Swiss Villa Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 48.1 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to monitoring vital signs prior to medication administration for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Resident 16)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 16 was reviewed on 08/21/25 at 12:59 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/06/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, hypertension, diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, anxiety, and depression. The Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for March and April 2025, was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/26/25 at 10:40 A.M. The record indicated the resident had a physician's order for Metoprolol tartrate 25 milligrams, once a day, to be administered between 7:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M., for a diagnosis of hypertension, with a start date of 02/26/25, and a discontinued date of 05/21/25. The medication was to be held, not given, for a Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) less…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines during indwelling urinary catheter care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Catheters/Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). (Resident 6)Findings include:An observation, on 08/25/25 at 10:51 A.M., indwelling urinary catheter care for Resident 6 was observed. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2 entered the resident's room, donned a gown and gloves, dropped the window blind by touching the cords, pulled a stained privacy curtain around the foot of the resident's bed, opened the drawer on the resident's night stand, and removed a package of cleansing wipes. The CNA proceeded to pull wipes out of the package and clean the resident's private area without changing her gloves. The privacy curtain by the foot of the resident's bed had several brown/yellow stains, one was 8 (inches) x (by) 2 , one was the size of a golf ball, and two were the size of a baseball. During an interview, on 08/25/25 at 11:07 A.M., CNA 2 indicated when providing catheter care, she would use hand sanitizer,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during medication administration for 1 of 11 medication administration observations.Findings include: During an observation, on 08/22/25 at 11:16 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 prepared to administer Resident 30's insulin. LPN 5 checked the resident's blood sugar and indicated he would receive 13 units of Insulin lispro (short acting insulin) based on the physician's orders. LPN 5 went to the medication cart and started to prepare the insulin. She removed the insulin pen from the plastic bag, took off the lid and attached the needle. She did not cleanse the top of the insulin pen before attaching the needle. She dialed up 2 units to prime the pen and then dialed up 13 units to administer. She went into the resident's room and administered the insulin. During an interview, on 08/22/25 at 11:37 A.M., LPN 5 indicated she normally would have cleansed the pen with alcohol before attaching the needle. The current facility policy, titled Insulin Pen Administration, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and accurate antibiotic stewardship was implemented related to tracking and trending of infections for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (Resident 8)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 08/22/2025 at 11:07 AM. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/01/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, heart failure, hypertension, obstructive uropathy, diabetes, and anxiety. The June 2025 Surveillance Log of Resident Infections and Antibiotic Use indicated Resident 8 had a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) with an onset date of 06/12/25, with signs and symptoms of an increased white blood cell count, lethargy, and a temperature of 100.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The urine culture was obtained to determine the appropriate antibiotic to treat the infection on 06/15/25. The resident received Bactrim (an antibiotic) from 06/13/25 through 06/22/25. The surveillance log indicated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a physician related to obtaining a urinalysis for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 21) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 09/30/24 at 10:38 A.M. An Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 09/05/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hypertension, and depression. The resident was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. A Facility Event Report, titled Hot Charting--SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Physician Communication Tool, dated 06/12/24, indicated the resident had complaints of leaking urine with burning on urination. The nurse requested, from the physician, for a UA (Urinalysis) culture and sensitivity. A Physician's Note, dated 06/18/24, indicated the staff were to obtain a sample for a urinalysis that day and the physician would treat the results appropriately. The urinalysis results, dated 06/19/24, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain diagnostic services in a timely manner for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for radiology and diagnostic services. (Resident 6) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 10/01/24 at 9:53 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 08/21/24, indicated the resident was rarely or never understood. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and hypertension. A Progress Note, dated 11/07/23 at 11:33 A.M., indicated the resident's LLE (Left Lower Extremity), leg, was inflamed, red, and warm, and A Progress Note, dated 11/08/23 at 2:40 A.M., indicated the resident's LLE continued to be reddened and the redness was moving up to his inner thigh. A Facility Event Report, titled Hot Charting--SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Physician Communication Tool, dated 11/07/23, at 11:17 A.M., indicated the resident's LLE was inflamed, red, and warm. The recommendation was to obtain a venous doppler. The physician was notified. The report lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge a resident had dentures and notify the dentist of lost dentures in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental. (Resident 36) Findings include: During an observation and interview on 09/27/24 at 10:59 A.M., Resident 36 was sitting in his wheelchair at the nurse's station. He was edentulous (had no teeth) and indicated his dentures were missing. He had told the Administrator about it and was unsure how long they had been missing. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 1:28 P.M., RN 4 indicated she was unaware the resident had dentures. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 1:29 P.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 3 indicated the resident did not have dentures. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 1:30 P.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 5 indicated she was unaware of the resident ever having dentures. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 1:59 P.M., the SSD (Social Service Director) indicated when the dentist came to the facility to give a resident their new dentures, she would be made aware of it.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments related to residents' diagnoses of urinary tract infections for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Residents F and B) Findings include: 1. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/22/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Section I of the assessment listed potential active diagnoses. The directions indicated staff were to check all diagnoses that applied. The diagnoses checked off as active included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. The assessment lacked indication the resident had a UTI (urinary tract infection) in the last 30 days. An Infection Event Report, dated 08/25/23, indicated the resident had symptoms of a UTI with an onset date of 08/22/23. The symptoms included a fever or leukocytosis (an elevated white blood cell count), and a new or marked increase in incontinence. A progress note, dated 08/22/23 at 4:55 P.M., indicated the resident experienced an increased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines during toileting care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident E) Findings include: During an observation on 10/11/23 at 10:30 A.M., Resident E was provided toileting care by CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 2 and RN 3. Upon entering the resident's room, supplies were already placed on the over the bed table, including fresh towels, wash cloths, and a pan of water. The staff members washed their hands with soap and water, closed the doors and blinds, then pulled the privacy curtains. The resident requested the bed pan. The staff donned gloves, opened the resident's brief, placed the bed pan between the brief and the resident, and pulled the brief up to cover the front of the resident's peri area (vaginal area). They raised the head of the bed, provided privacy, placed the call light in reach, and left the room. The staff reentered the room, explained care to the resident, washed their hands, and donned clean gloves. They prepared a clean bag at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related to having multiple unsecured loose tablets in the medication carts for 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (Medication Carts on the 200 Hall, 300 Hall, and 100 Hall) Findings include: 1. The 200 Hall Medication Cart was observed on 07/31/23 at 10:42 A.M., with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 2 and contained the following loose pills laying in the bottom of the drawers: - two small white oval tablets, - one medium white oval tablet, - two small tan round tablets, - one small white round tablet, - two small pink round tablets, and - two clear round tablets. During an interview on 07/31/23 at 10:44 A.M., LPN 2 indicated the medications that were dropped in the drawers needed to be accounted for, destroyed, and the pharmacy should be notified that the 30 day count would be off. 2. The 300 Hall Medication Cart was observed on 07/31/23 at 10:45 A.M., with RN 3 and contained the following loose pills laying in the bottom of the drawers: - two small white oval tablets, - one small white round…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $701K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN