Springhill Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 173 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 85.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident received notice of transfer and bed hold policy, and failed to notify the hospital of transfer or condition report for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 96 and 7). Findings include:1. On 2/23/26 at 9:52 a.m., the medical record of Resident 96 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included, but was not limited to, Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), and congestive heart failure (CHF) (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs). An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with daily care needs. The medical record, indicated on 1/24/26 at 2:32 p.m., the resident was observed to have extensive swelling of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy and re-evaluate a resident's weight for 1of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 57). Findings include:On 1/17/26 at 12:00 p.m., observed resident sitting in the activity lounge area with a noon meal. The resident did not have dentures in place and was attempting to eat a sandwich. She was very restless during the meal and refused to allow staff to assist her. On 1/18/26 at 9:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 57 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). According to documented weights the resident has lost 12.5% weight loss in 6 months and 1.14% weight loss in 30 days. The monthly weight record indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they implemented a policy to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 14, 1, and 34) and they failed to ensure a physician order was obtained for respiratory equipment for a resident's use for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 14). Findings include:1. During an interview, on 2/18/26 at 8:20 a.m., Resident 14 indicated she used a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- a method of respiratory therapy in which air is pumped through the nose or nose and mouth during spontaneous breathing) machine at night. The machine was hers that was brought from home to use. She indicated the facility could not get the equipment quick enough for her and she needed to have it because of her sleep apnea (a common, serous disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, preventing restful sleep and reducing blood oxygen levels). During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened for 1 of 2 medication carts. Findings include:On 2/20/26 at 8:43 a.m., observed the medication cart for 100 hall with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 19. Observed an insulin pen, Basaglar insulin100 units, with instructions to administer 15 units at bedtime for Resident 30. The insulin pen had been opened, and label was not dated with an opened date. Observed an insulin pen Lantus insulin 3 milliliter pen with instructions to administer 15 units daily, for Resident 73 opened and not dated with an opened date. On 2/20/26 at 8:50 a.m., during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 18 indicated the insulin pens must be dated when opened and discarded after 30 days. On 2/20/26 at 10:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing provided a document titled, Medication storage and expiration policy, and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. The policy indicated, .9. Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container.c. If a multidose vial of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE-wearable gear and clothing designed to protect individuals from workplace illnesses and infections) when entering a room of a resident who was COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease) for 1 of 1 hall tray pass observation (Resident 93). Findings include:On 2/17/26 at 12:52 p.m., the Activity Director (AD) was observed entering Resident 93's room to deliver his lunch tray. Through the open door, the AD was observed to set the resident's lunch tray on the overbed table (a table that can be placed over a resident in bed to allow the resident access to items, such as meal trays, etc.) which was set directly in front of the resident. The AD was observed to enter and exit the room without donning or doffing (removing) appropriate PPE. Signage on the resident's room door indicated the resident was in droplet precautions (measures designed to prevent the spread of germs transmitted through large respiratory droplets) and a PPE bin was setting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted quarterly for 4 of 24 residents reviewed for care plan meetings (Residents 24, 28, and 37), and the facility failed to ensure the resident and or the resident representative was present for an initial care plan meeting for 1 of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 64). Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 1/8/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 24 indicated he did not remember being invited to or attending a care plan meeting recently. He thought maybe the last one was 6 months ago. Resident 24's record was reviewed on 1/9/25 at 10:42 a.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/12/24, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A care plan summary note, dated 6/26/24 indicated a care plan meeting was conducted on this day for Resident 24. A care plan summary note, dated 10/30/24, indicated a care plan meeting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for shaving facial hair, received the service for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance (activities related to personal care). (Resident 65) Findings include: On 1/07/25 at 11:54 a.m., during an observation, Resident 65 was observed in his room with extensive beard growth. The resident indicated he wanted to be shaved. He indicated the staff had shaved him before and needed to do it again. He did not like to have facial hair. On 1/8/25 at 10:45 a.m., observed Resident 65 in his room with facial hair. He indicated the staff had not offered to shave him. On 1/9/24 at 10:30 a.m., observed Resident 65 in the hall with extensive facial hair. On 1/9/25 at 11:35 a.m., during an interview, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) (15) indicated she shaved residents on their designated shower day. On 1/9/24 at 11:38 a.m., during an interview CNA (13) indicated residents were to be shaved on shower days. On 1/9/24 at 2:30 p.m., during an interview the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1of 1 residents observed for transfers and reviewed for accidents had adequate assistance devices and interventions in place to prevent potential for accidents (Resident 8). Findings include: On 1/7/25 at 1:00 p.m., observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 16 transfer Resident (8) from bed to chair. CNA failed to apply a gait belt, nor shoes or non-skid socks prior to assisting to transfer from the bed to a chair next to the resident's bed. The CNA assisted the resident by lifting under the resident's left arm, stood and transferred the resident to the chair. The resident required extensive assistance to transfer and was unsteady when standing. On 1/7/25 at 1:07 p.m., during an interview, CNA 16 indicated the resident refused to wear shoes or socks and indicated sometimes she used a gait belt to transfer a resident. On 1/7/25 at 1:10 p.m., during an interview, Resident 8 indicated the staff always made her wear her shoes when transferring her. She could not recall if the CNA had offered to apply shoes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent (%) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 172) observed during the medication pass when 2 medication errors were observed during 29 opportunities for error in medication administration resulting in a medication error rate of 6.9%. Findings include: On 1/10/25 at 8:51 a.m., during an observation of the medication pass, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 17 was observed to prepare medications for Resident 172. The LPN was observed administering Timolol 5% eye drops (a medication used to treat the pressure within the eye caused by glaucoma) one drop into each eye of Resident 172. At 8:52 a.m., the LPN administered Dorzolamide HCL 2% (a medication used to treat the pressure within the eye caused by glaucoma) one drop into each eye. The LPN failed to wait a specific time period between administering the eye drops. On 1/10/25 at 8:55 a.m., during interview LPN 17 indicated she would normally wait five minutes between eye drops but the physician order did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the scoop used to place ice into residents drink glasses was maintained in a safe and sanitary fashion, and to ensure proper hand hygiene was used when assisting residents in eating their meals for 2 of 2 dining observations. Findings include: 1. During an observation in the main dining room, on 1/7/25 at 11:59 a.m., the Activity Director was preparing a drink for a resident. She scooped ice into the glass and returned the scoop into the ice bucket. The Activity Director served the juice to a male resident. The ice scoop remained in the ice bucket until 12:12 p.m., the Marketing and admission Director walked over to the drinks and prepared a lemonade for a resident. She scooped the ice into a glass and returned the scoop into the ice bucket. She then served the lemonade to a female resident. The ice scoop remained in the ice bucket until 12:20 p.m. During an interview, om 1/13/25 at 8:30 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 19 indicated staff were not to leave the ice scoop in the ice bucket. They were to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN