No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverview Village

586 Eastern Blvd, Clarksville, IN 47129 · Government - County · 130 certified beds · (812) 282-6663 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 282-6663 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
905 Eastern Blvd · (812) 284-2273 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.9 mi
220 E Lewis And Clark Pkwy · (812) 944-4466 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
554 Eastern Blvd · (812) 282-4353 · Call to confirm hours
Park
500 Little League Blvd · (812) 283-5313 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
555 Eastern Blvd · (812) 225-1683

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.4%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms30.0%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.3%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.6%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.5%23.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.5%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.0%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.901.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.551.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.8%CMS range 32.8–55.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 8.7–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.4–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
36.2%
Total nursing turnover
10.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 100.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-25)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2025-03-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident (Resident C), upon return from the hospital, from a resident (Resident D) with escalating behaviors, which resulted in Resident C's head injury/concussion without loss of consciousness for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/3/25 at 11:15 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety, depression, and vascular dementia with agitation. The Behavior Note, dated 10/7/24 at 9:08 p.m., indicated the resident repeatedly attempted to enter the nurse's station. The resident kicked the doors, tried to hit the nurse and asked staff to fight. The interventions were not effective, and the resident would be referred to the psychiatrist. The Behavior Note, dated 10/17/24 at 6:15 a.m., indicated the resident was in the middle of the hall screaming. The staff attempted to help, and the resident threatened to hit staff members. The Progress Note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' (Resident C and Resident F) medication administration accurately reflected the administration of narcotic pain medication for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medical records. Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 11/20/25 at 11:40 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, restless leg syndrome, depression and osteoarthritis. The physician's order, dated 5/19/25, indicated the resident was to receive Tramadol (narcotic pain medication) 50 mg (milligrams) every 6 hours for pain at 8:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Review of the October 2025 and November 2025 controlled substance record indicated the resident received the medication on the following dates and times: 10/03/25 at 8:00 p.m., 10/30/25 at 2:00 a.m., 11/01/25 at 2:00 a.m., 11/05/25 at 8:00 p.m., 11/07/25 at 8:00 p.m., and 11/11/25 at 8:00 a.m. The October 2025 and November 2025 medication administration record lacked documentation that the pain medication was administered. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for 2 of 66 resident rooms reviewed for the environment. (Residents 11 and 17). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/19/25 at 1:00 p.m., the following was observed: - Resident 17 was sitting on the side of his bed. He was observed to be disheveled and had a strong foul odor. - The bedside nightstand had approximately 15 Styrofoam cups stacked up. - There were 3 garlic bread sticks laying in the bed. The review of the meal menu indicated the last time the facility had served breadsticks was on 6/16/25. - There were 3 bowls of food like substances in each bowl. - The resident's linens and clothes were observed with stains, food debris, and had a foul odor. - There were 3 Styrofoam containers underneath the resident's bed with food stored in them. The resident became upset when the staff tried to open the containers. - The floor had unknown substances that had dried and stained the floor. - The bedside table had a Styrofoam container that contained breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident F) record accurately reflected the discontinuation of a wanderguard for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for documentation. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 3/4/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, severe dementia with agitation and bipolar. The physician order, dated 12/27/24, indicated the resident had a security bracelet (wanderguard) to the left ankle and to check the placement and function every day shift and night shift. On 3/4/25 at 10:18 a.m., the resident was observed slightly reclined in a broda chair in the dining room. The resident did not have a wanderguard in place. The elopement risk assessment, dated 2/13/25 at 1:45 p.m., indicated the resident resided had a significant change, resided on a secure unit and was not assigned a security bracelet. The progress note, dated 2/14/25 at 10:45 a.m., indicated the interdisciplinary team determined the resident no longer required the use of a wanderguard due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error related to insulin administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/27/24 at 10:08 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, diabetes with hyperglycemia. The care plan, dated 7/24/24, indicated the resident was at risk for hyperglycemia and to administer medication as ordered. The physician's order, dated 7/23/24, indicated the resident was to receive insulin degludec (ultralong-acting insulin) 50 units, subcutaneously every morning at 6:30 a.m. The physician was to be notified of a blood sugar less than 60 or greater than 400. The July 2024 medication administration record indicated on 7/24/24 at 6:30 a.m., Resident B's blood sugar was 390. The July 2024 medication administration lacked documentation that the insulin was administered as ordered by the physician. A notation was documented by RN (Registered Nurse) 4 that the drug item was not available,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff followed procedure during 2 of 3 observations of the administration of insulin related to Quality of Care. (Residents 6 and 18) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/12/24 at 10:45 a.m., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 3 prepared the lispro flexpen for administration to Resident 6 by applying the needle. The LPN failed to prime the needle prior to dialing the prescribed dosage of lispro. The LPN dialed the flexpen to 10 units and entered the resident's room and administered the insulin into the resident's abdomen. The LPN indicated the resident's blood sugar was 155 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). The record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 6/13/24 at 8:40 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. The physician's order, dated 5/17/23, indicated the staff were to administer 10 units of the lispro flexpen to the resident subcutaneously, three times a day. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 4/9/24, indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator filters were placed and maintained for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 41,14, and 31) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/10/24 at 9:37 a.m., Resident 41's oxygen concentrator filter was 100% lightly covered with a white powdery substance and multiple small chunks of a white substance. During an observation on 6/11/24 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 41's oxygen concentrator filter was 100% lightly covered with a white powdery substance and multiple small chunks of a white substance. The record for Resident 41 was reviewed on 6/12/24 at 11:16 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and hospice care. The care plan, dated 1/14/21, indicated the resident was at risk for impaired gas exchange related to COPD with shortness of breath while lying flat and at times with physical exertion. The interventions, dated 1/14/21, indicated staff were to administer oxygen as ordered, assess vital signs, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate notification to the physician for elevated blood sugar values, administration of insulin and performance of blood glucose monitoring for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Residents 4 and 70) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 4/14/23 at 9:31 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus. The care plan, dated 1/29/16 and last revised on 3/26/23, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse effects of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia related to the use of glucose lowering medication and the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The interventions, dated 1/29/16, indicated to document abnormal findings and notify the MD (medical doctor), and monitor blood sugars as ordered. The physician's order, dated 2/26/21, indicated to conduct an accu (accurate) check (blood glucose monitoring test) as needed for signs or symptoms of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. Notify the MD if the blood sugar was less than 70 mg/dL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate skin assessments for residents with pressure injuries were conducted for 2 of 3 resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 74 and 37) 1. The clinical record for Resident 74 was reviewed on 4/12/23 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute osteomyelitis right ankle, foot, and heel, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, folate deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia, and vitamin D deficiency. The admission Observation, dated 11/6/22 at 5:21 p.m., indicated the resident had no alterations in skin. The nurse's note, dated 11/6/22 at 6:00 p.m., indicated the resident admitted to the facility at 1:50 p.m. The only skin impairments documented were a surgical incision to the right hip, multiple healed scratches, bruises to all four extremities, and redness to the right heel. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, dated 11/6/22, indicated the resident had no sensory impairment, was rarely moist,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure employees provided meal service in a safe and sanitary manner for handling of food while serving meals in the Cottage Unit Dining Room for 1 of 4 staff observed. (CNA 4) Findings include: During the lunch meal service in the Cottage Unit Dining Room on 4/10/23 at 11:20 a.m., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 4 was delivering a meal to Resident 36. She picked up the top bun for the fish sandwich with her bare hands and added tartar sauce. She placed the bun on top of the fish with her bare hand, mashing down on the bun with her palm. During the lunch meal service in the Cottage Unit Dining Room on 4/10/23 at 11:30 a.m., CNA 4 delivered a meal to Resident 53. She picked up the top bun of the fish sandwich with her bare hand, laying it in the plate. She applied the tartar sauce to the fish and placed the bun on top of the fish, using her bare hand. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 1:26 p.m., CNA 4 indicated she would perform hand washing prior to the provision of meal trays. She would also apply hand sanitizer between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Valparaiso Care & RehabilitationValparaiso, IN 2 of 5Arbor Grove VillageGreensburg, IN 2 of 5Bethany VillageIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Columbia Healthcare CenterEvansville, IN 2 of 5Community Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Eagle Valley MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harcourt Terrace Nursing And RehabilitationIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harrison TerraceIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Hickory Creek At New CastleNew Castle, IN 2 of 5Maple Park VillageWestfield, IN 2 of 5Park Terrace VillageEvansville, IN 2 of 5Riverside VillageElkhart, IN 2 of 5Trailpoint VillageSouth Bend, IN 2 of 5University Nursing CenterUpland, IN 2 of 5Williamsport Nursing And RehabilitationWilliamsport, IN 3 of 5Allisonville MeadowsFishers, IN 3 of 5American VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brownsburg MeadowsBrownsburg, IN 3 of 5Countryside MeadowsAvon, IN 3 of 5East Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterElkhart, IN 3 of 5Hickory Creek At CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsville, IN 3 of 5Hillcrest VillageJeffersonville, IN 3 of 5North Capitol Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosebud VillageRichmond, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk Village At LafayetteLafayette, IN 3 of 5Spring Mill MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Stonebrooke Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation CentreWabash, IN 4 of 5Beech Grove MeadowsBeech Grove, IN 4 of 5Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CenterClarksville, IN 4 of 5Clinton GardensClinton, IN 4 of 5Creekside VillageMishawaka, IN 4 of 5Edgewater WoodsAnderson, IN 4 of 5Forest Creek VillageIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Franklin MeadowsFranklin, IN 4 of 5Heritage House Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterConnersville, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At ColumbusColumbus, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At MadisonMadison, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At PeruPeru, IN

Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHI ASSET (IN) CLARKSVILLE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2012
CHIES, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/17/2016
JACKSON, BLAKEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JACKSON, ETHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JACKSON, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JACKSON, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/14/2024
JACKSON, WESSLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JUSTICE, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
KELSEY, DONNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/18/2024
STITLE, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/16/2016
WRIGHT, THERESSAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/21/2021
DOUCET, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/03/2025
DRUMMER, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
FISCH, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
HANIFY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
HORN, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/20/2023
LAZARD, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/29/2021
O'BRIEN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/03/2025
BABCOCK, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/30/2020
CAINE, VIRGINIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/1994
GODDARD, NICHOLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/11/2022
HARRIS, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/22/2003
SIMPSON, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/06/2023
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2003
THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2003
BURNS, MARKIETTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2026
CARR, TAQUISHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/30/2025
DICE, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
KANTZ, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2026
SHANE, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
VAN CAMP, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 4%Other / private 20%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,199per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$305per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155165. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next