Cypress Grove Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for a resident to self administer without completion of a self administration of medications assessment during a random observation. (Resident 2) Finding includes:During a random observation on 4/6/26 at 9:29 A.M., Resident 2 had a medication cup on her bedside table with a small white round pill with imprint 111. Resident 2 indicated she was unsure what pill it was. The medications in the medication cart for Resident 2 were reviewed at that time, the pill was determined to be exemestane 25 milligrams (mg) (steroidal drug). On 4/8/26 at 1:21 P.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of upper-inner quadrant of left female breast. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/5/26, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact and was independent for eating. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: exemestane tablet 25 mg oral once a day; Start date 10/9/23 During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication usage (Resident 10) and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 39). Findings include:1. On 4/7/26 at 8:57 A.M., Resident 10's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder.The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/30/26, indicated Resident 10 had severe cognitive impairment and received an antidepressant during the 7-day lookback period.The clinical record lacked an active physician order for an antidepressant medication between 3/23/26 and 3/30/26. The March 2026 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) lacked documentation that an antidepressant medication was administered to Resident 10 between 3/23/26 and 3/30/26.2. On 4/7/26 at 10:57 A.M., Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia.The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided bathing on their scheduled days for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for bathing. (Resident 25 and Resident 18) Findings include: 1. On 4/9/26 at 10:24 A.M., Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/13/26, indicated Resident 25 was cognitively intact and required partial assistance from staff (staff does half of the work) for bathing. A grievance form, dated 10/29/25, indicated Resident 25 was not getting her showers and was not getting her hair washed. The form indicated staff were educated on preference of shower not a complete bed bath. A shower schedule, updated 4/1/26, indicated Resident 25's shower dates were Tuesday and Friday. Shower documentation reviewed in the electronic medical record and paper shower documents indicated Resident 25 had not received a shower on the following scheduled days from 3/9/26-4/9/26: 3/10/263/27/263/31/26 2. On 4/9/26 at 8:49 A.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation of skin assessments and medication administrations were completed accurately and timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and 1 of 5 residents for medication administration. (Resident C, Resident G)Findings include:1. During an observation of incontinence care on 4/8/26 at 10:37 A.M., Resident C was observed to have a large purple discoloration on a large area of both right and left buttocks. Barrier cream was applied to the area. On 4/7/26 at 2:00 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia, and left below the knee amputation. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/1/26, indicated that Resident C was cognitively intact. Resident C needed setup assistance for eating, substantial to maximum assistance for hygiene, and was dependent on staff for dressing and transferring. A skin assessment was completed but there was no indication of skin discoloration.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had orders from the attending practitioner for oxygen therapy use and maintenance of equipment. A resident documented as using oxygen therapy had no physician orders for use. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 1/7/26 at 9:14 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, and obstructive sleep apnea. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was not coded for oxygen therapy. Resident B had been discharged to the hospital on 1/4/26. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to:The resident has potential for impaired gas exchange related to: Head elevated while in bed to alleviate shortness of breath while lying flat, related to diagnosis of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and sleep apnea. Approaches included but were not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for assistance with daily living (ADL) tasks were provided showers or baths for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 78, Resident 25, Resident 69, and Resident 12) Findings include: 1. On 5/28/25 at 10:30 A.M., Resident 78's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 78 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent admission MDS Assessment, dated 3/31/25, indicated Resident 78 was dependent on staff (staff do all of the work) for bathing and transfers. A shower schedule, provided by the Director of Nursing on 5/30/25 at 9:14 A.M., indicated Resident 78's scheduled shower days were Tuesday and Saturday. The point of care ADL report indicated Resident 25 had not received, or refused, a shower or complete bed bath on the following days during May 2025: 5/3-Saturday 5/17-Saturday 5/27-Tuesday 2. On 5/28/25 at 10:48 A.M., Resident 25's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a random observation on 5/29/25 at 9:33 A.M., Resident 79 was observed sitting quietly in a chair talking to another resident with a Wander Guard (monitoring device) present on his right ankle. During a random observation on 5/30/25 at 9:55 A.M., Resident 79 was observer walking in the kitchen with a Wander Guard (monitoring device) present on his right ankle. On 5/28/25 at 1:14 P.M., Resident 79's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and generalized anxiety disorder. The Current admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 79 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 79 needed set up for eating, supervision for hygiene, toileting, and transferring, and exhibited wandering behaviors daily. The admission Elopement assessment dated [DATE] at 1:13 P.M., indicated that Resident 79 did not have a security bracelet on at that time. The record lacked documentation of an order for a Wander Guard Device. The admission care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 233) observed during the medication pass. There were 29 opportunities observed with 8 medication errors. This resulted in a 27.59 percent medication error rate. Finding includes: On 5/29/25 at 10:21 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 was observed preparing medication to administer to Resident 233. The following medications were placed in a medication cup: 1 tablet Allopurinol (medication used to lower uric acid levels in the blood) 100 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet Carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg 1 tablet Clopidogrel (an anticoagulant) 75 mg 1 tablet Eliquis (an anticoagulant) 5 mg 1 tablet Famotidine (medication used to treat heart burn) 20 mg 1 tablet Furosemide (a diuretic) 40 mg 1 tablet Jardiance (medication used to treat diabetes mellitus) 25 mg 4 tablets [NAME]-Bid (a probiotic) 250 mg LPN 3 placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received showers for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident 40, Resident 46, Resident 20, Resident 12, Resident 19, Resident 75) Findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 2:04 P.M., Resident 40 indicated he only got a shower once a week, but he would prefer to take a shower three times a week. At that time, Resident 40 was observed to have dandruff on his shirt. On 5/16/24 at 9:39 A.M., Resident 40's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, primary hypertension and overactive bladder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/30/24, indicated Resident 40 had mild cognitive impairment, had no behaviors, and required partial to moderate assistance (staff does less than half) of staff for bathing. A current ADL (Activities of Daily Life) care plan, dated 11/14/19, included an intervention to offer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity for 1 of 1 residents viewed during a random observation. (Resident 75) Finding includes: During an observation on 5/17/24 at 8:58 A.M., Resident 75's bedroom door was fully opened and Resident 75 was observed laying in bed and body was fully exposed. Resident 75 was not wearing pants, an incontinence brief, or covered with a bedsheet. QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 22 was standing at the medication cart directly across the hall from Resident 75's room. She then took the medication cart towards the opposite end of the hall. At 9:01 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurses Aide) 15 responded to Resident 75's call light and placed an incontinence brief on Resident 75. On 5/15/24 at 11:07 A.M., Resident 75's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 75 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN