Life Care Center of Elkhorn
20275 Hopper Street, Elkhorn, NE 68022 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (402) 289-2572 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,397 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-06)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.6% | 19.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.8% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 4.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.5% | 18.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 19.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.1% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.1% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.0% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.6% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 20.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.8% | 11.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 1.92 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 90.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.7%CMS range 34.6–52.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.5–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 90.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 88.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 81.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 29.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 6.5–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders, for daily weights and fluid restrictions for 1(Resident 1) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 83. The findings are:A. Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 09-19-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-date of admission [DATE].-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -required extensive assistance with dressing, hygiene and bed mobility.-required total assistance with transfers, toileting and bathing. -had a diagnosis of Heart Failure. Record review of Resident 1's Order Summary (OS) printed on 11-06-2025 revealed an order dated 06-18-2025 for daily weights. Record review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 37) of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 86. The Findings are: Record Review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-28-2024 revealed an admission date of 06-25-2024 following hospitalization for surgery of a diaphragmatic Hernia with Obstruction (is a protrusion of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity due to a defect within the diaphragm), other diagnosis included Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD, is a long-term condition that occurs when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus), Barrett's Esophagus (is a condition in which the flat pink lining of the swallowing tube that connects the mouth to the stomach (esophagus) becomes damaged by acid reflux, which causes the lining to thicken and become red) with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The MDS also indicated Resident 37…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5). Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the residents provider that medications were not administered for the prescribed duration for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 sample resident. The facility identified a census of 87. The findings are:Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03/16/2026 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact.-required total staff assistance with all self-care and mobility needs-had a diagnosis of Quadriplegia (inability to control movement in all four limbs). Record Review of Resident 2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 5/1/2026 through 5/31/2026 revealed Resident 2's practitioner had ordered Cefepime (An antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 87. Findings are:A.Record Review of the facility's Policy titled Administration of Medications with a revision date of 9/9/2025 revealed the following: The facility will ensure medications are administered safely and appropriately per physician order to address residents' diagnosis and signs and symptoms. DefinitionsMedication Error- This means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with:1. The prescribers' order;2. Manufacturers specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or3. Accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services. Accepted professional standards and principles include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(S)Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a toilet safety arm support device (a bathroom aid that attaches around or directly to a toilet to provide stable armrests) was securely attached to the toilet in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] and failed to ensure a toilet was secured to the floor in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility had a census of 87. An observation on 6/10/2026 between 7:25am and 8:05AM of the following rooms, 101, 102, 103, 106, 107, 108, 114, 124, 212, 310, and 412, containing toilet safety arm supports attached to the toilet revealed the single safety arm support for the toilet in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] was not securely attached to the toilet.An observation of the toilet in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the toilet was not securely attached to the floor and moved in a lateral (sideways) direction when touched. An interview on 6/10/2026 at 7:45AM with Nurse Assistant (NA) F confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5). Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the residents practitioner when pain and antibiotic medication were unavailable for 2 (Resident 2 and 3) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 93. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-20-2026 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at a 13. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact.-required limited assistance bed mobility.-required extensive assistance with bathing and dressing.-required total assistance with toileting and transfers.-had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (a serious infection and inflammation of the bone that can lead to bone death if untreated) of the left foot and ankle.Record review of Resident 2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.05(G). Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were re-evaluated by the medical practitioner for rationale and duration of continued use beyond 14 days for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 93. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility policy titled Pharmacy Services and Medication Regimen Review dated 09-15-2025 revealed the facility maintains the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible, by providing oversight by a licensed pharmacist, attending physician, medical director and the director of nursing. The pharmacist must report any irregularities to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and the director of nursing, and these reports must be acted upon. The facility must develop and maintain policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that include time frames for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for pain management for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 93. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications dated 08-01-2024 revealed upon discovery that the Facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a resident, the facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication from the Pharmacy. If the medication shortage is discovered at the time of medication administration, the facility staff should immediately notify the Pharmacy. If the medication is unavailable during normal Pharmacy hours: the facility nurse should call the pharmacy to determine the status of the order, if the medication has not been ordered, the facility nurse should place the order or reorder for the next scheduled delivery. If the next available delivery causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D). Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1(Resident 2) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 93. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications dated 09-09-2025 revealed the facility will ensure medications are administered safely and appropriately per physician order to address residents' diagnosis and signs and symptoms. A medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with:-the prescriber's order;-manufacturer's specifications regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological-accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services. Accepted professional standards and principles include the various practice regulations in each state, and current commonly accepted health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(H) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to operate the dishwasher. This had the potential to effect 85 of 86 residents who received foods from the kitchen. The Facility census was 86. The findings are:Record review of the facility's information from Ecolab on the dishwasher revealed the minimum operating temperature during the wash cycle is 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the minimum operating temperature for the rinse cycle is 120 degrees F. An observation conducted on 12-03-2025 at 9:17 AM-10:00 AM revealed Dietary Aid (DA) K was doing dishes in the dishwasher. DA K placed 8 plates and 3 plate covers on a dish rack and put them into the dishwasher, the dishwasher temperature reached 100 degrees F during the wash cycle and 110 degrees F during the rinse cycle. After the dishwasher was done rinsing, DA K removed the dishes from the dishwasher and allowed them to dry. While the dishes were drying DA K placed several cups onto a tray and placed them into the dishwasher the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher reached the minimum required temperature of 120 degrees and failed to ensure the floor under the dish racks in the dish room were free of debris and dark, waxy build up; and the facility failed to ensure the double convection ovens were clean and free of food debris and hard water buildup. This had the potential to affect 85 of 86 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 86. The findings are: Record review of the facility's information from Ecolab on the dishwasher revealed the minimum operating temperature during the wash cycle is 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the minimum operating temperature for the rinse cycle is 120 degrees F. Record review of the facility's dishwasher temperature log for October 2025 revealed no temperatures logged for breakfast and lunch after 10-11-2025 and no temperatures were logged for supper after 10-24-2025. Record review of the facility's dishwasher temperature log for November 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 [Nurse Aides (NA) C, D, and E] of 5 nurse aides had completed 12 hours of yearly required in-service education. This had the ability to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The facility had a total census of 86 residents.Findings are: A. Record review of a facility Employee list revealed NA C was hired on 5/28/24. Record review of NA C's Inservice education revealed that NA C had completed a total of 3.50 hours of training.B. Record review of a facility Employee list revealed NA D was hired on 5/28/24. Record review of in-service education for NA D had completed a total of 5 hours of training.C. Record review of a facility Employee list revealed NA E was hired on 4/25/23. Record review of in-service education for NA E revealed that NA E completed a total of 3 hours of training. D. Interview on 12/8/25 at 7:58 AM with the Director of Nursing [DON] confirmed that the 12-hour education training requirement had not been completed for NA's C, D, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(C), 12-006.18(B)Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure soiled linen did not come into contact with staff clothing for Residents 5 and 15, ensure nebulizer kits were cleaned after use for Residents 27 and 63, ensure Resident 6's PAP and PAP mask were clean and off the floor, and ensure Resident 6's PAP machine contained a filter; and the facility staff failed to wear enhanced barrier precautions when providing catheter care for Resident 12. The facility census was 86.Findings are: A. Record review of a facility policy dated 7/5/25 entitled Laundry Services revealed the following information: Facility staff should handle all laundry as potentially contaminated and use standard precautions with the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible and with a minimum of agitation to prevent gross microbial contamination of the air and of persons handling linen. -Never carry soiled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-007.04(D)Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that ventilation systems were operational in resident bathrooms in 4 (Rooms 106, 108, 114 and 115) of 15 occupied resident rooms on the 100 hall of the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings are:Observation on 12/4/25 between 9:00 AM to 9:30 AM with the facility Maintenance Supervisor [MS] revealed that the ventilation system did not draw a 1 ply square of toilet paper to the surface of the ventilation cover in resident bathrooms in resident rooms 106, 108, 114 and 115. This indicated that the ventilation system was not working properly on the 100 hall of the facility at the time of the observation. Interview on 12/4/25 at 9:25 AM with the MS confirmed that the ventilation system did not draw a 1 ply square of toilet paper in resident bathrooms in rooms 106, 108, 114 and 115 which indicated that the ventilation system was not working properly on the 100 hall of the facility. The MS confirmed that no routine checks of the ventilation system had been completed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006-05(A)(B)(C)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notice of resident rights on admission for 1 (Resident 95) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 86.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled admission Policy dated reviewed 8/28/2025 revealed: - Resident Rights - Before or upon admission the facility will ensure that the resident and/or the resident's representative or interested family member has been informed of the resident's rights and all facility policies governing resident conduct and responsibilities in a language and manner they can understand. - 1. The resident's rights are communicated both orally and in writing with adaptations made to account for visual and hearing impairments (i.e., sign language, large print, Braille copies). - 2. The facility will provide language assistance services such as qualified interpreters for individuals with limited English proficiency, and appropriate auxiliary aids and services to comply with Section 1557. - 3. Written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident surveyed (Resident 14) during the investigation of an abuse allegation. The facility had a census of 88.Findings are:A record review of Resident 14's undated care plan revealed the following diagnoses: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (consistently high blood sugar levels due to insufficient insulin production), Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes insipidus ( a kidney disorder causing excessive thirst and large amounts of urine), Chronic pain, Adrenocortical insufficiency (a condition where the adrenal glands do not produce enough hormones), spinal stenosis with claudication (a narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves causing pain, numbness or weakness), depression, suicidal ideation (thoughts of suicide), other speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction (stroke).A record review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool that measures the health status in nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an anti-psychotic medication [a class of medications used to manage symptoms of psychosis such as delusions and hallucinations] was used to treat a medically accepted, diagnosed, specific condition for 1 (Resident 10) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 86.Findings are:A. Record review of a facility policy dated 11/19/24 entitled Psychotropic Medication Management revealed the following information:A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories:Anti-psychotic, Anti-depressant, Anti-anxiety, and Hypnotic.Residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. With regards to psychotropic medications, the regulations additionally require:Giving psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.2(H)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an abuse allegation for 1 of 1 resident surveyed (Resident 14) was reported to officials within the required time limits. The facility claimed a census of 88.Findings are:A record review of Resident 14's undated care plan revealed the following diagnoses: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (consistently high blood sugar levels due to insufficient insulin production), Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes insipidus (a kidney disorder causing excessive thirst and large amounts of urine), Chronic pain, Adrenocortical insufficiency (a condition where the adrenal glands do not produce enough hormones), spinal stenosis with claudication (a narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves causing pain, numbness or weakness), depression, suicidal ideation (thoughts of suicide) and other speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction (stroke).A record review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.2(H)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents surveyed (Resident 14). The facility had a census of 88.Findings are:A record review of Resident 14's undated care plan revealed the following diagnoses: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (consistently high blood sugar levels due to insufficient insulin production), Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes insipidus ( a kidney disorder causing excessive thirst and large amounts of urine), Chronic pain, Adrenocortical insufficiency (a condition where the adrenal glands do not produce enough hormones), spinal stenosis with claudication (a narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves causing pain, numbness or weakness), depression, suicidal ideation (thoughts of suicide) and other speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction (stroke).A record review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool that measures the health status in nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E)(i)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, a written interdisciplinary comprehensive plan detailing how to provide quality care for a resident) related to prophylactic antibiotic use for Resident 8 and anticoagulant [a blood thinner medication which can increase the risk of bleeding] for Resident 14. The facility sample size was 25. The facility census was 86.Findings are:A. Record review of Resident 8's Face Sheet revealed that Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection [UTI], chronic kidney disease, and bladder neck obstruction. Record review of Resident 8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 10/21/25 revealed that Resident 8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a brief screening tool that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 11 which indicated that Resident 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to administer tube feeding as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident 7) of 1 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 86.Record review of facility policy entitled Enteral Nutrition Therapy (Continuous) dated reviewed 9/5/2025 revealed: - The facility will provide continuous enteral nutrition therapy in accordance with physician orders and professional standards of practice.Record review of Resident 7's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 7/24/2025. Further review of the admission record identified Resident 7 had diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain dysfunction often caused by an underlying condition such as infections, toxins, liver or kidney failure, or nutritional deficiency) and severe protein-calorie malnutrition.Record review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 11/13/2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain valid positive airway pressure (PAP) device (a machine used to treat sleep apnea) orders for 2 (Residents 6 and 63) of 3 sampled residents and oxygen orders for 1 (Resident 63) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 86. Findings are:A record review of the facility's BIPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) / CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) Administration Policy with a reviewed date of 09/24/2025 revealed the facility would ensure each resident received respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. When a PAP was ordered, the mode, pressure setting, size and type of mask, liters of oxygen if ordered, and frequency of use must be included in the written order. A.A record review of Resident 6's Clinical Census dated 12/02/2025 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE]. A record review of Resident 6's Medical Diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate for and identify situational triggers for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Resident 9) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 86.The findings are:Record review of facility policy entitled Trauma Informed Care dated reviewed 9/2/2025 revealed: - 1. Screening and assessment - The facility will use a multi- pronged approach to identifying a residents with PTSD or history of trauma. This approach would include assessing the residents for indicators of trauma upon admission/readmission and with change in condition. This assessment will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event. - a. The facility will utilize the Trauma-Informed Care Assessment in PCC to assess the resident's experience of seventeen possible negative life events. - b. If the residents responds to any of the seventeen possible negative life events with an answer other than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(i) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide secured storage for medications stored in the residents' rooms for 2 (Residents 6 and 43) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 86. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy with a last revised date of 06/01/2024 revealed the care plan would reflect that the resident could self-administer medications. The staff would document in the resident's care plan if the resident or the facility staff were responsible for storage of the resident's medications. The facility should provide a secured compartment for the storage of the resident's medications. The storage compartment would be stored in the resident's room and locked when not in use. A.A record review of Resident 6's Clinical Census dated 12/02/2025 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE]. A record review of Resident 6's Medical Diagnosis dated 12/04/2025 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete admission paperwork for 1 (Resident 95) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 86.The findings are:Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete admission paperwork for 1 (Resident 95) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 86.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled admission Policy dated reviewed 8/28/2025 revealed: - Resident Orientation - 1. Prior to, or upon admission, the resident is orientated, but not limited to: - a. Privacy Practices - b. Antidiscrimination policy - c. Grievance policy - d. Resident Rights. - e. A nursing facility that is a composite distinct part as defined in section 483.5 must disclose in its admission agreement its physical configuration, including the various locations that comprise the composite distinct part, and must specify the policies that apply to room changes between its different locations - f. Resident Trust Fund. - g. Financial Agreement. - h. Smoking policies and procedures. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update the medical practitioner of changes in daily weights for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 resident sampled. The facility census was 83. The findings are:Record review of the Facility Policy titled Changes in Resident's Condition or Status dated 08-29-2025 revealed the facility will notify, his/her primary care provider, and resident/resident representative of changes in the resident's condition or status. The facility must immediately inform the resident and consult the resident's physician when there is a need to alter treatment significantly (That is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment.Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 09-19-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-date of admission [DATE].-Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with respiratory equipment and treatments for 1(Resident 1) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 83. The findings are:Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 09-19-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-date of admission [DATE].-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -required extensive assistance with dressing, hygiene and bed mobility.-required total assistance with transfers, toileting and bathing. -had a diagnosis of Heart Failure. Record review of Resident 1's Clinical Physician Orders (CPO) printed 11-06-2025 revealed an order dated 07-31-2025 for Oxygen with Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP: a treatment for sleep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food items in the kitchen's refrigerators and freezers were sealed, labeled, and dated, ensure food preparation (prep) was completed in a sanitary manner and per the menu, and ensure all kitchen equipment was cleaned to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 86 resident that consumed food from the kitchen. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Food Safety policy dated 05/01/2024 revealed all leftovers must be covered, labeled, and dated. An observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:03 AM revealed the following: The reach-in refrigerator in the kitchen: -1 open bag of a purple shredded substance was not sealed, labeled, or dated. -1 open zip lock style bag of a white chunk was not sealed or labeled. -1 bag of yellow slices not sealed. -1 clear cup of a liquid substance not sealed, labeled, or dated. -1 large zip lock style bag of a shredded green substance not labeled or dated. -1 opened package of bologna not sealed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update and revise Care Plans for straight catheterization, wound care, tube feeding, and dental care for 4 (Resident 6, 68, 34, and 14) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6/18/24 revealed the resident's admission date was 6/7/24. Resident was unable to participate with the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener to determine cognition) due to being rarely/never understood. According to the MDS, Resident 6 required supervision/touching assist with eating and was dependent for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. The MDS also revealed the resident was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Resident 6's primary diagnosis was stroke. Other diagnosis included on the MDS were aphasia (non-speaking), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1.009.04(D) Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures in resident bathrooms for rooms 101, 102, 109,113, 114, 117, 118, 120,122 and 123. This had the ability to affect 14 of the residents that reside at the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings are: Observation on 08-07-2024 at 9:00 AM of resident rooms revealed water temperatures in resident bathrooms were as follows: -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 132.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 131 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 126.5 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 125.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 129.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 124.9 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 124.3 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 123.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 125.1 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 124.5 degrees F. An interview was conducted with the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 07-08-2024 at 10:00 AM revealing the MS had taken a water temperature in room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(C) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure Resident 26, 38, and 42's respiratory equipment and supplies was cleaned and sanitized to prevent cross contamination, failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions during ADL care for Resident 14, and during catheter care for Resident 37, and failed to provide enhanced barrier signage for 1, Resident 68. The total sample size of the survey was 18. The facility staff identified a census of 86. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)/Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)(machines used to treat apnea) Administration Policy with a reviewed date of 09/26/2023 masks should be cleaned with soap and water as needed. A record review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revised date of 02/27/2024 revealed the exterior of the oxygen concentrators (a machine that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(B) Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain flooring in good repair for 12 resident rooms. This had the potential to affect 13 residents. The facility identified a census of 86. Findings are: A record review of the Facility policy titled Resident Belongings and Home Like environment, dated 06/12/2024. The policy states the facility will provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment. The policy included a section titled The facility must provide-This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. A tour with Mantenence Suppervisior (MS) on 8/13/2024 at 11:20 AM revealed 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 111, 113, 114, 121, and 122. rooms did not have a transition strip between the hall carpet and the flooring in the resident's room. A tour with MS on 8/13/24 at 11:20 AM revealed 104, 113, 114, 122, 123, and 207 resident rooms had cracked or bubbled linoleum in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 37) of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 86. The Findings are: Record Review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-28-2024 revealed an admission date of 06-25-2024 following hospitalization for surgery of a diaphragmatic Hernia with Obstruction (is a protrusion of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity due to a defect within the diaphragm), other diagnosis included Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD, is a long-term condition that occurs when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus), Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH, a non-cancerous condition that causes the prostate gland to enlarge in men), Barrett's Esophagus (is a condition in which the flat pink lining of the swallowing tube that connects the mouth to the stomach (esophagus) becomes damaged by acid reflux, which causes the lining to thicken and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report a fall resulting in serious bodily injury to the state agency for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 86. Findings are: Record Review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-21-2024 revealed Resident 2 had diagnosis of Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), anxiety and depression.The MDS also indicated Resident 2 needed staff to set up and supervise bathing and was independent with bed mobility, dressing, hygiene, and ambulation. Record Review of Resident 2's Progress Notes (PN) dated 08-08-2024 revealed Resident 2's roommate yelled for help and staff found Resident 2 on the bathroom floor, curled up on the right side. The PN also indicated the resident was crying and had bleeding from the right cheek. The facility staff called 911 and Resident 2 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 57) of 1 sampled resident's tube feeding was on the Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 07/12/2024 and Insulin and Insulin injections were excluded from the 7/12/24 MDS. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) & (and) Care Plan Development policy with a reviewed date of 08/22/2023 revealed the facility would follow the procedures in the RAI User's Manual 3.0 when completing the MDS and the facility must make a comprehensive (complete) assessment of the resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history, and preferences using the RAI. A record review of Resident 57's Clinical Census dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 57's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 26) of 5 sampled resident's oxygen order was followed and failed to ensure 1 (Resident 42) of 5 sampled residents had valid oxygen orders. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Physician Orders policy with a revised date of 02/26/2024 revealed a Physician, Physician's Assistant, or Nurse Practioner must provide orders for the resident's immediate care and ongoing care of the resident. A. A record review of Resident 26's Clinical Census dated 08/13/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 26's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbid (severe) Obesity Due To Excess Calories (overweight), Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia (low oxygen), End Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), Pleural…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident 26 and 57) of 2 sampled resident's shunt site (an access point to a major artery) was assessed before and after each dialysis (mechanical treatment of the blood to clean it of impurities) treatment. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Hemodialysis Offsite Policy dated 04/17/2023 revealed the facility assures each resident received care and services for the provision of services which includes ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. A. A record review of Resident 57's Clinical Census dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 57's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report abuse allegations to the facility's Administrator and state survey agency within the required timeframe of two hours and failed to submit final investigation reports to the state survey agency within five working days of the occurrences involving 5 (Residents #39, #149, #57, #66, and #53) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Area of Focus: Abuse & Neglect, revealed, 483.12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: 483.12(c)(1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse involving 5 (Residents #39, #149, #57, #66, and #53) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Area of Focus: Abuse & Neglect, revealed, 483.12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: 483.12(c)(2) Have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. 1. A review of Resident #39's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/30/2019 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF), type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/16/2022, revealed Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment carts were locked when not within line of sight for 4 (two treatment carts on the 100 Hall, one treatment cart on the 200 Hall, and one medication cart on the 200 Hall) of 8 carts in the facility. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, 5.3 Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, revised 07/21/2022, revealed, 3.3 Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. During an observation on 07/12/2023 at 8:06 AM, there were two unlocked treatment carts (one light brown in color and the other dark brown in color) on 100 Hall, approximately 143 inches from the nurse at the medication cart who was administering medications. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #84 to ensure that no bowel movement remained on the resident before starting to put a new incontience brief on the resident. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention, dated 05/04/2023, indicated, If diarrhea develops or if the patient is incontinent, follow these steps: Change underpads and briefs after soiling; and clean the skin with a no-rinse skin cleanser that has pH [acidity] similar to normal skin. A policy that specifically addressed incontinence care was requested but not provided. A review of Resident #84's admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted the resident on 10/26/2022 and readmitted the resident on 11/11/2022 with diagnoses that included malignant poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, protein-calorie malnutrition, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #9), who was not a candidate for self-administration, did not have a medication brought into the facility by a family member available for use at the resident's bedside. Findings included: A review of Resident #9's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/20/2022 with diagnoses that included enterocolitis, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), peripheral venous insufficiency, heart disease, spontaneous migraine, typical atrial flutter, gastroenteritis and colitis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic kidney disease, long-term use of anticoagulants, and history of malignant neoplasm of the large intestine (colon cancer). The admission Record indicated the resident had a pacemaker. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/21/2023, revealed Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,397 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $26,397 — penalty dated 2025-11-06
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-09 for 30 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-30 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUND I INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 96% | since 08/23/1995 |
| DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/23/1995 |
| COX, TAMMY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/29/2021 |
| EKLUND, AMBER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/16/2024 |
| RODMAN, JARED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/21/1994 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/02/2020 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/16/1999 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/09/2018 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2011 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/22/2000 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/16/1999 |
| CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE FUND I LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/1995 |
| HCF INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/23/1995 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/05/1990 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/06/2025 |
| SATTAR, ARIF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2018 |
| CRHC LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/31/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285134. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.