Willows Health And Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 67.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on closed medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely identify and implement interventions to prevent significant/severe weight loss. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #173 was assessed to have a severe 24.8 pound/13.3 percent (%) weight loss in 30 days without evidence of timely identification of the resident's decreased oral intake or timely intervention to address the cause of the weight loss. On 01/17/24 Resident #173 complained of tooth pain and was discovered to have a loose front tooth. The resident complained of continued pain with a decrease in oral intake. On 01/18/24 Resident #173 weighed 186.2 pounds and the next weight obtained on 02/13/24 was 161.4 pounds which reflected a 24.8 pound (severe)/13.3 % weight loss in under 30 days. This affected one resident (#173) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #173 revealed an admission date of 05/18/21 and a discharge date of 02/20/24 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #121's pain was managed effectively. Resident #121 sustained actual harm as evidenced by severe pain and depression when physician ordered Fentanyl patches for pain associated with sickle cell anemia was not provided for eighteen days. This affected one of two residents (Residents #121 and #63) reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the Resident #121's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/13/22. Admitting diagnoses included unspecified sequela of cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure and sickle cell anemia. Review of the admitting physician orders dated 04/14/22 revealed an order for Fentanyl patch 50 microgram (mcg)/hour one patch transdermal every 72 hours for pain. Review of Resident #121's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #121 was alert and oriented to time, person and place, and required extensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for residents who were smokers. This affected four (Residents #2, #17, #64, #65) of twenty-one residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 65 residents. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility dated 05/01/24 revealed there were 21 residents who were smokers. Residents #2, #17, #64, #65 were listed as smokers. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 11/12/21 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the care plan for Resident #2 dated 04/04/24 revealed it did not include a care plan for smoking. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 12/07/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, hypertension, and bipolar disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #17 dated 03/14/24 revealed it did not include a care plan for smoking. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, family interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans with updated with changes in code status. This affected one (Resident #50) of 29 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/16/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic kidney disease, cardiomegaly, and diabetes. Review of May 2024 physician's orders for Resident #50 revealed an order dated 02/04/24 for the resident be a full code (all resuscitative interventions would be performed in the event the resident's heart stopped). There was an order dated 02/20/24 for Resident #50 to be admitted to hospice care for a diagnosis of COPD. The resident remained a full code. Review of the care plan for Resident #50 dated 02/14/24 revealed the resident's code status was do not resuscitate comfort care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate pre-dialysis communication was provided to the dialysis center, failed to ensure the dialysis provider provided the facility with timely post-dialysis information, and failed to respond to concerns from the dialysis center. This affected one (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 65 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 11/03/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, bilateral below the knee amputation, schizoaffective disorder, and noncompliance with renal dialysis. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #36 revealed an order for the resident to receive hemodialysis outside the facility on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The facility was to send a bagged meal/snack with Resident #36 to dialysis. A dialysis communication tool was to be completed and sent to dialysis with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store frozen foods under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents receiving food from the facility. There were three resident who were not receiving food from the facility (#45, #52, and #66). The facility census was 71. Findings include: On 05/02/22 from 9:48 A.M. to 10:06 A.M. a tour of the kitchen was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #284. During the tour one bag of opened, unlabeled, and undated chicken cubes was found in the freezer. The bottom shelf of one storage rack in the freezer was not six inches from the floor. There was hardened spilled liquid, food, and dirt under the rack. There were multiple food containers stored on the bottom shelf. On 05/02/22 at 10:02 A.M. these findings were verified by CDM, #284.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-05-09 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) sign-in sheets and staff interview the facility failed to hold quarterly meetings. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of QAA sign-in sheets from 05/01/2021 to 05/01/22 revealed a QAA meeting was held on 04/01/22 for the first quarter of 2022. There was no documentation of QAA sign-in sheets for the last three quarters in 2021. Interview with the Administrator on 05/06/22 at 2:42 P.M. confirmed the missing QAA sign-in sheets for the last three quarters of 2021. The Administrator stated she was new to the facility and was unable to locate the sign-in sheets. Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan undated revealed it was the mission of the facility to provide the highest quality of care possible to all those they were privileged to serve.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility's Coronavirus, (COVID-19) policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent the possible spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect 21 residents (Resident #14, #21, #24, #27, #31, #32, #33, #41, #42, #43, #44, #46, #48, #54, #58, #64, #65, #171, #172, #173, #174) on the 300 hall. The facility also failed to ensure Legionella water testing laboratory results were addressed in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 71 residents at the facility. And, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention standards were maintained during wound care. This affected one resident (Resident #62) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #174 revealed an admittance date of 05/01/22. Diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to verify financial records, account transactions or quarterly statements were maintained for resident funds. This affected five of five residents (#29, #58, #60, #61, and #65) reviewed for resident funds and had the potential to affect 33 residents (#2, #5, #8, #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #17, #23, #24, #26, #27, #29, #31, #33, #35, #36, #42, #43, #44, #49, #50, #53, #54, #58, #60, #63, #65, #67, #70) whose funds were managed by the facility. The facility census was 71. Finding include: Review of the Resident Fund Management Service Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds forms revealed the facility managed the personal funds for Residents #29, #58, #60, #61, and #65. Interview on 05/06/22 at 2:45 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #294 revealed she had been at the facility for two weeks and did not know how to access the resident's financial records or obtain quarterly statements. The facility was unable to provide resident financial records or access resident statements. They were therefore unable to show if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure participation of the resident and resident's representative in developing the residents comprehensive care plan. This affected six residents (#4, #10, #30, #45, #52, and #70) of seven residents reviewed for care plan participation. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 09/10/21. Diagnoses included hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition. Review of Resident #4's progress notes and assessments revealed no evidence care conferences had been conducted. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 05/27/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dependence on oxygen, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/25/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #10's progress notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility drug storage policy and manufacturer's instructions the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to manufacture guidelines. This affected four residents (Resident #29, #50, #69 and #171) of 71 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 10:00 A.M. of the 300-hallway medication cart revealed an unopened box of nasal spray containing oxymetazoline 0.005 percent, an open bottle Senna-s, a stool softener, a medication cup filled with three round blue tablets, two white oblong pills, one round green tablet, one purple and blue capsule and three and half small round white pills with a piece of paper with a name. Interview on [DATE] at 10:05 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #274 revealed she was not assigned to the cart and the nurse who was assigned was on break. LPN #274 verified the findings and stated the medication cup containing the unlabeled medications should have been administered to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Resident Fund Management Service Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds form were witnessed for residents whose personal funds were being managed by the facility. This affected one Resident (#58) of five residents (#29, #58, #60, #61, and #65) reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the Resident Fund Management Service Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds form for Resident #58 revealed the facility failed to have a witnessed authorization form on record for personal funds to be managed by the facility. Interview on 05/06/22 at 4:40 P.M. with Corporate Clinical Nurse #292 confirmed the Resident Fund Management Service Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds form for Resident #58 was not documented as witnessed.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,683 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $39,683 — penalty dated 2024-05-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $765K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH