No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

North Woods Village

2233 W Jefferson St, Kokomo, IN 46901 · Government - County · 155 certified beds · (765) 457-9175 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$24,291 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $24,291 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
201 N Dixon Rd · (765) 457-1191 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.4 mi
605 N Dixon Rd · (765) 457-2514 · Call to confirm hours
Park
UCT Park0.9 mi
1325 Kingston Rd · (765) 456-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
First EPC<0.1 mi
2000 W Jefferson St · (765) 457-8201

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms50.8%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.0%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.0%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.9%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.551.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.6%CMS range 36.7–59.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.4–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.6–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
32.7%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 112.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-20)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident B was free from staff-to-resident physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B sustaining 14 severe first-degree burns (a first-degree burn affects the outer layer of skin. Burn sites were red, painful, and dry without blisters) on an ear, a lip, the neck, the upper back, the breasts, the abdomen, the bilateral thighs, the bilateral buttocks, and the perineal area. Finding includes: The immediate jeopardy began on January 6, 2024, when it was identified the resident had 14 burns that were caused from a hair dryer. Resident B sustained burns in 14 different locations across her body, which included, but were not limited to her breasts, pubic area, bottom, back of the neck, ear, and mouth area. The Executive Director (ED), Regional [NAME] President of Operations, Regional Director of Clinical Services, and Director of Nursing Services (DNS) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 1/9/24 at 2:54 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 12 and 13)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 3/16/26 at 1:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury, and diabetes mellitus. The clinical record indicated the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder was added to the resident's diagnoses list on 5/2/25. There was no care plan located in Resident 12's electronic record related to post-traumatic stress disorder. During an interview, on 3/19/26 at 11:18 a.m., RN 5 indicated she was not sure what Resident 12's trauma triggers were related to the diagnosis of PTSD, and she would have to look it up on the computer. During an interview, on 3/20/26 at 10:00 a.m., the DON indicated Resident 12 was admitted with a diagnosis of PTSD, and a care plan was not added until 3/17/26 for her trauma and triggers. She did not have a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressures were obtained and documented prior to administering a blood pressure medication with parameter orders and to ensure a physician's order was followed according to the medication parameters for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents 95 and 69)Findings Include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 95 was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 10:43 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and Parkinson's disease.A care plan, dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident 95 was at risk for ineffective tissue perfusion related to high blood pressure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered.A physician's order, dated 2/11/26, indicated to administer 60 milligrams (mg) of nifedipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) every morning and to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 130.The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were free from theft of an employee for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident B and C) The deficient practice was corrected on 7/29/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:During an interview, on 12/16/25 at 11:34 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident B had requested a pain pill on 7/26/25. LPN 4 was unable to find her oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) or the medication count sheet. LPN 4 called the pharmacy and was informed Resident B should have the narcotics available at the facility. LPN 4 then reported the missing narcotics and an investigation was started. During the investigation, it was discovered Resident C also had narcotic medication and a medication count sheet missing. The facility determined LPN 2 had stolen the narcotics. LPN 2 was terminated from the facility.1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/16/25 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication for blood pressure was held according to the physician's ordered parameters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 100) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 100 was reviewed on 3/4/25 at 10:41 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, familial dysautonomia, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. An Emergency Department After Visit Summary, dated 1/11/25, indicated the resident was seen for a headache and his blood pressure was higher than the normal range during the visit. A physician's order, dated 1/13/25, indicated to give midodrine (a medication used to increase blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg) three times per day with special instructions to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was greater than 120. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated January 1 through 31, 2025, indicated a midodrine dose was not held: a. On 1/14/25 at 1:00 p.m., with a systolic blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen tank was turned on to administer the correct flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 4) Findings include: During an observation, on 3/2/25 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 4 was in the hallway in her wheelchair at the nurse's medication cart with QMA 2 receiving her medications. The resident had a nasal cannula in her nose with a portable oxygen tank hanging on the back of her wheelchair. The flow rate on the portable tank was set at zero (0) liters/minute. QMA 2 administered medications to Resident 4 and signed the medication administration record (MAR). QMA 2 did not look at the portable oxygen tank to verify the amount of oxygen the resident was receiving. During an observation, on 3/2/25 at 12:15 p.m., the resident wheeled herself past 2 nurses and a certified nursing assistant (CNA) and greeted them as she entered the dining room for lunch. The nasal cannula was in her nose, and the portable oxygen tank on the back of her wheelchair was still set at zero (0)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves when touching a resident's medication for 1 of 9 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident 3) Findings include: During an observation, on 3/2/25 at 10:12 a.m., QMA 2 removed the resident's medication from the medication cart. She placed the card of multivitamin 7.5 milligrams (mg) iron with 400 micrograms (mcg) of folic acid in her right hand. QMA 2 used her right hand and popped the pill from the card into her left bare hand. She took the pill with her fingers and placed the pill into the medication cup. During an interview, on 3/2/25 at 10:14 a.m., QMA 2 indicated she should have used gloves and not touched the pill with her bare hands. The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 3/2/25 at 10:12 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order indicated to give a multivitamin 7.5 milligrams (mg) iron and 400 micrograms (mcg) folic acid tablet daily. A current facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a psychotic disturbance and the start of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 89). Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 89 was reviewed on 3/13/24 at 4:44 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nondisplaced fracture of the right femur, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit and dementia with psychotic disturbance. A physician's order, dated 1/4/24, indicated to give Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) 0.25 milligram (mg) at bedtime for dementia with psychotic disturbance. A physician's order, dated 1/25/24, indicated to give Risperdal 0.5 mg at bedtime for dementia with a psychotic disturbance. A physician's order, dated 2/7/24, indicated to give Risperdal 1 mg twice a day. A Pharmacy Consultation Report, dated 1/14/24, indicated the resident received Risperdal 0.25 mg at bedtime for dementia with psychotic disturbance. Antipsychotics had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0642 — isolated
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly code an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) (Resident 9). Finding include: The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 3/13/24 at 9:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with mood disturbance, insomnia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. A notice of PASARR level 2 outcome, with a notice date of 12/23/22, indicated the resident had a long-term approval without specialized services based on the diagnoses of bipolar disorder NOS (not otherwise specified), unspecified depressive disorder, dementia NOS, unspecified insomnia disorder, and for treatment history, current symptoms, and service needs. An annual MDS assessment, dated 1/10/23, indicated the resident was not currently considered by the state level 2 PASARR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition. During an interview, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen was on the correct liter flow per the physician's orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 60). Findings include: During an observation, on 3/13/24 at 11:03 a.m., Resident 60's oxygen was at 1 liter flow. The clinical record was reviewed on 3/13/24 at 11:17 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to COPD, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and influenza due to novel influenza A virus. A physician's order, with a start date of 2/21/24 and an end date of 3/13/24, indicated the resident was to wear oxygen at 2 liters per nasal canula continuously. A physician's order, started on 3/13/24 at 9:17 a.m., indicated the resident was to wear 2 liters of oxygen per nasal canula at bedtime. During an observation and interview, on 3/13/24 at 2:20 p.m., the DNS (director of nursing services) saw and indicated the resident's oxygen was on 1 liter. During an interview, on 3/13/24 at 2:21 p.m., the DNS indicated the resident had a continuous oxygen order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were documenting resident behaviors, implementing and documenting nonpharmacological interventions for behaviors, and failed to ensure potential side effects of an antipsychotic medication were documented and assessed for a resident with dementia for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident 75). Findings include: During an observation, on 3/12/24 at 10:31 a.m., the resident was sitting up in her wheelchair in the activity room. The resident was continuously rocking herself back and forth in the wheelchair. The resident was very fidgety and pulling at a blanket while continuously moving her hands. During an observation, on 3/12/24 at 10:57 a.m., the resident was still in the dining area and was fidgeting with a napkin on the table and the blanket on her lap and making constant movements with her body. During an observation, on 3/13/24 at 1:58 p.m., the resident was sitting up in her wheelchair in the common area at a table by herself. The resident was constantly touching a piece of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free of loose pills and opened medications were dated for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (The Walnut Unit and a combined medication cart for the [NAME] and Magnolia Units). Findings include: During a medication storage observation with the Qualified Medical Assistant (QMA) 4 on 3/14/24 at 11:10 a.m., the Walnut unit cart was observed to have the following: a. The second left large drawer had 17 loose pills on the bottom. b. The third left large drawer had 33 loose pills and 13 half tablets on the bottom of the drawer c. The third right drawer had a bottle of opened Milk of Magnisium (MOM) for Resident 89 opened and not dated. The record for Resident 89 was reviewed on 03/14/23 at 11:40 a.m. A physician order, dated 12/28/23, indicated to give MOM 400 Milligram(mg)/5 Milliliter(ml) daily when needed. During an interview, on 3/14/23 at 11:23 a.m., QMA 4 indicated the pills should not be in the bottom of the cart. The pills should be destroyed in a jug in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store clean clothing or resident personal care items in a clean environment for 4 of 117 residents (Residents 2, 14, 52, and 76). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 03/11/24 at 01:15 p.m., clean clothes were hanging from one end of the shower curtain rod to the other over the bathtub in the bathroom of Residents 2 and 52. Blankets and a large black trash bag of items were in the bathtub. The toilet had armrests attached, no lid, and was positioned immediately beside the bathtub. Multiple items of clean hanging clothes were touching the armrest of the toilet. At least half of the hanging items were within the contamination splash zone of the flushing toilet of less than 3 feet. During an observation on 03/12/24 at 09:37 a.m., clean clothes continued to hang from one end of the shower curtain rod to the other over the bathtub, were touching the armrest of the toilet, and were within the splash zone of the flushing toilet. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,291 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $24,291 — penalty dated 2024-01-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Valparaiso Care & RehabilitationValparaiso, IN 2 of 5Arbor Grove VillageGreensburg, IN 2 of 5Bethany VillageIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Columbia Healthcare CenterEvansville, IN 2 of 5Community Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Eagle Valley MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harcourt Terrace Nursing And RehabilitationIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harrison TerraceIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Hickory Creek At New CastleNew Castle, IN 2 of 5Maple Park VillageWestfield, IN 2 of 5Park Terrace VillageEvansville, IN 2 of 5Riverside VillageElkhart, IN 2 of 5Trailpoint VillageSouth Bend, IN 2 of 5University Nursing CenterUpland, IN 2 of 5Williamsport Nursing And RehabilitationWilliamsport, IN 3 of 5Allisonville MeadowsFishers, IN 3 of 5American VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brownsburg MeadowsBrownsburg, IN 3 of 5Countryside MeadowsAvon, IN 3 of 5East Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterElkhart, IN 3 of 5Hickory Creek At CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsville, IN 3 of 5Hillcrest VillageJeffersonville, IN 3 of 5North Capitol Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosebud VillageRichmond, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk Village At LafayetteLafayette, IN 3 of 5Spring Mill MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Stonebrooke Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation CentreWabash, IN 4 of 5Beech Grove MeadowsBeech Grove, IN 4 of 5Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CenterClarksville, IN 4 of 5Clinton GardensClinton, IN 4 of 5Creekside VillageMishawaka, IN 4 of 5Edgewater WoodsAnderson, IN 4 of 5Forest Creek VillageIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Franklin MeadowsFranklin, IN 4 of 5Heritage House Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterConnersville, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At ColumbusColumbus, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At MadisonMadison, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At PeruPeru, IN

Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHI ASSET (IN) KOKOMO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2012
CHIES, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/17/2016
JACKSON, BLAKEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JACKSON, ETHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JACKSON, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JACKSON, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/14/2024
JACKSON, WESSLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
JUSTICE, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2003
KELSEY, DONNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/18/2024
STITLE, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/16/2016
WRIGHT, THERESSAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/21/2021
DOUCET, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/03/2025
DRUMMER, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
FISCH, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
HANIFY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
HORN, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/20/2023
LAZARD, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/29/2021
O'BRIEN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/03/2025
BABCOCK, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/30/2020
CAINE, VIRGINIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/1994
GODDARD, NICHOLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/11/2022
HARRIS, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/22/2003
SIMPSON, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/06/2023
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2003
THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2003
DICE, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
HEAD, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/09/2026
HEATH, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/20/2017
SEDAGHAT, VAHID-DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
SHANE, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
VAN CAMP, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 4%Other / private 25%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,777per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155139. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next