Complete Care At Summit Ridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 145.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2661084Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 11/17/2025 and 11/20/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to report a verbal abuse allegation that a resident's representative (RR) reported to the facility's staff and to the Department of Health (DOH) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3) and was evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: paraplegia (type of paralysis that affects the lower half of the body), spinal stenosis (when the space inside the backbone is too small and puts pressure on the spinal cord), and diabetes. According to the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/24/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact.A review of the facility's document titled Summary of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: 2661084Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/17/2025 and 11/20/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that care was provided to a resident who required maximal assistance for toileting hygiene. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: paraplegia (type of paralysis that affects the lower half of the body), spinal stenosis (when the space inside the backbone is too small and puts pressure on the spinal cord), and diabetes. According to the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/24/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The MDS further revealed that the resident needed substantial and maximal assistance with toileting hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2661084Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/17/2025 and 11/20/2025, it was determined that the facility failed provide evidence that a physician's order for wound care was carried out and documented for two days to treat a facility acquired pressure injury in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: paraplegia (type of paralysis that affects the lower half of the body), spinal stenosis (when the space inside the backbone is too small and puts pressure on the spinal cord), and diabetes. According to the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/24/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact.A review of the facility's document titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of 2 unsampled residents during the lunchtime meal in the main dining room and 1 sampled resident (#53) during a wound treatment observation. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. 1. The surveyor observed the lunchtime meal in the main dining room on 05/22/25 at 12:23 PM. The surveyor observed as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) placed a disposable clothing protector on a cognitively impaired resident. The CNA did not explain the procedure of placing the clothing protector prior to attempting to fit it over the resident's head. The clothing protector had a opening where it would be fitted over the resident's head. The opening was too small for the resident's head and got stuck with the clothing protector covering the resident's head and face. The resident became startled and tried to push the protector away from their head. The CNA was able to rip the clothing protector's opening so that it eventually fit over the resident's head. The CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 29 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #57), and was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 57 seated in a wheelchair with his/her overbed table and lunch tray positioned in front of them. The surveyor observed that the resident's call bell (a bell used to summon staff for assistance) was in the middle of the bed not within the resident's reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #57. A review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; Diabetes Mellitus, Schizophrenia and Leukocytosis. A review of Resident #57's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/18/25 revealed Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 which indicated moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the prior year's State of New Jersey (State) inspection results in an area that was readily accessible to residents, families, and the public. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. The surveyor conducted a group meeting on 5/22/25 at 10:30 AM, with 5 alert and oriented residents chosen by the facility. Five of 5 residents stated they did not know where to find the State inspection results. On 5/23/25 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor looked for the most recent State inspection results on the A and B Nursing Units and was unable to locate them. On 5/23/25 at 12:30PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the results of the last survey were in a binder on the shelf by the receptionist. The surveyor observed the binder on the shelf behind the kiosk, not at wheelchair level and not easily accessible to residents. On 5/23/25 at 12:35 PM, the regional Registered Nurse (RRN) acknowledged that the binder should be kept in an area that is accessible to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner for 4 of 29 residents; (2 unsampled residents) and (Resident #60 and #38) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/20/25 at 1:05 PM, the surveyor observed in an Unsampled Resident's room (Room A21), the privacy curtain was soiled with a white substance on several areas of the curtain. On 5/20/25 at 1:15 PM, the surveyor observed in an Unsampled Resident's room (Room A28), the privacy curtain was soiled with a white substance on several areas of the curtain. The surveyor observed on the wall by the headboards brown material splattered across the entire wall, ceiling tiles buckled and displaced, chipped paint on the wall by the window, and the radiator in the bathroom was rusted and soiled. On 5/23/25 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional Housekeeper (RHK), who confirmed that the privacy curtains were soiled and that the HK on the unit should be monitoring the curtains for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's order for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident # 20), reviewed for respiratory therapy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure, a.) accurate administration of medications for Resident #70, b.) documentation of the removal of controlled dangerous substance (narcotic; with high potential for drug diversion) medication from inventory, maintained accountability, for accurate reconciliation of Resident #343, #132, #131, and #129's narcotic medications, identified during the medication storage inspection of 1 of 3 medication carts, c.) maintenance of the record keeping of the DEA Form-222 that ensured accurate ordering and receiving, narcotic inventory and reconciliation of controlled dangerous substance (narcotics medications, with high potential for abuse and are tracked with detail) identified in 1 of 14 forms reviewed and, d.) accurate receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 form) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment that helped prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for 3 of 29 residents (Resident #20, #53 and #57) reviewed for infection control. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. a. On 5/20/2025 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #53 in their bed. The surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator (a device that enriches air with oxygen by removing nitrogen) in the room with a humidifier bottle (a plastic bottle that infuses the normal flow of oxygen with water droplets) dated 10/25/24. The oxygen concentrator was not in use. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #53. A review of the admission record reflected Resident #53 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; Alzheimer's Disease, Diabetes Mellitus and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ