Complete Care At Glendale

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 194 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had significant cognitive impairment did not leave the facility unescorted. Resident #1 was located by the police approximately 2 hours and 40 minutes after he/she was last seen by a staff and was transported to the hospital and treated for hypothermia. This resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, Parkinson's, anxiety, and psychotic disorder with delusions. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of six (6) indicative of severely impaired cognition, was independent with ambulation and activities of daily living. A care plan dated 11/27/2023 identified Resident #1 has a decline in cognitive function and impaired thought processes, short-and long-term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policies, and staff interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance for daily living skills, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan and physician orders to address the required use of a left arm sling following a humerus fracture. The findings included: Resident #1's diagnoses included fracture of the left humerus, chronic kidney disease, and type two diabetes. Review of the hospital discharge documents dated 11/21/25 identified Resident #1 was fitted for a left arm sling due to a humerus fracture. Review of physician's orders from 11/21/25 through 12/2/25 failed to identify an order for a left arm sling. The five (5) day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13) and was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers in and out of the bed and chair. The Resident Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dry storage items were stored under sanitary conditions; and failed to ensure that the sanitizing solution was monitored for appropriate sanitizing levels; and failed to ensure food temperatures were monitored and logged for every meal; and failed to ensure that the nourishment refrigerator temperatures were checked and logged daily. The findings include:Observation on 1/11/26 at 8:24 AM during an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Director in the dry food storage area identified a large, prepackaged bag that contained corn flake type cereal. The bag was not labeled or dated and there was a large tear in the bag (approximately 3 inches) with cereal open to the air. Additionally, a box of powered liquid thickener was observed fully opened at the top and had been placed in a plastic bag. The bag was open and nonsealable. Observation of the red sanitizing buckets identified that 2 of 3 buckets tested at 150 PPM. The Dietary Director identified these levels were low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #7, 117 and 119) reviewed for hospitalization and/or discharge, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified in a timely manner when the residents were was transferred and admitted to the hospital and when a resident had left against medical advice (AMA). The findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in February 2021 with diagnoses that included epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, and acute embolism. Review of the census form identified Resident #7 was transferred to the hospital and admitted on [DATE]. A nurse's note dated 6/9/25 at 8:26 PM identified Resident #7 was readmitted to the facility at 7:00 PM alert, nonverbal, and calm. Review of a notification details form dated 10/2/25 identified the routine monthly resident transfers dated between 6/1/25 – 6/30/25 were sent to the Office of the State Long-term Ombudsman (4 months…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to reduce future injury after the resident sustained an injury of unknown origin. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses that included atherosclerosis of the native arteries, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and dementia.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired, independent with bed mobility and required one person assist with transfers, toileting and locomotion using a wheelchair/walker. The care plan dated 11/18/25 identified Resident #1 had impaired cognition, was independent with transfers and ambulation with a walker, received antiplatelet therapy (medication used for PVD management that may increase risk for bleeding) and was at risk for skin breakdown. Interventions included to cue, supervise as needed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policies, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #121) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure an RN assessment was completed timely following a change in the residents condition and failed to ensure antibiotics were administered timely after an x ray identified pneumonia. The findings include:Resident #121 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, and dysphagia.The physician's orders dated 12/15/25 directed for a cardiac, carbohydrate-controlled diet, dysphagia puree texture, honey consistency and directed for the administration of Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution (2.5mg/3ml) 0.083% (a bronchodilator which works to relax the muscles of the airway to make breathing easier) 3ml inhale orally, via nebulizer every 6 hours, for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policies, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to complete a nutritional assessment for a resident with a newly re-opened pressure injury in a timely manner, and for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #60 and 121) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure a specialty mattress was set in accordance with a physician's order, and for Resident #121, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive pressure ulcer assessment was completed on admission. The findings include: Resident #12 was admitted in 4/2025 with diagnoses that included Type II diabetes and atrial fibrillation. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 had severely impaired cognition, required one person assist for bed mobility, transfers, was dependent for toileting needs, had no unhealed pressure ulcers and was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer. The care plan dated 10/22/25 identified Resident #12…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interview for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #121) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for aspiration was supervised during a meal. The findings include: Resident #121, during admission to an acute care hospital on [DATE], had a Clinical Bedside Swallow Evaluation. The Clinical Bedside Swallow Evaluation identified Resident #121 had mild oral phase dysphagia complicated by prolonged oral transit time/bolus manipulation across trial consistencies. No overt signs and symptoms (s/s) or airway compromise was noted at this time and no retention in the oral cavity post-swallow. Recommendations included the following: diet: puree/IDDSI-4 and mildly thick liquids/IDDSI-2, liquid administration via: cup and straw, supervision: total assist with feeding, compensation/maneuvers: slow rate, small bites/sips and check for pocketing, environmental considerations: upright 90 degrees and upright…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to ensure pain assessments per the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with diagnoses that included headache, polyosteoarthritis, chronic pain, schizoaffective disorder, borderline personality disorder, and repeated falls. A physician's order dated 5/1/24 directed to administer Acetaminophen 325mg, 2 tablets by mouth, every 4 hours as needed for mild pain. A physician's order dated 5/13/25 directed to administer Topiramate (an anticonvulsant also used to prevent migraines) 100mg, 1 tablet by mouth, twice daily for migraines, The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 had intact cognition and reported pain that rarely interfered with therapy activities, occasionally effected sleep and day-to-day activities, and over the past 5 days his/her worst pain rating was 3 (on a scale of 0…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that a pharmacy recommendation was reviewed and addressed by the APRN/Physician. The findings include:Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and dementia.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel, occasionally incontinent of bladder, and required supervision by facility staff with toileting, bathing, and dressing.The care plan dated 3/10/25 identified Resident #37 had altered cardiovascular status due to hypertension. Interventions included administering cardiac medications as ordered.A physician's order dated 5/15/25 directed for Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication for hypertension) 37.5 mg once daily.A pharmacy recommendation form dated 5/23/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #119) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff documented when a resident left the facility against medical advice (AMA). The findings include: Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain, diabetes, pneumonia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility.The nurse's note dated 8/29/25 at 9:57 PM identified Resident #119 arrived at the facility and was alert and oriented. Prior to admission Resident #119 had weakness and pain to the lower back and radiating to the left leg. Resident #119 denied shortness of breath and difficulty breathing. No edema noted to bilateral lower extremities. Resident #119 was on Levofloxacin 500mg every 48 hours for 5 days.Review of the census form identified Resident #119 had left the facility against medical advice (AMA) on 8/31/25.A nurse's note by the DNS dated 8/31/25 at 4:06 PM identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT