Complete Care at Laurelton, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 119.8 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2026-04-24 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Planning Process, on 04/21/2026 through 04/23/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was discharged to a safe home, including the repair of a water pipe prior to discharge, for 1 of 1 residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for appropriate discharge from the facility. As a result, R1 was discharged to an unsafe home without running water or heat. Ten days after discharge, the police were called to the home to find the resident with limited electricity, no running water or working heating system, and unable to walk or get down the stairs, other than sliding down on his/her buttocks. R1 was taken by the Police Department (PD) to the Emergency Department (ED) for care. The facility's failure to ensure a resident was discharged to a safe home posed a likelihood that serious injury, harm, impairment, or death could occur to all discharged residents. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The IJ began on 04/06/26 after R1 was discharged to an unsafe home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to recognize a change in condition and ensure that no delay in treatment occurred, when on 09/23/23, a resident presented with pain accompanied by an externally rotated bruised left lower extremity and the resident was not immediately assessed by a Registered Nurse, and waited over 24 hours to receive an X-ray and was then transferred to the Emergency Room. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #257) reviewed for fracture of unknown origin. Resident #257 was diagnosed with an impacted comminuted fracture of the base of the left femoral neck (hip fracture) which required surgery on 09/25/23 for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of the Left Hip. Refer to 610G The evidence was as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document enteral tube feeding flush administration to assure the total volume administered was in accordance with physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Residents #5), reviewed for enteral tube feeding and was evidenced by the following: Review of the admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to; acute respiratory failure, aphasia (difficulty expressing self or difficulty in processing language), dysphasia (swallowing problems) and epilepsy (seizures). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care dated 5/23/25, indicated that Resident #5 had short and long-term memory deficits. The resident was severely impaired for decision making and required maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS also indicated that the resident received nutritional, and hydration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ Complaint: #NJ186246 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the prescriber's orders and accepted professional standards and principles by administering medications past the required time frame. The deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 (Resident #77, 110, ) residents reviewed for being free of significant med errors. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #77's quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/25/2024, revealed that Resident #77 had a brief interview of mental status score of 15 which indicated he/she was cognitively intact. A review Resident # 77's diagnoses located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) include but are not limited to Diabetes Mellitus (the body's inability to use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels). A review of Resident #77 physician's orders revealed the following orders but not limited to Insulin Regular Human Injection Solution 100 UNIT/Milliliter (a hormone produced in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to to maintain the resident's environment, equipment, and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 nursing units observed for environment and evidenced by the following: Upon initial tour of Unit 2 on 06/04/2025 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor observed a nurse's call bell wall unit depressed through the drywall with medical tape securing it to the wall. On 06/06/2025 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor observed the same nurse's call bell unit depressed through the drywall with medical tape securing it to the wall. During an interview with the surveyor on 06/06/2025 at 11:17 AM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) indicated that their responsibilities included daily check of the resident's room to make sure everything was in a safe working order. On 06/11/2025 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor requested that Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN/UM#1)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) for 1 of 34 residents reviewed, Resident #18 as evidenced by the following: Upon initial tour of the Unit 2 on 06/04/2025 at 9:52 AM, the surveyor observed an individual outside room [ROOM NUMBER] putting on personal protective equipment. The surveyor observed the individual's uniform displaying a hospice name and she identified herself as a hospice aide caring for Resident #18. On 06/06/2025 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #18 in resting in bed with family in room holding their hand. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Multiple Sclerosis. A review of the Physician's Orders identified an order for Hospice Evaluation and Treatment on 2/3/2025. The surveyor reviewed the MDS assessments for Resident #18. A SCSA MDS was not completed for the change in status for Resident #18.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's Interdisciplinary Care Plan (ICP) was resident specific and reflected accurate resident care. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #5) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to; acute respiratory failure, aphasia (difficulty expressing self or difficulty in processing language), dysphasia (swallowing problems) and epilepsy (seizures). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care dated 5/23/25, indicated that Resident #5 had short and long-term memory deficits. The resident was severely impaired for decision making and required maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #74) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by: A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #74 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to respiratory conditions due to other external agents, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition that occurs when the body tissues do not get sufficient oxygen supply) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment that facilitates a resident's care dated 4/11/25, indicated that Resident #74 scored a 14 on the basic interview for mental status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated that the resident required supervision with activities of daily living (ADL's) and was on oxygen (O2). On 6/5/25 at 10:39 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ183557 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 04/24/2025 and 04/29/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice for Physician Orders (POs) for medication administration and follow the Care Plan (CP) interventions for a resident (Resident #5). The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Medication Administration. This deficient practice was identified for 1of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ183557 Based on interview and review of facility documents on 5/22/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 1 of 21 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for the weeks of 02/09/25 through 02/15/25, 04/06/2025 through 04/12/2025, and 04/13/2025 through 04/119/25, revealed that the facility had no RN coverage for all shifts on 02/09/25 The surveyor reviewed the facility's policy titled Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff updated 03/05/25 which indicated, It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ00181615, NJ00177959 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, as well as a review of pertinent facility documents on 12/23/24, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards of practice by not ensuring that a medication [Sucralfate], an anti-ulcer medication, was administered to a resident (Resident #1) in a timely manner as ordered by a physician. Sucralfate was a medication to be administered before meals. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable temperature for 6 of 6 residents who attended a resident council meeting, and on 2 of 3 units reviewed for food temperatures. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/30/24 at 11:04 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident council meeting with six residents. The surveyor inquired about the meals served and 6/6 residents interviewed stated the [hot food] was always served cold and especially the coffee. On 01/31/24 at 7:30 AM, surveyor #1 observed the meal truck enter Unit 3. The first meal tray was passed at 7:31 AM, and the last meal tray was passed at 7:49 AM. At that time, the surveyor removed the last meal tray and completed a test meal observation, in the presence of the Unit Manager Nurse, with the following recorded temperatures: Oatmeal: 136 degrees Farenheight (F) Sausage: *112 F 2 Pancakes: *120 F 4-ounce Orange Juice: *51 F 8-ounce Low Fat Milk: *56 F Coffee: *112 F On 01/31/24 at 8:40 AM, surveyor #2 observed the meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$163,101 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $148,970 — penalty dated 2026-03-23
• $14,131 — penalty dated 2024-02-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ