Complete Care At Park Place LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 84.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 89.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one resident (Resident (R) 23) reviewed for tracheostomy (trach) care out of a total sample of 20 residents was provided necessary suctioning of the airway, had the necessary supplies at the bedside in the event of a life-threatening emergency, and failed to train staff on appropriate emergency tracheostomy care in the event that a resident's airway was compromised, which placed residents with a tracheostomy at increased likelihood of serious harm or death and resulted in harm to R23 who was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses of pneumonia due to an infectious organism, AMS (altered mental status), SOB (shortness of breath), rigors (fever causing severe chills and shaking), respiratory distress, increasingly thick trach secretions, and sepsis (injury to tissues and organs due to infection). On 11/29/22 at 10:30 PM, the Administrator in Training (AIT), the Regional Clinical Supervisor, and Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-12-07 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician clarified orders for suctioning and emergency tracheostomy care for one of one resident (Resident (R) 23) with a tracheostomy (a surgical opening into the windpipe for breathing) out of a total sample of 20 residents. These failures resulted in harm to R23 who was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses of pneumonia due to an infectious organism, AMS (altered mental status), SOB (shortness of breath), rigors (fever causing severe chills and shaking), respiratory distress, increasingly thick trach secretions, and sepsis (injury to tissues and organs due to infection). Findings include: Review of R23's undated admission RECORD, located in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include malignant neoplasm of larynx (cancer of the voice box), tracheostomy status, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of R23's admission Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn by laundry staff in one of one laundry rooms while sorting soiled resident clothing and bed linens. This had the potential to infect the staff and/or residents with pathogens which could potentially lead to the development of infectious diseases.Findings include:During an observation conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 03/13/26 at 9:42 AM, upon entrance to the laundry room, the Laundry Aide was observed reaching into a soiled container of linens and loading them into the washing machine. The Laundry Aide wore disposable gloves but did not wear a protective gown. During the observation, the Laundry Aide stated that he/she had forgotten to don (put on) a protective gown prior to handling the soiled items. At 9:44 AM, The Director of Environmental Services (DES) entered the area and confirmed the Laundry Aide was required to don a protective gown since this was a potential infection control issue. The IP stated that the Laundry Aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on the memory care unit. Specifically, the floor in the dining/activity area was observed to be sticky. Additionally, a large table surface was visibly dirty. The sticky floor posed a potential risk for residents who ambulate, as it could contribute to loss of balance of falls. The unclean condition of the table had the potential to attract pests. Findings include:During an observation conducted on 03/10/26 at 10:35 AM of the memory care unit's main dining/activity room, there were multiple staff and residents in the area participating in activities. The floor was observed to be dull and sticky. There was a rectangular table that faced the back wall and cabinets. The table's surface was visibly smudged, contained fingerprints, and had large areas of dry, raised substance. The observation ended at 12:10 PM. During an observation conducted on 03/10/26 at 1:52 PM, the memory care's dining/activity room had a small group of residents who were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed accurately to reflect post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of four residents (R87) reviewed for mood/behavior related to PTSD in the sample of 25 residents. This failure had the potential to affect the care planning and provision of needed services.Findings include:Review of R87's Face Sheet located in resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included PTSD. Review of R87's Hospital Notes dated 01/28/26 located in the EMR under the Misc tab revealed a diagnosis of PTSD effective 11/2024. Review of R87's admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/28/26 and located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan included information necessary to meet the care needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident (R) 91) reviewed for dialysis.Specifically, the baseline care plan did not address peritoneal dialysis (PD). This failure had the potential to result in staff lacking the necessary guidance to provide effective care and meet the resident's needs. Findings include:Review of R91's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of R91's Physician Orders, located in the EMR under the Orders tab, reflected an order, dated 02/27/26, for, Peritoneal dialysis: Exchange frequency: Q [every] 4 Hours. Exchange volume: 2L [liters] Dialysate: 2.5% Dianeal [sterile solution used for dialysis]. Instill PD Fluid over: 20mins [minutes]. PD fluids drain time: 20Mins. Continue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, and policy review, the facility failed to develop person-centered, comprehensive care plans with measurable goals and interventions for two residents (Resident (R) 13 and R87) reviewed for care plans out of a sample of 25 residents. The failure placed R13 at risk for skin breakdown due to incomplete and/or inconsistent care to prevent pressure ulcers and placed R87 at risk for compromised emotional stability and impaired daily functioning related to a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).Findings include: 1. Review of R13's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the facility admitted the resident on 09/01/23. Review of R13's EMR titled annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/25, located under the MDS tab indicated that the staff could not determine a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services to maintain or improve their activities of daily living (ADLs) for one of one resident (Resident (R) 19) reviewed for ADLs out of a sample size of 25 residents.Specifically, R19 was not properly assessed by the facility's interdisciplinary team prior to the staff altering the method of meal consumption by placing pureed food and thickened liquids into a plastic cup for the resident to consume.This had the potential for the resident to experience a decline in functioning. Findings include:1. Review of R19's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 12/13/24. Review of R19's EMR titled Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab dated 05/27/25, indicated that the resident required verbal cues during mealtimes provided by one staff member. There was no direction to provide the resident with a plastic cup to consume his/her meals. Review of R19's EMR titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to administer oxygen in accordance with physician orders, document oxygen use, and change oxygen tubing for one of two residents (Resident (R) 87) reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total of 25 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for adverse outcomes related to improper oxygen administration, including hyperoxia, a condition in which cells, tissues, and organs are exposed to an excessive level of oxygen. Findings include:Review of R87's Face Sheet located in resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included unspecified asthma.Review of R87's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/28/26 and located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that, prior to the installation of bed rails, alternative measures were attempted, discussions regarding the risks versus benefits were documented, and signed informed consent was obtained for one of four residents (Resident (R) 108) reviewed for bed rails out of 25 sampled residents. The failure to complete these required steps before bed rail installation increased the potential risk for resident entrapment or for bed rails to be used as restraints. Findings include: Review of R108's admission Record in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of repeated falls and muscle weakness.Review of R108's Side Rail Assessment Screening located under Assessments tab in the EMR, dated 03/04/26, revealed no indication if bed/side rails would be used or not used. Further review revealed no documentation of risk versus benefits or signed informed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and hospice agreement review, the facility failed to obtain documentation of recertification of hospice services for one of one resident (Resident (R) 14) reviewed for hospice services out of a total sample of 25 residents. This had the potential to result in a lack of coordination of care and services. Findings include:Review of R14's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 02/22/17.Review of R14's EMR titled physician Orders located under the Orders tab dated 12/16/24, indicated the resident was ordered hospice services.Review of R14's EMR titled annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/27/25, located under the MDS tab indicated that the staff could not determine the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score. The assessment indicated that the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had a diagnosis of having six months or less to live. Review of R14's EMR Misc…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for a resident who required a continuous positive airway pressure (C-PAP) machine at night. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care (Resident #33), and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 8/22/24 at 09:35 AM, the surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator near Resident #33's bed. At that time, the surveyor did not observe a C-PAP machine (delivers oxygen via a mask while asleep) in the resident's room. According to the admission Record, Resident #33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (occurs when airway is blocked during sleep), and Chronic Respiratory failure (low oxygen levels). A review of the Order Details revealed a physician's order (PO) dated 5/25/23 at 5:06 AM, Please assist pt [patient] in wearing C-PAP at HS [at night] please have respiratory come to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ