No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care At Hillside LLC

810 South Broom Street, Wilmington, DE 19805 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (302) 652-1181 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (302) 652-1181 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1416 Lancaster Ave · (302) 202-3020 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1416 Lancaster Ave · (302) 652-1994 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
822 Maryland Ave · (302) 429-5919 · Call to confirm hours
Park
601 S Franklin St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.8%12.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%10.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.7%13.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.5%21.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%3.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%20.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.7%10.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%83.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.4%23.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%11.6%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.9%CMS range 41.9–65.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.2–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.1–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
45.1%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for three (second floor, third floor and fourth floor) of three shower rooms, the facility failed to ensure that adequate housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a clean, sanitary, and home-like environment. Additionally, the hallway carpet on all the units, and the floors of multiple residents' rooms were visibly soiled. Lastly, the facility also failed to ensure that resident care equipment was maintained in good repair and sanitary condition. Findings included: 1. 1/21/26 11:11 AM – During a tour of the second floor, the shower room was observed with cracked tiles, standing water on the floor, discolored walls and water dripping from the shower head. The handwashing sink was inaccessible due to multiple equipment including wheelchairs and mechanical lifts in the room. An area between the wall and the window was observed with a large amount black debris. During an interview, E13 (CNA) stated, A heater used to be there. But it was removed a while ago. The Surveyor asked E13 about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R103) out of three residents reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure that R103 was treated with dignity when staff did not wake the resident or obtain resident's permission before attempting to provide incontinence care. Findings include: Review of R103's clinical record revealed:8/19/25 - R103 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including orthostatic hypotension and heart failure.8/25/25 - R103's admission MDS documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating an intact cognition. 8/26/25 - A facility incident report documented, [R103] reported that four days ago [8/22/25] a male aide came into his room and assaulted him by pulling down his underwear. [R103] then said it wasn't his underwear but it was his pants. [R103] unclear [sic] with this allegation and stated that he has been foggy since admitted from [hospital], medications have taken over his mind. [sic] The CNA who cared for [R103] that day was [E16, CNA] .8/26/25 - A follow up facility incident report documented, .[R103] said he was woken up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R55, R98 and R105) reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to provide care that meets the professional standards of care. For R55 and R105, an LPN completed R55's and R105's admission assessments in violation of the State Board of Nursing Scope of Practice. For R98, there was no evidence of an RN providing discharge education. Additionally, for R105, there was no evidence that an RN completed post fall assessments and documentation. Delaware State Board of Nursing – RN, LPN and NA/UAP Duties 2024. admission Assessments * - RN. * = Once a care plan is established, the LPN may do assessments. Post Fall Assessment & Documentation ^ - RN .^ = RN must do initial fall assessment; LPN can do subsequent assessments. Discharge Process (RN must do initial teaching) . = LPN can reinforce discharge teaching/plan. RN must do all initial assessments. Review of R55's clinical record revealed: 11/22/25 – R55 was admitted to the facility. 11/22/25 – E15 (LPN) completed the Nursing Admission/ Readmission/Annual/Sig…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R99) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure the dependent resident received his scheduled bathing/showers. Findings include: Review of R99's clinical record revealed: 8/19/25 - R99 was admitted to the facility. 8/19/25 - R99 was care planned for ADL self-care performance deficit related to a stroke. An intervention was that R99 was totally dependent on staff to provide bath/shower. 8/21/25 - R99 was care planned that it was . important that he has the opportunity to engage in daily routines that are meaningful and relative to his preferences. An intervention for R99 was .very important for [R99's name] to choose how he [was] bathed. He prefers a shower or bed bath. Review of R99's Documentation Survey Reports from 8/19/25 through 9/4/25 revealed that he was scheduled to be showered or bathed every Wednesday and Saturday evening shift and as needed. Out of five scheduled shower/bathing opportunities documented, R99 received bathing two times and refused bathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility infection control procedures were followed related to Transmission Based Precautions (TBP)/Isolation for four Residents (R) R48, R93 and R199 of a total of 47 residents reviewed in the sample. This failure created the potential for residents to become ill related to facility outbreak of infection. The findings include: The facility's Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions Policy most recently revised 03/14/23 read, in pertinent part, It is our policy to take appropriate precautions to prevent transmission of pathogens' modes of transmission; and Facility staff will apply Transmission Based Precautions, in addition to standard precautions, to residents who are known or suspected to be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents requiring additional controls to prevent transmission. 1. Review of R48's admission Record, dated 02/06/25 and found in the EMR under the Admissions tab,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for a resident that was not assessed to self-administer medications for two resident (Resident (R) 24 and R298) out of 47 residents in the sample. This had the potential to affect all residents who received medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, undated, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medication may be self-administered safely .Bedside medication storage is permitted only when it does not present a risk to confused residents who wander into the other resident's rooms or to confused roommates of the resident who self-administers medication .All nurses and aides are required to report to the charge nurse on duty any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for one(Residents (R)85) out of a sample of 47 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs and preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their call lights to best assist the residents in maintaining and/or achieving their independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible. Findings include: 1. Review of R85's admission Record, found in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, polyneuropathy, epilepsy, and acquired absence of left leg below the knee. Review of R85's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment with no recorded score due to the resident refused to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate misappropriation of property for two of four residents (Resident (R)84 and R108), This failure has the potential to affect all residents who choose to keep money and/or personal property in their rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, dated 09/12/24 indicated Investigation. the facility will investigate all allegations and types of incidents as listed above in accordance with facility procedure for reporting/response as described below.the facility will perform an investigation that focuses on whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent, clinical evaluation for any signs of injury, causative factors, and interventions to prevent further injury. 1. Review of R84's admission Record located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Review of R108's admission Record located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans related to nebulizer treatment for one resident (Resident (R) 12) out of a total sample of 47 residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings include: Review of the facility-provided policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 10/2019, revealed A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and residents condition change . Review of the Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of heart failure, diabetes, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two residents of five residents (Resident (R) 31 and R200) who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene (showers per personal preference) out of a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: Review of a facility policy Resident Showers dated 03/14/23 indicated .It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice. 1. Review of R31's admission Record located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] a stroke which affected the right side. Review of R31's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab dated 06/13/24 indicated that the resident identified it was important for her to take showers. Review of R31's annual Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R)85 reviewed for prevention of skin breakdown, received treatment and interventions according to physician orders out of a total sample of 47 residents. This failure placed the resident at an increased risk for a worsening pressure ulcer, pain, and a decrease in quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, revised 05/26/23, revealed, This facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, unless clinically unavoidable, and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries .The facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management, including prompt assessment and treatment; intervening to stabilize, reduce or remove underlying risk factors;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a urinary catheter bag was properly positioned in a manner to prevent potential urinary tract infections due to contamination for one of two residents (R)85 reviewed for urinary catheters and urinary tract infections out of a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Catheter Care, revised 08/11/24, revealed It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use .Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel .Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use .Ensure drainage bag is located below the level of the bladder to discourage backflow of urine .Assist resident to a comfortable, appropriate position .Document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident (R) 12) out of 47 sampled residents was provided with the necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards. This failure had the potential to impact the residents treatment and interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility-provided policy titled Nebulizer Therapy, dated 03/13/23, revealed, It is the policy of this facility for nebulizer treatments, once ordered, to be administered by nursing staff as directed using proper technique and standard precautions .Correctly assemble the tubing, nebulizer cup, and mouthpiece and ensure connections are secured tightly .Observe the resident during the procedure for any change in condition .When medication delivery is complete, turn the machine off .Disassemble and rinse the nebulizer with sterile or distilled water and allow to air dry .Air dry on an absorbent towel .Once completely dry, store the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to installation of side rails for two residents reviewed for side rails (Resident (R) 83 and R298) of 31 sampled residents. The lack of alternate side rail measures could lead to potential safety concerns related to bed rail use for residents with bed rails. Findings include: 1. Review of R83's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, and complete traumatic amputation of right shoulder and upper arm. Review of R83's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/05/24 and located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was not impaired. Review of R83's Care Plan, dated 10/09/23 and located in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical necessity of psychotropic medication administration for one Resident (R)48 of five residents reviewed for Psychotropic Medication Administration and a total of 47 residents reviewed in the sample. Informed consent was not obtained from the resident and/or resident's representative related to administration of psychotropic medication. This failure created the potential for the resident to receive unwanted medications. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medications, revised in 07/11/24 read, in pertinent part, Residents and/or representatives shall be educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use, as well as alternative treatments/non-pharmacological interventions. Review of R48's admission Record, dated 02/06/25 and found in the EMR under the Admissions tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included End Stage Renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)201 of seven residents reviewed during medication pass observations was free from a significant medication error. The resident's insulin (a medication used to control blood sugar) was not properly administered, creating the potential for the resident to receive an inaccurate dose. A total of 47 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Insulin Pen Procedure, dated 03/13/23 read, in pertinent part, j. Injecting the insulin: v. While still pressing the plunger, keep the needle in the skin for up to 6 to 10 seconds and then remove the needle from the skin. Review of R201's admission Record, dated 02/05/25 and found in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes. Review of R201's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident medication stored in facility medication carts was appropriately labeled to indicate the open date of the medication for three Residents (R)47, R110, and R298 out of a total resident sample of 47. This failure created the potential for residents to experience negative effects related to the administration of expired and/or out-of-date medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's procedure titled Insulin Pen Procedure, dated [DATE] read, in pertinent part, Insulin pens must be clearly labeled with the resident name, physician name, date dispensed, type of insulin, amount to be given, frequency, and expiration date; and Insulin pens should be disposed of after 28 days or according to manufacturer's recommendation. The medication cart on the facility's third floor was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)8 on [DATE] at 9:20 AM. Open insulin glargine pens were found in the cart for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident (R) 9) of five residents, reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were provided risks verses benefits prior to the administration of the pneumococcal vaccine. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated 08/02/24, indicated .It is our policy to offer residents and staff immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations.Prior to offering the pneumococcal immunization, each resident or the resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization with the education documented in the clinical record. Review of R9's admission Record, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was over the age of [AGE] years old. Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the room for one resident (Resident (R) 54) of 47 sampled residents was equipped with a functioning call light. This failure had the potential to result in a delayed response to the needs of the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility-provided policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, dated [DATE], revealed The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance .Staff will report problems with a call light or the call system immediately to the supervisor and/or maintenance director and will provide immediate or alternative solutions until the problem can be remedied . Review of the Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident food stored in the refrigerators in the nourishment rooms on 3 of 3 units was stored in a sanitary manner. This involved 3 of 3 units and had the potential to affect 96 of 98 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.On 01/24/24 at 9:28 AM the refrigerator/freezer in the nourishment rooms on the 100 unit was inspected with the assistance of Corporate Dietary Manager 27 (CDM27). The refrigerator contained the following: Oikes yogurt with a use by date of 05/03/24. The container was not labeled with a name. An unlabeled and undated Styrofoam cup half full of a tan colored food substance. An open and half used 16-ounce bottle of Gatorade with no name or open date on it. A [NAME] donut bag with a breakfast sandwich in it with no name or date. A whole pizza in a pizza box with no name or date on it. A 4-ounce Sysco Imperial nutrition supplement with no date on it to indicate when it was thawed out. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure donning and doffing procedures, hand hygiene, and isolation precautions were followed according to facility processes to prevent the potential spread of infection to facility residents and staff. This had the potential to affect 98 of 98 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: 1. An observation on 01/29/24 at 10:41 AM revealed R7's COVID-19 positive isolation room with an isolation cart and a doffing bin outside the room. The doffing bin label read, Yellow isolation gowns . Please take to laundry at the end of each shift. The sign on the door read, Stop, Contact and Droplet Precaution. You must perform hand hygiene before entering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three residents (Residents (R) 45, 55, and 34) out of a sample of 40 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs and preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their call lights to best assist the resident in maintaining and/or achieving their independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible. Findings include: 1. Review of R45's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, and epilepsy. Review of R45's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/07/23, located under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive plan of care with measurable goals and plans for one of 40 sampled residents (Resident (R) R87) reviewed for care plans. Specifically, R87 did not have a Care Plan to address Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Findings include: Review of R87's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 01/05/24 with admitting diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), diabetes, and other disorders of gait and mobility. Review of R87's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/11/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R87 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R87 was cognitively intact. Review of R87's Care Plan, located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab, revealed there was not a care plan for PTSD. On 01/29/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one resident after an unwitnessed fall and failed to put additional interventions in place to prevent future falls for one of three (Resident 10 (R10)) sampled residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of R10's Diagnosis tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and glaucoma. Review of R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/19/23, revealed R10 was identified as moderately cognitively impaired, having functional limitations on one side of her upper and lower extremities, frequently incontinent of urine, and always incontinent of bowel. Review of R10's Plan of Care (POC), located under the POC tab of the EMR and with a revision date of 05/24/23, revealed the resident was dependent for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of oxygen for one of four residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of R2's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/27/23, located under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R2 was cognitively intact. R2 was documented to be on oxygen while a resident. Review of R2's EMR under the Orders tab revealed a 06/27/23 physician order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review of one (R1) out three residents sampled for care plans, the facility failed to implement a care plan for R1's use of oxygen. Findings include: 10/12/23 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen reaching body tissues). R1's physician's orders included oxygen at 2-3 liters continuously every shift via nasal cannula (medical device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels). 11/17/23 10:30 AM - A review of R1's care plans failed to show evidence of a care plan for the use of oxygen. The facility failed to implement a care plan for R1's continuous use of oxygen. Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) E5 (Staff Educator) and E4 (Regional Clinical Consultant) on 11/17/23 at 5:00 PM.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for care, the facility failed to ensure that R1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders. On the evening of 11/14/23 R1 had a change in condition and became unresponsive in the facility and was transported to an acute care hospital without a nursing assesment including vital signs. Findings include: A review of R1's clinical record revealed: 10/12/23 - R1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anemia, high blood pressure, diabetes and congestive heart failure, and R1 took daily medications to address those diagnoses. 10/12/23 - A physician's order was written for low blood sugar protocol: if the resident became symptomatic and was difficult to arouse or unconscious . remain with patient., monitor vital signs, perform blood glucose, if blood glucose is above 70, notify practitioner of symptoms. If blood glucose equal to or below 70 immediately administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for Staffing, the facility failed to provide competent nursing care that included assessments and interventions for a resident who experienced a change in respiratory condition. Findings include: A review of R1's clinical record revealed: 10/12/23 - R1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anemia and congestive heart failure. R1 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 10/12/23 which included the treatment of respiratory wheezing, and R1 was started on oxygen at that time. 10/12/23 - A Physician's order was written for Do Not Resuscitate. 10/16/23 - A Physician's order was written for Oxygen at 2-3 L/min via nasal cannula continuously. 11/9/23 - A Physician's order was written for 02 sats to keep oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 92%. Every Shift. 11/14/23 1:30 PM - A progress note was written by E8 that revealed that R1's blood pressure, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. Findings include: The following were observed during the kitchen tour on 1/10/22 from 9:35 AM to 10:15 AM: - The paper towel dispenser at the cooking area hand sink had clean paper towels dispensing into the hand washing splash zone. The splash zone is an area around a sink in which contamination could occur. CMS identifies it as 3 feet apart; - The fume hood was greasy; - The hand sink by the dishwashing area was inaccessible. Findings were reviewed and confirmed by E5 (FSD) on 1/10/22 at approximately 10:15 AM. Findings were reviewed on 1/19/22 during the Exit Conference, beginning at 3:20 PM, with E1 (NHA), E6 (NPE/Staff Developer), E10 (Regional Clinical Consultant), and E11 (Complete Care Representative).

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R28) out of 19 resident in the investigative sample, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for identified resident care areas. Findings include: 1a. Review of R28's clinical records revealed the following: 8/12/18 - R28 was admitted to the facility with an indwelling suprapubic (SP) catheter for a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. 8/13/18 - The care plan for the SP catheter included a goal that R28 would have no signs or symptoms (s/s) of urinary tract infection. Interventions included to monitor for s/s of infection and report to Physician, catheter care twice a day and prn (as needed), keep catheter off of the floor, and provide privacy and comfort. 3/10/19 through 10/27/20 - The following physician's orders were written and initiated related to the care and maintenance of the SP catheter: - 9/19/19 Cleanse SP site daily with soap and water and to Z-Guard with foam drain sponge every night shift. - 10/27/20 Change supra pubic (sic) catheter with 22 FR (french- the catheter size) and 10 ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that for one (R60) out of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations received medication as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of R60's clinical records revealed the following: 10/8/21 - Review of hospital records and nurse progress notes revealed that R60 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) after being sent to the emergency room for an evaluation. R60 returned to the facility with a prescription for the antibiotic medication Keflex. 10/13/21 1:43 PM - Review of nurse progress notes revealed that E9 (RN) received an order from the hospital for R60 to begin a different antibiotic, Bactrim, to be given twice a day for seven days due to the Keflex being an ineffective option for treatment of the UTI. 10/13/21 2:50 PM - E9 (RN) transcribed R60's order for Bactrim. 10/13/21 2:55 PM - E9 (RN) discontinued the Keflex order for R60. 10/13/21 9:00 PM - Review of the facility's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed that R60 did not receive the first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of the clinical record and the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined that for one (R80) out of two residents sampled for Coumadin medication review, the facility failed to ensure that R80's 1/3/22 lab result was received and reviewed by the physician. Findings include: 5/21 (revised) - The facility's Coumadin Anticoagulant Therapy policy and procedure stated, . Policy: All residents requiring Coumadin administration will have a . INR drawn as ordered by the physician to determine effectiveness of therapy and subsequent dosages. Licensed nurses will monitor the required lab work completion . Procedure: 1. Obtain physician's order for . INR drawing . 2. Post . INR results on flow sheet or EHR (electronic health record), indicating date . 4. Prior to administering the dose of Coumadin nurse will be required to check and document date and results of last INR for current dose of Coumadin . Review of R80's clinical record revealed: 1/3/22 - A physician order documented, . INR one time only until 1/3/2022 . 1/3/22 - The January 2022 electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician's order for one resident (R79) was followed during a random dining observation. Findings include: Review of R79's clinical record revealed the following: 11/23/21- R79 was originally admitted to the facility. 11/26/21 - The admission MDS Assessment documented that R79 was independent in daily decision making. 12/17/21 - A physician's order was written for regular, low lactose and low fiber diet and to avoid diary such as milk and ice cream. 1/10/22 12:45 PM - During a random dining observation, R79's lunch tray and comparison of the meal ticket (a form used by the facility in which residents check their meal selection) did not match. R79's meal ticket stated .NO DIARY/lactose intolerance, LOW FIBER .NO ENTREE, GIVE instead meat sandwich (no cheese) .Give bag of chips. The tray did not contain the sandwich with chips and incorrectly contained an entree of fettuccini alfredo (contains butter, heavy cream and parmesan cheese which are all diary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-06 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a qualified activity professional was hired. This has the potential to affect the 96 residents' quality of life who currently reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of an undated facility document titled Activities Director Job Description indicated . The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who .Is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the state in which practicing.Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October l, 1990; or o Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years, one of which was full-time in a therapeutic activities program; or o Is a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or o Has completed a training course approved by the State. Review of a facility document titled Employee Action Form, dated 11/24/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-01-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Ombudsman was notified of a hospital transfer or facility discharge for two (R60 and R92) out of two residents sampled for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of R92's clinical record revealed a lack of evidence that the facility notified the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when R92 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 1/13/22 at 12:34 PM, E1 (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman that R92 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) on 1/19/22 during the Exit Conference, beginning at 3:20 PM. 2. Review of R60's medical records revealed the following: 1/14/22 11:00 AM - A review of R60's nurse progress notes revealed that R60 was transferred to the hospital on the following dates: 8/13/21, 9/16/21, 9/25/21, 10/8/21 and 11/8/21. 1/14/22 11:54 AM - During an interview with E1 (NHA), it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC DE OPCOS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2021
PC WTA OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2021
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2021
WELLTOWER INCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
BAICH-PIETLOCK, DEBRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
COX, VICKIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
GRAZIANO, RUTHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
MANSFIELD, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
MCGHEE, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
SILVERBERG, NISANELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO II CO-BORROWER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO II MEZZ BORROWER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO II, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN II REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN PARTNERS II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
HILLSIDE CENTER REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
J & R FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
L FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
L FRIEDMAN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
LANDAU FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
M FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
PC WTA ACQUISITION LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
PC WTA MULTI-STATE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
R&J FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 9%Other / private 14%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$383per resident / day
operating cost
$11,651per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Delaware
$14,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,132/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085013. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next