Prairie Village Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 51.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to participate in the development and implementation of the resident's plan of care for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for care plan conferences. Care plan conferences were not completed quarterly. (Resident 24, Resident 8, Resident 41, Resident 1, Resident 14) Findings include: 1. On 5/7/25 at 1:34 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, and Bipolar disorder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/25/25, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Care plan conferences for the previous 12 months took place on the following dates: 5/31/24 8/28/24 1/23/25 Resident 24 lacked a care plan conference from 1/23/25 to current. 2. On 5/7/25 at 2:22 P.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, seizure disorder, anxiety, and depression. Resident 8 was admitted [DATE]. The most recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 1 of 2 halls reviewed for hot water. The water temperature in resident areas exceeded 120 degrees Fahrenheit. (100 hall, 200 hall) Finding includes: On 5/6/25 between 1:35 P.M. and 1:50 P.M., the following water temperatures were obtained: room [ROOM NUMBER] (shared bathroom with room [ROOM NUMBER]) 122 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER] (private bathroom) 126 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER] (shared bathroom with room [ROOM NUMBER]) 126 degrees Fahrenheit On 5/6/25 between 2:02 P.M. and 2:06 P.M., the following water temperatures were obtained by the Maintenance Supervisor: room [ROOM NUMBER]-- 123 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER]-- 127.6 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER]-- 127.6 degrees Fahrenheit During an interview at that time, the Maintenance Supervisor indicated water temperatures are checked every morning and should be between 100 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 1 of 1 random observation. (Resident 24) Finding includes: During the Resident Council meeting on 5/8/25 at 2:26 P.M., Resident 24 administered 2 puffs of an albuterol inhaler (respiratory medication) to herself. She asked another resident how many doses were left in the inhaler and proceeded to administer another puff (total of three puffs) to herself. Resident 24 did not rinse her mouth after use. There was no staff present during this time. On 5/9/25 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/25/25, indicated Resident 24 had moderate cognitive impairment. Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, Ventolin (albuterol sulfate) inhaler, 90 micrograms (mcg), administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was not attempted as required for a hypnotic medication. (Resident 24) Finding includes: On 5/7/25 at 1:34 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and Bipolar disorder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/25/25, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 24 had received a hypnotic medication. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Ambien (zolpidem) (a hypnotic) 5 mg (milligrams) at bedtime, dated 12/12/24. The order had originally been dated 10/13/23 - 12/12/24. A current risk for adverse side effects related to use of psychotropic medication care plan, dated 2/20/19 and last revised 5/6/25, indicated use of a hypnotic for a diagnosis of insomnia. Interventions included, but were not limited to, Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. A resident's oxygen concentration indicator was on the wrong setting. (Resident 19) Finding includes: During an observation on 5/5/25 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 19 was observed in her wheelchair with oxygen on via nasal cannula at 1.5 Liters Per Minute (LPM), and the back of the machine had dust particles on it. At that time, Resident 19 indicated she should be on 2.5 Liters (L) of oxygen. On 5/8/25 at 10:10 A.M., Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/23/25, indicated Resident 19 was cognitively intact and utilized oxygen. Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, oxygen at 2 L via nasal cannula, dated 1/21/25. A current care plan for impaired gas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident centered care and services were provided to meet resident needs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement. Wandering and exit seeking behaviors were not monitored, elopement risk assessments were inaccurately completed, leading to a lack of an elopement risk care plan with interventions to prevent elopement. (Resident 40) Finding includes: On 5/7/25 at 10:22 A.M., Resident 40's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/5/25, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment and no behaviors including wandering. Resident 40 required supervision or touching assistance with wheelchair mobility. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Activity Level: Up ad lib (allowed to move around freely by oneself) with walker/wheelchair, dated 4/6/24. A current Behavior Care Plan, dated 1/30/23 and last revised 3/26/25, indicated Resident 40 had episodes of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 of 3 residents during an observation of perineal care. Staff put hand sanitizer on soiled gloves, gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during perineal care, and staff failed to sanitize hands between dirty and clean tasks. (Resident 2) Finding includes: On 5/8/25 at 10:11 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 7 and CNA 9 performed perineal care on Resident 2. CNA 7 used her gloved hand to wipe resident 2's perineal area with a wet wash cloth, placed that washcloth in a bag, grabbed another wash cloth, and wiped Resident 2's scrotum. At that time, she walked over to the hand sanitizer machine on the wall and dispensed hand sanitizer onto her soiled gloves, then she grabbed a dry towel from a bag and patted Resident 2 dry. Resident 2 was turned on his right side and CNA 7 wiped his buttocks with the same gloves and dried with a towel. CNA 7 failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene before she placed the clean incontinence pad under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services of an RN (Registered Nurse) were available at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for one of seven days reviewed. (Facility) Findings include: On 5/1/24 at 3:30 P.M., the review of nurse staffing from 4/20/24 through 4/26/24 indicated there was no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on 4/21/24. During an interview on 5/2/24 at 9:03 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated he had an RN scheduled for 4/21/24 but she called in sick and was replaced with an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). He indicated there should be an RN in the building at least 8 hours a day, seven days a week. During an interview on 5/2/24 at 12:41 P.M., the DON indicated they did not have a policy for RN coverage but it was their policy to follow the state regulations. 3.1-17(b)(3)

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care plan conferences were completed for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 22, Resident 2, Resident 13, Resident 1) Findings include: 1. On 5/2/24 at 6:22 A.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, epilepsy. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 2/28/24, indicated Resident 22 was cognitively intact. The most recent care plan conference was completed 9/6/23. 2. On 5/1/24 at 9:06 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, blindness. The most recent Annual MDS Assessment, dated 2/21/24, indicated Resident 2's cognition status could not be assessed. The most recent care plan conference was completed 9/20/23. 3. On 4/30/24 at 12:05 P.M., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, schizophrenia. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in 1 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms. The narcotic box was not locked in a medication cart, unlabeled and expired medications where in the treatment cart. (100/400 Hall medication cart, treatment cart in E wing medication storage room) Finding includes: On 5/1/24 at 2:27 P.M., the narcotic box of the 100/400 Hall medication cart was observed unlocked. On 5/1/24 at 2:38 P.M., the following was found in the treatment cart in the medication storage room on the E Hall: -two unlabeled 15 gram (g) bottles of nystatin topical powder (anti-fungal) with expiration dates of 11/30/23 -two bottles of ammonium lactate lotion (lotion for dry skin) 12%, opened but not dated when opened -three 45 g tubes of clotrim betameth cream (anti-fungal) 1-0.5% with expiration dates of 5/30/23, 11/30/23, and 12/30/23 -one 1.5 fluid ounce (fl oz) tube of medihoney (medicated honey for wound care) gel from a resident that passed away 3/24/24 -one 1.5 fl oz tube of medihoney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $543K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN