Life Care Center Of Altamonte Springs

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 386 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 228 beds and averages 211.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by their failure to provide post fall neurologic assessment and monitoring, failure to immediately notify the physician of changes in condition post fall, (#4); failure to implement fall management protocols to ensure residents received necessary care, equipment, and services to prevent falls and avoid major injuries; and failure to maintain processes that supported effective interdisciplinary team (IDT) functions to meet the safety and care needs for 6 of 8 residents reviewed for falls, out of a total sample of 13 residents, (#1, #8, #9, #11, and #12). These failures contributed to falls with major injuries for residents #1 and #9, who required hospitalization, surgery, and rehabilitation for hip fractures. There was likelihood residents #1 and #9 suffered excruciating pain, were placed at risk for blood clots, infection, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and chronic pain. On [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement effective fall prevention approaches including equipment, adequate assistance, and increased supervision for vulnerable, physically and cognitively impaired residents, to avoid falls and falls with injuries for 5 of 8 residents reviewed for falls, out of a total sample of 13 residents, (#1, #8, #9, #11, and #12). This failure contributed to numerous unwitnessed falls which resulted in injuries such as fractures, head injuries, and lacerations. There was likelihood residents #1 and #9 who sustained hip fractures suffered excruciating pain, and were placed at risk for blood clots, infection, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and chronic pain. Between 3/01/23 and 8/16/23, the facility recorded 221 falls, of which 190 were unwitnessed. Resident #1 fell four times during self-transfers without necessary staff assistance and supervision. She suffered a hip fracture as a result of the fourth fall. Resident #9 fell nine times,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's administration failed to recognize and address trends related to repeated unwitnessed falls and fall-related injuries; and failed to direct its resources to provide adequate clinical oversight of the fall incident review process and implementation of fall management protocols to ensure the safety and well-being of 5 of 8 residents reviewed for falls, out of a total sample of 13 residents, (#1, #8, #9, #11, and #12). These failures contributed to falls with major injuries for residents #1 and #9, who required hospitalization, surgical intervention, and rehabilitation for hip fractures. There was likelihood residents #1 and #9 suffered excruciating pain, and were placed at risk for blood clots, infection, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and chronic pain; and likelihood residents #8, #11, and #12 would suffer repeated falls with injuries. Between 3/01/23 and 8/16/23, the facility recorded 221 falls, of which 190 were unwitnessed. Resident #1 fell four times during self-transfers without necessary staff assistance and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses provided neurological assessments after an unwitnessed fall and failed to ensure licensed nurses notified a physician of changes in condition post-fall per professional standards of practice for post fall monitoring for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 13 residents, (#4). On [DATE] at approximately 12:15 AM, resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall and was found sitting on the floor near her bed. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who found her notified assigned Registered Nurse (RN) H. Assigned night shift RN H documented in the medical record a brief Event Note that resident #4 was assessed as having no injuries, no change in range of motion and was to have continued monitoring. There was no documentation in the medical record of neurological assessments having been initiated or performed, nor of the physician or family being notified after the fall. The next day, at the end of her night shift on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed and agency nurses were knowledgeable and competent in initiating and performing neurological assessments after an unwitnessed fall, and in notifying the physician and oncoming staff of a resident's fall and changes in condition for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for falls of a total sample of 13 residents, (#4). On [DATE] at approximately 12:15 AM, resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall and was found sitting on the floor near her bed. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who found resident #4 notified assigned Registered Nurse (RN) H of resident #4's fall. Assigned night shift RN H documented in the medical record a brief Event Note that resident #4 was assessed as having no injury, no change in range of motion and for continued monitoring, although there was no documentation that specified what monitoring was to be continued. There was no documentation in the medical record of neurological assessments having been initiated or performed, nor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate and included post fall reporting, notifying and monitoring for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 13 residents (#4). On [DATE] at approximately 12:15 AM, resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall and was found sitting on the floor near her bed. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who found her notified assigned Registered Nurse (RN) H. Assigned night shift RN H documented in the medical record a brief Event Note that resident #4 was assessed as having no injuries, no change in range of motion and was to have continued monitoring. There was no documentation in the medical record of neurological assessments having been initiated or performed, nor of the physician or family being notified after the fall. The next day, at the end of her night shift on [DATE] at 7:55 AM, RN F documented resident #4's CNA had stated she was not herself, had a headache and was alert, but confused. RN F…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assessment, treatment, and management of pain for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain, of a total sample of 63 residents, (#228). The facility's failure to follow the physician's orders and treat pain and discomfort resulted in actual harm.Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #228 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of the third lumbar vertebra, low back pain, and osteoarthritis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 8/11/25 revealed resident#228's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment noted no behaviors or rejection of evaluation or care necessary to obtain goals for health and well-being. The MDS assessment noted she received PRN (as needed) and scheduled pain medications in the last five days. The assessment noted pain was present daily, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician and failed to notify the physician of lab results in a timely manner for wound infection for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for wound care of a total sample of 13 residents, (#2). Findings: Resident #2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture to the right leg with surgical repair, dementia with mood disturbance, and contractures of both knees. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition and no behavioral symptoms during the look back period. The MDS assessment for skin conditions indicated resident #2 had surgical wounds, moisture associated skin damage and an unhealed pressure ulcer. The skin assessment indicated resident #2 had one unstageable suspected deep tissue injury in process that was not present upon admission or re-entry to the facility. Review of the undated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation involving serious bodily injury and an injury of unknown source to the state Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) within the required timeframes for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, of a total sample of 5 residents, (#1).Findings: Review of resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of falls, and mild cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on 5/16/26 due to chest pain and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Upon readmission, new diagnoses included multiple right rib fractures, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses including multiple right rib fractures. The hospital course documented the resident was admitted from a skilled nursing facility with chest pain.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and document a skin injury that occurred for 1 of 3 residents sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions, (#124), of a total sample of 63 residents.Findings:Review of resident #124's medical record revealed an admission date of 3/27/25. Her diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified; other lack of coordination, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) affecting left dominant side. Review of resident #124's Quarterly Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score dated 6/30/25 was a 12/15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the facility's incident list revealed resident #124 sustained a skin related injury incident on 4/15/25.Review of the skin related injury incident dated 4/15/25 at 6:55 PM, revealed the description indicated it occurred around 4:55 PM, when the nurse was asked by a certified nursing assistant (CNA) to assess resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record reflected the correct site for blood pressure (BP) measurement for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis, of a total sample of 63 residents, (#10).Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, type 2 diabetes, and bacteremia. Review of the Order Summary Report revealed a physician order dated 1/07/25 which included resident #10 received dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and specified no BP on the right arm with fistula/shunt. Review of the Blood Pressure Summary report from 7/19/25 to 8/19/25 revealed documentation of BP obtained on the right arm 13 times: 7/19/25 at 3:10 PM, 7/22/25 at 9:00 PM, 7/25/25 at 6:07 PM, 7/26/25 at 9:21 AM, 7/26/25 at 5:47 PM, 7/27/25 at 9:41 AM, 8/02/25 at 9:38 AM, 8/02/25 at 4:56 PM, 8/03/25 at 5:31 PM, 8/08/25 at 9:01 PM, 8/10/25 at 4:00 PM, 8/18/25 at 9:04 PM, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to call for staff assistance through a call bell system for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for call bells, of a total sample of 63 residents, (#229).Findings: Review of resident #229's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain, mobility abnormalities, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 8/06/25 revealed resident #229's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 14 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment noted no behaviors or rejection of evaluation or care necessary to obtain goals for health and well-being. The assessment showed no vision, hearing or speech impairment. Resident #229 had functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) on an upper extremity and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence that grievances were resolved promptly, and residents/family members were apprised of progress toward a resolution of grievances for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for grievances, of a total sample of four residents, (#2).Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, depression, dependence on supplemental oxygen and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated she needed substantial to maximum assistance from the staff to perform her activities of daily living, was frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally of bowel. On 7/15/25 at 9:30 AM, resident #2 was sitting up in bed, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer Oxygen (O2) therapy as ordered by the physician for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 4 residents, (#2 and #4).1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, hypertension, dependence on supplemental oxygen and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/03/25 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment noted the resident required substantial to maximum staff assistance with dressing/personal hygiene care and received oxygen therapy. The assessment also noted the resident did not exhibit behavior symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and wellbeing. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the acquisition and/or timely administration of physician-ordered medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, out of a total sample of 8 residents, (#1 and #3). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #1, an [AGE] year-old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included peptic ulcer disease, difficulty swallowing, and gastrostomy status. Resident #1 was discharged home on 7/16/24. A peptic ulcer is an open sore found on the lining of the stomach or in the first section of the small intestine. These ulcers are often caused by an overproduction of stomach acid and common treatment options focus on medications that reduce the production of stomach acid (retrieved on 7/25/24 from www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/peptic-ulcer-disease). A gastrostomy is a surgical procedure in which a tube is inserted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record accurately represented medication administered for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, out of a total sample of 8 residents, (#1). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1, an [AGE] year-old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included peptic ulcer disease, difficulty swallowing, and gastrostomy status. Review of resident #1's Order Summary Report for July 2024 revealed a physician order dated 7/01/24 for Protonix Oral Delayed Release 20 milligrams (mg) once daily for acid reflux. Review of the pharmacy's Proof of Delivery form for resident #1 for the period 6/01/24 to 7/16/24 revealed Protonix 20 mg was never shipped to the facility. Review of the resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 revealed the physician order for Protonix Oral Delayed Release 20 mg was transcribed to the document and scheduled for daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures to prohibit Neglect related to conducting thorough incident investigations and/or reporting fall-related injuries for 5 of 8 residents reviewed for falls, out of a total sample of 13 residents, (#1, #8, #9, #11, and #12); and failed to ensure Risk Management processes included identification of potential Neglect for all residents in the facility who were at risk for falls. Findings: Cross reference to F600, F684, F689, F726, F835, F842 Review of the facility's incident log from 3/01/23 to 8/16/23 revealed there were 221 resident falls reported in less than six months, and at least seven resulted in major injuries. The log showed 190 of the total falls were unwitnessed by staff. Review of the facility's reportable incident log from March to August 2023 revealed no documentation to show identification and investigation of potential neglect related to unwitnessed falls for resident #9's fall with hip fracture on 5/20/23, resident #11's fall with leg fracture on 7/08/23, resident #1's fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement person-centered care plans to provide care and services deemed necessary for the health and well-being of 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 7 residents, (#20 and #22). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, a history of falling, unsteadiness on her feet, and difficulty walking. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 9/06/23 revealed resident #20 required limited assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, walking, and toilet use. The MDS assessment showed the resident had unsteady balance, was only able to stabilize with staff assistance, and used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. Resident #20 had two or more falls with no injuries and one fall with an injury since admission or the prior assessment. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL