Waters Edge Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 64.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME] on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents C, D, E and F)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 2/2/26 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. An 11/10/25, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired with fluctuating levels of inattention and disorganized thinking observed during the assessment period. A current resident care plan indicated a 12/25/25 problem of Resident B may have threatened to hit or physically attack other residents. Resident B may also shove. Resident B may also have episodes of shoving, hitting, scratching. Interventions included 1/23/26 encourage fluids and make sure fluids are in reach, 1/16/26 added stop sign to keep others out of room, offer to take a walk, 1/15/26 likes to tinker per family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete thorough and accurate investigations of resident-to-resident abuse to mitigate risk to other residents for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident E, and Resident F.)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 2/2/26 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and anxiety.A current resident care plan indicated a 12/25/25 problem of Resident B may have threatened to hit or physically attack other residents. Resident B may also shove. Resident B may also have episodes of shoving, hitting, scratching. Review of Resident B's progress notes indicated the following:12/14/25 at 2:00 p.m. The resident pushed another resident out his personal space, causing the other resident to lose balance. Resident B was placed on 1-on-1 monitoring.1/15/26 at 7:45 a.m. Resident B reportedly shoved another resident causing a fall.1/23/26 at 6:34 p.m. Resident B pushed another resident against the wall in the hallway, creating a laceration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations involving abuse immediately to the Administrator and to the State Agency (Indiana Department of Health) as required for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents D and F)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 2/2/26 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and anxiety.An 11/10/25, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired with fluctuating levels of inattention and disorganized thinking observed during the assessment period.A current resident care plan indicated a 12/25/25 problem of Resident B may have threatened to hit or physically attack other residents. Resident B may also shove. Resident B may also have episodes of shoving, hitting, scratching. Interventions included 1/23/26 encourage fluids and make sure fluids are in reach, 1/16/26 added stop sign to keep others out of room, offer to take a walk, 1/15/26 likes to tinker per family - offer to disabling a remote, offer PVC pipes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from staff to resident verbal abuse for 3 of 4 residents reviewed abuse (Resident B, F and G).Findings include:During an interview on 11/24/25 at 9:27 a.m., Resident B indicated he and LPN 1 had previously had a verbal argument. They both got upset and cursed. He was fine. He wasn't scared then, or currently. People swear when they are angry.During an interview on 11/24/25 at 1:46 p.m., LPN 2 indicated on the evening of 9/30/25, she was working with LPN 1 when Resident B came to the medication cart and asked her to contact his hospice company for an increase in his anxiety medication because he felt his current dosage wasn't effective. She looked and saw LPN 1 was at the nurses station. She indicated perhaps LPN 1 could call because he was at the station with the phone. Resident B replied NO, that m----r f----r won't help me. In reply, LPN 1 loudly called Resident B a m----r f----r. She immediately told LPN 1 he could not talk to a resident that way. Resident B and LPN1 continued to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was provided services to maintain a dignified existence related to available clothing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 47) Finding includes: During an observation on 1/27/25 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 47 wore a gray long sleeve shirt and lounge pants as he walked out of his room. During an observation on 1/28/25 at 10:09 a.m., the resident wore gray long sleeve shirt and white/black plaid/checkered lounge pants, unchanged from the previous day, as he participated in an activity in the dining area. During an interview on 1/28/25 at 10:51 a.m., the resident tugged on his shirt and indicated that he did not have a change of clothing. The resident opened his drawer, which contained a blue polo Special Olympics shirt with his name on it. The resident opened his closet, which contained a tote with a button-up dress shirt. No other clothing items were observed in the resident's room. Resident 47's clinical record was reviewed on 1/28/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the five rights of medication administration (right resident, right medication, right dose, right time, and right route) to prevent a medication error for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 8) Finding includes: Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed on 1/28/25 at 2:46 p.m. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease and a non-pressure chronic ulcer of an unspecified lower leg. A physician's order, dated 12/9/24, included hydrocodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain reliever) 10-325 milligrams (mg) - give one tablet by mouth every six hours for pain. This medication was scheduled to be administered at the following times: 5:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 5:00 p.m., 11:00 p.m. The order was discontinued on 1/9/25. A current physician order, dated 1/9/25, included hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg- give one tablet by mouth every four hours for pain. This medication was scheduled to be administered at the following times: 3:30 a.m., 7:30 a.m., 11;30 a.m., 3:30 p.m., 7:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the daily facility census number and actual hours worked of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily. Finding includes: During an observation and record review, on 1/28/25 at 11:43 a.m., the Nursing Staffing Data was posted from 1/28/25- 2/3/25 on the wall outside the Business Office and indicated the following: On 1/28/25, the total number of licensed and unlicensed staff were 2 Registered Nurses (RN), 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), 2 Qualified Medication Aides (QMA) and 15 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). The form lacked a shift to shift breakdown. The form lacked a census number. On 1/29/25, the total number of licensed and unlicensed staff were 2 RNs, 2 LPNs, 2 QMAs and 15 CNAs. The form lacked a shift to shift breakdown. On 1/30/25, the total number of licensed and unlicensed staff were 2 RNs, 1 LPN, 3 QMAs and 15 CNAs. The form lacked a shift to shift breakdown. On 1/31/25, the total number of licensed and unlicensed staff were 1 RN, 4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under safe and sanitary conditions for 1 of 3 units observed during dining (Cottage Unit). This had the potential to affect 21 of 21 residents who were served meals on the Cottage Unit. Findings include: During a Cottage Unit dining observation on 1/27/25 from 11:43 a.m. through 12:03 p.m. the following was observed: CNA 13 handled Resident 45's sloppy joe sandwich with her bare hands while she assisted the resident with his meal in the dining room. CNA 13 handled Resident 46's breaded tenderloin sandwich with her bare hands while she set up the residents food for the resident to eat in the dining room. CNA 13 grasped three of Resident 45's cups from the top, touching the rim of each cup, at the dining room table. During an interview on 1/30/25 at 12:08 p.m., the Memory Care Support Specialist indicated that the residents' cups should have been handled at the bottom of the cup. It was not proper technique to touch the rim of the cup. The proper procedure to assist a resident with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's dignity and failed to assist him with ADL care, leaving him in a soiled bathroom for another staff member to assist following an incontinence episode for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident C) Using the reasonable person concept, it would be likely that a dependent, vulnerable person unable to care for themselves could experience recurrent fear or anxiety when the facility staff failed to assist them during a vulnerable episode of incontinence where he was found to be unsupervised, and covered in feces, seated on a bathroom floor with staff closing the door. Findings include: A complaint filed with the Indiana Department of Health indicated Resident C had been in a bathroom, alone, with his door shut and was unable to open doors due to his diagnoses. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 10/9/24 at 11:15 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, psychotic disorder with delusions, anxiety disorder, dystonia, and history of alcohol abuse. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an interview on 12/9/24 at 2:14 p.m., CNA 4 indicated she called the Administrator on 11/21/24 following an incident with Resident C, who was part of her assignment. She was providing care to another resident in a room across the hallway from Resident C. CNA 2 was providing care to the resident's roommate and had finished and left the room. CNA 2 and CNA 8 returned to the room she was working in and reported Resident C was covered in feces. CNA 8 indicated she had shut him in the bathroom. When CNA 4 completed caring for the resident, which she thought was around three minutes' time, she went across the hall to Resident C's room. The bathroom door was closed and when she opened it, she observed Resident C seated on the floor with feces in his hair, face, entire clothing, and socks. The walls, sink, and floor were also smeared with feces. When Resident C saw her, he began…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $875K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN