Danville Regional Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 223 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 105.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 94) had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: On 06/19/25 at 11:44 a.m., Resident 94's medical record was reviewed. He was a long-term care resident with diagnoses which included, but was not limited to, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), a below the knee amputation of his left leg, surgical wound failure with necrosis, and dementia with unspecified severity. At the time of his admission, on 1/14/25, there was no Power of Attorney (POA) and/or guardianship documentation. Resident 94's face-sheet contact information was reviewed and revealed he was his own responsible party and received his Accounts/Receivable (AR) statements. Resident 94's family member was listed as an emergency contact. A social service progress note, dated 4/7/25 at 2:14 p.m., indicated a notary was scheduled to come to the facility to assist Resident 94 to establish a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a suprapubic catheter (a hollow tube inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine, typically used when a urethral catheter is not feasible or desirable) and an coded an anticoagulant medication when the resident did not received an anticoagulant medication for 2 of 7 resident reviewed (Residents 39 and 13). Findings include: 1. On 6/19/25 at 9:54 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 39. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, hypertension, anxiety, and high cholesterol. Her MDS was not coded as her having a suprapubic catheter. She had an order, dated 5/5/25, for suprapubic catheter, size 18 French (FR), 30 milliliter (ML) bulb. She had an order, dated 5/5/25, to change suprapubic catheter and urinary collection bag as needed for dislodgement, leakage, or occlusion. She had a care plan, dated 5/7/25, that she required assistance with toileting due to assistance with transfers, hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents with ongoing safety monitoring and assessments for a resident (Resident 62) who required the use of a seat belt in his wheelchair for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the use of a seat belt. Findings include: On 6/19/25 at 11:41 a.m., Resident 62 was observed seated in his wheelchair (wc). A seat belt was observed across his lap but hung slack to the middle of his thighs. The left side of the belt was frayed nearly in half, as it appeared to rub against a sharp edge of the wc frame. On 6/20/25 Resident 62 was observed multiple times seated in his wc outside of the Activity Director's office door as he visited with staff and other residents. A seat belt was observed across his lap but hung slack and reached almost to the top of his knees. The left side of the belt was observed to rub against a sharp edge of his chair and remained frayed, nearly in half. On 6/23/25 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 62 was observed with the Social Service Director, (SSD). Resident 62 was asked to unbuckle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store topical creams from medications, keep the medication cart clean, failed to remove expired insulin from use, and failed to date insulin and eye drops for 2 of 4 medications carts observed. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 12:04 p.m., the Cottage medication cart was observed. In the cart it was noted that wound gel was being stored next to eye drops and throat lozenges. Resident 197 had an insulin pen, Humalog, in the cart with no date to indicate when it was opened. There were approximately 50 various pills loose in the second drawer of the medication cart. 2. On [DATE] at 12:22 p.m., the Meadows medication cart was observed. In the cart nitroglycerin tablets was being stored with eye drops. Resident 12 had an insulin pen, Lispro in the cart. It was dated for [DATE]. The observations were confirmed by LPN 6 and LPN 8. A policy titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals was provided by the Executive Director (ED) on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag and catheter tubing did not touch the floor resulting in a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 2 residents observed for catheter acquired urinary tract infection (cauti) (Resident 81), and failed to ensure residents had diagnoses to support the insertion of urinary Foley catheters for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 81 and 155). Findings include: 1. On 4/30/24 at 12:15 p.m., Resident 81's urinary Foley bag and catheter tubing were observed on the floor. On 5/1/24 at 12:15 p.m., Resident 81's records were reviewed. A care plan, dated 4/17/24, indicated Resident 81 required an indwelling urinary catheter related to urinary retention. The goal indicated she would have catheter care managed appropriately as evidenced by not exhibiting signs of urinary tract infection. A nursing approach was to not allow tubing or any part of the drainage system to touch the floor. An Infection Control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 treatment carts remained locked and medication remained inaccessible to residents and visitors (Residents 345, 11, 79, and 63). Findings include: One 4/30/24 at 9:48 a.m., the Rosewood treatment cart was observed unlocked. Several staff were observed to pass the treatment cart. Prescription medication found inside the treatment cart included: a. Resident 345 had SSD cream 1%. b. Resident 11 had thera-gel 0.5% shampoo. c. Resident 79 had diclofenac sodium 1% gel, one container in drawer one and one container in drawer two. d. Resident 63 had diclofenac sodium 1% gel. During an interview, on 4/30/24 at 10:03 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 indicated the treatment cart should not be unlocked. She was observed locking it. During an interview, on 5/1/24 at 10:21 a.m., the Moving Forward Unit Manager (MFUM) 5 indicated all treatment carts should have been locked because it was a violation of resident's privacy because a resident or visitor could have been curious and looked at or taken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-28 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Residents 34, 40, 69 and 102). Findings include: 1. A comprehensive record review was completed on 2/23/23 at 12:35 p.m. for Resident 34. He admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included but were not limited to, after care of joint replacement surgery, unspecified atrial fibrillation, encephalopathy, acute pyelonephritis, urinary retention, GERD (gastro-esophageal reflux disease), undifferentiated schizophrenia, and restlessness with agitation. Resident 34 had a notice of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) level II outcome in his medical record. The notification was dated 12/2/22 and indicated he had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Resident 34's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], indicated that he did not require a level II assessment. 2. A comprehensive record review was completed on 2/22/23 at 10:40 a.m. for Resident 40.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents by maintaining safe hot water temperatures in the secured memory care unit. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 26 of 26 residents who resided on the memory care unit (Residents 24, 53, 54, 88, and 59). Findings include: On 2/22/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 24 was observed. She was seated in a recliner chair in the memory care TV lounge area. Her eyes were closed, her head was bowed, and she appeared to be asleep. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 9:50 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 20 indicated Resident 24 was not a resident on the secured memory care unit, but that since her admission, a couple days prior, she had trial days on the unit due to her confusion and behaviors. Particularly, the night before, she had been found in her bathroom. She had left the bathroom sink running until it overflowed and wandered around the unit. Staff brought her to memory care early that morning and she seemed to have settled down. When asked if there were other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter bags were kept off the floor for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 18 and 41). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 2/22/23 at 10:02 a.m., Resident 18 was lying in her bed. She indicated she had a supra-pubic catheter to drain her bladder. The catheter collection bag was lying on the floor. On 2/22/23 at 3:15 p.m., a comprehensive record review was completed for Resident 18. She had the following diagnoses, but not limited to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), sacral spina bifida with hydrocephalus (occurs when the bones in the spine do not properly form and hydrocephalus is extra fluid in and around the brain), paraplegia, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anxiety, constipation, and tobacco use. Resident 18's care plan dated 10/29/20, indicated she required a supra-pubic urinary catheter related to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and she is at risk for infection. The goal dated, 3/5/23, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed by staff in the main dining room while assisting residents with eating for 5 of 5 randomly observed residents during a dining services observation, (Residents 9, 159, 163, 305, and one unidentified resident). Findings include: On 2/21/23 at 12:25 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Unit Manager (UM) 4 were observed in the Moving Forward dining room. LPN 4 moved Resident 159's walker with her bare hands and did not wash or gel her hands before she moved Resident 163's walker. Resident 163 was prepared to leave the dining room. LPN 4 walked with Resident 163 to her room. On 2/21/23 at 12:31 p.m., UM 4 indicated, LPN 4 should have performed hand hygiene before she touched Resident 163's walker. On 2/21/23 at 12:36 p.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 5 was observed as she touched Resident 305's arm. She did not perform hand hygiene before she returned to assist an unidentified resident with her meal. On 2/21/23 at 12:37 p.m., CNA 6 was observed as she touched…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN