No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Timbers Of Jasper The

2909 Howard Dr, Jasper, IN 47546 · For profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (812) 482-6161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 482-6161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 actual-harm citations$16,777 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,777 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-28)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1950 Saint Charles St · (812) 996-6050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
3606 N Newton St · (812) 481-1513 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
109 W 28th St · (812) 556-5223 · Call to confirm hours
Park
800 W 15th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2910 Howard Dr

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.1%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms55.2%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.3%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.251.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.141.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.7%CMS range 39.5–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.5–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.9–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
46.6%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 77.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff thoroughly and completely assessed a resident after a fall with head injury, failed to ensure the fall was effectively documented with specific fall details to ensure interventions were immediately implemented to prevent further falls, failed to effectively monitor the neurological status of the resident after a subdural hematoma was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident D) This deficient practice resulted in the resident experiencing right-sided shaking, slurred speech, altered mental status, and an active brain bleed that required a craniotomy to repair. Finding includes: A facility investigation of Resident D's fall on 6/13/24 included a handwritten, untimed, note signed by Therapy Assistant 4, dated 7/2/24. The note indicated that Resident D was walking with a staff member on 6/13/24 and went to kick a ball and fell. Nursing staff came to take the residents vital signs and staff assisted the resident up. Resident D stated she was fine and continued the walk. The investigation did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-14 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing care and services consistent with professional standards of practice were provided to a resident that required ostomy care. Staff did not appropriately change a resident's newly placed ostomy appliance, resulting in pain, psychological trauma and a fear of getting out of bed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for ostomy care. (Resident 219) Finding includes: On 8/7/23 at 10:11 A.M., Resident 219 was observed lying in bed with several small towels and washcloths propped up against her right side and her gown raised up. At that time, she indicated she had just been admitted a few days prior from the hospital with a new ostomy on the right side of her abdomen. She indicated she had surgery to place the ostomy on 7/24/23, and had been at the facility since Tuesday 8/1/23. She indicated the ostomy bag was supposed to be changed for the first time on Friday, 8/4/23, and was not. It was changed Saturday 8/5/23 morning but leaked, and had been done three times since then, with leaking every time. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for a cognitively impaired resident at high risk of falling for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls. Fall care plan interventions were not in place. (Resident 14)Finding includes:On 1/28/26 at 3:33 P.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behaviors, and Guillain-Barre syndrome. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/21/26 indicated Resident 14's cognition was severely impaired, partial to moderate assist from staff (resident performs over half the effort) for bed mobility and transfers, and substantial to maximum assistance of staff (staff performs over half the effort) for toileting and bathing, and the resident has had two or more falls with no injury and 2 or more falls with injury (not major) since the last MDS assessment, dated 11/3/25.A current Fall Care plan, last revised 1/20/26, included, but were not limited to, the following interventions:keep urinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered and a discharged resident was sent home with the correct medication for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed. A blood thinner was not given as ordered, and a resident was sent home with another resident's medications at discharge. (Resident B)On 1/30/26 at 4:00 P.M., the Administrator provided an incident form that indicated on 9/19/25 when Resident B was discharged from the facility, medications belonging to another resident had been sent home with them. The form indicated the facility attempted to contact Resident B's representative several times daily until 9/25/25 when contact was made and the medication was brought back to the facility the same day. On 1/29/26 at 11:32 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 9/19/25. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, fracture of the right lower leg. The most recent admission minimum data set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents observed for incontinence care. Hand hygiene was not done, gloves were not changed between clean and dirty tasks, and the soiled incontinence pad was laid on the bedsheet. (Resident 45)Finding includes:On 1/29/26 at 8:57 A.M., incontinence care was observed on Resident 45 performed by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 14 and CNA 22.CNA 14 used Antibacterial Hand Rub (ABHR) and put gloves on. Then she used the bed control to put the bed down, touched the privacy curtain, grabbed the foot board of the bed, and then grabbed the resident's call light. CNA 22 did not sanitize hands before putting on gloves, used the bed control to lower and raise the bed and moved the call light. Both CNAs pulled down the resident's bed sheets and blanket. CNA 14 unfastened the resident's incontinence pad and held the resident on her left side while CNA 22 grabbed wipes and a clean incontinence pad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely or under proper temperature controls for 2 of 15 residents sampled for medications on the floor, and 2 of 2 medication storage rooms. (Resident D, Resident M, 100 Hall Medication Storage Room, 300/400 Hall Medication Storage Room) Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 9:19 A.M., the 100 Hall Medication Storage Room medication refrigerator log was observed to be missing temperatures. The 100 Hall medication refrigerator log lacked a temperature on days from 10/1/24 through 10/15/24. The 100 Hall medication refrigerator log was missing a temperature for night shift on 10/1/24, 10/2/24, 10/4/24, 10/5/24, 10/6/24, 10/7/24, 10/9/24, 10/10/24, 10/12/24, 10/13/24, and 10/14/24. At that time, QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 11 indicated that temperatures were taken twice a day and logged for medication refrigerators. The 300-400 Hall medication refrigerator log was observed to be missing temperatures for day shift from 10/2/24 through 10/15/24. The log was observed to be missing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared safely in accordance with professional standards for food service for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Foods were not labeled correctly, food was stored uncovered, and the facility failed to dispose of outdated food. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 9:13 A.M., the following was observed in the kitchen: Freezer in the kitchen: -- 5 undated, uncovered, and unlabeled bowls of pink ice cream -- 5 covered bowls undated and unlabeled. Refrigerator in the kitchen: -- clear container with cheese that had a label printed on 10/2/24 with a discard date of 10/8/24 -- applesauce with an opened date of 10/8/24 and a discard date of 10/14/24 -- clear container of lettuce undated and unlabeled -- 3 trays of fruit with several bowls uncovered on all 3 trays -- silver container with hotdogs and hamburgers undated and unlabeled -- silver container with an unknown substance that was undated and unlabeled Walk in freezer -- apple roasted pork prepared on 9/29/24 with a discard date of 10/1/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety during transportation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. A resident was improperly loaded onto a transportation vehicle lift causing the resident to fall backwards from a wheelchair onto the lift platform. (Activity Assistant 3, Resident B) Finding includes: During a review of facility reported incidents on 6/19/24 at 10:35 A.M., an incident that occurred on 6/3/24 at 2:45 P.M., indicated that Resident B was being transferred out of the facility transportation van and fell off the lift. Resident B was sent to the emergency room and received eight sutures to the right shin. During an observation and interview on 6/19/24 at 11:00 A.M., Resident B was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room. Resident B indicated that she had fallen off of the facility transportation vehicle when the vehicle lift was not out properly. Resident B indicated she needed 8 stitches to her right leg and thinks she landed on a metal part of the lift which cut her leg. Resident B indicated the driver…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was implemented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care provided. A resident was not assisted by two staff members during a transfer during incontinence care per the resident's plan of care. (Resident D, Resident C) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/6/24 at 10:35 A.M., Resident D indicated that they had reported CNA 9 for punching her in the stomach while providing care. Resident D indicated that CNA 9 transferred her from her wheelchair to her bed using a Hoyer mechanical lift prior to providing incontinence care. Resident D indicated that CNA 9 slipped and accidentally hit her stomach while providing care. During record review on 2/6/24 at 11:30 A.M., Resident D's diagnoses included, but were not limited to unspecified multiple injuries, person injured in unspecified motor vehicle accident, chronic pain, displaced commuted fracture of right patella, fracture of sternum, fracture of unspecified forearm, and fracture of right lower leg. Resident D's most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop resident specific care plans and implement interventions for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. A resident's care plan indicated to encourage fluids when the resident was NPO (nothing by mouth). Two residents had orders that did not match care plans for dental services. A resident with falls did not have interventions in place. (Resident 6, Resident 49, Resident 51, Resident 62) Findings include: 1. On 8/8/23 at 10:05 A.M., Resident 62 was observed lying in bed with the head of her bed elevated 30 degrees, on her right side,eyes closed, moving her right arm around. Her tube feeding was infusing at 45 ml/hr (milliters/hour) per pump. An oxygen mask, dated 8/8/23, was over the tracheostomy. High flow humidified oxygen was on at 6 L/min (Liters per minute). Foley catheter was hanging on the right side of the bed covered with a bag and draining yellow urine with sediment. Suction machine was sitting on the bedside cabinet. Call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right of dignity was promoted and protected for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. A visibly soiled resident was not stopped by staff on his way to the dining room and a resident receiving incontinence care was told the staff was going to change his diaper. (Resident 35, Resident 40) Findings include: 1. On 8/7/23 at 3:09 P.M., Resident 35 was laying in bed with a urinary catheter hanging on the right side of his bed. On 8/9/23 at 1:30 P.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus type II, prostate cancer, stroke, and hemiplegia on left side. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/7/23, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, an extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility and toileting, and had a urinary catheter but was incontinent of bowel movements. On 8/10/23 at 2:55 P.M., incontinence care given by CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 14 and CNA 28 was observed on Resident 35. During that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self-administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. Resident clinical records lacked a self administration of medication assessment. (Resident 6, Resident 65) Findings include: 1. On 8/11/23 at 8:29 A.M., Resident 6 was observed sitting in his room in his wheelchair. At that time, there was a medicine cup sitting on his bedside table with 1 white, circular pill in it. On 8/10/23 at 9:03 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors and diabetes mellitus type II. The most current significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/17/23, indicated resident was severely cognitively impaired and was an extensive assist of 2 staff members for bed mobility, transferring, and toileting. Resident 6's clinical record lacked a physician's order for self administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were conducted and completed following an emergency room visit where all insulin medications were discontinued for a diabetic resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change of condition. (Resident 31) Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 2:25 P.M., Resident 31 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room. At that time, he was observed sweating, with a yellow substance in the outer corner of the left eye, and a built up white substance on his teeth at the gum line. On 8/9/23 at 9:57 A.M., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, heart failure and diabetes. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/26/23, indicated no cognitive impairment, no behaviors, required extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility and toileting, supervision of one staff with eating, and was totally dependent of two staff with transferring and bathing. Resident 31 did not receive insulin in the 7-day look back period. Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered free of error for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. A resident was administered the wrong dose of (2) medications, resulting in an error rate of 8%. (Resident 65) Findings include: On 8/10/23 at 7:11 A.M., Qualified Nurse Aide (QMA) 9 was observed to administer medications to Resident 65 that included, but were not limited to, the following: Auryxia (an iron supplement medication) 210mg (milligram) tablet (one tablet) hydralazine (a blood pressure medication) 100mg tablet (one tablet) Breakfast was not provided at the time of the medication administration. On 8/11/23 at 1:51 P.M., Resident 65's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes and anxiety. The most recent admission MDS (minimal data set) Assessment, dated 7/26/23, indicated no cognitive impairment. Resident 65 required extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Current physician orders included, but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-14 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing sheets contained the correct information daily for 5 of 6 days during the survey. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 11:30 A.M., a posted nurse staffing sheet was observed posted on the wall next to the nurse's station facing the dining room. The posted nurse staffing sheet indicated the facility name, current date, census, and the number of staff scheduled for the following disciplines: CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) and NA (Nurse Aide that was not yet certified). The nurse column did not specify RNs (Registered Nurse) and LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurse) working and the facility's actual hours worked were not included on the posting. On 8/11/23 at 10:30 A.M., posted nurse staffing sheets were provided for the following dates: 8/7/23 8/8/23 8/9/23 8/10/23 8/11/23 Each posted nurse staffing sheet lacked specific number of hours worked and the separation of RNs and LPNs on each shift. During an interview on 8/11/23 at 10:35 A.M., the Scheduler indicated a lot of their staff worked 12 hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate submission of all direct care staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for the reported period of January 1, 2023 through March 31, 2023. One entry, March 11, 2023, was triggered in error for low weekend staffing due to inaccurate staffing information submitted. Finding includes: During a review of the facility's PBJ information on 8/10/23 at 9:24 A.M., low weekend staffing was triggered in the second reporting quarter of January 1, 2023 through March 31, 2023. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 11:20 A.M., the Administrator indicated home office reports staffing to PBJ, but they did not notify him that it had triggered for low staffing. On 8/11/23 at 2:45 P.M., the schedules for staff were reviewed for all weekends in January, February, and March of 2023. At that time, the Administrator indicated on the weekend of 3/11/23, there were 6 admissions and several call ins from staff. A CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) who worked activities and transported residents also worked the floor for 2 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,777 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,777 — penalty dated 2024-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Valparaiso Care & RehabilitationValparaiso, IN 2 of 5Arbor Grove VillageGreensburg, IN 2 of 5Bethany VillageIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Columbia Healthcare CenterEvansville, IN 2 of 5Community Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Eagle Valley MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harcourt Terrace Nursing And RehabilitationIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harrison TerraceIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Hickory Creek At New CastleNew Castle, IN 2 of 5Maple Park VillageWestfield, IN 2 of 5Park Terrace VillageEvansville, IN 2 of 5Riverside VillageElkhart, IN 2 of 5Trailpoint VillageSouth Bend, IN 2 of 5University Nursing CenterUpland, IN 2 of 5Williamsport Nursing And RehabilitationWilliamsport, IN 3 of 5Allisonville MeadowsFishers, IN 3 of 5American VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brownsburg MeadowsBrownsburg, IN 3 of 5Countryside MeadowsAvon, IN 3 of 5East Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterElkhart, IN 3 of 5Hickory Creek At CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsville, IN 3 of 5Hillcrest VillageJeffersonville, IN 3 of 5North Capitol Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosebud VillageRichmond, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk Village At LafayetteLafayette, IN 3 of 5Spring Mill MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Stonebrooke Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation CentreWabash, IN 4 of 5Beech Grove MeadowsBeech Grove, IN 4 of 5Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CenterClarksville, IN 4 of 5Clinton GardensClinton, IN 4 of 5Creekside VillageMishawaka, IN 4 of 5Edgewater WoodsAnderson, IN 4 of 5Forest Creek VillageIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Franklin MeadowsFranklin, IN 4 of 5Heritage House Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterConnersville, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At ColumbusColumbus, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At MadisonMadison, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At PeruPeru, IN

Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KELSEY, DONNAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2016
VAN CAMP, STEVENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/06/2019
DRUMMER, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
FEHRIBACH, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/14/2004
HANIFY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
LAZARD, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/29/2021
MANTRAVADI, GEETAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/21/2022
MUKES-GAITHER, BEVERLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
PAYNE, MONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/09/2021
BABCOCK, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/30/2020
CAINE, VIRGINIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/1994
HARRIS, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/22/2003
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/2011
KELLAMS, BEAUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/19/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$883K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 6%Other / private 20%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $883K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,988per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155478. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next