Grand Rapids Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 30.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 1.00 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, review of a facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility incident log, review of witness statements, staff and resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from staff-to-resident verbal abuse. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 30.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission of 08/16/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction (stroke).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidence by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9. Resident #15 was assessed to require total care for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, review of a facility initiated Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility incident log, review of witness statements, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of staff-to-resident verbal abuse timely. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission of 08/16/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction (stroke).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #15 was assessed to require total care for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated 11/19/24 revealed Resident #15 had behaviors of throwing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to included supports and interventions for depression and related antidepressant use. This affected one resident (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 30. Findings Include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/02/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, depression, osteomyelitis, pain, kidney cancer, prostate cancer, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, 04/07/24, revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Resident #3 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #3's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/18/23 for mirtazapine tablet 7.5 milligrams (mg), administer one tablet at bedtime for depression. An order dated 01/22/24 included Zoloft 25 mg and 50 mg for a total of 75 mg once a day for diagnosis of depression. Review of Resident #3's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was timely referred for dental services for missing dentures. This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 30. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 had an admission date of 03/17/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage three, atrial fibrillation, vascular dementia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care initiated 01/24/24 revealed the resident had impaired dental/oral hygiene related to no natural teeth and the resident wore full dentures. Interventions included to encourage the resident to remove dentures at bedtime and store dentures in proper container to soak, obtain dental consult as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of resident personal fund account documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure witness signatures were obtained when personal fund accounts were opened. This affected two (#6 and #7) of five residents reviewed for personal fund accounts. The census was 28. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's resident fund management authorization to handle resident funds revealed an undated and unwitnessed signature by the resident. Review of resident fund balance activity revealed a current balance as of 05/21/23 to be $698.62. 2. Review of Resident #7's resident fund management authorization to handle resident funds revealed an undated and unwitnessed signature by the resident's guardian. Review of the resident fund balance activity revealed a current balance as of 05/21/23 to be $1,100.31. On 05/24/23 at 8:30 A.M., interview with the Business Office Manager verified Resident #6 and Resident #7 did not have witness signatures to authorize management of resident funds.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and resident representative were notified of changes in medication and test results. This affected two (#5 and #19) of two residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 28. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spinal stenosis lumbar region, essential hypertension, fibromyalgia, ulcer of esophagus without bleeding, dysphagia, mixed hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease stage three, and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/05/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a pharmacy recommendation, dated 05/02/23, revealed Resident #5 was prescribed the antidepressant Doxepin by mouth every night at bedtime for depression…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in good repair. This affected one (#6) of 28 residents reviewed. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bilateral primary osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/25/23, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation on 05/21/23 at 8:30 A.M. revealed a wall in Resident #6's room had large scrapes and holes in the wall measuring approximately three feet long by one foot wide. Interview on 05/23/23 at 1:35 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 indicated she was not aware how long the scrapes and holes were present and appeared alarmed at the size of the wall damage. Interview on 05/23/23 at 1:42 P.M. with Maintenance #236 verified the holes in Resident #6's room started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a self-reported incident, resident representative interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#19) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/13/23, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of self-reported incident (SRI) #235054, dated 05/16/23, revealed Resident #19's family reported Resident #19 was missing a ring. The facility searched for the ring and could not find it. The report stated Resident #19 had dementia and could have taken the ring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent pressure ulcer development or worsening of a current pressure ulcer. This affected one (#28) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/20/23 with the diagnosis including, encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type II, stage three sacral pressure ulcer, COVID-19, necrotizing fasciitis, neuropathic bladder, malnutrition, prothrombin gene mutation, dysphagia, anemia, thrombophilia, nephrotic syndrome, hypertension, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility and transfers, was incontinent of bowel, had an indwelling urinary catheter, received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physical therapy treatments and range of motion interventions were consistently implemented for a resident to prevent contracture and decreased joint mobility. This affected one (#28) of one residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed and admission date of 02/20/23 with the diagnosis including, encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type II, stage three sacral pressure ulcer, COVID-19, necrotizing fasciitis, neuropathic bladder, malnutrition, prothrombin gene mutation, dysphagia, anemia, thrombophilia, nephrotic syndrome, hypertension, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility and transfers, was incontinent of bowel, had an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $649K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH