Complete Care At Burlington Woods, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 215 beds and averages 180.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure adequate supervision was provided to a resident to prevent falls, b) follow the facility accident policy to investigate falls, and consistently initiate new fall prevention interventions in response to falls, c) ensure current care plan interventions to prevent accidents were implemented. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #116) for fall with major injury who was identified as being at high risk for falls, sustained multiple falls including a fall on 02/14/22 that required transfer to the emergency room which resulted in a fracture of the left proximal humerus (arm bone) and the left olecranon (bony part of elbow), and required a surgical Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/28/23 at 11:44 AM, the surveyor toured the D Unit and observed Resident #116 seated in a wheelchair in the hallway and appeared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #2698562Based on interviews, record review of the medical records, and other pertinent facility documents on 1/27/26, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and to provide needed care or services to manage resident's symptoms in accordance with professional standards of practice; after they received report from the resident's family member that the resident had decline in condition. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents, (Resident #2) reviewed and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of casefinding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.According to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT # NJ 172662 Based on interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications within scheduled parameters on various shifts in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 34 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice (Resident #269). Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) contain nebulizer (a machine used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) delivery systems in protective coverings and 2.) ensure a nebulizer was stored appropriately to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #99 and Resident #151) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/28/25 at 9:08 AM, Resident #99 was observed lying in bed and the nurse was present for morning medication administration. An oxygen (O2) concentrator (a medical device that separates nitrogen and oxygen from the air around you so you can breathe up to 95% pure oxygen) with oxygen tubing attached was observed at the side of the bed. The O2 concentrator was off on this observation. Resident #99 was not wearing oxygen via nasal cannula (n/c) (a medical device that provides…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to post the updated nurse staffing report daily. This deficient practice was identified on 5/27/25, and was evidenced by the following: On 5/27/25 at 9:15 AM, upon initial entrance to the facility, the surveyor observed the posted daily staffing in the lobby was dated 5/23/25. While the survey team was in the lobby awaiting the facility administration, the staffing coordinator (SC) entered the lobby and replaced the posted staffing sheet for the current day 5/27/25. At that time, the surveyor interviewed the SC who stated staffing should be posted and updated daily and should have been changed by the weekend nursing supervisors in her absence. She further acknowledged that the posting was four days old for the 5/23/25 staffing. On 6/2/25 at 11:37 AM, the surveyor re-interviewed the SC who stated that staffing should be updated and posted daily in the facility lobby to be visible by everyone. She stated that nursing supervisors should make updates if there are any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) potentially hazardous and perishable food items located in the refrigerator were labeled with a use by date and covered. b) staff restrained hair c) resident food storage areas were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and food was appropriately labeled and dated with a use by date to prevent the potential for food borne illness. This deficient practice occurred in the main kitchen and 2 of 2 remote resident food pantries and was evidenced by the following: On 11/28/23 at 8:54 AM, the surveyor conducted a tour of the kitchen with Food Service Manager FSM and observed the following: 1) The walk-in refrigerator was observed with opened potentially hazardous food items that were not labeled with a used by date and expired dairy products. This included half a case of bacon stored in a box that was uncovered, exposed to air and was not labeled with a use by date, ham that was opened and exposed to the environment, located on a tray without use by date, and a bag of shredded…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the quality assessment and assurance committee (QAPI) facility failed to ensure: a) written policies and procedures were followed to ensure all adverse events were identified and investigated, b) written procedures were followed to ensure the QAPI was consistently data driven and measurable to ensure the effectiveness of the performance improvement initiative, and c) a mechanism was in place and consistently followed to obtain input from staff, residents/ resident representatives. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F584E, F585D, F677E, F686E, F689G, F924E On 11/28/23, during the initial tour of the facility, multiple surveyors observed the following: -9:40 AM: the D Unit had a strong odor of urine throughout the Unit. -11:35 AM, two surveyors observed the condition of room on the D Unit which included: D1- room and bathroom floor visibly soiled. D9- the air conditioner unit and door appeared to be torn…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ 152052, NJ 152420, NJ 153704 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident environment, equipment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was evidenced on 2 of 3 resident Wings (Wing A & D) and was evidenced by the following: Interviews and observations of Surveyor #2 were as follows: On 11/28/23 at 09:23 AM, upon entrance to the facility, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility had 3 wings which consisted of Wing A which was the Subacute Unit and had 50 beds, D Wing had 59 beds and E Wing had 50 beds. On 11/28/23 at 9:45 AM, an unsampled resident on D wing informed the surveyor the heat in his/her room had been broken for 4 days. The resident stated that they had been unable to sleep because of the cold. At that time, the Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN UM) confirmed the head had not been working and that maintenance was made aware. On 11/28/23 at 10:00 AM, a maintenance worker confirmed that the heat had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ# 151052, NJ #152112 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide appropriate Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) care, for residents who were dependent on staff assistance for care, by failing to provide: a) nail care, and b) incontinence care. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 dependent residents (Resident # 20, 76, #101, #106 and Resident #116) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living. Findings included: On 11/28/23 at 9:40 AM, during the initial tour of the D Unit, a strong urine odor was noted in the hallway. 1. On 11/28/23 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 lying in bed in their room. The resident was alert and informed the surveyor that he/she was soiled. He/she could not find the call light to alert the staff, and stated, Please help. The surveyor left the room and informed the nurse of the resident's request. The resident informed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 151052 Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility policy to ensure that residents who were admitted without a pressure ulcer (PU) and was identified at Mild risk for developing pressure ulcers, and a resident admitted without a PU and was identified as completely limited in ability to respond to pressure-related discomfort, were provided with care and services to prevent worsening, or development of a pressure ulcer by failing to ensure: a) comprehensive skin assessments were accurately documented for a pressure ulcer and interventions were implemented to prevent further skin breakdown and promote healing, b) a resident was kept clean and free of exposure to urine and fecal matter, and c) a resident was evaluated for nutritional status to determine if interventions to increase calories and protein were needed to assist with wound healing. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ 149879, NJ 151052, NJ 151398, NJ 152112, Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to: a) provide timely and appropriate incontinence care for residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) care, b) provide nail care for a resident who was dependent on staff for ADLs, and c) provide colostomy (a surgically created opening in the colon or large intestine) for a resident dependent on staff for colostomy care. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 9 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #20, #76, #101, #106, #116, #354, and closed record #159), and expressed by 5 of 5 residents who attended a resident council meeting and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 677E, 686E, 689G, and 691D. a) On 11/28/23 at 10:03 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #20 lying in bed in his/her room. The resident was alert and informed the surveyor that he/she was soiled. He/she stated he/she could not find the call light to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$63,469 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $63,469 — penalty dated 2023-12-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ