Complete Care at Hamilton, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00178362, NJ00178481 Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and review of pertinent facility documents on 10/15/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for a resident (Resident #1) who had a Physician's Order for a prescribed diet of dysphagia puree, Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD), Thickened Liquid Nectar consistency. On 10/8/2024, Resident #1 who was sitting in a wheelchair, was attending an outdoor activity program with other residents. The Director of Recreation (DOR) had donuts cut into thirds for an afternoon lunch snack. The DOR gave Resident #1 a bite sized soft donut, when the resident reached out for it. The DOR left the resident with 3 other Activity Staff (AS). Resident #1 started coughing and observed choking. The AS immediately wheeled the resident back into the facility and nursing staff performed the Heimlich maneuver (an abdominal thrust maneuver, used to treat upper airway obstructions caused by foreign bodies). Food particles…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#: NJ00170690 Based on interviews and record review, as well as review of pertinent facility documents on 1/30/24, the facility failed to use a two-person assistance interventions for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2), as determined necessary by the Resident's comprehensive Care Plan (CP). The failure to follow this intervention during morning care on 01/20/24 for Resident#2,.who was combative towards the one staff member present at that time, resulted in the resident groaning in pain and his/her right upper arm swollen and requiring immediate transfer to an acute care hospital emergency room for further evaluation. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission RECORD Resident #2 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Scoliosis, Major Depression, Adjustment Disorder, Insomnia, Pain in Unspecified Shoulder, Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 12/23/23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following:On 09/02/2025 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and observed the following: 1. In the reach in refrigerator the surveyor observed 3 blocks of pre-sliced cheese wrapped in plastic film with no open date or use by date and a foil covered plate of breakfast foods with no label, opened or use by date. The FSD stated all opened or left over foods should have a prepared or opened on date and a use by date to prevent residents from receiving spoiled or expired foods. The FSD confirmed that the unlabeled foods would be discarded.2. In the walk-in cooler, the surveyor observed a tray of souffle cups of individually portioned canned fruits and pureed canned fruits. Neither the containers nor the tray was labeled with open dates or use-by dates. The FSD stated all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of residents. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 22 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #96), and was evidenced by the following: On 09/04/25 at 8:07 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #96 in bed. The surveyor observed the Resident's call light pull cord (used to summon staff for assistance) affixed to the upper aspect of the right-side rail, not within his/her reach. The resident stated, There should be a string around here somewhere, but I can't seem to find it, so I can't call for help. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #96. A review of the admission Record reflected the Resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood), malignant neoplasm of the breast (cancer of the breast), and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease) of the right knee. A review of Resident #96's Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ 401472 Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain a homelike environment that was clean, safe, and sanitary in 3 out of 24 resident rooms (rooms 114,116, and 123) and b.) ensure that personal clothing items, specifically socks, were returned after being laundered to 5 out of 5 residents who attended the resident council meeting (Resident #25, 67, 70, 83, 85). Additionally, Resident # 96 complained that their socks were not returned after being laundered. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1. On 9/2/2025 at 11:06 AM, the surveyor observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] a broken dresser drawer, peeling paint with exposed plaster and sheet rock to the right of the sink. On 9/2/25 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 a portable oxygen tank heavily soiled with rust and a brown substance, with a swarm of flying insects around the oxygen tank. The surveyor observed the wall by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor the nutritional status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #2), specifically by not following a physician's orders for monitoring of Resident #2's weights.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 9/3/25 at 11:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 in bed with the head of bed elevated, eye opened and not verbal.A review of Resident #2's admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Anoxic brain damage ( an injury to the brain caused by lack of oxygen), functional quadriplegia (the loss of functional use of the upper and lower body), gastrostomy for enteral feeding (full nutrition is provided through a tube directly into the resident's stomach) and aphasia (the inability to produce or understand speech) A review of Resident #2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, reflected that the resident was severely cognitively impaired.A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the administration of oxygen therapy and failed to ensure that respiratory equipment was stored in accordance with infection control measures for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident # 44). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse four of five residents (R)7, R8, R13, and R14) reviewed for abuse out of 14 sampled residents. This had the potential to cause injuries to the residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R7's Face Sheet, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, mood disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/03/24 and located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab, revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R7's Care Plan, dated 10/01/24 and located in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the responsible physician supervising the care of residents conducted face to face visits and wrote progress notes at least once every sixty days. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 25 residents, Resident #45 was reviewed for physician visits and was evidenced by the following: On 6/23/24 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #45 lying in bed who was noted to be alert and responsive. On 6/24/24 at 9:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed the admission Record for Resident #45 which revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to end stage renal disease (permanent kidney failure that requires a regular course of dialysis or a kidney transplant); dependence on dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly); and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of the Annual Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) for recording incidents of infections identified under the facility's IPCP, surveillance, tracking and trending, and the corrective actions taken by the facility. As part of this failure, the facility did not have an effective antibiotic stewardship program, which had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. (Cross Reference F881) Findings include: Review of a document titled, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) . National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) . Long Term Care Facility Component Tracking Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities, dated 01/2020, indicated, Surveillance is defined as the ongoing systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of data. A facility infection prevention and control (IPC) program should use surveillance to identify infections and monitor performance of practices to reduce infection risks among residents, staff, and visitors. Information collected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-05-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, document review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included a functional antibiotic stewardship program. The failure to have a system in place that monitors antibiotic use in accordance with established protocols had the potential to affect all 106 residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of a CDC document undated titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes indicated .Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority.Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to 'optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use'. CDC also recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use.Nursing homes monitor both antibiotic use practices and outcomes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse / neglect and/or the investigations were submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) within the time limits of the policy and federal regulation for five of eight residents (Resident (R)14, R25, R91, R38, and R28) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R14's admission Record from the facility electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed a facility admission date of 04/04/23 with medical diagnoses that included schizophrenia (hallucinations and delusions). During an interview on 05/23/23 at 2:52 PM, R14 stated that 15 staff jumped on him and sprayed [NAME] in his eyes. The Administrator was advised of R14's allegation on 05/23/23 at 4:30 PM and stated they (facility staff) were unaware of the allegation previously. On 05/25/23 at 9:15 AM the Administrator was asked for any documentation related to the allegation. On 05/25/23 at 11:00 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,313 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-10-15
• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ