Lane House, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively intact resident with new onset altered mental status and vomiting was monitored and treated timely resulting in the resident having a delay in treatment and death for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] at 10:46 a.m. when a cognitively intact resident had new onset symptoms of coughing, coffee ground emesis, complaints of feeling drunk, and staggering while ambulating. The physician ordered a Complete Blood Count (CBC) that was not obtained. The record lacked documentation of the resident's condition on [DATE]. On [DATE] the resident had altered mental status, dizziness, abdominal pain, and his pulse was 128. The physician ordered a STAT (immediately) chest x-ray, a STAT abdominal x-ray, and STAT CBC with differential for cough, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, altered mental status, weakness, and dizziness. The STAT CBC was not obtained prior to the resident's death.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's family, and/or emergency contact when a cognitively intact resident developed new onset altered mental status, vomiting, and physical decline for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for family notification (Residents B). Findings include:A confidential concern during the survey process indicated Resident B had a sudden change in his health status, and the physician ordered the resident to go to the hospital. Despite the resident continuing to get worse, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) refused to allow the resident to go. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:33 p.m. Diagnoses on Resident B's profile included prostate cancer, lung cancer, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment completed on [DATE], assessed Resident B as being cognitively intact. He was independent with eating, bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff ordered, obtained, and tracked STAT (immediately) laboratory orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for completion of laboratory orders (Resident B). Findings include: A confidential concern during the survey process indicated Resident B had a sudden change in his health status, and the physician ordered the resident to go to the hospital. Despite the resident continuing to get worse, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) refused to allow the resident to go, and the resident subsequently died. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:33 p.m. Diagnoses on Resident B's profile included prostate cancer, lung cancer, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). A nursing progress note, dated [DATE] at 10:46 a.m., indicated Resident B started coughing and had a small amount of coffee ground emesis. The resident complained of feeling drunk and staggering when he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete an elopement risk assessment for a vulnerable resident who was found outside the facility, on the grass after falling out of his wheelchair, without the knowledge of staff for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect (Resident C). The deficient practice was corrected by 9/8/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include:A nursing progress note, dated 9/7/25 at 3:35 p.m., indicated that emergency medical services (EMS) were at the facility. A resident had gotten outside without being seen and had fallen from his wheelchair. EMS had arrived to the facility at 3:32 p.m. and indicated they had gotten a call around 3:28 p.m. that a person was crawling in the grass on the side of the facility. Nursing staff reported last seeing Resident C around 3:00 p.m. A different resident had indicated she saw a visitor coming or going who had left the door open for Resident C to go outside. The resident had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dish machine (a commercial dishwashing machine that relies on chemical sanitizers, rather than high temperatures, to sanitize dishes, typically operating at temperatures between 120° Fahrenheit [F] and 140 F) wash and rinse temperatures met minimum standards and the March 2025 logs for the dish machine temperatures were completed for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food or liquids from the kitchen. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the March 2025 logs for the sanitizer solution bucket (a container filled with a sanitizer solution [like bleach or a similar chemical] used to reduce germs on surfaces, often wiping cloths or equipment, to safe levels), freezer, refrigerator, and dinner meal food temperatures were completed for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food or liquids from the kitchen. C. Based on observation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment was maintained for residents during meal service for 2 of 2 random observations. This had the potential to affect all residents on the [NAME] Hall consuming food during the use of cleaning supplies. Findings include: On 4/01/25 at 12:10 p.m., during observation of the noon meal service on the [NAME] Hall, observed Employees 8 and 3 cleaning rooms and mopping floors while drinks and food trays were being passed to residents. On 4/01/25 at 12:30 p.m., observed Employee 3 cleaning handrails outside of the residents rooms while residents were eating. On 4/01/25 at 12:18 p.m., during interview with Housekeeping Supervisor she indicated she had instructed the staff to remove carts when meals were being served. She indicated the housekeepers were not permitted to clean residents rooms or hall area when meals were being served. On 4/1/2025 at 1:48 p.m., the Administrator provided a document, titled, Housekeeping Services, dated 6/29/21, and indicated it was the policy currently being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure falls were documented, interventions implemented, and a call light was within the resident's reach for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 29). Findings include: During an observation, on 4/1/25 at 11:05 a.m., Resident 29 was in his recliner with no call light within his reach. The call light was observed at the end of his bed. At the same time, the resident indicated he used the call light to request assistance when needed, and it was over there on the bed somewhere. When queried how he used the call light when it was on the bed, the resident indicated, I don't. The resident requested to lay back down in bed. During an interview, on 4/1/25 at 12:07 p.m., Resident 29's daughter indicated he had fallen a lot since being at the facility. He fell often at home too. The resident used the call light to ask for help and knew how to use it, but he sometimes got up without assistance. The resident had fallen earlier in the day on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition and the facility failed to obtain daily weights for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for weights (Residents 27, 17, and 21). Findings include: 1. Resident 27's record was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 1:45 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a long-term condition where the heart's ability to pump blood effectively impairs both systole [contraction] and diastole [relaxation], leading to fluid buildup and other symptoms) and cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/26/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and indicated the resident had weight loss in the last 6 months and was not on a weight loss regimen. A care plan, dated 1/14/25, indicated the resident had unplanned/unexpected weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 14). Findings include: 1a. On 4/1/25 at 11:21 a.m., Resident 14's unbagged nebulizer (turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mouthpiece and tubing were observed laying on top the nebulizer machine. The resident was sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed. 1b. On 4/1/25 at 2:38 p.m., Resident 14 was sitting up in her wheelchair watching T.V. and her unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing were observed laying on top of the nebulizer machine on her bedside table. 1c. On 4/2/25 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 14 was resting in bed and her nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing was observed sitting on top of her nebulizer machine in a clear plastic trash bag. The trash bag was not labeled with the resident's name or date. 1d. On 4/3/25 at 10:28 a.m., Resident 14's unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing were observed to be sitting on top of her nebulizer machine. The resident indicated that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were documented to support the declination of a medication gradual dose reduction (GDR) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 36). Findings include: Resident 36's record was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder single episode and unspecified mild anxiety disorder. Progress Notes, dated December 2024, lacked documentation of behaviors, including restlessness. A physician's order, dated 12/31/24, indicated administer Ativan (antianxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg) via gastrostomy tube (g-tube) twice daily for anxiety. A physician's order, dated 12/31/24, indicated administer sertraline (antidepressant medication) 25 mg via g-tube once daily for depression. Progress Notes, dated January 2025, lacked documentation of behaviors, including restlessness. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated February 2025, indicated monitor and document behaviors of yelling out and disturbing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure keys to the medication room were kept in an area only accessible to nursing staff, food was not kept in the medication room, multi-use medication containers were dated when opened, and insulin was disposed of once it was past the use by date for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed and 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed (Residents 33 and 12). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 4/7/25 at 10:19 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) removed keys from an unsecured drawer at the nurse's station and unlocked the medication room. The nurse's station was not locked or secured and was accessible to staff and visitors. The keys obtained from the unsecured drawer unlocked the narcotic and refrigerated emergency drug kits (EDKs) in the medication room. A container of peanut butter bars was observed on the counter in the medication room. A medication bottle contained three vials of Aplisol (tuberculosis testing solution) and was stored in the refrigerator. One of the vials of Aplisol was opened. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$175,065 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $175,065 — penalty dated 2026-01-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 69% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN