North Park Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 85.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident without diabetes was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors. (Resident L) This deficient practice resulted in Resident L receiving an overdose of rapid-acting and long-acting insulins and a significant change in condition that required emergent, intensive care at an acute care hospital for treatment of low blood sugar. Finding includes: On 8/22/24 at 2:40 P.M., Resident L's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. The resident did not have a diagnosis of diabetes. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/1/24, indicated Resident L was not assessed for cognitive ability because the resident was rarely or never understood, was dependent on staff for eating, did not have insulin orders, and did not receive any insulin injections during the 7-day look back period. The physician orders, dated 5/1/24 to 8/22/24, did not include documentation to indicate Resident L had a diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received supervision and consistent implementation of interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Resident 31 had a fall that resulted in a fracture to right femur. (Resident 31) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/21/23 at 11:14 A.M., Resident 31's spouse indicated Resident 31 had fallen several times and recently had a fall that resulted in sutures and staples. He was concerned that the falls resulted from a lack of staffing on the unit. He indicated he had been to management several times with the concern, and was told that Resident 31's falls could have been prevented if there was more staff. He indicated during the most recent fall, the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) had left all the residents on the hall to get report from another CNA in another hall. At that time, Resident 31 was in her room and had gotten up by herself to walk toward the door. Her alarm was sounding, but because…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Following a significant decline, a dependent resident was encouraged to participate in dressing which resulted in a fall, and a resident's care plan intervention was not in place to prevent an additional fall. (Resident C, Resident D)Findings include: 1. A record review on 12/22/25 at 1:40 P.M. indicated Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia with agitation, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet.Resident C's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/20/25, indicated the resident required set-up assistance with the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) of upper and lower body dressing. Resident C's most recent Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment, was dependent (helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's plan of care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. A resident's care plan intervention to reduce a risk for falls was not in place for a resident with a recent fall. (Resident D)Finding includes:During an observation and interview on 8/6/25 at 8:45 A.M., Resident D was sitting up in her bed with a breakfast tray in front of her. The resident indicated she was not sure how long she had been in the facility and that she was not sure how much assistance she needed to get out of bed. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 9:30 A.M., LPN 2 indicated that Resident D had a recent fall and had occasional falls due to attempting to transfer herself in her room. Record review on 8/6/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident D's diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, depression, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unsteadiness on feet. Resident D's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene and sanitation during care for 3 of 4 resident care observations. Staff failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes and failed to perform hand hygiene immediately following care and prior to touching resident belongings and room door handles. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident F) Findings include: 1. On 8/6/25 at 2:02 P.M., LPN 2 was observed providing wound care to Resident B's lower extremities. Resident B was observed sitting in bed. LPN 2 gave a clear plastic trash bag to Resident B to hold. LPN was observed during the treatment of the wounds to dispose of the old, soiled dressings and supplies into the bag that Resident B was holding on his lap. On 8/6/25 at 2:34 P.M., the Infection Preventionist Nurse indicated that she would have put a trash can at the end of the bed to drop the soiled dressing in. On 8/7/25 at 2:48 p.m., the Infection Preventionist Nurse provided the current skills competency nursing policy and procedure for dressing change clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The plan of care was not followed while transferring a resident to obtain a weight chair when a fall occurred. ( Resident C) Finding includes: On 6/12/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nontraumatic intercranial hemmorrhage, unspecified, diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, polyneuropathy in diseases classified elsewhere, morbid obesity. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated cognition intact, sit to stand substantial/maximal assist (sit to stand: the ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair, or on the side of the bed.) Chair/bed -to-chair transfer- substantial/maximal assist (the ability to transfer to and from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair). Toilet transfer- substantial/maximal assist-(the ability to get on and off a toilet or commode.) Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident had immediate orders for wounds for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 3/20/25 at 8:44 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemaparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia following cerebral infarction,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, hyperlipidemia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was intact, range of motion, impairment one side upper and lower extremities. Pressure injury, 2 unstageable deep tissue injury present on admission. Resident B admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 12/4/24. Care plans included, but were not limited to: [Resident B] is at risk for skin breakdown or further skin breakdown due to refuses showers at times. Responds to verbal commands…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored and labeled in 2 of 6 medication carts and 2 of 2 treatment carts observed. (E-Hall, F-Hall, Short Hall Cottage Treatment Cart, A-Hall Treatment Cart) Findings include: 1. On 8/21/24 at 8:50 A.M., the following loose pill was observed in the E-Hall Medication Cart for rooms 141-147: 1/2 small round white pill 2. On 8/21/24 at 8:55 A.M., the following loose pills and unlabeled medications were observed in the E-Hall Medication Cart for rooms 131-140: 2 1/2 small round white pills 1 bottle of Honey Robitussin (cough medicine) with [Resident 33] on bottle but no label or open date 3. On 8/21/24 at 9:05 A.M., the following unlabeled materials were observed in the Short Hall of the Cottage: 1 Honey Dressing (medicated) package no label or open date 4. On 8/21/24 at 9:25 A.M., the following unlabeled materials were observed in the A-Hall Treatment Cart: 1 tube of opened antifungal cream for [Resident 27] no label 1 bottle of wound cleaner open with [Resident 8] no label…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (A-Hall) Finding includes: On 8/21/24 at 10:06 A.M., Resident Q indicated the food was always cold. On 8/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 36 indicated the food was usually cold. On 8/21/24 at 2:20 P.M., Resident 33 indicated the food was cold all the time. On 8/23/24 at 1:06 P.M., a test tray was obtained. Food temperatures for that meal were: chicken 114 F (Fahrenheit) fries 109 F coleslaw 55.5 F mandarin oranges 60 F On 8/29/24 at 8:50 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated food temperatures should be palatable. On 8/29/24 at 10:51 A.M., the Administrator provided a Food Temperatures policy, revised 6/23, that indicated All hot and cold food items will be served to the resident at a temperature that is considered palatable at the time the resident receives the food. The Retail Food Establishment Sanitation Requirements 410 IAC 7-24 Sec. 166, effective November 13, 2004, indicated (a) .refrigerated, potentially hazardous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were within range and food was prepared under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchens observed. The temperature on the final rinse of the dishwasher did not reach required levels, hairnets did not cover hair, and staff touched food with their bare hands. (Kitchen, [NAME] 10, Dietary Aide 25) Findings include: 1. On 8/21/24 at 8:45 A.M., a dishwasher cycle was observed. The final rinse reached 173 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 8/21/24 at 10:36 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated the regulation stated the dishwasher final rinse needed to reach 180 F, but the manufacturer said 175 F was acceptable. A service technician had been called that morning. At that time, a high temp dishmachine temperature log was provided. Final rinse temperatures recorded for the month of August ranged from 168 F to 178 F. On 8/29/24 at 10:51 A.M., the Administrator provided a Work Order for the dishwasher, dated 8/21/24, that indicated Customer stated that dish machine was not getting to 180 degrees. Upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for medications. Medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) were not documented as completed. (Resident M, Resident N, Resident Q, Resident 86, and Resident 45) Findings include: 1. On 8/26/24 at 2:35 P.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity, and chronic pain syndrome. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/5/24, indicated Resident M was cognitively intact, required supervision for eating, and received an antianxiety medication, anticoagulant, opioid, and insulin during the 7-day look back period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: insulin lispro (a rapid-acting insulin) - insulin pen; 100 unit/mL (units per milliliter) -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for care plan conferences. (Resident M, Resident N, Resident Q) Findings include: 1. On 8/26/24 at 2:35 P.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, and depression. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/5/24, indicated Resident M was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for toileting, and required substantial to maximal assistance of staff (staff does more than half) for bed mobility and bathing. The clinical record lacked documented care plan conferences between 5/9/23 and 11/6/23. 2. On 8/21/24 at 1:59 P.M., Resident N indicated he did not have care plan meetings to discuss his care. On 8/22/24 at 11:33 A.M., Resident N's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,288 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $38,288 — penalty dated 2024-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $933K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN