Washington Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 61.3 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure wounds on a resident's toes were treated in a timely manner and failed to follow up on an arterial doppler causing a delay in treatment of the wounds which resulted in osteomyelitis, gangrene, and cellulitis for 1 of 3 reviewed for quality of care (Resident 45). B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had appropriate skin assessments and interventions in place to address non-pressure wounds for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for skin management (Residents 31 and 21). The immediate jeopardy began on 4/25/23 when Resident 45 was noted to have developed new wounds on his left and right toes. No treatments were ordered until 4/27/23. The wound doctor observed the wounds on 4/28/23 and diagnosed the resident with osteomyelitis. A bilateral doppler ultrasound was ordered on 4/28/23 and completed on 5/1/23. However, the facility failed to follow up in a timely manner to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 7 of 7 residents who had observed concerns (Residents 40, 10, 12, 5, 47, 20, and 51).Findings include:1. On 8/6/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 40's call light was observed out of reach, wrapped on top of the bedside dresser. The cord was visibly dirty with stains and built-up debris under peeling tape. On 8/8/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 40's call light remained out of reach, hung over the call box on the wall. The cord remained dirty. On 8/11/25 at 9:31 a.m., Resident 40's call light was observed hung out of reach on the call box, the cord remained dirty. On 8/12/25 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 40's call light remained out of reach and rested on the floor. The yellow tape was still peeling and there was stuck on debris. There were several gnats flying around his head and in the bathroom. 2. On 8/6/25 at 10:29 a.m., Resident 10's fall mattress on the floor beside his bed was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper oral hygiene was provided and maintained for a dependent resident (Resident 5) and failed to ensure a resident preference for facial hair was maintained (Resident 49) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living.Findings include:1.On 8/6/25 at 10:49 a.m., Resident 5 was observed. She laid in her bed and had a Tube Feeding hung and running. Her lips were dry and cracked, there was a pasty/frosty build-up around her lips and gums. On 8/6/25 at 12:02 p.m., Resident 5's was observed. Her lips remained dry and cracked, and there was a thick build-up of pasty drying secretions. There was an uncovered cup of blue liquid and an oral sponge left on her bedside table. There were two gnats on the rim of the cup. On 8/7/25 at 9:09 a.m., Resident 5 was observed. Her lips were dry and cracked, and a thick layer of pasty secretions rimmed her lips and gums. Her teeth were also observed to have built up plaque/tarter. On 8/8/25 at 10:17 AM Resident 5 was observed. Her mouth remained in need of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate, person centered programing, and treatment plans to attain or maintain the highest practical level of psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for behavioral health concerns.Findings include:On 8/6/25 at 10:50 a.m. Resident 11 was observed as she lay in bed watching her roommate's tv and resting. There was no tv on her side of the room. Resident 11 indicated she arrived at the facility about 5 months ago and hadn't had any problems so far. She appeared to have a flat affect (a severe reduction in the outward expression of emotion) and a low mood.On 8/7/25 at 9:45 a.m. the memory care unit dining room was observed. There were three residents at a table with the Dementia Care Facilitator watching a cooking show on a tablet and two residents sitting on the couch watching TV. This was not the scheduled activity.On 8/7/25 at 12:01 p.m. Resident 11 was observed in bed resting with her eyes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a vegetarian resident had food variety and options to meet his dietary preferences for 1of 1 resident reviewed for dietary preferences (Resident 43). Findings include:On 8/6/25 at 11:00 a.m. Resident 43 was observed as he sat on his bed. The resident indicated the food the facility provided was terrible. He indicated sometimes he could send the food back and they gave him something else but a lot of times there wasn't anything for them to give him because he was vegetarian. He indicated most days he got either grilled cheese or a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for his entree.On 8/7/25 at 12:17 p.m. lunch trays were observed being passed to residents in the memory care dining room. Resident 43 received two grilled cheese sandwiches and two sides.On 8/12/25 at 9:40 a.m. Resident 43's medical record was reviewed. He was a long-term care resident residing on the memory care unit whose diagnoses included but were not limited to traumatic brain injury (TBI) and depression. His diet order indicated he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to offer the influenza (flu) vaccination to 2 of 5 residents reviewed for the influenza vaccination (Resident 11 and 18). Findings include:1. On 8/11/25 at 1:39 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 11. She had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Schizophrenia, asthma, and sleep apnea. Her record lacked a consent to receive the influenza vaccination, and she did not receive the vaccination. 2. On 8/11/25 at 1:44 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 18. He had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and anxiety. His record lacked a consent to receive the influenza vaccination, and he did not receive the vaccination. On 8/11/25 at 2:00 p.m., during an interview with the Regional Clinical Specialist (RCS), she indicated she could not find the consents or where the residents were administered the vaccinations. A policy titled, Influenza (Flu) Vaccination (Resident) was provided by the RCS on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer a resident the COVID-19 vaccination for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 15). Findings include:On 8/11/25 at 1:32 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 15. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depression, and anxiety. Her record lacked a consent to administer the COVID-19 vaccinations, and lacked documentation the COVID-19 vaccination was administered.On 8/11/25 at 2:00 p.m., during an interview with the Regional Clinical Specialist (RCS), she indicated she could not find the consent or where the resident was administered the COVID-19 vaccination.A policy titled, Resident COVID-19 Vaccination was provided by the RCS on 8/12/25 at 10:55 a.m. It indicated, .On admission resident(s) will be offered the COVID-19 vaccinations based on their COVID-19 vaccination history.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a physician's order to change a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 5/23/25 at 11:25 a.m. Diagnoses included colostomy infection, osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus type II, and necrotizing fascititis. The resident admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 3/20/25. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/27/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, had no behaviors or rejection of care, had an indwelling catheter and an ostomy, had an unstageable pressure ulcer, and received intravenous medications. A physician's order, received 3/20/25, indicated to change the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing every seven days with a transparent dressing. The nurse needed to measure (in centimeters) the PICC catheter length (from insertion site to catheter hub) AND the nurse needed to measure upper arm circumference (10 cm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Council Grievance concerns related to call light wait and response times were addressed in a timely and effective manner to prevent ongoing concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 10 of 53 residents who attended the Resident Council Meeting and complained on behalf of all 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 7/9/24 at 9:36 a.m., the call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. It was illuminated, flashed and alarmed at the nurse's station. Several staff members passed the light. On 7/10/24 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 35 was heard as she yelled out, Nurse! over and over. After five minutes, Resident 35 yelled again, with a louder voice and frustrated tone. This visitor knocked and entered her room to ask what the resident needed assistance with. Resident 35 indicated she wanted to get out of bed, but no one would listen to her. Within seconds of the visitor's entrance into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident B) was treated with respect and dignity during a care plan meeting when she attempted to express her concerns for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 7/8/24 at 10:16 a.m., Resident B was observed as she reclined in her bed and played a game on her smartphone. During a general and initial interview, Resident B indicated the Executive Director (ED) had hurt her feelings and made her angry. Resident B indicated she did not feel comfortable talking about the ED and was afraid she would get in trouble if she continued to complain about the way she felt she had been treated. Resident B indicated, she had been in a care plan meeting with the Social Service Director, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) and her best friend who helped her coordinate her care was on speakerphone. During the meeting, the ED had been asked to come to the room since Resident B and her friends had several…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 3) was included and engaged in a meaningful activity program according to her routine and preferences to maintain and/or enhance her quality of life as a totally dependent resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activity Programming. Findings include: On 7/8/24 at 10:43 a.m., Resident 3 was initially observed in bed in her room. She wore a hospital gown, her hair was flattened on one side, and her lips and gums were observed to have a buildup of unidentified goopy debris. Her side of the room was darkened as the privacy curtain between her, and her roommate's side had been pulled so that the natural light from her roommate's window could not be viewed. The ceiling lights were off. Resident 3's TV was off, and there was no music. She was positioned in bed with the head of her bed (HOB) elevated as her tube feeding pump was hooked up and running. Resident 3 leaned on her left side, and her eyes were open,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $654K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN