No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hallmark Manor

32300 First Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 · For profit - Corporation · 147 certified beds · (253) 874-3580 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (253) 874-3580 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$32,175 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $32,175 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
301 S 320th St, 0 · (253) 874-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
301 S 320th St · (253) 874-7049 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
32911 1st Ave S · (253) 733-8612 · Call to confirm hours
Park
32901 1st Ave S · (253) 835-6901 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.1%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.1%17.7%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.8%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.8%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.2%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.2%82.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.6%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.8%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.001.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.211.521.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

29.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF29.0%CMS range 17.9–45.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.0–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified82.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.4–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.76
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
29.4%
Total nursing turnover
38.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 108.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-13)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a full assessment, monitor, notify the provider and take timely action for a latent injury and a significant change in pain experience for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. Resident 1 who reported a popping noise after receiving care from staff and acute pain, experienced harm with increasing pain when there was a delay in transfer to the hospital for evaluation where they were diagnosed with a right ankle fracture. Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's revised 11/11/2025 Pain Assessment and Management policy showed, based upon a comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility would ensure residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to pain management. The policy showed residents would be assessed for pain indicators with any changes of condition and would address and treat the underlying causes and collaborate with the attending physician/provider to manage the pain.<Resident 1>According…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent the occurrence of an avoidable pressure ulcer/pressure injury (PU/PI) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed an unstageable (a pressure injury that is a full thickness skin and tissue loss to which the extent of the tissue damage cannot be seen) wound to their right foot requiring hospital treatment and amputation. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the 02/21/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 1 had no pressure ulcers, was dependent on staff to put on/take off footwear, required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, and was assessed as at risk of developing PU/PIs. Review of the Braden Scale (an assessment for predicting pressure sore risk) dated 05/06/2024 showed Resident 1 was assessed at a severe risk of developing pressure sores. According to the assessment, Resident 1 was confined to bed, had very limited ability to change and control body position,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 35> Review of a 10/22/2024 nursing progress note showed Resident 35 was transferred to the hospital for complaints of abdominal pain, chest pain, and shortness of breath. Review of Resident 35's records on 05/13/2025 showed no documentation staff provided Resident 35 or their representative with a written transfer notice. There was no progress note or copy of the written transfer notice available in Resident 35's record. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 11:12 AM, Staff B and Staff F reviewed Resident 35's record and stated staff did not document the written transfer notice was provided as required. Staff B stated it was their expectation staff provided the notice within at the time of the resident being transferred, and in emergencies, the notice should be provided within 24 hours, and a copy was expected to be in the resident's record. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the bed hold policy upon transfers to the hospital for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 3 & 64), call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sharps and chemicals were stored safely for 2 units (South and North Units) and 2 storage rooms (Soiled Laundry Room & Central Supply Room) reviewed. This failure to ensure sharps and chemicals were secured placed residents at risk for exposure to sharps and chemicals, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Storage of Chemicals, revised 06/17/2024, the facility would appropriately store chemical's to ensure residents environment remained free from accident hazards. The policy showed chemicals would be stored out of reach of residents. According to a facility policy titled, Safer Sharps and Safe Injection Practices Policy, revised 06/03/2024, the facility would ensure sharps devices were never left unattended within residents reach. <South Unit> Observations on 05/06/2025 at 9:47 AM, 05/08/2025 at 9:21 AM, and 05/09/25 at 12:25 PM, the door to the shower room on the south 600 hallway was propped open and no staff were present.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide required liability notices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 247) reviewed for liability notices. Failure of the facility to issue a Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) before coverage for Medicare services ended for Resident 247 and discharged from the facility, placed the resident at risk for not fully understanding their Medicare benefits. Findings included . <Resident 247> Record review revealed Resident 247 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to an adult family home on [DATE]. Resident 247's record showed no indication the facility provided a NOMNC letter to the resident. A 01/28/2025 social services note showed the discharge plan was for the resident to discharge to an adult family home when they completed their course of antibiotic medication. A 01/29/2025 social services progress note showed Resident 247 was scheduled to discharge back to an adult family home, transportation was arranged to pick up the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment was provided to the residents. Failure to ensure resident rooms were personalized for 1 (South Wing) of 2 wings reviewed and maintain resident weight scales clean and free from rust for shower rooms on 2 (North and South Wing) of 2 wings reviewed, left residents at risk for a less than homelike environment. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Resident Belongings and Home Like Environment policy, revised 06/12/2024, the facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The policy showed it was the responsibility of all facility staff to create a homelike environment and promptly address any cleaning needs. <South Wing> Observation on 05/06/2025 at 10:17 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] occupied one resident in the bed nearest the window. The walls were blank and did not have any décor or personal items for the resident. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed within 14 days from the date of determination for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 92) reviewed for death. Failure to identify the need for a SCSA when Resident 92 had a decline in condition and started on Hospice/Palliative care services placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (RAI - a document directing staff when assessments of resident status is required) a .SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare Hospice or other structured hospice) and remains in the nursing home. <Resident 92> Review of Resident 92's 03/03/2025 Minimum Data Set (MDS - and assessment tool) showed a 03/03/2025 Death in Facility MDS. Resident 92's records did not show a SCSA was completed. Review of Resident 92's health records showed a 01/26/2025 Social Services significant change progress note stating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 94) reviewed for closed records and 1 of 7 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument and Care Plan Development policy revised 09/05/2024, the facility would follow procedures described in the Resident Assessment Instrument (instructions/guidelines) when completing MDS assessments. <Resident 1> According to the 03/06/2025 Quarterly MDS, Resident 1 had intact cognition, normal thinking and memory. The MDS showed Resident 1 had functional impairment to one arm and one leg, required partial/moderate assistance from staff for transfers in and out of their bed and wheelchair, and for sitting to standing position. The MDS showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 comprehensive evaluations (a process to determine what mental health services residents required after a Level 1 PASRR determined mental health services were necessary) were obtained for 5 (Residents 35, 80, 3, 5, & 71) of 9 residents whose PASRRs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . <Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, revised 09/26/2024, a resident with a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) would indicate a positive level 1. The policy stated a positive level 1 screen necessitated an in depth evaluation of the resident by the state designated authority, known as a PASRR level 2, which would be conducted prior to admission to the facility or the referral would be made for the level 2 at time of new identified SMI's. <Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure development of a Palliative care plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 92) reviewed for closed records. Failure to develop a Palliative care plan placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences, revised 09/05/2024, the facility would ensure timeliness of each resident's person-centered care plan, and that each resident/representative would be involved in development of their care plan. <Resident 92> According to a 03/03/2025 Death in facility Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 92 passed away in the facility on 03/03/2025. Review of Resident 92's health records showed a 02/13/2025 physician progress note stating the resident representative agreed to Palliative care services. Resident 92's health records showed no Palliative care plan. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 10:46 AM Staff B (Director of Nursing) reviewed Resident 92's health records and stated they did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to facilitate quarterly care conferences for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 1, 50, & 64) reviewed for care conferences, and failed to ensure Care Plans (CP) were revised as required for 2 (Resident 71 and 88) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, unnecessary care, frustration, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences, revised 09/05/2024, the facility would ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive CP, and ensure the comprehensive CP was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team composed of individuals who have knowledge of the resident and their needs, and each resident and/or resident representative was involved in developing the CP and making decisions about their care. The policy showed the interdisciplinary team consisted of, at a minimum,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: physician orders were obtained for bed rails and blood sugar parameters, clarify physician orders, and medications were administered within ordered parameters for 3 (Residents 80, 88, & 1) of 20 sample residents. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . <Blood Sugar Parameters> <Resident 80> According to a 07/13/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 80 had a diagnosis of, but not limited to, Diabetes (unstable blood sugar levels). Review of Resident 80's records showed a physician order for a blood sugar lowering injectable medication. Resident 80's records did not include physician orders for parameters of when to notify the physician of dangerously out of range blood sugar levels. In an interview on 05/12/2025 at 12:13 PM, Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated Resident 80 should have physician instructions to notify when their blood sugar was less than 60 but did not. Staff B stated this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 3 (Residents 46, 61 & 62) of 7 residents who were assessed to be dependent on staff for ADLs. The failure to provide ADL assistance as required left residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished feelings of self-worth, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's [ADLs] policy, revised 09/10/2024, residents would receive assistance with ADLs as needed. Any change in the ability to perform ADLs would be reported to the nurse. For bed and wheelchair mobility, staff would assist residents with bed/wheelchair repositioning as necessary to prevent skin breakdown. For fingernail care, staff would ensure fingernails were clean and trimmed to avoid injury and infection. <Resident 62> According to the 04/28/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 62 had a significant change in their health status, resulting in their transition to hospice care (a comfort-focused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate laboratory testing for 2 (Resident 80 & 88) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, failed to report changes of condition for 2 (Residents 44 & 46) of 2 sampled residents, and failed to administer pain medications for 1 (Resident 65) of 1 sampled residents. These failures to ensure adequate testing to prevent unnecessary medication use, identify changes of condition, and administer pain medications placed residents at risk for the administration of unnecessary medications, discomfort from skin impairments and untreated pain, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Laboratory Testing> <Resident 88> According to the 04/22/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 88 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including hypothyroidism (HT - thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid hormones). Review of a 04/10/2025 physician order directed staff to administer a medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Resident 3> Continuous observation on 05/08/2025 at 12:11 PM showed staff bring Resident 3 their lunch tray to their room. Staff elevated Resident 3's head of bed to a sitting position, placed their lunch tray on the over the bed table in front of them, and then exited the room. The lunch tray had ground pork in gravy, potatoes, and green beans. Observation showed Resident 3 did not feed themselves. At 1:04 PM Staff BB (CNA) entered Resident 3's room to remove the lunch tray and Resident 3 stated they could not feed themselves. Staff BB asked Resident 3 if they wanted assistance and Resident 3 stated yes but the food was probably cold now. Staff BB stated it was still warm and asked if Resident 3 wanted a bite of green beans, the resident replied yes. Staff BB assisted Resident 3 with a bite of green beans and the resident stated yuck, it's cold. Staff BB asked how about some meat and assisted Resident 3 with a bite of ground pork. Resident 3 stated yuck, it's cold. Staff BB stated they did not think they had a microwave to warm the food up and asked Resident 3 if they wanted some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring of bed rail use for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 5, 64, & 80) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, entrapment, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Bed Rails - Safe and Effective Use of Bed Rails, revised 09/06/2024, the facility would ensure, at a minimum, evaluation for bed rail use would be completed quarterly and with a change of condition. <Resident 5> According to a 01/09/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) bed rails were not used on Resident 5's bed. Observation on 05/06/2025 at 1:06 PM showed bilateral bed rails on Resident 5's bed. Review of Resident 5's records showed a 06/17/2024 physician order for bed rails to be applied to their bed. Resident 5's health records did not show ongoing bed rail use monitoring was completed. <Resident 64> According to a 03/28/2025 Quarterly MDS bed rails were not used on Resident 64's bed. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were added to the resident records and that the recommendations were reviewed and acted upon for 2 (Resident 35 & 1) of 5 residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for delays in necessary medication changes, risk for adverse side effects, and receiving medications without required pharmacist oversight. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Pharmacy Services and Medication Regimen Review policy, revised 09/16/2024, the facility would maintain the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being while preventing or minimizing adverse side effects of medications by ensuring oversight by a licensed pharmacist. <Resident 35> According to the 03/13/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 35 received several medications including antipsychotic (medication that affects brain function), antidepressant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 26) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to evaluate the need for continued use of an antibiotic medication placed residents at risk for use of unnecessary medications and at risk for adverse side effects. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 11/28/2022 Antibiotic Stewardship guidelines, antibiotic stewardship would be accomplished by improved antibiotic prescribing, administration and management practices to reduce inappropriate use, to ensure that residents received the right antibiotic for the right indication, dose and duration. According to the 03/06/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of urinary tract infections and a skin infection of the lower leg. Review of the 01/10/2025 Pain care plan,showed Resident 26 had pain in their lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications in 1 of 4 medication carts (Medication Cart 300/400) and 2 of 4 halls (600 & 300 Hall) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, ineffective treatment, accidental ingestion of medication, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included <Medication Cart 300/400> Observation on 05/06/2025 at 9:56 AM showed three opened inhaler medications without the open date on the inhalers. In an interview on 05/06/2025 at 10:15 Staff V (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated all inhalers should have an open date on them, but they didn't. Staff V stated the inhalers are only good for 30 days after the open date and would need to be disposed of after 30 days.<600 Hall> Observation on 05/06/2025 at 9:47 AM showed the door to the shower room on the 600 hall was propped open, no staff were present. The overhead cabinet was unlocked and contained an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve foods that were appetizing in appearance and palatable. Observations of meal trays and interviews with 5 (Residents 61, 46, 71, 145, & 29) sample residents and 4 supplemental (Residents 69, 45, 83, & 70) residents identified concerns about the taste and overall palatability of the meals served, and being offered alternate meals by the facility. Facility failure to ensure meals were palatable, appetizing in appearance, and alternate meals were offered by staff placed residents at risk for less than adequate nutritional intake and dissatisfaction with daily meals. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Hydration and Nutrition policy revised 09/10/2024, showed if a resident refused a meal or particular food, staff would offer a substitute of similar nutritive value. <South Hall Day Room> Observation of breakfast on 05/09/2025 at 8:18 AM showed several residents in the South Hall day room eating breakfast. Resident 69 and Resident 45 were eating together at a table. Both breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to ensure staff performed Hand Hygiene (HH) when providing personal care for 1 (Resident 50) and failed to follow an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign for 1 (Resident 50) who required EBP. These failures placed residents at risk for the development of contagious, communicable diseases, and an unclean environment. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, revised 06/03/2025, showed staff would perform HH (even if gloves were used) before and after resident contact and after contact with body fluids. Review of the facility's Transmission-based Precautions and Isolation Procedures policy, revised 09/24/2024, showed EBPs were an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms and utilized gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. <Resident 50> Review of Resident 50's tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the person designated to serve as the Dietary Manager (Staff C) had the proper training and qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff without the required competencies and skills to carry out food and nutrition services. Findings included . Review of the (undated) staff list showed Staff C (Dietary Manager) was employed by the facility on 08/07/2024. In an interview on 08/19/2024 at 9:48 AM, Staff A (Administrator) stated Staff C was required to have the ServSafe Manager Certification (verifies that a manager or person-in-charge has sufficient food safety knowledge to protect the public from foodborne illness) before being hired. Staff A stated they would provide a copy to the investigator. Staff A stated as a part of employment Staff C was required to take the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) (certification and training on managing food service operations and ensuring food safety in a healthcare facility). Staff A stated Staff C was not registered for a CDM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food to residents in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The failure to check temperatures on foods served, prevent cross-contamination, label and date refrigerated foods after opening, throw out expired foods past three days of opening, prevent pests in food storage areas, clean kitchen vents that circulate air around foods, perform hand hygiene, and untimely service of meals placed all 92 residents at the facility at risk of foodborne illness, poor nutritional intake, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Food Temperatures> Observation on 08/19/2024 at 7:50 AM showed Staff C (Dietary Manager) plating food for resident tray service at breakfast. The foods in the steam table included sausage patties, over-easy eggs, toast, two types of hot cereal, hard boiled eggs, mechanically altered puree texture eggs and toast. Staff D (Dietary Aide) and Staff E (Dietary Aide) were setting up trays with milk, juices and other drinks. The milk was placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services according to professional standards of practice for 8 of 10 Residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8) reviewed for COVID-19 testing. The facility failed to obtain Physician Orders (PO) to conduct COVID-19 testing for 6 of 10 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6), and failed to document the results of the testing for 3 of 10 residents (Resident 6, 7 & 8). This failure increased the likelihood for the delayed identification/diagnosis of COVID-19. Findings included . COVID-19 is an infectious virus which causes respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, or new dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death. During an interview on 05/06/2024 at 10:20 AM, Staff B (Director of Nursing), stated the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak, since 04/20/2024. The facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to abuse allegations in a timely manner, for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 & 8). In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment when they allowed Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), to continue to work with residents after an allegation of abuse. Failure to recognize possible abuse, suspend the alleged perpetrator pending investigation, and immediately investigate allegations, placed the resident at risk for diminished quality of life, and continued possible abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, Abuse - Protection of Residents, dated 07/18/2023 showed the facility would ensure that all residents were protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after investigations. The methods to ensure the protection of residents during investigation, may included, but were not limited to responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation, examining the alleged victim for any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 4 (Residents 25, 91, 8, & 68) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 05/12/2023 Transfers and Discharges policy, when a resident transferred emergently to an acute care setting (i.e. a hospital) this was categorized as a facility-initiated transfer. The policy showed when the facility initiated a discharge, the facility was responsible to provide the receiving provider specific information including diagnoses, medications, and other significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 8> According to the 01/09/2024 admission MDS, Resident 8 readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] and had intact memory. The MDS showed Resident had diagnoses including respiratory failure, and dependence on oxygen. According to a 12/31/2023 progress note, Resident 8 transferred to the hospital with no new concerns with cognition noted at time of discharge. A second 12/31/2023 progress note showed no new concerns with mood noted at time of discharge. An 11/23/2023 progress note showed Resident 8 reported having shortness of breath . MD notified [,] ordered transfer resident to the hospital. In an interview on 03/06/2024 at 9:15 AM Resident 8 they were not offered a bed hold when they went to the hospital on [DATE] or 12/31/2023. Resident 8 stated they recalled being offered one at a sister facility, so they noticed when they were not offered one at the current facility. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 10:55 AM Staff C (Unit Care Manager) stated the facility's business office was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%). Failure to properly administer 6 of 27 medications for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 77, 16, 80) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 22.22 %. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medication. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 02/13/2023 Administration of Medications policy, the facility must maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The policy defined a medication error as the failure to prepare or administer a medication in accordance with the physician's order, manufacturer recommendations, and professional standards of nursing. The policy showed nurses should verify the right medication, right resident, right dose, right route, right time/frequency, and right documentation. <Resident 77> Observation of medication pass on 03/01/2024 at 8:46 AM showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to appropriately store drugs and/or biologicals (medicine derived from natural sources) for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 2 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage in Refrigerator/Freezer, dated 08/24/2023, showed the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments in accordance with applicable state and federal laws. <Medication Storage Room> An observation on 02/29/2024 at 11:55 AM showed two bottles of a controlled medication in the refrigerator sitting on top of a gray lockbox. An interview on 02/29/2024 at 12:00 PM, Staff C (Unit Care Manager-UCM) stated controlled medications were required to be double locked. Staff C stated the two bottles of controlled medication should be locked inside the lockbox but were not. An interview on 03/06/2024 at 10:00 AM, Staff B (Interim…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals that accommodated resident food allergies and preferences for 5 (Resident 14, 8, 18, 56, & 245) of 7 sample residents reviewed for preferences. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, frustration, and a diminished quality if life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 06/08/2020 Resident Rights policy, residents had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were important to them. The policy showed all residents had the right to self-determination. <Resident 14> According to the 12/01/2023 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 14 had intact memory and medically complex conditions including Diabetes Mellitus (a condition making the regulation of blood sugar harder). The MDS showed Resident 14 required a therapeutic diet. In an interview and observation on 02/27/2024 at 12:46 PM, Resident 14 requested a surveyor look at their lunch tray and their menu. Resident 14 showed they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchens. Failure to ensure food items in the dietary department were properly stored, labeled, and out-of-date foods were identified and discarded, placed residents at risk for consuming expired/spoiled foods and potential exposure to food-borne illness. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to revised 04/26/2023 Food Safety policy the facility would store food in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. The policy showed pre-packaged food must be placed in leak-proof containers with a tight-fitting lid. The policy showed the container must be labeled with the name of the food and the date the item was placed in the container, with a use-by date as applicable. The policy showed dented cans must be returned to the vendor. The policy showed opened dry food must be resealed tightly and labeled with a use by date. <Facility Kitchen> During initial observations of the dietary department on 02/27/2024 at 8:51 AM the following was noted: In the walk-in freezer: - a bag of chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to prevent placing residents at risk for facility acquired infections. The failure to ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on 2 of 2 Units, and to ensure proper Hand Hygiene was performed on 2 of 2 units before and after care/contact placed residents at risk for facility-acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's revised 07/15/2022 Hand Hygiene policy showed facility staff may use Alcohol-Based Hand Rub to perform hand hygiene in most clinical situations unless hands were visibly soiled. The policy showed facility staff should perform hand hygiene before and after contact with residents, after contact with blood, other body fluids, and visibly contaminated surfaces, and after removing PPE. The facility's revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that promoted resident dignity for 5 (Residents 38, 55, 25, 56, & 91) of 24 sample residents reviewed, and 1 of 2 assisted dining rooms. The failure to provide care with dignity placed residents at risk for frustration, unmet care needs, and a diminished sense self worth. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 06/08/2020 Resident Rights policy, residents had the right to a dignified existence. The policy showed residents had the right to respect and dignity. The facility's 05/06/2019 Dignity policy showed all residents should be treated with respect and dignity. The policy provided examples, including treating resident possessions and space with respect, not using bibs or clothing protectors when dining unless by resident choice, ensuring catheter bags were covered, and referring to the resident by their name of choice. <Resident 38> According to the 11/16/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 38 had intact memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (SCSA- an assessment tool) was completed as required for 1 (Resident 68) of 24 sampled residents reviewed. The failure to complete a Significant Change MDS timely left residents at risk for unassessed care needs, inappropriate care, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, (RAI, a manual directing staff on requirements for completion of a Minimum Data Set- MDS) dated [DATE] showed a SCSA must be completed within 14 calendar days after the facility determined or should have determined there was a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. An SCSA was appropriate if there were consistent patterns of changes, with either two or more areas of decline. <Resident 68> According to the 12/15/2023 SCSA Resident 68 admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents 2, 18, 91, & 7) of 24 residents Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) were completed accurately to reflect the resident's condition. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . <Resident 2> According to a 01/29/2024 Significant Change MDS, Resident 2 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including dementia and depression, had no psychosis, and was taking an antipsychotic medication during the assessment period. Review of Resident 2's February 2024 Medication Administration Records showed the resident was not receiving antipsychotic medication during the assessment period. In an interview on 03/06/2024 at 11:32 AM, Staff Q (MDS Nurse) reviewed Resident 2's records and confirmed the resident was not receiving any antipsychotic medications during the assessment period and stated, I do not know why I marked that. Staff Q stated the MDS was coded inaccurately and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a mental health screening required before transfer to a nursing home) assessments were revised to reflect mental health changes for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 47) reviewed for PASRRs. This failure left residents at risk for risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's revised 10/06/2022 PASRR policy showed positive Level 1 PASRR screenings required an in-depth evaluation of the resident by the state-designated agency. The policy showed any resident with a newly evident or possible serious disorder, . intellectual disability or related condition must be referred to the state agency. <Resident 47> According to the 02/01/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 47 had severe memory impairment, and diagnoses including non-traumatic brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CP) were revised as needed for 6 of 24 (Residents 14, 38, 8, 2, 91, & 35) sample residents reviewed. The failure to ensure CPs were updated to reflect current care needs left residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care, frustration, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 08/22/2023 Comprehensive CP and Conferences policy, the facility would ensure each resident's CP was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team. The policy showed the CP should be revised based on changing goals and needs for care. <Resident 14> According to the 12/01/2023 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 14 had intact memory and no mood concerns. The MDS showed Resident 14 had medically complex conditions including a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The Stage 4 pressure ulcer was noted to be present on admission. The 08/30/2022 Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an approach of targeted gown and glove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: Physician's Orders (POs) were followed for 5 (Residents 16, 80, 25, 19, & 8) of 24 sample residents; POs were clarified as needed for 2 (Resident 19 & 68) of 24 sample residents; nurses signed only for tasks completed for 3 (Resident 2, 16, 80) of 24 sample residents; and adequate rationale was provided for a late onset mental health condition for 1 (Resident 38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . <Following PO> <Resident 16> According to a 12/12/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 16 had multiple medically complex diagnoses and received scheduled pain medications during the assessment period. Review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed Resident 16 had orders for pain medication patches to be applied to the lower back and right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were provided for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for rehab/restorative (Resident 90) and 2 supplementary residents (Residents 18 & 85). This failure left residents at risk for diminished Range of Motion (ROM), loss of function, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 09/11/2023 Restorative Nursing policy to promote the resident's optimum function, the facility would develop and implement a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP). The policy showed residents were placed on a restorative as appropriate when they discharged from physical therapy. <Resident 90> According to the 01/17/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 90 was able to make themselves understood and understood others during communication. The MDS showed Resident 90 was assessed to have intact memory and thinking. The MDS showed Resident 90 had muscle weakness and was unsteady on their feet. Review of the 01/23/2024 Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident supervision, thorough accident investigation to determine the cause of incidents, and implement interventions required to prevent injury for 2 of 11 (Resident 11, & 55) sampled residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility's failed practice resulted in the continued risk of receiving injuries related to avoidable incidents. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Incident and Reportable Event Management, dated 05/04/2023, showed residents received assistance and supervision as addressed by the care plan. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) would conduct a thorough review of an event to determine the most likely cause of the incident and ensure the interventions in place were appropriate to prevent recurrence. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Management, dated 09/22/2023, showed supervision refers to an intervention and means of mitigating the risk of an accident. The facility was obligated to provide adequate supervision to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided within professional standards of nursing for 2 of 4 sample residents (Residents 8 & 295) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to ensure Oxygen (O2) tubing was replaced per facility policy, O2 tanks were replaced when empty, and O2 concentrators were set per the Physician's Order (PO) placed residents at risk for Shortness of Breath (SOB), respiratory distress, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 08/2021 policy showed residents requiring O2 therapy should have a PO in place specifying the flow rate in liters. The policy showed O2 supplies should be replaced weekly and when visibly soiled and should be labeled with a date. <Resident 8> According to the 01/09/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 8 was assessed with intact memory and cardiac respiratory conditions including asthma (inflammatory lung condition),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received ongoing communication and collaboration with the Hemodialysis (HD- a process to remove blood waste) center for 1 of 1 (Resident 295) residents reviewed for dialysis. This failure to communicate and collaborate with the dialysis as required, placed dialysis residents at risk for adverse health outcomes, inadequate quality of care and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Hemodialysis Offsite Policy, dated 08/23/2023, showed the facility would assure that each resident received .ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. <Resident 295> According to the 02/29/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) showed Resident 295 admitted to the facility on [DATE], received HD services, and had medically complex diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 (Resident 55) residents reviewed for dementia care. The failure to assess residents individualized care needs through an interdisciplinary approach and implement a person-centered Care Plan (CP) prevented the facility from supporting residents to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 08/22/2023 Care of the Cognitively Impaired (Dementia Care) policy, the facility would utilize an individualized, non-pharmacological approach to dementia care. The policy showed the facility would develop, implement, review, and revise as needed, a person-centered CP to address the dementia diagnosis, symptoms, and dementia progression. <Resident 55> According to the 01/04/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 55 had severely impaired memory, and physical behavior towards others on one-to-three of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance committee that met at least quarterly and included the required participants. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs due to on going non-compliance with federal regulations and detracted from the interdisciplinary effectiveness of the nursing home Quality Assurance team. Findings included . Facility Policy According to an 08/26/2021 revised Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan [QAPI] facility policy, the facility must maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program. The policy indicated the QAPI program was a way to promote continuous improvement of the facility. The gaps in the systems would be addressed through planned interventions with a goal to improve quality of life, quality of care, and services provided to residents in the facility. Review of the facility's QAPI logs showed the last documented meeting was held 06/17/2022. This log showed the Medical Director (MD) attended the meeting but not the pharmacist.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 74 Review of Resident 74's record showed no AD available. Review of Resident 74's admission Packet showed the packet included no information indicating whether or not Resident 74 wanted the facility to provide them assistance to formulate an AD. The 09/05/2022 Quarterly MDS showed Resident 74 was assessed as cognitively intact, had multiple complex conditions including severe kidney failure and diabetes. The MDS showed Resident 74 had no legally authorized representative. A review of Resident 74's medical record showed no AD or POA documents on file or available to staff. In an interview and record review on 11/07/2022 at 9:20 AM, Staff J verified Resident 74's admission agreement in section H showed no current AD was in place prior to admission and no documentation the resident was offered assistance to formulate an AD. Resident 50 Review of the 09/26/2022 Quarterly MDS showed Resident 50 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including severe kidney and lung disease. This MDS showed Resident 50 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-08 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions and/or a PASARR was completed for 5 (Resident 63, 66, 38, 12, & 24) of 7 residents reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . Facility Policy According to a revised 10/06/2022 PASARR policy, the facility was to ensure potential admissions were screened for possible serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions. The PASARR process was to ensure residents with a mental or intellectual disorder received the care and services they needed in the most appropriate setting. Resident 63 According to an 08/13/2022 Significant Change Minimum Data set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 63 had diagnoses of depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. The MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff to meet their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) needs, were consistently provided necessary assistance for 7 (Residents 22, 16, 8, 50, 38, 63, & 70) of 7 sample residents reviewed. Failure to provide assistance to residents who were dependent on staff for bathing placed residents at risk for unmet needs, poor hygiene, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility Policy According to an 08/22/2022 Activities of Daily Living facility policy, residents would receive assistance to complete ADLs and maintain hygiene based on their needs, choices, and assessment. A resident who was unable to carry out ADLs would receive the necessary services to maintain grooming, personal and oral hygiene. Resident 22 According to an 08/10/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 22 was cognitively intact with clear speech and had no rejection of care during the assessment period. This MDS assessed Resident 22 to require extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide mobility and Range of Motion (ROM) treatment and services to increase, maintain, or prevent further decrease in mobility and ROM for 3 of 5 (Residents 63, 70 & 16) residents and 2 supplemental residents (Residents 25 & 379) reviewed for limited ROM. The failure to place residents on a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) after completion of Physical Therapy (PT) or Occupational Therapy (OT), and implement RNP established by therapy placed residents at risk for functional decline, mobility, and loss of ROM. Findings included . Facility Policy According to a 09/19/2022 facility Restorative Nursing Policy, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure a resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) did not diminish unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated such diminution was unavoidable. The facility was to ensure residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide care and services as evidenced by seven resident interviews and ten staff interviews. The failure to ensure adequate Registered Nurse (RN) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staffing to maintain infection control standards related to COVID-19 (Coronavirus, a highly contagious infectious respiratory disease) and Tuberculosis (TB) screening, provide Restorative Nursing Programs (RNP), verify and maintain staff credentials and competency, ensure assistance with showers according to resident care plan and preferences, and timely call light response to resident needs, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, decline in condition and negative outcomes. Findings included . Facility Assessment The 02/14/2022 Facility Assessment (FA) showed Staff assignments are made based on census and acuity. Resident schedules for bathing are based on resident's preference and on resources available. Residents are involved in their plan of care and preferences are noted and updated as needed per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain verification from the state survey registry to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) met competency evaluation requirements before the staff's start date for 3 of 5 staff (Staff P, Q & CC) reviewed. The failure to ensure the competency of staff placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and abuse. Findings included . In an interview and record review on 11/07/2022 at 11:54 AM, Staff I (AP/Payroll) confirmed Staff P (CNA) was hired on 06/28/2022, Staff Q (CNA) was hired on 07/15/2022 and Staff CC (CNA) was rehired on 10/20/2022. Staff I reviewed the human resources records, medical records, and a binder labeled OBRA for the CNA registry verification for the three staff and stated, there was no verification of competency document in the files. Staff I stated the Staff Development Coordinator was responsible for the registry verification and the position was vacant since 09/09/2022. Staff I stated no one was assigned the task when the other staff left employment. In an interview on 11/08/2022 at 10:55 AM, Staff A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system of medication records that ensures accurate reconciliation and accounting of all controlled medications for 4 of 5 inventory of controlled substance books reviewed from 2 of 4 medication carts (Hall 700 medication cart and Hall 400 medication cart). This failure placed residents at risk for misappropriation of property and drug diversion. Findings include . Review of the Inventory Control of Controlled Substances policy, revised on 01/01/2022, showed instructions for incoming and outgoing nurses to count all controlled substances at the change of each shift and document the results on a shift count sheet. Hall 700 Medication Cart Observation of Hall 700 medication cart on 11/02/2022 at 10:27 AM with Staff U (LPN- Licensed Practical Nurse) showed two inventory of controlled substances books with missing signatures on the shift count sheet for the months of August 2022 and November 2022. In an interview on 11/02/2022 at 10:35 AM, Staff U stated it is important to have complete signatures on the shift count…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 (Residents 9, 379, 24, 63, & 12) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 3 supplemental residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). The facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to administering psychotropic medications (Residents 379, 9, 12, 24, & 63); identify and monitor target behaviors (Residents 379, 9 & 38); identify and implement non-medication, behavioral interventions prior to administering an antianxiety medication (Resident 379); and initiate gradual dose reductions (GDR- stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks could be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication could be discontinued) or obtain a rationale from the physician that a GDR was clinically contraindicated (Residents 2 & 6). These failures placed residents at risk of being over medicated, medication side effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices that provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent and contain the transmission of communicable diseases including Covid-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death). The facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene during medication administration for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 66, 72 and 19), conduct cleaning and sanitizing procedures for reusable medical equipment before, after, and in between resident use, and adhere to N95 fit testing requirements for 2 of 5 staff (Staff M and N). These failures placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for the development and transmission of infections, including Covid-19. Findings included . Hand Hygiene Record review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised on 07/15/2022, showed that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that implemented an antibiotic stewardship program, to promote appropriate use of antibiotics and reduce the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use, including the development of antibiotic resistance, for 5 (Residents 12, 71, 13, 49, & 8) of 6 residents reviewed who were treated with antibiotics. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes, associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of Antibiotics (ABO). Findings included . Review of a revised 08/22/2022 facility Antibiotic Stewardship policy, ABO stewardship was a set of commitments and activities designed to optimize the treatment of infections while decreasing the adverse events associated with ABO use and included ABO use protocols and a system to monitor ABO use. The ABO Stewardship Team would demonstrate support and commitment to safe and appropriate ABO use. Actions included: assessment of residents suspected having an infection using McGeer's criteria (surveillance definitions of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to recognize and treat 1 of 3 residents (Resident 24) who were reviewed for pain management. Failure to implement identified interventions to alleviate pain, including administration of pain medication after conducting the scheduled pain assessment, resulted in Resident 24 experiencing daily episodes of untreated pain, and placed the resident at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 24 According to the 09/13/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 24 had diagnoses including Diabetic Neuropathy (nerve damage that occur in people with diabetes) and unspecified pain. The cognitive assessment showed Resident 24 had intact short-term and long-term recall and usually understood and understands others. According to the 02/02/2022 Significant Change in Status MDS, Resident 24 had diagnoses including chronic pain. Review of the medical diagnosis list showed Resident 24 was diagnosed with low back pain dated 10/01/2021 during their facility stay. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure ongoing collaboration with the dialysis center for 1 (Resident 74) of 1 residents reviewed for hemodialysis (purifying the blood of a person whose kidneys were not functioning normally). Facility failure to establish an agreement with the dialysis center, collect run sheets (a document describing all the care provided at a dialysis session) and monitor weights, left the resident at risk for fluid overload (too much fluid in the body) and negative health outcomes. Findings included . Facility Policy The facility's revised 12/29/2021 Dialysis policy showed the facility must ensure all residents requiring dialysis received care and services within professional standards of nursing, including ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. The policy directed nurses to ensure they did not obtain Blood Pressure (BP) on the resident's arm with the shunt (dialysis access site), and to provide ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). Failure of 1 of 2 nurses (Staff W) to properly administer 7 of 25 medications for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 68) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 28%. This failure placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects due to improper medication administration. Findings included . Resident 68 The revised 08/25/2022 Administration of Medications policy showed, staff who are responsible for medication administration will adhere to the 10 rights of Medication Administration. These rights include right drug, right resident, right dose, right route, right time and frequency, right documentation, right assessment, right to refuse, right evaluation, and right education and information. Right resident included the use of two identifiers: the resident's full name on the Medication or Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) and the resident's photo.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and vaccines (a preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases) were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to secure all medications in a locked storage area for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 39) during medication administration. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised medications with decreased or no potency and inadvertent ingestion of unsecured medications. Findings included . South Hall Medication Room Observation of South Hall medication room on 11/02/2022 at 10:30 with Staff U (LPN- Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed 49 pieces of rectal suppositories and four vials of vaccines that expired 09/28/2022. In an interview on 11/02/2022 at 10:38 AM, Staff U validated the dates of the expired medications and vaccines. Staff U stated the expired medications and vaccines should be removed from the medication room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines were provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 63) and influenza vaccinations were provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from pneumococcal and influenza diseases. Findings included . Resident 63 Review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website titled Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate, indicated . CDC recommends PCV15 or PCV20 [Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine] for adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain medical conditions or risk factors. The PCV15 or PCV20 dose should be administered at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 [Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine] vaccination. The CDC guidelines went into effect on 10/21/2021 per recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices that provided a safe environment to help prevent and contain the transmission of Covid-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death). The facility failed to ensure staff completed the required Covid-19 vaccination verification for 2 of 2 contracted staff (Staff Z and AA). These failures placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for the development and transmission of Covid-19 infection. Vaccination Verification The 03/31/2022 Covid-19 Vaccination Program Policy for Associates showed the facility vaccination tracking requirements included tracking each staff member's vaccination status including the specific vaccine received, the dates of each dose received including booster. The tracking mechanism would clearly identify each staff's role, assigned work area and how they interact with residents, including contracted staff, volunteers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$32,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $32,175 — penalty dated 2024-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Life Care Center Of TullahomaTullahoma, TN

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/23/1995
BUTNER, NANCYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/16/2018
CARLISLE, HEATHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/28/2025
VELASCO-FORTUNE, ROSIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/21/1994
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/02/2020
HENRY, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
LAY, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/09/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2011
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/22/2000
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE FUND I LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/1990
HCF INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/23/1995
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/1990
KIM, DENNISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2017
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/06/2025
CRHC LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2017
FUND I INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/23/1995

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 4%Other / private 10%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,592per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505313. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next