Complete Care At Court House, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 261 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 91.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2695513 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 12/19/25 and 12/23/25, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately assess and implement measures to protect a resident (Resident #3) who was identified as a high risk for elopement on their initial admission nursing assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for elopement risk.This was evidenced as follows:Resident #3 was not at the facility at the time of the survey and a closed record review was conducted. According to the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: cognitive communication deficit, type II diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction from a chemical imbalance in the body), and acute kidney failure. A review of the Facility Reported Event (FRE) dated 12/14/25, revealed the following:At 2:30 AM on 12/14/25 while conducting rounds, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) observed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units, (2nd and 3rd floor) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/06/2025 at 11:06 AM, in the 3rd floor shower/bathroom the surveyor observed the toilet paper holder was rusted and the toilet paper roll was on the floor. There was no roller observed on the toilet paper holder. On 03/11/2025 at 08:45 AM, the surveyor completed environmental rounds on the 3rd floor as follows: *Door trim on all rooms of the 3rd floor noted with chipped paint and black colored marks. *cove base board between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] has areas bubbled out. *bottom of exit door at both ends of hallway has brown colored marks and what appears to be rust. *resident doors on bottom tan color have black colored scuff type marks on all rooms. *room [ROOM NUMBER], 313 and 315 floor with gap in flooring joints upon entering. *door casings on bathroom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ 173198 Based on observation, interview and record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) ensure proper administration of medication during medication pass observation for 1 of 5 residents observed (Resident #43); b) document the administration of a medication in the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for 1 of 2 residents sampled for pain (Resident #196); c) clarify physician's admitting medication orders for 1 of 1 post orthopedic surgery residents admitted for rehabilitation services sampled for anticoagulation therapy (Resident #196), in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer development. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident #86) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/10/2025 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #86 in bed with eyes opened. The resident was lying on their left side with both legs bent on the knees. The surveyor did not observe any heel boots on the resident or visible in the room. On 03/10/2025 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed with eyes opened. The resident laid in bed on their left side with both legs bent on the knees. The surveyor did not observe any heel boots on the resident or visible in the room. On 03/06/2025 at 1:27 PM, a review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following: A review of the admission Record reflected the resident had diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement a physician order for supplemental oxygen. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #249) reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/06/2025 at 10:22 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #249 seated in their wheel chair with the oxygen (O2) nasal cannula (n/c) (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) on his/her lap. The oxygen concentrator was in operation and was observed to be set at two (2) liters (L) per minute (min). Oxygen in use signage was posted on the door frame upon entry to the room. On 03/10/2025 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #249 seated in their wheelchair and playing a game on their tablet. Resident #249 did not have O2 on at this time and stated that it ran out when the surveyor asked why they were not receiving their supplemental oxygen. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medication for 1of 25 residents (Resident #352) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/10/2025 at 8:31 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #352 in their room seated on the bed and connected to an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that takes in air from the room and filter out nitrogen providing higher amount of oxygen) via nasal cannula (tube used to deliver oxygen through the nostrils) at 2 liters per minute. The resident was cognitively intact and indicated to the surveyor through nodding their head that they were good. The surveyor observed an inhaler (a portable device for administering a drug which is to be breathed in) beside a pink wash basin on top of the bedside table to the right. The surveyor pointed to the inhaler and asked the resident what it was. The resident took the inhaler from the bedside table, gave themselves one puff and put the inhaler inside the right pocket of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice, specifically by a.) failing to transport soiled laundry appropriately and b.) failing to wear a the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while transferring a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for EBP (Resident #86) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, including gloves and gown. Wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Donning PPE upon room entry and properly discarding before exiting the patient room is done to contain pathogens.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/25/2023 from 9:47 to 10:43 AM, the surveyors, accompanied by the Director of Dining (DOD) observed the following in the kitchen: 1. Upon entry to the kitchen the surveyors observed a dietary aide (DA) in the cook's area. The female DA had a hair net that only partially covered their hair and the forehead to the middle of the head area was uncovered and exposed. On interview the DOD stated, The hair should be fully enclosed in the hair net. 2. On a lower shelf in the dry storage area, a previously opened bag of egg noodles had no open or use by dates. When interviewed, the DOD responded, It should be labeled with an open date and use by date. Pasta goes 30 days after being opened. I'm throwing it out. 3. In the walk-in refrigerator on an upper shelf a white plastic container contained grated parmesan cheese. The container was dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag is maintained off the floor in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 Resident reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter (Resident # 75) and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the unit on 1/25/2023 at 10:17 AM, Resident #75 was observed resting in bed with eyes closed and with an indwelling urinary catheter. The urinary catheter drainage bag was observed resting on the floor. On 1/27/2023 at 8:54 AM Resident #75 was observed awake, alert and nonverbal resting in bed. Resident #75's urinary catheter drainage bag was observed touching the floor. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #75 was admitted with a diagnosis including but not limited to: Neurogenic bladder or obstructive uropathy . A review of the Order Summary Report of active orders as of 2/2/2023, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nutritional formula connected to a feeding tube (surgically placed tube into the stomach to provide nutritional formula) was accurately labeled for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #26) reviewed for tube feeding. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/30/2023 at 9:04 AM, the surveyor observed a bottle of nutritional formula hanging from a pole that was connected to a feeding pump that was attached to Resident #26's feeding tube while he/she was in bed. The feeding pump was operating. At that time, the surveyor observed that the date written on the bottle was 1/27, indicating that the nutritional formula was opened on January 27th. A review of Resident #26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/25/22, revealed that he/she had a feeding tube while a resident in the facility. A review of Resident #26's physician orders located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an order for Jevity 1.5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ