Riverwalk Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 169 beds and averages 126.3 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints regarding the use of antipsychotic medication without gradual dose reductions and/or documented behavioral indicators for use for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for the use of antipsychotic medications (Resident 19 and 13). Findings include: 1. Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed on 1/15/26 at 10:25 a.m. Current diagnoses included dementia severe with agitation, anxiety and bipolar disorder.The resident had a current physician's order for the following antipsychotic medication: Risperdal 1mg- give 1 tablet two (2) times daily. This order originated 11/25/24 (1 year and 2 months).A 12/22/25, quarterly, Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, did not have either hallucinations or delusions during the assessment period, did not display maladaptive behaviors during the assessment period, and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications.The resident's clinical record contained documentation of three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement immediate fall interventions and/or follow fall interventions to prevent further falls for a dependent resident at high risk for falls for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 112)Finding includes:During an observation on 1/14/26 at 2:03 p.m., Resident 112 was seated in her wheelchair at the table in the dining room and being assisted with her meal. Resident 112's clinical record was reviewed on 1/14/26 at 3:16 p.m. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, atrial fibrillation, abnormal posture, unsteadiness on feet, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Current orders included metoprolol tartrate (blood pressure/heart rate) 25 mg every 12 hours (8/26/25).A 10/17/25, annual, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A wheelchair was used for mobility. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for eating toileting, bathing, dressing, footwear, and personal hygiene. She required substantial staff assistance to stand and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, recorded review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for and deemed appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident J) Findings include:During an interview and observation on 11/17/2025 at 10:28 a.m., Resident J indicated her morning medications had been given to her between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. On the over-the- bed table, medication cup with several pills was observed. The resident indicated she had too many pills to take in the morning at one time.During an interview on 11/17/2025 at 10:31 a.m., LPN 6 indicated she had left the medication at the bedside during the morning medication administration pass. She indicated medications should not be left at the bedside. LPN 6 identified the medications in the medication cup as follows: amlodipine (calcium channel blocker) tablet 2.5 mg, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) tablet 500 mg, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B-12) tablet 1,000 mcg, fluoxetine capsule (anti-depressant) 40 mg, furosemide (diuretic) tablet 40 mg, losartan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess for fall risks, to implement fall interventions, and to thoroughly document falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls with injury. (Resident F) Findings include: Resident F's clinical record was reviewed on 11/26/24 at 4:00 p.m. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, difficulty walking, and history of falling. A 8/29/24, Geriatric Interim Care Note from Resident F's admission paperwork indicated the following: fall one week ago on 8/21/24, with right hip pain ongoing. The fall one week ago was out of a chair onto right hip, did not hit head, able to get up unassisted. Hip was painful without improvement. He still walked and bore his own weight. Dementia with behavioral disturbances, likely mixed vascular and Alzheimer's Disease. He had been getting more assistance with ADLs and iADLs, which family had been providing. Skilled nursing placement required for wound care. A 9/3/24, admission Fall Assessment document indicated the resident had no falls in the previous six months, was incontinent of bowel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shift-to-shift narcotic count and reconciliation was completed for 6 of 7 medication carts reviewed for medication reconciliation. (Carts HI, [NAME], [NAME], C, D, and Cottage 2) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the HI medication cart, on 10/25/24 at 11:27 a.m., accompanied by LPN 7, the Narcotic Count Sheet was reviewed and the following dates lacked shift-to-shift count and reconciliation signatures of controlled medications: October 2024- lacked a narcotic card count: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th. October 2024- lacked shift-to-shift narcotic reconciliation signatures: 10/2: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., 10/5: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 10/6: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., 10/9: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 10/10: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., 10/12: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m. 10/25: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. During an interview, at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 10/25/24 at 9:30 a.m. Diagnosis included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, oropharyngeal dysphagia, and epilepsy. A physician's order, dated 5/17/24, indicated may crush appropriate medications and administer per gastrostomy tube. Check placement of gastrostomy tube and check residuals (fluid or contents in the stomach). A physician's order, dated 6/4/24, indicated enteral feeding (to provide nutrition), gastrostomy tube, size 18 French (diameter of the tube). An isolation care plan, dated 6/10/24, indicated the resident was at risk of transferring Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) and required enhanced barrier precautions related to indwelling medical devices. The approaches included to use standard precautions including hand hygiene and to wear gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities. During an observation, on 10/23/24 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 2's room had an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign on the wall directly beside the door. Personal protective equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to appropriately discard expired insulin pens and label medications with resident information in 2 of 6 medication carts observed for medication storage. (D and Cottage 2) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the D hall medication cart, accompanied by RN 3, on [DATE] at 12:15 p.m., the following was observed: One unlabeled 8 milligram (mg) ondansetron (to prevent vomiting) blister packaged pill. One glargine (insulin) pen, with approximately 25 units remaining, with an open date of [DATE]. During an interview, at the time of the observation, RN 3 indicated the ondansetron pill must have fallen out of the bag and the insulin was expired and should not be given to the resident. 2. During a medication storage observation of the Cottage 2 medication cart, accompanied by LPN 4, on [DATE] at 12:24 p.m., the following was observed: One unlabeled bottle of morphine (a narcotic pain reliever) with approximately 14 units remaining. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete verification of the correct type of insulin prior to administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin use, resulting in the wrong type of insulin being given. (Resident B) Findings include: Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 4/4/24 at 9:43 a.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. His physicians orders included glargine-yfgn insulin (long-acting insulin) pen 40 units subcutaneously daily in the a.m. (started on 3/11/24) and Levemir (long- acting insulin) 55 units subcutaneously at bedtime (started on 2/20/24 - discontinued on 3/19/24). A 2/9/24 significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated he was cognitively intact. His blood sugars on 3/16/24 were 180 mg/dL at 8:00 p.m., 184 mg/dL at 8:13 p.m., 150 mg/dL at 8:20 p.m., and 167 mg/dL at 8:33 p.m. A nurses note, dated 3/16/24 at 8:45 p.m. (recorded as a late entry on 3/17/24 at 3:09 p.m.), indicated a medication error was made. He received 55 units of Novolog insulin (short acting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date resident's insulin vials and insulin flex pens after opening in accordance with facility policy (Resident G, C, D, E, F, and H) for 2 of 3 medication carts observed. (H hall and K/I medication carts) During a medication administration observation, on 4/4/24 at 11:55 a.m., with RN 14, she administered 22 units of Lispro (short acting insulin) insulin to Resident G. Neither the insulin vial, nor the container, had an open date on it. RN 14 checked other in-use insulins stored in the H hall medication cart and the following in-use insulins lacked open dates: 1. Resident C's Lispro insulin vial. 2. Resident D's Lispro insulin vial and a glargine-yfgn (long acting insulin) insulin pen with 180 of 300 units used from the pen. 3. Resident E's insulin aspart (short acting insulin) insulin pen with 280 units of 300 units used from the pen. 4. Resident F's glargine-fygn insulin pen with 280 units of 300 units used from the pen. RN 12 indicated they would normally date the insulin vials and pens after opening.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the verbal and mental abuse of a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident D) by a staff member (QMA 1). Using the reasonable person concept, it is likely this deficient practice would lead to chronic anxiety, or fear. Findings include: The clinical record of Resident D was reviewed on 3/6/24 at 12:18 p.m. Diagnoses included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebral infarction, depressive disorder, disorientation, and hypertension. The resident was living on the secured memory care unit. The most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/4/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a facility self reportable, dated 3/1/24, indicated an allegation of verbal abuse was reported by staff. The reportable documented communication concerns between Resident D and QMA 1. Review of a written statement by Lab Tech 2, dated 3/1/24, indicated on 3/1/24 at 5:40 a.m., Resident D was standing up. The lab tech verbally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN