Dunbar Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 58.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a video, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from pests. This affected two (#60 and #19) of the three residents reviewed for the environment. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/20/25 and discharged on 05/27/25. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy (trach), nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and diabetes mellitus. Review of a physician order for Resident #60 dated 05/22/25, revealed the resident was ordered to have trach checks and observations completed four times per day and as needed. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #60 dated 05/27/25, revealed Resident #60 was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the facility SRI, dated 05/29/25, revealed the facility completed staff and resident interviews and observations. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure portion sizes were served as planned. This had the potential to affect 57 of 63 residents in the facility. The facility identified six residents (#167, #54, #62, #48, #49, and #43) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the dietary spreadsheet for the lunch meal on 04/30/25 revealed the serving size for the rice was 1/2 cup, sliced carrots was 1/2 cup, and ground chicken was 3 ounces. Observation on 04/30/25 at 11:04 A.M. revealed [NAME] #735 making plates for the lunch meal. [NAME] #735 utilized a #12 scoop (1/3 cup) for the sliced carrots, a #20 scoop (1 5/8 ounces) for the ground chicken, and a #16 scoop (1/4 cup) for the rice. Observation on 04/30/25 at 11:12 A.M. revealed the first cart of trays was complete and left the kitchen to be delivered to the unit. Interview on 04/30/25 at 11:12 A.M., [NAME] #735 verified she was using a #12 scoop for the sliced carrots, a #20 scoop for the ground chicken, and a #16 scoop for the rice.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the steam table was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 57 of 63 residents in the facility. The facility identified six residents (#167, #54, #62, #48, #49, and #43) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 04/30/25 at 10:26 A.M. revealed the water wells of the steam table in the kitchen contained a yellowish-brown liquid with debris floating at the top and brown sediment around the bottom and edges of each well. Interview at the same time, [NAME] #735 verified the water wells of the steam table contained a yellowish-brown liquid and there was debris floating at the top of the liquid and brown sediment around the bottom and edges of each well. [NAME] #735 described the liquid as grimey and attributed the color to grease falling into the well when taking pans in and out of the steam table. [NAME] #735 stated she planned on cleaning the steam table wells the following day (05/01/25) and stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the review of Resident Council meeting minutes, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to document and follow up on resident concerns from the resident council meetings. This affected 10 out of 10 members of Resident council who regularly attended the meetings and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census is 63. Findings include: Review of Resident Council meetings minutes from August 2024 to March 2025 revealed the facility did not follow up on concerns brought forward at the Resident Council meetings. Review of the meeting minutes revealed the resolutions from the last meeting concerns were left blank. The meeting concerns that had not been addressed included more outings, a higher activities budget, loud music in other residents' rooms, a pop up facility store, bed linen changes, call lights, and snacks for residents including fresh fruit. Interview on 04/30/25 at 3:14 P.M. with Resident Council President #12 verified that the previous meeting concerns had not been addressed and stated that they do not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, family interview, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted on abuse and misappropriation allegations. This affected three (#38, #117, and #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/17/23. Diagnoses included unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, quadriplegia, depression, dysphagia, anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required setup/clean-up assistance with eating and was dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #117 revealed an admission date of 04/22/22. The resident discharged to another facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review. The facility failed to provide nail care for one (#167) dependent resident of two sampled for activities of daily living. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #167's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/25. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with ventilator dependence, diabetes, and anxiety. Resident #167 required nutrition through a gastrostomy tube. The most recent Minimum Date Set (MDS ) dated 03/18/25 revealed the resident was totally dependent on staff for all care. Review of the residents activities of daily living plan of care dated 03/18/25 noted the resident is to get nail care weekly with his bath. During an observation of wound care on 04/30/25 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #167 was observed to have long fingernails that were growing downward into his finger tips. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #48 ) 04/30/25 at 9:35 A.M. verified the residents nails were too long. LPN #48 stated they would be taken care of. Review of the facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly and timely investigated. This affected two (#46 and #66) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, vascular dementia, left femur fracture, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #46 was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility. Review of the Fall Risk Assessments dated 11/01/24 and 02/21/25 revealed Resident #46 was a high fall risk. Review of the care plan dated 04/28/25 revealed Resident #46…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents are observed taking medications and medications were not left with residents. This affected one (#31) of 21 residents observed in the sample. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/03/20. Diagnoses listed included encephalopathy, malnutrition, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, major depression, and insomnia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had moderately impaired cognition. Observation on 05/01/25 at 9:40 A.M. revealed Resident #31 was in bed holding a medication cup that contained three pills. Resident #31's eyes were closed. Resident #31 could not be verbally aroused. During an interview on 05/01/25 at 9:43 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #220 confirmed he had not observed Resident #31 consume the medications. LPN #220 identified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed and also failed to ensure staff sanitized hands after providing care to a resident and delivering meal trays. This affected three Residents (#19, #54, and #55) observed during dining. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/30/24. Diagnoses listed included traumatic brain injury, anxiety, brain cancer, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was severely cognitively impaired and had a feeding tube. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 02/24/25 for Isolation/Transmission-Based Precautions: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Observation on 04/29/25 at 7:42 A.M. revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #160 and CNA #760 repositioning Resident #54 in bed. Neither CNA #160 or CNA #760 were wearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor weights and implement appropriate interventions in a timely manner. This affected one Resident (#64) of the three resident reviewed for significant weight changes. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 06/06/24 with a discharge date of 01/15/25. Diagnoses included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #64 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, dependent with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing and dressing, and partial assistance with transfers. Review of the care plan dated 01/14/25, revealed Resident #64 had increased nutrition/hydration risk related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $916K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH