and active medication with the most recent dose given on 08/08/2024. On 08/08/2024 in the afternoon, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated R14 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater for one unsampled resident (Resident 37). Failure to administer medications as prescribed could have delayed the therapeutic treatment for the resident. Findings include: On 08/08/2024 in the morning, a Medication Administration Pass observation was performed with 27 opportunities observed and revealed two errors. The medication error rate was 7.41%. Resident 37 (R37) Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, and polyneuropathy. On 08/08/2024 at 8:00 AM, during the Medication Administration Pass observation, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared and administered the following medications to R37: - Heparin 5,000 units subcutaneous (SQ/injection) - Budesonide Suspension 0.5 milligram (mg)/2 milliliter (ml) inhale orally - Cholestyramine one packet 4 grams by mouth - Famotidine 20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure stored foods were labeled and dated and food items were stored properly. This deficient practice posed a potential risk to safety and health standards which could lead to contamination, inadequate storage, and place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: On 08/06/2024 at 7:46 AM, open bags of green beans, asparagus, and peppers & onion mix were stored in the walk-in freezer without a date as to when the bag was opened. The Dietary Manager explained the open bagged items should have been dated as to when the bag was opened and then placed back in the freezer. On 08/06/2024 at 8:01 AM, a bottle of lemon juice, Jello packets, and canned pimentos were missing received on dates in the dry storage area. Also, silk, a milk substitute, was stored in the reach in cooler without a lid. The Dietary Manager explained the items in the dry storage area should have been dated as to when the items were received from the [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were included in the baseline care plan of a resident who was at risk for falls for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 7). The deficient practice potentially contributed to an actual fall. Findings include: Resident 7 (R7) R7 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced mid cervical fracture of right femur. On 11/14/2023 at 10:00 AM, R7 was alert and sitting on the side of a low bed. A walker and bedside commode were observed on the right side of the resident's bed. R7 recounted having a recent fall while ambulating to the toilet with walker assist. According to R7, the walker got caught on the bedside commode and the resident landed on bottom. An alert charting dated 11/06/2023, revealed R7 was admitted to the facility following a right femur fracture sustained from a fall. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed R7 had one to two falls prior to admission and was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to 1) document evidence at discharge of medication education, instructions, and reconciliation, 2) follow-up for durable medical equipment (DME) recommendation, and 3) lacked a physician's discharge summary for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 9). The deficient practice potentially contributed to the resident's lack of knowledge regarding their medication and delayed the resident from obtaining the recommended medical equipment. Findings include: R9 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 07/21/23, with diagnosis including atrial fibrillation, gout, and encephalopathy. Medication Education, Instructions and Reconciliation: A physician order dated 07/21/23, documented R9 was to go home with medications on hand and was to be provided instructions on medication administration. The medical record lacked documented evidence the resident and/or family was educated, or provided instructions for medication and medication reconciliation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was obtained prior to evaluation and admission to hospice, and there was a process in place to ensure communication between the facility and the hospice agency for 2 of 3 hospice residents. The deficient practice had the potential to have adverse effects on the resident's well-being and continuity of care. Findings include: Resident #9 (R9) R9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15/15 indicating R9 was cognitively intact. The facility policy titled Hospice (revised 11/23/2022) documented if the resident or responsible party chooses to receive hospice services, the attending physician must write an order referring the resident to hospice. A physician order dated 05/22/2023 documented, Admit to hospice services as of 3/18/23 to Harbor Hospice Services. On 06/06/23 at 12:27 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 22 residents (R72) could safely self-administer medications. The failed practice had the potential to affect the resident's health and well-being. Findings include: Resident 72 (R72) R72 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of left tibia (shin bone) and unspecified fracture of shaft of humerus (upper arm bone) and left arm. On 06/08/2023 at 7:30 AM, observed on R72's bedside tray table were three bottles containing: calcium, magnesium, and zinc supplement, advanced hemp gummies 900 milligrams (mg), and gummies 400 mg. R72 informed they self-administered the supplement before meals and the gummies as needed for their pain, in addition to oxycodone administered by the facility. R72 identified the gummies as a tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (cannabis) product. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (LPN1) entered the room advising this was the first time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an incident of misappropriation of property was reported to the state agency following the occurrence per policies and regulations for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 15). This deficient practice could potentially lead to psychological harm to the resident, undermine rights, compromise safety, and jeopardize their well-being. Findings include: Resident #15 (R15) R15 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and anemia. On 06/06/23 at 9:53 AM, R15 indicated missing $100 dollars the resident had kept in the wallet since admission. Resident indicated informing the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) about the missing money but has not heard anything back. R15 claimed it had been at least 2 weeks since the occurrence. The medical record lacked documented evidence an investigation was initiated with regards to R15's missing property. Review of the Inventory of the Personal Effects Record dated 05/09/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility lacked documented evidence a thorough investigation of a misappropriation of property following the occurrence was completed for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 15). The failed practice had the potential to create an environment where abuse or neglect could occur unchecked, affecting all residents. Findings include: Resident #15 (R15) R15 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and anemia. On 06/06/23 at 9:53 AM, R15 indicated missing $100 dollars the resident had kept in the wallet since admission. Resident indicated informing the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) about the missing money but has not heard anything back. R15 claimed it had been at least 2 weeks since the occurrence. The medical record lacked documented evidence an investigation was initiated with regards to R15's missing property. Review of the Inventory of the Personal Effects Record dated 05/09/2023, revealed the resident had five twenty-dollar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan to manage the resident's pain was formulated following admission, to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 230). This deficient practice could potentially result in complications, poor outcomes, and a diminished quality of life for the resident. Findings include: Resident 230 (R230) R230 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis, repeated falls, pressure ulcer, cognitive communication deficit, and difficulty walking. The Nursing assessment dated [DATE], documented R230's acceptable pain level was 3/10 (with a pain scale of 1 - 10). R230 had a pressure wound on the coccyx stage 2. No history of opioid addiction or disorder. A Physician order dated 05/23/2023, documented Percocet oral tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg) to give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for pain. A Physician order dated 05/26/2023, documented Acetaminophen tablet of 325…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and document review, the facility failed to clarify blood pressure medication instructions for 1 of 22 residents (R380). The failed practice had the potential to affect the resident's health and well-being. Findings include: Resident 380 (R380) R380 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include end stage renal disease, hypertension, diabetes type II, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 06/06/23 at 10:37 AM, R380 shared had refused the second dose of blood pressure medication when a nurse offered the resident medication, advising the resident's blood pressure was 121/54. R380 indicated did not feel blood pressure reading was high. A physician's order documented: -Clonidine 0.1 mg tablet. Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for hypertension. Hold for systolic blood pressure greater than 110 or heart rate less than 90. Started on 06/05/2023. -Clonidine 0.2 milligrams (mg) tablet. Give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a low bed position, or a hazard-free environment was timely implemented for 1 of 22 sampled residents. This deficient practice could lead to an increased risk of falls and potential injuries for the resident. Findings include: Resident 86 (R86) R86 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a fracture of the left femur (thigh bone). The Nursing Fall Risk Evaluation dated 06/02/2023, documented R86 had a history of falls and had experienced a change in cognitive status in the last 90 days. R86 was moderately impaired with limited vision. Assistance was required for elimination, and ambulation was problematic. The resident had three or more risk factors present and was taking three or more medications, which put R86 at risk for falls. A Care Plan dated 06/05/2023, documented R86 was a fall risk with an intervention to ensure a call light was within reach and orient the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) the correct size of an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) was followed as ordered or clarified; 2) the Foley catheter assessment was completed; and 3) Foley use was care planned for 1 of 22 sampled residents. The deficient practices could lead to potential urinary tract infections (UTIs), an increased risk of catheter-associated complications, dehydration, blockage, and discomfort or pain for the resident. Findings include: Resident 86 (R86) R86 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hyperplasia (enlargement of an organ or tissue) without lower urinary tract, benign prostatic disease, and a fracture of the left femur. On 06/06/2023 at 10:23 AM, R86 was in bed, incoherent, and the family was at the bedside. The family indicated R86 was admitted to the facility with a Foley catheter from the hospital. R86's Foley, 16 French catheter was in place, anchored, and draining with 175 cubic centimeters (cc)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #68 (R68) R68 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and chronic wound. On 06/06/23 at 11:56 AM, observed R68's left upper arm PICC line had no date and resident was not able to say when was the last dressing change was completed. The IV pole had three bags of 100 milliliter (ml) IV antibiotics attached to a dial-a-flow (a medical device that is used when regulating the flow of a liquid or fluid through an IV) tubing with no dates. There was a .45 normal saline (NS) one liter bag with an attached tubing with no date on the bag and tubing. Observed three partially used NS 10 ml flushes at the desk with no caps. Review of R68's physician's orders and medication administration record (MAR) revealed there was no care and maintenance orders for the left upper arm PICC line. On 06/06/23 at 11:51 AM, the wound care nurse confirmed the observation and agreed IV lines should have been dated and discarded within 24 hours. IV lines should have been dated, and NS saline should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was obtained and care orders were transcribed and implemented before the administration of Oxygen (O2) for 2 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 7 and 9). The deficient practice could lead to the potential risk of administering incorrect or inappropriate oxygen levels to residents, compromising their respiratory health and overall well-being. Findings include: A facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, Safety, Storage, and Maintenance, dated revised 10/07/2022, documented Oxygen would be administered in accordance with physician orders and current standards of practice. Change O2 supplies weekly and when visibly soiled. Equipment should be dated when set up or changed out. Resident 7 (R7) R7 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia, emphysema, asthma, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen) and hypercapnia (high levels of carbon dioxide in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to 1) label a multi-dose vial with an open and discard date. The failure can lead to administering a nonviable medication to resident or staff member and 2) ensure supplements and recreational medications were safely stored for 1 of 22 residents (R72). The failed practice had the potential for resident to self-administer medication that could interact with facility prescribed medication. Findings include: 1) On 06/07/23 at 4:02 PM, inside the medication refrigerator of the medication room at 100 and 200 Hall, was an opened Tubersol (Tuberculin PPD) 5 Units/0.1 milliliter solution for injection, with a lot #61619, expiration date of 09/2024. The vial had no open date and discard date. A nurse confirmed the finding and acknowledged the vial should have been labeled with an open and discard date. The nurse indicated a multi-dose vial was only safe to be administered for 28 days once opened. The facility policy titled Storage and Expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were correctly implemented based on medical indication for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 336). The deficient practice could lead to potential breaches in infection control. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Transmission- Based Precautions and Isolation Procedures last revised on 05/24/2023 revealed contact precautions were intended to prevent transmission of pathogens which were spread by direct person- to- person contact. The policy indicated enhanced barrier precautions were used when exposure to blood and body fluids was anticipated such as during device care or use of central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, and tracheostomy/ ventilators. Resident #336 (R336) R336 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including dementia. On 06/06/2023 at 9:51 AM, a sign outside of R366's room indicated the resident was on contact precautions. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was observed donning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,378 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-05-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
| BUTNER, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2018 |
| MINOR, JEFFREY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/25/2025 |
| SMITH, NICOLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2024 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/13/2024 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/1997 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/16/1999 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/09/2018 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2011 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/22/2000 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/25/2025 |
| SOUTH LAS VEGAS MEDICAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/24/1995 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/13/2024 |
| PUA, ROLAND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/13/2024 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/24/1995 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $252K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295076. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.